[NemosMiner] multi algo profit switching NVIDIA/CPU miner

[Max3k]

Miner                Algorithm            Speed     mBTC/Day      BTC/Day      USD/Day BTC/GH/Day Pool
-----                ---------            -----     --------      -------      ------- ---------- ----
ccminerpolytimos     poly          Benchmarking Benchmarking Benchmarking Benchmarking    0.00589 zpool-
Running:
Failed:  1
    ----- ------   ------   ---  -------
0.00 PH/s dd:hh:mm 00:00:00 Once Bin\NVIDIA-ccminerpolytimos\ccminer.exe -a polytimos -o stratum+tcp://polytimos.mine.zpool.ca:8463

need help guys i tried everything i know and i cant figure out why i am getting this error.
benchmark for poly fails ....it opens the miner window and closes it right after
anyone know what might be causing this?

Just open the Miners folder, find the file ccminerpolytimos.ps1, in this file, change the values, it must be so:

Code:

"poly" = " -d $SelGPUCC" #polytimos

[primo1983]

Making several mistakes

Loading miners..
No C:\Users\Avell\Desktop\NemosMiner-v2.4.1-master\Miners\ccminerAlexis78.ps1:130 caractere:19
+ </a>              </li>
+                   ~
Operador '<' reservado para uso futuro.

No C:\Users\Avell\Desktop\NemosMiner-v2.4.1-master\Miners\ccminerAlexis78.ps1:134 caractere:19
+ </a>              </li>
+                   ~
Operador '<' reservado para uso futuro.

No C:\Users\Avell\Desktop\NemosMiner-v2.4.1-master\Miners\ccminerAlexis78.ps1:139 caractere:19
+ </a>              </li>
+                   ~
Operador '<' reservado para uso futuro.

No C:\Users\Avell\Desktop\NemosMiner-v2.4.1-master\Miners\ccminerAlexis78.ps1:144 caractere:19
+ </a>              </li>
+                   ~
Operador '<' reservado para uso futuro.

No C:\Users\Avell\Desktop\NemosMiner-v2.4.1-master\Miners\ccminerAlexis78.ps1:148 caractere:19
+ </a>              </li>
+                   ~
Operador '<' reservado para uso futuro.

No C:\Users\Avell\Desktop\NemosMiner-v2.4.1-master\Miners\ccminerAlexis78.ps1:939 caractere:227
+ ... g:0;display:inline"><input name="utf8" type="hidden" value="&#x2713;" ...
+                                                                 ~
O caráter de E comercial (&) não é permitido. O operador & está reservado para uso futuro; coloque um E comercial entre
aspas duplas ("&") para transmiti-lo como parte de uma cadeia de caracteres.

No C:\Users\Avell\Desktop\NemosMiner-v2.4.1-master\Miners\ccminerAlexis78.ps1:942 caractere:10
+ </form>  </div>
+          ~
Operador '<' reservado para uso futuro.

No C:\Users\Avell\Desktop\NemosMiner-v2.4.1-master\Miners\ccminerAlexis78.ps1:958 caractere:24
+       <li class="mr-3">&copy; 2018 <span title="0.11521s from unicorn ...
+                        ~
O caráter de E comercial (&) não é permitido. O operador & está reservado para uso futuro; coloque um E comercial entre

[Lubrifiant]

Anyway today i have some results of one week test between miningpoolhub, ahashpool and nicehash for you who want to know which one has better profit. Whole test runs on 6x GTX1060 6GB rig.
Results:
Nemosminer - miningpoolhub -> 0.00158208BTC/day
Nemosminer - ahashpool -> 0.00147477BTC/day
NiceHash Miner 2 - NiceHash -> 0.00135381BTC/day

Strange (low) values for weekly test, it was carried out simultaneousl (3 rigs of 6 cards)?

By the way, what EWBF replaced at DSTM? They have the same speed, the same load on the card, that's only for the first can be set --fee 0.

No i switched one rig over week between those pools. Tried to have equal time for all of them. Do you think it can be better per day value? I dont have set gpus for top performace, but for better effeciency, core +80, mem +400, power limit 80% (hynix memory). Getting 1620h/s equihash and 3900h/s neoscrypt for example.

you can't do that, run at the same time to compare; 2 gpu on each pool. payout move too much in a week to compare that way

Agree, you can't compare two different weeks of mining. Too much up an down currently, you can't compare two pools this way

[Zikkson]

Agree, you can't compare two different weeks of mining. Too much up an down currently, you can't compare two pools this way

Yeah i understand, but how much can price drop affect amount of mined coins? Im mining still with same speed so amount should be same and only autoexchange can be affected by price i guess (or am i wrong?). Can it be that much difference?

