I agree on the community being responsible for bringing a coin to exchanges if they want to trade it, not developers with their funds. Go on people, do it, I'm not interested in trading personally but if you want to, then it's your job to ask the exchanges about it, vote or whatever.
The unmade mobile apps are not worth speculating on either. its not innovation! If by some miracle this project lasts more then a year, people still wont use the apps!! Not for at least 10 years. You are all in such a rush but you forget this tech is not ready for mainstream yet. I encourage you to support projects however, i encourage you to remain calm until one of you actually innovates!!
Making an App for mobile-to-mobile transactions is not innovative? Of course making it user-friendly is the goal. The only thing that is not ready for mainstream yet are the user interfaces! Having user-friendly UIs and infrastructure to let normal people use it is one of the biggest challenges in cryptocurrencies these days, how is that not innovative?
If any crypto currency were as easy to use as Paypal or WhatsApp I'm sure it could be a competitor to Bitcoin. It's all about the UI, no normal user cares about fancy tech stuff as long as it does the job. Afaik, one of the ideas is to use Spectre as cash using your mobile phone. That's why it's called Spectre.Cash. Just a balance and QR code reader here, with the Spectre network working in the background.
Also @LongAndShort, how do you come to judge about the developers (plural) of Spectre? Do you know any of them personally? Also you keep saying "he" has not done his crypto history, what exactly do you mean by that?
Poll
