[NemosMiner] multi algo profit switching NVIDIA/CPU miner

[minerx117]

Wow! Thanks for the continued support and updates to newest miners.  This has become my go-to setup for all of my rigs.

: )

[minerx117]

  Type: NVIDIA

Miner                Algorithm            Speed     mBTC/Day      BTC/Day      USD/Day BTC/GH/Day Pool
-----                ---------            -----     --------      -------      ------- ---------- ----
ccminerpolytimos     X17             36.52 MH/s        1.577      0.00158       18.075    0.04319 zpool-
ccminerpolytimos     Skein            1.84 GH/s        1.382      0.00138       15.839    0.00075 zpool-
CcminerTpruvot       Skunk          104.03 MH/s        1.130      0.00113       12.945    0.01086 zpool-
CcminerTpruvot       Bitcore         55.74 MH/s        1.099      0.00110       12.590    0.01971 zpool-
ccminerpolytimos     poly          Benchmarking Benchmarking Benchmarking Benchmarking    0.00589 zpool-
CcminerTpruvotcuda9  Groestl       Benchmarking Benchmarking Benchmarking Benchmarking    0.00355 zpool-
DSTM                 Equihash      Benchmarking Benchmarking Benchmarking Benchmarking  573.61000 zpool-
PalginHSR            NeoScrypt     Benchmarking Benchmarking Benchmarking Benchmarking    0.41134 zpool-
CcminerTpruvotcuda9  X11evo        Benchmarking Benchmarking Benchmarking Benchmarking    0.02237 zpool-
CcminerTpruvotcuda9  Timetravel    Benchmarking Benchmarking Benchmarking Benchmarking    0.00314 zpool-
CcminerTpruvotcuda9  Tribus        Benchmarking Benchmarking Benchmarking Benchmarking    0.00048 zpool-
ccminerpolytimos     Nist5         Benchmarking Benchmarking Benchmarking Benchmarking    0.00930 zpool-
ccminerAlexis78      Sib           Benchmarking Benchmarking Benchmarking Benchmarking    0.00493 zpool-
CcminerAlexis78cuda9 Xevan         Benchmarking Benchmarking Benchmarking Benchmarking    0.06559 zpool-
ccminerAlexis78      MyriadGroestl Benchmarking Benchmarking Benchmarking Benchmarking    0.00030 zpool-
ccminerAlexis78      Blakecoin     Benchmarking Benchmarking Benchmarking Benchmarking    0.00002 zpool-
ccminerAlexis78      Hsr           Benchmarking Benchmarking Benchmarking Benchmarking    0.03283 zpool-
CcminerAlexis78Phi   Phi           Benchmarking Benchmarking Benchmarking Benchmarking    0.02448 zpool-
ccminerpolytimos     Lbry          Benchmarking Benchmarking Benchmarking Benchmarking    0.00020 zpool-
ccminerpolytimos     Lyra2RE2      Benchmarking Benchmarking Benchmarking Benchmarking    0.00630 zpool-
ccminerpolytimos     Keccak        Benchmarking Benchmarking Benchmarking Benchmarking    0.00014 zpool-
ccminerpolytimos     Blake2s       Benchmarking Benchmarking Benchmarking Benchmarking    0.00009 zpool-
ccminerpolytimos     C11           Benchmarking Benchmarking Benchmarking Benchmarking    0.02056 zpool-


Running:
Failed:  1

    Speed Exited   Active   Cnt  Command
    ----- ------   ------   ---  -------
0.00 PH/s dd:hh:mm 00:00:00 Once Bin\NVIDIA-ccminerpolytimos\ccminer.exe -a polytimos -o stratum+tcp://polytimos.mine.zpool.ca:8463 -u 14rEu3oaRyfF7z6R869rDL54dABUEza1Xz -p ID=NemosMiner-v2.4.1,c=BTC -d 0,1,2,3


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Last Refresh: 01/22/2018 05:48:35
Sleep 30 sec
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

need help guys i tried everything i know and i cant figure out why i am getting this error.
this rig has    2x1060 6gb   1x1070    1x1070ti
Mining on zpool bat on latest release version 2.4.1 downloaded fresh copy again an hour ago
benchmark for poly fails ....it opens the miner window and closes it right after

have been using nemosminer since 2.3 never had no issues even when i updated to pre-release versions or whenever i noticed nemo update the github i would download the latest update and never had any issues until now so thats why its really weird that this is happening

if i remove the algo from bat or turn off the polytimos in the miner then it just removes it from benchmarking and all is set with the rest

anyone know what might be causing this?

