stormia
|
|
March 27, 2017, 06:16:26 AM |
|
Name calling again? That's all you got! Is that all I got, or are you just retarded? Because if you knew how to read you would notice there is more there than just name calling in my post. On the other-hand, all you have are these pathetic attempts to deflect. Whatever, as you already said youself: the burden of proof lies on qtum. They haven't provided it. Therefore, the ICO must have been a complete failure. SAD! You wish! I don't need to wish, it is evident based on the logic you outlined yourself. Not my words, yours. Sorry the ICO was such a failure.
|
|
|
|
|
stackoverflow
|
|
March 27, 2017, 06:25:55 AM |
|
Name calling again? That's all you got! Is that all I got, or are you just retarded? Because if you knew how to read you would notice there is more there than just name calling in my post. On the other-hand, all you have are these pathetic attempts to deflect. Whatever, as you already said youself: the burden of proof lies on qtum. They haven't provided it. Therefore, the ICO must have been a complete failure. SAD! You wish! I don't need to wish, it is evident based on the logic you outlined yourself. Not my words, yours. Sorry the ICO was such a failure. How is that a failure when all the exchanges were sold out as they announced? You think they're lying? prove it!
|
|
|
|
stormia
|
|
March 27, 2017, 06:26:39 AM |
|
Name calling again? That's all you got! Is that all I got, or are you just retarded? Because if you knew how to read you would notice there is more there than just name calling in my post. On the other-hand, all you have are these pathetic attempts to deflect. Whatever, as you already said youself: the burden of proof lies on qtum. They haven't provided it. Therefore, the ICO must have been a complete failure. SAD! You wish! I don't need to wish, it is evident based on the logic you outlined yourself. Not my words, yours. Sorry the ICO was such a failure. How is that a failure when all the exchanges were sold out as they announced? You think they're lying? prove it! I don't have to prove anything, because that's not how things are done around here. I can just say it is so and it is so. Pretty awesome!
|
|
|
|
szafa
|
|
March 27, 2017, 06:28:29 AM |
|
Yunbi have not qtum in trading yet or i am not good to find.
|
|
|
|
stormia
|
|
March 27, 2017, 06:29:41 AM |
|
And remember everybody this is a quote from stackoverflow: ""the burden of proof is on the one who declares, not on one who denies" And as we all know qtum is the one who declared a successful ICO, and I am only denying that So according to stackoverflow himself I don't have to provide any proof to deny it, they are the ones that need to provide proof to confirm it.
|
|
|
|
stackoverflow
|
|
March 27, 2017, 06:32:16 AM |
|
And remember everybody this is a quote from stackoverflow: ""the burden of proof is on the one who declares, not on one who denies" And as we all know qtum is the one who declared a successful ICO, and I am only denying that So according to stackoverflow himself I don't have to provide any proof to deny it, they are the ones that need to provide proof to confirm it. The proof is the numerous exchanges which witnessed the success
|
|
|
|
stormia
|
|
March 27, 2017, 06:33:32 AM Last edit: March 27, 2017, 06:59:55 AM by stormia |
|
And remember everybody this is a quote from stackoverflow: ""the burden of proof is on the one who declares, not on one who denies" And as we all know qtum is the one who declared a successful ICO, and I am only denying that So according to stackoverflow himself I don't have to provide any proof to deny it, they are the ones that need to provide proof to confirm it. The proof is the numerous exchanges which witnessed the success I don't think you understand what proof means. This is crypto we are talking about, there is objective evidence on the blockchain and that is the only thing that can be trusted. Why should we trust exchanges controlled by the team themselves when we could rely on a trustless system to obtain our proof? It's so simple to do, and the fact you and the team are still fighting this is a gigantic red flag. This struggle you guys are putting up is equivalent to admittance. There is no reason for it except that you need to hide something. My theory: The ICO did not raise anywhere near 15 mil, but you are going to pretend it did until release, because although you didn't raise 15 mil you have control of the vast majority of the coins because you "purchased" them from the exchanges under your own control. All you need to do is maintain some confidence in the coin until release, and then you can dump to make up for all the money you didn't raise in the ICO. You could prove that wrong in an instant, but you don't because apparently you can't. And let me make one thing clear, until objective evidence of the ICO funds (the addresses) are shared with the community I will be in here alllllllll the way up until and past the launch making sure nobody who comes here forgets or is unaware that the team has failed to bear their burden of proof and provide this simple and standard degree of transparency that they themselves alluded to before the ICO. Remember, your own words: "the burden of proof is on the one who declares, not on one who denies" Qtum declared a successful ICO, I am just denying it
|
|
|
|
TheBobyHunter
|
|
March 27, 2017, 06:38:22 AM |
|
Yunbi have not qtum in trading yet or i am not good to find.