Anyway today i received new batch of GPUs so i can do test with two rigs at same time.

[SpliceOfLife]

Hi everybody.
New to the forum here but long time lurker.
I would just like to thank everybody for their creative and experimental flair when it comes to mining. I have learned  a great deal from you all.  Thank you everybody that has been doing side by side testing and thank you nemo for your continued development of your miner.

I hadn't felt the need to register until a few moments ago. Being relatively new to mining I felt I wouldn't have much to contribute and I had also found that any questions I had were already answered some where on the net, so rather than to spam the network and fill up the forums with previously answered question I had decided rather to use my own initiative and search when I was in need of information.


Late last nite I came across the following "issue" on the github for nemos miner
https://github.com/nemosminer/NemosMiner-v2.4.1/issues/192
jjude80 commented 4 days ago
Through my experimenting, I have found that running nemosminer in multiple sessions (one for each card) staggered ,each with a 15 minute cycle time, is the most profitable way to run it. That way you get your share percentage up all the way per algo, and you don't loose out on another algo if it goes most profitable. I have doubled my daily usd by doing this. However it is irritating to edit each miners ps1 file each time a new version comes out. I propose being able to change the api ports used via the bat file to make it easier. that way someone unable to figure out how to edit the ps1 file properly can do this, and so that I dont have to have several full nemosminer folders configured.
https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/18168364/35174067-fce0f74e-fd3b-11e7-9ae6-4d79a5e2679e.png
The difference in price on that graph is quite staggering!


Having seen the potential increase in profits I attempted to replicate the results.
To begin with I bench marked a single gpu then I duplicated the folder 7 times and assigned a different gpu to each instance  and changed the interval to 900. Running for 12 hours I'm seeing an estimated 0.00416 btc/day which is actually less than i was recieving on ahashpool24. I have 7 1080ti FTW3s' MSI afterburner is set to core+50 mem+400 power80%.

My questions are:
Which ps1 files specifically is he editing and how is he editing them? (ps1 for each individual miner?)
Does anybody have a greater understanding how to "change the api ports" to achieve the same results?

Thanks Everybody for being Great
SOL

[primo1983]

Hi everybody.
New to the forum here but long time lurker.
I would just like to thank everybody for their creative and experimental flair when it comes to mining. I have learned  a great deal from you all.  Thank you everybody that has been doing side by side testing and thank you nemo for your continued development of your miner.

I hadn't felt the need to register until a few moments ago. Being relatively new to mining I felt I wouldn't have much to contribute and I had also found that any questions I had were already answered some where on the net, so rather than to spam the network and fill up the forums with previously answered question I had decided rather to use my own initiative and search when I was in need of information.


Late last nite I came across the following "issue" on the github for nemos miner
https://github.com/nemosminer/NemosMiner-v2.4.1/issues/192
jjude80 commented 4 days ago
Through my experimenting, I have found that running nemosminer in multiple sessions (one for each card) staggered ,each with a 15 minute cycle time, is the most profitable way to run it. That way you get your share percentage up all the way per algo, and you don't loose out on another algo if it goes most profitable. I have doubled my daily usd by doing this. However it is irritating to edit each miners ps1 file each time a new version comes out. I propose being able to change the api ports used via the bat file to make it easier. that way someone unable to figure out how to edit the ps1 file properly can do this, and so that I dont have to have several full nemosminer folders configured.
https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/18168364/35174067-fce0f74e-fd3b-11e7-9ae6-4d79a5e2679e.png
The difference in price on that graph is quite staggering!


Having seen the potential increase in profits I attempted to replicate the results.
To begin with I bench marked a single gpu then I duplicated the folder 7 times and assigned a different gpu to each instance  and changed the interval to 900. Running for 12 hours I'm seeing an estimated 0.00416 btc/day which is actually less than i was recieving on ahashpool24. I have 7 1080ti FTW3s' MSI afterburner is set to core+50 mem+400 power80%.

My questions are:
Which ps1 files specifically is he editing and how is he editing them? (ps1 for each individual miner?)
Does anybody have a greater understanding how to "change the api ports" to achieve the same results?

Thanks Everybody for being Great
SOL

where do I set only a gpu on the bench, in which file?