@cr3moon  thanks i'll fix that soon
https://github.com/nemosminer/NemosMiner-v2.4.1/issues/210

[minerx117]

NemosMiner-v2.4.1

https://github.com/nemosminer/NemosMiner-v2.4.1/releases/download/v2.4.1/NemosMiner-v2.4.1.zip

Disable ccminer KlausT

Why disable Klaust?! I'm still on 2.31 and it works just fine 0-o

Because PalginHsrNeo is 5-15% faster.... tested with 10603gb 1070 1070ti 1080ti

[minerx117]

In the folder there are new files, what are they needed for?

miner.cmd
start.bat
restart.bat
stop.bat

help NemosMiner-v2.4 open and close miners correctly

[Zikkson]

Last version works great on my 6x1060 rig. Benchmark takes more time, especially palgin hsr, but getting 10% better results.


Anyway today i have some results of one week test between miningpoolhub, ahashpool and nicehash for you who want to know which one has better profit. Whole test runs on 6x GTX1060 6GB rig.

Results:
Nemosminer - miningpoolhub -> 0.00158208BTC/day
Nemosminer - ahashpool -> 0.00147477BTC/day
NiceHash Miner 2 - NiceHash -> 0.00135381BTC/day

I used NiceHash Miner 2 for NiceHash to use that service as it is. Right now im running on MPH and getting the best results, also i will correct values to get clearer results if there will be difference.

[minerx117]

Last version works great on my 6x1060 rig. Benchmark takes more time, especially palgin hsr, but getting 10% better results.


Anyway today i have some results of one week test between miningpoolhub, ahashpool and nicehash for you who want to know which one has better profit. Whole test runs on 6x GTX1060 6GB rig.

Results:
Nemosminer - miningpoolhub -> 0.00158208BTC/day
Nemosminer - ahashpool -> 0.00147477BTC/day
NiceHash Miner 2 - NiceHash -> 0.00135381BTC/day

I used NiceHash Miner 2 for NiceHash to use that service as it is. Right now im running on MPH and getting the best results, also i will correct values to get clearer results if there will be difference.

yeh benchmark time is 8min per Algo apart from PalginHSR which is 10-18mins

[Zikkson]

Its worth that extra hash speed

[minerx117]

minerx117

Honestly I'm not seeing any improvement with this new phi client..

NemosMiner 2.4 - using ccminer 2.2.4
[2018-01-22 01:59:46] GPU #1: MSI GTX 1070 Ti, 22.31 MH/s
[2018-01-22 01:59:46] GPU #2: MSI GTX 1070 Ti, 22.23 MH/s
[2018-01-22 01:59:46] GPU #0: MSI GTX 1070 Ti, 22.12 MH/s
[2018-01-22 01:59:46] GPU #5: MSI GTX 1070 Ti, 22.00 MH/s
[2018-01-22 01:59:46] GPU #3: MSI GTX 1070 Ti, 21.85 MH/s
[2018-01-22 01:59:47] GPU #4: MSI GTX 1070 Ti, 21.80 MH/s
[2018-01-22 02:00:00] phi block 157319, diff 21635.913
[2018-01-22 02:00:02] GPU #2: MSI GTX 1070 Ti, 22.29 MH/s
[2018-01-22 02:00:03] accepted: 280/280 (diff 0.549), 132.14 MH/s yes!
[2018-01-22 02:00:10] GPU #0: MSI GTX 1070 Ti, 22.01 MH/s
[2018-01-22 02:00:10] accepted: 281/281 (diff 2.054), 132.13 MH/s yes!