i think you must wait, if you want qtum trading because ico selling in qtum coin is not finish, maybe the first trade in livecoin, because ico selling use livecoin
|
|
|
|
titibach
|
|
March 27, 2017, 07:18:18 AM |
|
so this was self brought within 90 minutes? that really is a special kind of stupid.
|
|
|
|
wheresmycoin
|
|
March 27, 2017, 10:42:55 AM Last edit: March 27, 2017, 10:57:02 AM by wheresmycoin |
|
if nothing goes wrong, there were a couple promising icos recently but qtum is probably going to be the most successful crypto since ethereum.
|
|
|
|
BlastHazard
Member
Offline
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
The World We Live In Today...
|
|
March 27, 2017, 10:59:10 AM |
|
if nothing goes wrong, there were a couple promising icos recently but qtum is probably going to be the most successful crypto since ethereum.
Unfortunately I missed out on this one, looks good though being a bitsa.
|
|
|
|
titibach
|
|
March 27, 2017, 11:03:05 AM |
|
if nothing goes wrong, there were a couple promising icos recently but qtum is probably going to be the most successful crypto since ethereum.
why you are whoring yourself for a project with a scammer as the ceo is beyond me. This is nothing and will amount to nothing as soon as he dumps out his free coins. Been warned.
|
|
|
|
wheresmycoin
|
|
March 27, 2017, 11:16:55 AM |
|
if nothing goes wrong, there were a couple promising icos recently but qtum is probably going to be the most successful crypto since ethereum.
why you are whoring yourself for a project with a scammer as the ceo is beyond me. This is nothing and will amount to nothing as soon as he dumps out his free coins. Been warned. The business world is far more complicated than you think it is supposed to be, not only qtum's. Things can go wrong with this project, not saying this won't go wrong.
|
|
|
|
provenceday
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1148
Merit: 1000
|
|
March 27, 2017, 03:20:49 PM |
|
if nothing goes wrong, there were a couple promising icos recently but qtum is probably going to be the most successful crypto since ethereum.
why you are whoring yourself for a project with a scammer as the ceo is beyond me. This is nothing and will amount to nothing as soon as he dumps out his free coins. Been warned. The business world is far more complicated than you think it is supposed to be, not only qtum's. Things can go wrong with this project, not saying this won't go wrong. finally there are some reasonable and good input in this thread.
|
|
|
|
provenceday
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1148
Merit: 1000
|
|
March 27, 2017, 03:26:55 PM |
|
based on 2 solid blockchain project, bitcoin and ethereum,
Qtum have big potential.
if the project can be released in 2017, this will be big.
|
|
|
|
Gleb Gamow
In memoriam
VIP
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1428
Merit: 1145
|
|
March 27, 2017, 10:01:03 PM |
|
Amazing how all those people who invested in Qtum's nonprofit, non-investment thingy registered in Singapore opted to not come to this thread and post their fuckin asses off after my last post hours ago. It's almost like, what I've more than alluded to, they're nonexistent. We may have gotten lucky in that the Bruce Peterson of Qtum, cocksuckeroverflow, truly abandoned this thread. Perhaps he's busy trying to break into my user accounts on this forum most recently (within hours ago) according to all the alerts I've been getting via emails.
|
|
|
|
stackoverflow
|
|
March 28, 2017, 02:22:42 AM |
|
Glebby talking to himself now Someone living by that river better call 911!
|
|
|
|
Gleb Gamow
In memoriam
VIP
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1428
Merit: 1145
|
|
March 28, 2017, 03:20:22 AM |
|
Glebby talking to himself now Someone living by that river better call 911!At least I more homies on this thread than you do, for I don't see many echoing your sentiment excepting Newbies posting exclusively here, most likely Team Qtum's shill accounts.
|
|
|
|
solix
|
|
March 28, 2017, 04:56:44 AM |
|
Glebby talking to himself now Someone living by that river better call 911!At least I more homies on this thread than you do, for I don't see many echoing your sentiment excepting Newbies posting exclusively here, most likely Team Qtum's shill accounts. Gleb and I are homies now thanks to the battle scars of the Legends Room. I get nervous when Gleb shows up on a thread. He's one of those guys that makes me most happy by never making an appearance. I warned him we'd cross paths again soon... I just didn't think it would be 30 minutes later.
|
Your Ad here! PM us now if you'd like to advertise here.
|
|
|
|