Re: Updated Overview of Bitcointalk Signature-Ad Campaigns

[Valanor]

-snip-

well there are some people making maybe 1btc weekly on bitx campaing as no limit on it well is the best payout campaing running for sure

Um...   how many posts does someone have to make for that? That would translate to a fulltime income (on the lower end of incomes) even in most developed countries. I thought cloudthink pays best, though its most likely scam, followed after dadice...

There are people who get ~0.3BTC+/week but certainly not 1BTC/week unless they have 3-4 alts and are spamming.

Staff need to make 715 posts, Legendary & Hero Members need to make 770 posts, Senior Members need to make 910 posts and Full Members need to make 1250 posts.

You must no more than 0.2BTC / week for Bit-X 200post is very high if you can make constructive post, but if you higher than 200post is totally scamer

[Amadues]

Thank you for your list of signature-ad campaigns, it's very useful and there is a lot of info about this nice way to earn some btc for "free".
thank you again and keep update the topic !  

[azguard]

-snip-

well there are some people making maybe 1btc weekly on bitx campaing as no limit on it well is the best payout campaing running for sure

Um...  how many posts does someone have to make for that? That would translate to a fulltime income (on the lower end of incomes) even in most developed countries. I thought cloudthink pays best, though its most likely scam, followed after dadice...

There are people who get ~0.3BTC+/week but certainly not 1BTC/week unless they have 3-4 alts and are spamming.

Staff need to make 715 posts, Legendary & Hero Members need to make 770 posts, Senior Members need to make 910 posts and Full Members need to make 1250 posts.

Now is possible with single account if we count avatar camp together in some avatar camp legendary gets 0.4 month so for 0.6 for legendary its no big deal if we count that for post they get 0.0015 then they have to make 400 that is ok with around 15 post a day witch is doable.

[SebastianJu]

-snip-

well there are some people making maybe 1btc weekly on bitx campaing as no limit on it well is the best payout campaing running for sure

Um...  how many posts does someone have to make for that? That would translate to a fulltime income (on the lower end of incomes) even in most developed countries. I thought cloudthink pays best, though its most likely scam, followed after dadice...

There are people who get ~0.3BTC+/week but certainly not 1BTC/week unless they have 3-4 alts and are spamming.

Staff need to make 715 posts, Legendary & Hero Members need to make 770 posts, Senior Members need to make 910 posts and Full Members need to make 1250 posts.

Now is possible with single account if we count avatar camp together in some avatar camp legendary gets 0.4 month so for 0.6 for legendary its no big deal if we count that for post they get 0.0015 then they have to make 400 that is ok with around 15 post a day witch is doable.

Its about 1BTC per week, not per month!

[u9y42]

A new signature campaign started today:

FastBets (Thread)
Payment period: Monthly
Minimum posts: 65 posts for L/H/S/F/M; 80 for J/N
Payments: H/L: 0.08BTC per month; S/F: 0.04BTC per month; M: 0.02BTC per month; J: 0.01BTC per month;
Escrow: No.
Miscellaneous: Only posts in English are counted. Participants will receive early access to new games, as well as have a say on new game development.

Code:

[b]FastBets[/b] ([url=https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1088570]Thread[/url])
[i]Payment period:[/i] Monthly
[i]Minimum posts:[/i] 65 posts for L/H/S/F/M; 80 for J/N
[i]Payments:[/i] H/L: 0.08[BTC] per month; S/F: 0.04[BTC] per month; M: 0.02[BTC] per month; J: 0.01[BTC] per month; 
[u][i]Escrow[/i][/u]: No.
[i]Miscellaneous:[/i] Only posts in English are counted. Participants will receive early access to new games, as well as have a say on new game development.

A

|

FastBets

|

fixed/monthly

|

0.08

|

0.08

|

0.04

|

0.04

|

0.02

|

0.01

|

x

|

65-80/m

|

x

|

N

|

Code:

[tr]
[td][i][color=green]A[/color][/i][/td][td]|[/td]
[td][url=https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1088570]FastBets[/url][/td][td]|[/td]
[td]fixed/monthly[/td][td]|[/td]
[td]0.08[/td][td]|[/td]
[td]0.08[/td][td]|[/td]
[td]0.04[/td][td]|[/td]
[td]0.04[/td][td]|[/td]
[td]0.02[/td][td]|[/td]
[td]0.01[/td][td]|[/td]
[td]x[/td][td]|[/td]
[td]65-80/m[/td][td]|[/td]
[td]x[/td][td]|[/td]
[td]N[/td][td]|[/td]
[/tr]

Too bad that payments are rather low, they aren't inclined to use escrow (especially considering this is a monthly campaign), and the required post count per month is somewhat high.

EDIT: disregard this post - FastBets have updated their signature campaign. Please see the following post instead: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=615953.msg11626837#msg11626837.