[cryptomoblo]

Hi everybody.
New to the forum here but long time lurker.
I would just like to thank everybody for their creative and experimental flair when it comes to mining. I have learned  a great deal from you all.  Thank you everybody that has been doing side by side testing and thank you nemo for your continued development of your miner.

I hadn't felt the need to register until a few moments ago. Being relatively new to mining I felt I wouldn't have much to contribute and I had also found that any questions I had were already answered some where on the net, so rather than to spam the network and fill up the forums with previously answered question I had decided rather to use my own initiative and search when I was in need of information.


Late last nite I came across the following "issue" on the github for nemos miner
https://github.com/nemosminer/NemosMiner-v2.4.1/issues/192
jjude80 commented 4 days ago
Through my experimenting, I have found that running nemosminer in multiple sessions (one for each card) staggered ,each with a 15 minute cycle time, is the most profitable way to run it. That way you get your share percentage up all the way per algo, and you don't loose out on another algo if it goes most profitable. I have doubled my daily usd by doing this. However it is irritating to edit each miners ps1 file each time a new version comes out. I propose being able to change the api ports used via the bat file to make it easier. that way someone unable to figure out how to edit the ps1 file properly can do this, and so that I dont have to have several full nemosminer folders configured.
https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/18168364/35174067-fce0f74e-fd3b-11e7-9ae6-4d79a5e2679e.png
The difference in price on that graph is quite staggering!


Having seen the potential increase in profits I attempted to replicate the results.
To begin with I bench marked a single gpu then I duplicated the folder 7 times and assigned a different gpu to each instance  and changed the interval to 900. Running for 12 hours I'm seeing an estimated 0.00416 btc/day which is actually less than i was recieving on ahashpool24. I have 7 1080ti FTW3s' MSI afterburner is set to core+50 mem+400 power80%.

My questions are:
Which ps1 files specifically is he editing and how is he editing them? (ps1 for each individual miner?)
Does anybody have a greater understanding how to "change the api ports" to achieve the same results?

Thanks Everybody for being Great
SOL

Hey Sol,

What is being suggested at the github page by another user is that the miner is probably using different GTX versions in the same RIG. With only the same cards is probably not really giving an advantage. Could explain why you didn't see any real gains while testing. Also to have a proper compare you should run similar rigs at the same time. But most of us dont have this luxury (yet)

[jmtech]

Is there a max limit on here?

Tried running benchmark but it just stops working after the first algo (11 gpu). My solution is usually to set one gpu, bench, then set the others, works but think it throws the estimates off

TIA
J

[Zikkson]

Last version works great on my 6x1060 rig. Benchmark takes more time, especially palgin hsr, but getting 10% better results.


Anyway today i have some results of one week test between miningpoolhub, ahashpool and nicehash for you who want to know which one has better profit. Whole test runs on 6x GTX1060 6GB rig.

Results:
Nemosminer - miningpoolhub -> 0.00158208BTC/day
Nemosminer - ahashpool -> 0.00147477BTC/day
NiceHash Miner 2 - NiceHash -> 0.00135381BTC/day

I used NiceHash Miner 2 for NiceHash to use that service as it is. Right now im running on MPH and getting the best results, also i will correct values to get clearer results if there will be difference.

what's your most runned algo in MPH?

Equihash -> Skein -> Neoscrypt -> Lyra2v2

[cryptomoblo]

Is there a max limit on here?

Tried running benchmark but it just stops working after the first algo (11 gpu). My solution is usually to set one gpu, bench, then set the others, works but think it throws the estimates off

TIA
J

Searching Google on gpu limit nemosminer brought me to this page: https://github.com/nemosminer/NemosMiner-v2.4.1/issues/165

Hope it helps

[verado]

I also have the issue with "Very long miner warming up time" as reported in https://github.com/nemosminer/NemosMiner-v2.4.1/issues/94 .

Alexis78 miner in nemosminer-23, but also polytimos and Alexis78Phi in nemosminer-241, have often this behavior on algo X17, Skein, Phi, blake2s, nist5.
Only 1 or 2 miner threads/gpus are starting (out of 6) and after some long minutes (sometimes up to 10) the other gpus get full load. No errors are reported in miner log.

Thats a really big performance drop. You closed the issue on github, but it seems that the problem still exist.

