Re: Updated Overview of Bitcointalk Signature-Ad Campaigns

[Mitchell]

bitmixer has same rate for full member up to legendary. Not that weird if you put in perspective

Care to explain your perspective?

Hey Mitchełł,

News about the actionCrypto signature campaign :

Removing now.

[1715053675]

1715053675

[1715053675]

1715053675

[1715053675]

1715053675

[1715053675]

1715053675

[1715053675]

1715053675

[1715053675]

1715053675

[picolo]

secondstrade.com raised payout rate and changed  the rule like below.
...

The same rate for Full Member and Senior? That's... weird.

Anyway, the OP has been updated.

bitmixer has same rate for full member up to legendary. Not that weird if you put in perspective

A legendary or Hero members usually post more interesting comments that are read more and have a bigger space available on his signature.

[RappelzReborn]

You should make TOP 3 on the top of that list if you ask me   Highest payout signature compaign
for now they are Bit-x & Bitmixer.io , not sure which is the third

[shorena]

-snip-
A legendary or Hero members usually post more interesting comments that are read more and have a bigger space available on his signature.

A Sr. Member has a significant larger Signature than a Full Member. I doubt the content is related to the rank.

You should make TOP 3 on the top of that list if you ask me   Highest payout signature compaign
for now they are Bit-x & Bitmixer.io , not sure which is the third

You shouldnt if you ask me. The payout is mostly depended of the number of posts and not everyone posts a crapton, some are more in the crapkilo section.

[sed]

secondstrade.com raised payout rate and changed  the rule like below.
...

The same rate for Full Member and Senior? That's... weird.

Anyway, the OP has been updated.

bitmixer has same rate for full member up to legendary. Not that weird if you put in perspective

A legendary or Hero members usually post more interesting comments that are read more and have a bigger space available on his signature.

Legendary doesn't increase sig size either.  I was surprised when some campaigns started paying more for legendary.

[Gronthaing]

^ Me too. But those members have been around longer. More people know them and they can be considered better advertisers because of that. Don't know if that is really how it goes though.

[uki]

FortuneJack last payment has been delayed for about a day now. I will update on how the situation progresses, as soon as there is any news.
Edit: the payments have been now made, everything is fine and back to normal.

[Quickseller]

CoinRoyale Sign Campaign (Thread)
Payment period: Weekly on Thursday at 4:00 PM PST
Minimum posts: 20 posts per week, at least half of which being in the gambling section, not including games and rounds
Payments: .04 BTC per week
Escrow: No
Miscellaneous: Only available to S/H/L, posts must be constructive to be counted, payment to be made to their account. It was suggested that payment be made directly to a BTC address as well as to use escrow.

[redsn0w]

I'd like to report MultiDice for not paying me for the Signature Campaign.

I was in his Signature Campaign for around 5 days and about an hour ago I received Negative Feedback by a complete garbage individual known as redsn0w who scammed a metric fuck ton of Escrowed Funds from the Signature Campaign he was escrowing...

After I received Negative Feedback MultiDice refused me to be in their Signature Campaign and also refused to pay me for all the posts I had made in those 5 days...

This is an absolute garbage way to run a Signature Campaign and basing Signature Entries on Trust is fucking retarded...

Everyone knows Bitcoin Talk is literally filled with trolls , liars , thieves , scammers , frauds , fuds , cheats , etc...

Basing it on trust is like trusting a dog to not chew up your slippers when you are gone...

Yes of course, first repay the varios loans and after you can "talk" whatever you want. Thanks for the attention,

redsn0w

[Quickseller]

I'd like to report MultiDice for not paying me for the Signature Campaign.

I was in his Signature Campaign for around 5 days and about an hour ago I received Negative Feedback by a complete garbage individual known as redsn0w who scammed a metric fuck ton of Escrowed Funds from the Signature Campaign he was escrowing...

After I received Negative Feedback MultiDice refused me to be in their Signature Campaign and also refused to pay me for all the posts I had made in those 5 days...

This is an absolute garbage way to run a Signature Campaign and basing Signature Entries on Trust is fucking retarded...

Everyone knows Bitcoin Talk is literally filled with trolls , liars , thieves , scammers , frauds , fuds , cheats , etc...

Basing it on trust is like trusting a dog to not chew up your slippers when you are gone...

Yes of course, first repay the varios loans and after you can "talk" whatever you want. Thanks for the attention,

redsn0w

how do you know this guy is an aly of suppa?

[redsn0w]

I'd like to report MultiDice for not paying me for the Signature Campaign.

I was in his Signature Campaign for around 5 days and about an hour ago I received Negative Feedback by a complete garbage individual known as redsn0w who scammed a metric fuck ton of Escrowed Funds from the Signature Campaign he was escrowing...

After I received Negative Feedback MultiDice refused me to be in their Signature Campaign and also refused to pay me for all the posts I had made in those 5 days...

This is an absolute garbage way to run a Signature Campaign and basing Signature Entries on Trust is fucking retarded...

Everyone knows Bitcoin Talk is literally filled with trolls , liars , thieves , scammers , frauds , fuds , cheats , etc...

Basing it on trust is like trusting a dog to not chew up your slippers when you are gone...

Yes of course, first repay the varios loans and after you can "talk" whatever you want. Thanks for the attention,

redsn0w

how do you know this guy is an aly of suppa?

Here we are off topic , send me a PM and I will give you all the posts (also smoothie confirmed that he is CrazyRabbi, suppa, etc...).

[erwin45hacked]

I'd like to report MultiDice for not paying me for the Signature Campaign.

I was in his Signature Campaign for around 5 days and about an hour ago I received Negative Feedback by a complete garbage individual known as redsn0w who scammed a metric fuck ton of Escrowed Funds from the Signature Campaign he was escrowing...

