Bitcoin Forum
November 13, 2024, 05:13:13 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 28.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 [157] 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 »
  Print  
Author Topic: OLD: BFGMiner 3.10.0: modular ASIC+FPGA, GBT+Strtm, RPC, Mac/Lnx/W64, AntU1, DRB  (Read 1193202 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic.
Luke-Jr (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2576
Merit: 1186



View Profile
April 09, 2014, 10:07:54 PM
 #3121

I would like it to be replaced by the old "accepted shares per minute", a good measure of miners performance.
Accepted shares per minute is absolutely useless information... it tells nothing about performance.

cafminer1
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 52
Merit: 0


View Profile
April 09, 2014, 10:25:49 PM
 #3122

I would like it to be replaced by the old "accepted shares per minute", a good measure of miners performance.
Accepted shares per minute is absolutely useless information... it tells nothing about performance.

Oh yes?!? My ignorance then... but how come that?

Is there something I should study or read about this? I thought it was what I should look after for each miner...

bigbeninlondon
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 742
Merit: 500



View Profile
April 09, 2014, 11:44:56 PM
 #3123

Here's a question.  I have two Block Erupter Sapphires amidst 7 antminer u2+ and 3 nanofury.  I just noticed when I restarted that the two BEs have the same stats as far as their shares, but the percentage at the end was different.  Here's a screenshot:




Is there something I'm missing?  Why are they different?
Luke-Jr (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2576
Merit: 1186



View Profile
April 09, 2014, 11:51:50 PM
 #3124

I would like it to be replaced by the old "accepted shares per minute", a good measure of miners performance.
Accepted shares per minute is absolutely useless information... it tells nothing about performance.

Oh yes?!? My ignorance then... but how come that?

Is there something I should study or read about this? I thought it was what I should look after for each miner...
Shares often have different targets/weights.

cafminer1
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 52
Merit: 0


View Profile
April 10, 2014, 12:56:21 AM
 #3125

I would like it to be replaced by the old "accepted shares per minute", a good measure of miners performance.
Accepted shares per minute is absolutely useless information... it tells nothing about performance.

Oh yes?!? My ignorance then... but how come that?

Is there something I should study or read about this? I thought it was what I should look after for each miner...
Shares often have different targets/weights.

Ah yes... That s right no doubt. I m alleviated. Smiley

But I was meaning something like shares/minute*diff or even "shares"/minute and we calculate diff. Main target here would be to have some usual number to see and check at any moment. I guess you ve elaborated that a lot more and sure, we have there "I:  143uBTC/hr" Maybe  I should just get used to that 143u... Is this the (new, better) way?

PS and BTW: about that doubt of me of sometimes BFGMiner showing, at [M] menu, erupter data (serial# and description) and sometimes not... Any recomendations? Solutions? Just live with that?

Thanks again Luke-Jr and congrats.


BRADLEYPLOOF
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 520
Merit: 500


View Profile
April 10, 2014, 01:05:29 AM
 #3126

Here's a question.  I have two Block Erupter Sapphires amidst 7 antminer u2+ and 3 nanofury.  I just noticed when I restarted that the two BEs have the same stats as far as their shares, but the percentage at the end was different.  Here's a screenshot:




Is there something I'm missing?  Why are they different?

Because the block erupters run at 333 mh/s you'll have very little chance of getting a diff 16 share.  Try running those on their own instance with a pool the will do diff 1.  Otherwise you'll have to sit around for a while before they add up...As for the Hardware Errors percentage, it's probably because one is running warmer than the other...generally heat has a very detrimental effect on performance.
bigbeninlondon
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 742
Merit: 500



View Profile
April 10, 2014, 02:11:44 AM
 #3127

Here's a question.  I have two Block Erupter Sapphires amidst 7 antminer u2+ and 3 nanofury.  I just noticed when I restarted that the two BEs have the same stats as far as their shares, but the percentage at the end was different.  Here's a screenshot:




Is there something I'm missing?  Why are they different?

Because the block erupters run at 333 mh/s you'll have very little chance of getting a diff 16 share.  Try running those on their own instance with a pool the will do diff 1.  Otherwise you'll have to sit around for a while before they add up...As for the Hardware Errors percentage, it's probably because one is running warmer than the other...generally heat has a very detrimental effect on performance.

I'm not worried about the hardware error itself, I usually get one or two near the beginning, but it stabilizes over time.  I just noticed that the shares are 2, with one HW error on both miners, but the % of hardware errors is different.  How are the percentages calculated if two miners with the same accepted and hardware error have different percentages?
cafminer1
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 52
Merit: 0


View Profile
April 10, 2014, 03:15:48 AM
 #3128

I'm not worried about the hardware error itself, I usually get one or two near the beginning, but it stabilizes over time.  I just noticed that the shares are 2, with one HW error on both miners, but the % of hardware errors is different.  How are the percentages calculated if two miners with the same accepted and hardware error have different percentages?

I guess hardware errors HW % are calculated among all usefull results (diff 1 up) so they may be compared to different totals for different erupters. If they were related to accepted shares, 1 versus 2 would be 33 or 50%...

Your numbers must be saying something like:
1  = 1.8% of 56, 2 of which above 16
1  = 2.4% of 42, 2 of which above 16
Beulemann
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 81
Merit: 10


View Profile WWW
April 10, 2014, 05:15:10 PM
 #3129

my hahsra image with bfgminer only shows me the following messages all the time:

Quote
Apr 10 10:15:40 bfgminer[28211]: Stratum authorisation success for pool 0
Apr 10 10:15:40 bfgminer[28211]: Closing socket for stratum pool 0
Apr 10 10:15:40 bfgminer[28211]: Stratum connection to pool 0 interrupted

anyone an idea?

another problem is the missing ssh-logindata to the hashra-pi-image

Taugeran
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 658
Merit: 500


CCNA: There i fixed the internet.