[cidman]

how is this calculating profit?
yesterday it had me mining timetravel for 1.5 hours 0 blocks found that whole time so no profit at all
and by the time the block was found my share ratio was nothing
and today the same thing on phi
on a long block coin finding a block means anyone mining up to that point is making more profit
but when u switch miners there after the block has been found and move them b4 another that is a huge problem
ive actually been finding i make more profit benchmarking than when profit switching is running
9/10 nist5 pays out more than nemos miners current most profitable
essentially when round robin beats profit switching something is wrong

actually i think im going to just remove all long block algos from the miner and try that
essentially phi timetravel xevan and prolly skien
skien runs a bunch all the time and makes dust even with 10x 6 card rigs

[Lubrifiant]

I also have the issue with "Very long miner warming up time" as reported in https://github.com/nemosminer/NemosMiner-v2.4.1/issues/94 .

Alexis78 miner in nemosminer-23, but also polytimos and Alexis78Phi in nemosminer-241, have often this behavior on algo X17, Skein, Phi, blake2s, nist5.
Only 1 or 2 miner threads/gpus are starting (out of 6) and after some long minutes (sometimes up to 10) the other gpus get full load. No errors are reported in miner log.

Thats a really big performance drop. You closed the issue on github, but it seems that the problem still exist.

Same problem here
I lost 3 to 4 minutes sometimes when the miner switch.
Only 1 or 2 GPU works, and after many minutes others comes alive

[verado]

I also can report that ccminerKlaust is faster on Neoscrypt for me than PalginHSR.
6,75MH/s vs 6,48MH/s on 6x MSI 1070ti Armor with settings 70/+200/+650

[TeamNYK]

Does anyone have this working for Linux?

[primo1983]

link from whatsapp group miner names, to discuss ideas.
 https://chat.whatsapp.com/A9jrZSkJ0aW0Qbl0NAIOWY

[Lubrifiant]

To illustrate the "very long miner warming up time" on 2.4
exemple, 3 to 7 minutes, switching on blake2s
https://reho.st/self/8c5d4c0610c44a985c139fb8e22cf175ff5df858.jpg

[wcp1988]

Hi guys, I'm new here, any idea how can I add more minutes of benchmark time for X17 ?
Currently running 6x1080ti, benchmark stops at 103MH/s, it could've gone up to 120MH/s in version 2.3 when I let it run more than 10minutes.

edit start.bat change -Interval 60

default 60 = 60 seconds before checking miner hash rate you can change this to any number

eg:

-Interval 90
-Interval 120
-Interval 240

[cable_loco]

I also have the issue with "Very long miner warming up time" as reported in https://github.com/nemosminer/NemosMiner-v2.4.1/issues/94 .

Alexis78 miner in nemosminer-23, but also polytimos and Alexis78Phi in nemosminer-241, have often this behavior on algo X17, Skein, Phi, blake2s, nist5.
Only 1 or 2 miner threads/gpus are starting (out of 6) and after some long minutes (sometimes up to 10) the other gpus get full load. No errors are reported in miner log.

Thats a really big performance drop. You closed the issue on github, but it seems that the problem still exist.

Same problem here
I lost 3 to 4 minutes sometimes when the miner switch.
Only 1 or 2 GPU works, and after many minutes others comes alive

This can happen when the miner "default" intensity is to high, look at the miner log for the command line arguments, open a command prompt window, cd to the bin folder where the miner is located (ie: Bin\NVIDIA-Alexis78Phi) paste the command line from the miner log and see what intensity value is used. (ie: -i 19, etc)  and observe in afterburner how long it takes for all card to rev up, if takes to long, lower the intensity 1 point at time ( 19 -> 18...) until you can find the right intensity for your system. you can then edit the .ps1 miner file and add this setting.

Hope this not too confusing.

[Max3k]

Which ps1 files specifically is he editing and how is he editing them? (ps1 for each individual miner?)
Does anybody have a greater understanding how to "change the api ports" to achieve the same results?

Also decided to try with 2 cards, there seems to be the point is not that different cards behave differently on different algorithms, but the fact that every single map will process the various algorithms, which at launch was the most profitable. We run the first card (interval 15 minutes, not 24hr.bat), after 7.5 minutes, run the 2nd card with the same interval. Accordingly, at one point in time, 2 cards will process 2 different algorithms, since they are constantly changing... but, this is not accurate and horseradish knows what will come of it =))

In the file .ps1 does not need anything edit, just run the programs (.bat) from other folder, the client (miner) yourself determines the desired port.