After I received Negative Feedback MultiDice refused me to be in their Signature Campaign and also refused to pay me for all the posts I had made in those 5 days...

This is an absolute garbage way to run a Signature Campaign and basing Signature Entries on Trust is fucking retarded...

Everyone knows Bitcoin Talk is literally filled with trolls , liars , thieves , scammers , frauds , fuds , cheats , etc...

Basing it on trust is like trusting a dog to not chew up your slippers when you are gone...

Yes of course, first repay the varios loans and after you can "talk" whatever you want. Thanks for the attention,

redsn0w

My loans have nothing to do with it or you mother fucker  

How about you pay the huge amount of escrow you owe you sack of shit fuck head  

Signature Campaign Conditions:

- 25 posts minimum per week ( 5 posts must be in gambling section ).
- Your Payment will be deposited into your MultiDice Bitcoin account. It can be withdrawn immediately without any hidden terms.
- All post have to be in English to be counted.
- Posts in the signature campaign or giveaway threads will not be counted.
- No negative trust, NO other advertisements allowed.
- Constant low quality posts will be kicked off the campaign.
- Do not post the majority of your posts in a few days, post consistently.
- You can earn more by adding your MultiDice referral link to the signature.
- The appropriate signature must be worn at all times, failure to do so will result in denial of payment.
- If in case of activity change you just need to change the signature and you will be paid at the new rate.
- If you get banned or haven't posted required amount of posts in any week we reserve the right to remove you from the campaign.
- We reserve the right to remove campaigners if not seen to be productive for our campaign.
- Spam, picture, bump, +1, LOL posts will not be counted.
- Once Payment received please consider leaving feedback. Thank you.

You got the red trust

In Multidice opinion, a red trust account isnt productive for the campaign therefore you were terminated

PS : bolded part done by me

[Coef]

...nearly everyone on the forum has some Negative Trust Rating now... 

It is far from that. The majority of users have a neutral trust, and only a small portion has a positive or negative trust score.

[tspacepilot]

...nearly everyone on the forum has some Negative Trust Rating now... 

It is far from that. The majority of users have a neutral trust, and only a small portion has a positive or negative trust score.

Many people have some negative trust from someone.  But it's whether or not that person is in default trust which matters (in terms sig campaigns, in my experience).

[Stargazer]

That is why the campaign manager should check the trust comment and decide. You can easily see that some of the negative ratings users have are given in retaliation or by people with extremely high negative trust.
ArmoredDoge has been given negative trust by a lot of people and if he is really CrazyRabbi it's obvious he made a new account to be able to join campaigns.

[Quickseller]

That is why the campaign manager should check the trust comment and decide. You can easily see that some of the negative ratings users have are given in retaliation or by people with extremely high negative trust.
ArmoredDoge has been given negative trust by a lot of people and if he is really CrazyRabbi it's obvious he made a new account to be able to join campaigns.

So? None of my negative trust even involves the people who gave the negative trust to me. How is that fair at all?

If you have negative trust then it will reflect poorly on the people who are advertising for. They do not want their brand/website associated with scammers.

You are not allowed to give negative trust if you've never interacted or dealt with the person you are giving negative trust to...

This is not true. The fact that a small number of people are in the default trust network means that only a small number of people can have any actual impact on others' trust score, and as a result when someone scams someone (or many people) in the default trust network should give negative trust to a scammer.

It's a forum rule that you are not allowed to give negative trust to someone you've never traded with.

You are just repeating yourself now. The trust system is not moderated.

That is why the campaign manager should check the trust comment and decide. You can easily see that some of the negative ratings users have are given in retaliation or by people with extremely high negative trust.
ArmoredDoge has been given negative trust by a lot of people and if he is really CrazyRabbi it's obvious he made a new account to be able to join campaigns.

You should really only consider negative trust from people who in the default trust network when deciding if they will be allowed to participate in a signature campaign. And when declining for negative trust you should generally only do so if they have a "Warning: Trade with extreme caution" tag. (although this is ultimately up to the person paying for the advertising)

[suchmoon]

That is why the campaign manager should check the trust comment and decide. You can easily see that some of the negative ratings users have are given in retaliation or by people with extremely high negative trust.
ArmoredDoge has been given negative trust by a lot of people and if he is really CrazyRabbi it's obvious he made a new account to be able to join campaigns.

So? None of my negative trust even involves the people who gave the negative trust to me. How is that fair at all?

You are not allowed to give negative trust if you've never interacted or dealt with the person you are giving negative trust to...

It's a forum rule that you are not allowed to give negative trust to someone you've never traded with.

Are you saying you can scam people who are not in default trust and trusted members "are not allowed" to color you red? Makes no sense at all.

For someone who owes 40 BTC you're incredibly concerned about Jr. sig campaign dust.

[stellar69]

Just a suggestion, can you please arrange the table in an order where monthly and weekly campaigns are grouped together?  The table will become a lot easier to read that way.

[croato]

Is there working and paying signature campaign for ppl who dont post much?

[u9y42]

Is there working and paying signature campaign for ppl who dont post much?

There are such signature campaigns - just not for Members, at the moment. It seems the least you need to post to reach the minimum mandatory post count is 80 posts a month, or 20 per week, for the campaigns: Secondstrade.com, 777Coin, and Bitin.io. I haven't been following these campaigns very closely however, and have no idea whether they are still accepting Member level users, or what conditions need be met for entry - you would need to go into their respective threads (the links for them being in the OP) to know that much.

EDIT: however, and looking better at it, considering those campaigns don't really pay a lot, you might be better served joining something like MultiDice. They require a few more posts a week, 25, but the pay rate for Members seems higher.