NemosMiner 2.4.1 - using phi-1.0 (which has some built in donation system)
[2018-01-22 01:58:27] [YES] [S/A/T]: 0/23/23, diff: 1.765, 130.51 MH/s
[2018-01-22 01:58:33] GPU#0: MSI GTX 1070 Ti, 22.26 MH/s
[2018-01-22 01:58:40] GPU#1: MSI GTX 1070 Ti, 22.33 MH/s
[2018-01-22 01:59:14] phi block 157318, diff 21635.913
[2018-01-22 01:59:46] GPU#3: MSI GTX 1070 Ti, 22.46 MH/s
[2018-01-22 01:59:46] GPU#2: MSI GTX 1070 Ti, 22.31 MH/s
[2018-01-22 01:59:46] GPU#0: MSI GTX 1070 Ti, 22.22 MH/s
[2018-01-22 01:59:46] GPU#4: MSI GTX 1070 Ti, 22.21 MH/s
[2018-01-22 01:59:46] GPU#5: MSI GTX 1070 Ti, 22.19 MH/s
[2018-01-22 01:59:56] [YES] [S/A/T]: 0/24/24, diff: 1.871, 131.11 MH/s
[2018-01-22 02:00:00] phi block 157319, diff 21635.913
[2018-01-22 02:00:32] GPU#1: MSI GTX 1070 Ti, 22.32 MH/s
[2018-01-22 02:00:57] phi block 157320, diff 21044.053
[2018-01-22 02:01:12] phi block 157321, diff 21044.053
[2018-01-22 02:01:25] GPU#5: MSI GTX 1070 Ti, 22.12 MH/s
[2018-01-22 02:01:25] [YES] [S/A/T]: 0/25/25, diff: 0.563, 131.35 MH/s


These are identical rigs, identical cards, identical overclock settings, identical power settings

thanks i'll double check today and confirm are you running lower tdp? i have two 6x1070ti rigs with 69%tdp (124watt) +125core +505mem and i got a slightly better hashrate with Alexis-Phi over Tpruvot 2.2.4

"which has some built in donation system"  Does it? i did not know that (can you elaborate more on that please millsys) i may remove it very soon...

Seems clean to me i checked through source code
Source Code: https://github.com/216k155/ccminer-phi-anxmod

[Max3k]

Anyway today i have some results of one week test between miningpoolhub, ahashpool and nicehash for you who want to know which one has better profit. Whole test runs on 6x GTX1060 6GB rig.
Results:
Nemosminer - miningpoolhub -> 0.00158208BTC/day
Nemosminer - ahashpool -> 0.00147477BTC/day
NiceHash Miner 2 - NiceHash -> 0.00135381BTC/day

Strange (low) values for weekly test, it was carried out simultaneousl (3 rigs of 6 cards)?

By the way, what EWBF replaced at DSTM? They have the same speed, the same load on the card, that's only for the first can be set --fee 0.

[minerx117]

Anyway today i have some results of one week test between miningpoolhub, ahashpool and nicehash for you who want to know which one has better profit. Whole test runs on 6x GTX1060 6GB rig.
Results:
Nemosminer - miningpoolhub -> 0.00158208BTC/day
Nemosminer - ahashpool -> 0.00147477BTC/day
NiceHash Miner 2 - NiceHash -> 0.00135381BTC/day

Strange (low) values for weekly test, it was carried out simultaneousl (3 rigs of 6 cards)?

By the way, what EWBF replaced at DSTM? They have the same speed, the same load on the card, that's only for the first can be set --fee 0.

i can add EWBF back alongside DSTM if you would like the choice

[Zikkson]

Anyway today i have some results of one week test between miningpoolhub, ahashpool and nicehash for you who want to know which one has better profit. Whole test runs on 6x GTX1060 6GB rig.
Results:
Nemosminer - miningpoolhub -> 0.00158208BTC/day
Nemosminer - ahashpool -> 0.00147477BTC/day
NiceHash Miner 2 - NiceHash -> 0.00135381BTC/day

Strange (low) values for weekly test, it was carried out simultaneousl (3 rigs of 6 cards)?

By the way, what EWBF replaced at DSTM? They have the same speed, the same load on the card, that's only for the first can be set --fee 0.

No i switched one rig over week between those pools. Tried to have equal time for all of them. Do you think it can be better per day value? I dont have set gpus for top performace, but for better effeciency, core +80, mem +400, power limit 80% (hynix memory). Getting 1620h/s equihash and 3900h/s neoscrypt for example.

[Max3k]

i can add EWBF back alongside DSTM if you would like the choice

Nothing serious, i thought maybe I have something wrong and the speed is the same.

Skunk and ccminer-x86-2.2 - it would be possible to start using the new version (ccminer-x86-2.2.4-cuda9), speed should be more.
For Bitcore can use for example SP2, he is now lying around everywhere, in order to exclude CcminerTpruvot.ps1 =))

No i switched one rig over week between those pools. Tried to have equal time for all of them. Do you think it can be better per day value?

No problem then, just good to compare in parallel and 2-3 weeks.