View Profile
April 12, 2014, 04:03:18 AM
 #3130

luke,

received your OneStringMiner dev stack yet from @benturas?

Bitfury HW & Habañero : 1.625Th/s
tips/Donations: 1NoS89H3Mr6U5CmP4VwWzU2318JEMxHL1
Come join Coinbase
Luke-Jr (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2576
Merit: 1186



View Profile
April 12, 2014, 04:04:37 AM
 #3131

luke,

received your OneStringMiner dev stack yet from @benturas?
Yes, we're working on it.

Taugeran
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 658
Merit: 500


CCNA: There i fixed the internet.


View Profile
April 12, 2014, 04:06:10 AM
 #3132

luke,

received your OneStringMiner dev stack yet from @benturas?
Yes, we're working on it.

 Smiley Cheesy Grin

Bitfury HW & Habañero : 1.625Th/s
tips/Donations: 1NoS89H3Mr6U5CmP4VwWzU2318JEMxHL1
Come join Coinbase
ManeBjorn
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1288
Merit: 1004



View Profile
April 12, 2014, 05:28:45 AM
 #3133

I am so looking forward to support for them.
The three I have now run great at about 32 gh/s each with no overclock but I so miss MultiMiner that it drives me nuts.
Once per day cgminer drops them.
They are fun units.


luke,

received your OneStringMiner dev stack yet from @benturas?
Yes, we're working on it.

Taugeran
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 658
Merit: 500


CCNA: There i fixed the internet.


View Profile
April 12, 2014, 09:52:36 AM
 #3134

I am so looking forward to support for them.
The three I have now run great at about 32 gh/s each with no overclock but I so miss MultiMiner that it drives me nuts.
Once per day cgminer drops them.
They are fun units.


luke,

received your OneStringMiner dev stack yet from @benturas?
Yes, we're working on it.

idk if it will be work noting but ive noticed cgminer seems to segfault when the jobid field is exhausted, instead of rolling back to the beginning of the 32bit number. idk if its the version im running so :/ with a grain of salt i suppose


as well cant wait to have all my hardware condensed into 1 screen. running cg and bfg on the same BBB and setting up permissions was a pita.

id start bfg with my usbs and some k16s. then fire up cg which would try and grab my usbs and fu** em up when i only wanted it to get the OSM. 

some fiddling with cg's udev rules did the trick.

Bitfury HW & Habañero : 1.625Th/s
tips/Donations: 1NoS89H3Mr6U5CmP4VwWzU2318JEMxHL1
Come join Coinbase
hurricandave
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 966
Merit: 1003



View Profile
April 12, 2014, 10:51:31 PM
 #3135

   I just happened to walk in and sit down to my computer and the bfgminer display was rolling up but said "reinitializing AMU 0" and went thru the list of all my devices... Any guess as to what would cause that?
rupy
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 725
Merit: 503



View Profile
April 13, 2014, 04:50:47 PM
 #3136

Can you underclock bfl singles with bfgminer somehow?

So I guess that's a no! Sad

BANKBOOK GWT Wallet & no-FIAT Billing API
ManeBjorn
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1288
Merit: 1004



View Profile
April 13, 2014, 06:37:52 PM
 #3137

Hi Luke,
Have you made any headway with the OneString miners.  I am so tired of once to twice a day cgminer stopping mining.  I really want to get them on BFG and MultiMiner.

Not rushing you though. 

Thanks again.

Taugeran
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 658
Merit: 500


CCNA: There i fixed the internet.


View Profile
April 13, 2014, 08:25:06 PM
 #3138

Hi Luke,
Have you made any headway with the OneString miners.  I am so tired of once to twice a day cgminer stopping mining.  I really want to get them on BFG and MultiMiner.

Not rushing you though. 

Thanks again.

Watching

Bitfury HW & Habañero : 1.625Th/s
tips/Donations: 1NoS89H3Mr6U5CmP4VwWzU2318JEMxHL1
Come join Coinbase
justworks
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 24
Merit: 0


View Profile
April 14, 2014, 08:53:42 AM
 #3139

Hello, if anyone could help me figure this out it would be great!

I have BFGminer on my wr703n (openWRT) running a few antminers.

The thing is, if I run the command from an ssh session everything is ok, but if I put the same command into the luci startup so it would run automatically on each boot BFGminer eats 100% of the routers CPU and becomes unstable after a few hours, hardware errors and GH/s drop.

The command is:

bfgminer -S antminer:all -o mypool -u myusername -p x --set-device antminer:clock=x0981

So again, through a ssh session, the CPU usage is 0 to 1%, as a startup command its 99 to 100%. And I am using the identical command.

What am I missing here..?


The main point of the wr703n miner was so my computer does not have to be on, but I am not there yet Cheesy
Luke-Jr (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2576
Merit: 1186



View Profile
April 14, 2014, 08:55:36 AM
 #3140

Hello, if anyone could help me figure this out it would be great!

I have BFGminer on my wr703n (openWRT) running a few antminers.

The thing is, if I run the command from an ssh session everything is ok, but if I put the same command into the luci startup so it would run automatically on each boot BFGminer eats 100% of the routers CPU and becomes unstable after a few hours, hardware errors and GH/s drop.

The command is:

bfgminer -S antminer:all -o mypool -u myusername -p x --set-device antminer:clock=x0981

So again, through a ssh session, the CPU usage is 0 to 1%, as a startup command its 99 to 100%.


The main point of the wr703n miner was so my computer does not have to be on, but I am not there yet Cheesy
Try --syslog ? Or -T and pipe output to /dev/null

Pages: « 1 ... 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 [157] 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!