[passteque]

Anyway today i have some results of one week test between miningpoolhub, ahashpool and nicehash for you who want to know which one has better profit. Whole test runs on 6x GTX1060 6GB rig.
Results:
Nemosminer - miningpoolhub -> 0.00158208BTC/day
Nemosminer - ahashpool -> 0.00147477BTC/day
NiceHash Miner 2 - NiceHash -> 0.00135381BTC/day

Strange (low) values for weekly test, it was carried out simultaneousl (3 rigs of 6 cards)?

By the way, what EWBF replaced at DSTM? They have the same speed, the same load on the card, that's only for the first can be set --fee 0.

No i switched one rig over week between those pools. Tried to have equal time for all of them. Do you think it can be better per day value? I dont have set gpus for top performace, but for better effeciency, core +80, mem +400, power limit 80% (hynix memory). Getting 1620h/s equihash and 3900h/s neoscrypt for example.

you can't do that, run at the same time to compare; 2 gpu on each pool. payout move too much in a week to compare that way

[HardBlockMiner]

Hye,

I've a little problem when I launch the miner, the miner is open for 4/5sec like this: https://www.noelshack.com/2018-04-1-1516647201-mineur.png

It just close after and nothing happened after, what can i do to make it run?

Do you have your number of GPU configured properly? 

Yes, I have only one GPU for the moment, my bat:

powershell -version 5.0 -noexit -executionpolicy bypass -windowstyle maximized -command "&.\NemosMiner-v2.4.1.ps1 -SelGPUDSTM '0' -SelGPUCC '0' -Currency USD -Passwordcurrency BTC -interval 30 -Username blacklpk -Workername lpk2 -Location US -ActiveMinerGainPct 3 -PoolName miningpoolhub -Type nvidia -Algorithm cryptonight,keccak,lyra2z,skein,equihash,groestl,MyriadGroestl,Lyra2RE2,neoscrypt -Donate 5

Which GPU are you using?

[car1999]

Last version works great on my 6x1060 rig. Benchmark takes more time, especially palgin hsr, but getting 10% better results.


Anyway today i have some results of one week test between miningpoolhub, ahashpool and nicehash for you who want to know which one has better profit. Whole test runs on 6x GTX1060 6GB rig.

Results:
Nemosminer - miningpoolhub -> 0.00158208BTC/day
Nemosminer - ahashpool -> 0.00147477BTC/day
NiceHash Miner 2 - NiceHash -> 0.00135381BTC/day

I used NiceHash Miner 2 for NiceHash to use that service as it is. Right now im running on MPH and getting the best results, also i will correct values to get clearer results if there will be difference.

what's your most runned algo in MPH?

[Mike011]

"tribus" = " --cpu-priority=3 -d $SelGPUCC" #Tribus

This is working like a charm! Thanks!

What is it for?

Actually benchmarking for 4*1070 ti. Very nice job nemos your miner is great

Sometimes this solves "does not validate on cpu", or lowering intensity helps. However, i get the same message on i5 too sometimes, so duh...

[car1999]

@minerrx117,
v2.4.1, ahashpool24hr
It showed

Code:

Stats 'Phi' -> 202.51 MH/s after xxxxx sec

but the stats never changed in the list, it's always

Code:

Phi     194.25 MH/s    4.917     0.00492   52.548    .........

is it a bug?

[Zybane]

When CCminer says a line in blue like "skunk block 111222, diff 1877.231"

What does that mean? Is that an error?

[Mike011]

When CCminer says a line in blue like "skunk block 111222, diff 1877.231"

What does that mean? Is that an error?

Omg! If you get that message, your rig could explode any minute! I suggest that you stop mining immidiately! Sell all your gpu`s to me! 

[Zikkson]

Last version works great on my 6x1060 rig. Benchmark takes more time, especially palgin hsr, but getting 10% better results.


Anyway today i have some results of one week test between miningpoolhub, ahashpool and nicehash for you who want to know which one has better profit. Whole test runs on 6x GTX1060 6GB rig.

Results:
Nemosminer - miningpoolhub -> 0.00158208BTC/day
Nemosminer - ahashpool -> 0.00147477BTC/day
NiceHash Miner 2 - NiceHash -> 0.00135381BTC/day

I used NiceHash Miner 2 for NiceHash to use that service as it is. Right now im running on MPH and getting the best results, also i will correct values to get clearer results if there will be difference.

what's your most runned algo in MPH?

I think its equihash, then neoscrypt and skein. But i will check it later today after i get back home