[Harry Hood]

64 Blocks campaign hasn't paid this week. There hasn't been any warning or notification from the campaign manager or escrow manager regarding the hold up. I think you should put this campaign in the Payment Not Yet Confirmed category as a warning to those seeking a campaign. They should stay away from 64 Blocks until those people get it sorted out.

[tspacepilot]

A new signature campaign started today:

[snip]

Too bad that payments are rather low, they aren't inclined to use escrow (especially considering this is a monthly campaign), and the required post count per month is somewhat high.

Not wanting to use escrow is big red flag for me.  I hope that they find themselves suprised at how few people are willing to sign up without funds in escrow---after up/down and others, people really should't add a paid signature that doesn't have funds set aside with a third party to ensure payment.

[u9y42]

Not wanting to use escrow is big red flag for me.  I hope that they find themselves suprised at how few people are willing to sign up without funds in escrow---after up/down and others, people really should't add a paid signature that doesn't have funds set aside with a third party to ensure payment.

It's especially concerning when the campaigns have month long periods, and still refuse to use escrow. Fortunately, FastBets seems to be considering changing the campaign to have weekly periods instead, and moving to pay per post, instead of fixed pay (so don't worry about updating the OP for now, Mitchełł ) - at least, if something goes wrong, people won't have wasted too much time with it all.

But ultimately, I think the main reason they may end up not having a lot of participants is the pay rate is quite low, compared to other campaigns. If that wasn't the case, a lot of participants would still join, I'm afraid.

[newIndia]

New campaign here...

Campaign Name (100bit.co.in)
Payment period: Bi-Weekly
Minimum posts: 50
Payments: S, H, L: 0.1BTC per two week 
Escrow: No
Miscellaneous: None

This campaign is already full. Please update accordingly when added to the OP.

[1211]

Thank you for this list, very usefull.

[tspacepilot]

But ultimately, I think the main reason they may end up not having a lot of participants is the pay rate is quite low, compared to other campaigns. If that wasn't the case, a lot of participants would still join, I'm afraid.

You're probably right, unfortunately.  I've seen it quite often that greed trumps common-sense on these forums.  Alas.

[mikaljan]

Thanks for taking over the task of keeping the overview up to date!

[u9y42]

FastBets have updated their signature campaign; these are the new terms:

FastBets (Thread)
Payment period: Weekly
Minimum posts: 10 posts per Week
Payments: H/L: 0.0012BTC per post; S: 0.001BTC per post; F: 0.0006BTC per post; M: 0.0004BTC per post; J: 0.0002BTC per post;
Escrow: No.
Miscellaneous: Only posts in English are counted. Participants will receive early access to new games, as well as have a say on new game development. Members with negative trust can still join but receive only 50% of the rates.

Code:

[b]FastBets[/b] ([url=https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1088570]Thread[/url])
[i]Payment period:[/i] Weekly
[i]Minimum posts:[/i] 10 posts per Week
[i]Payments:[/i] H/L: 0.0012[BTC] per post; S: 0.001[BTC] per post; F: 0.0006[BTC] per post; M: 0.0004[BTC] per post; J: 0.0002[BTC] per post; 
[u][i]Escrow[/i][/u]: No.
[i]Miscellaneous:[/i] Only posts in English are counted. Participants will receive early access to new games, as well as have a say on new game development. Members with negative trust can still join but receive only 50% of the rates.

A

|

FastBets

|

post/weekly

|

0.0012

|

0.0012

|

0.001

|

0.0006

|

0.0004

|

0.0002

|

x

|

10/w

|

100/w

|

N

|

Code:

[tr]
[td][i][color=green]A[/color][/i][/td][td]|[/td]
[td][url=https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1088570]FastBets[/url][/td][td]|[/td]
[td]post/weekly[/td][td]|[/td]
[td]0.0012[/td][td]|[/td]
[td]0.0012[/td][td]|[/td]
[td]0.001[/td][td]|[/td]
[td]0.0006[/td][td]|[/td]
[td]0.0004[/td][td]|[/td]
[td]0.0002[/td][td]|[/td]
[td]x[/td][td]|[/td]
[td]10/w[/td][td]|[/td]
[td]100/w[/td][td]|[/td]
[td]N[/td][td]|[/td]
[/tr]

EDIT: Member and Full Member rates were lowered by FastBets.

[tspacepilot]

@Michett Maybe it'd be a good idea to put campaigns that don't use escrow in a special color on the table.  Just a suggestion.

[SmartIphone]

Just heard for Signature Campaings, and joined YoBit, it was the first on the list so lets see how it goes.

[Don007]

Just heard for Signature Campaings, and joined YoBit, it was the first on the list so lets see how it goes.

To me YoBit looks like a good signature campaign for Jr.Members. Sure, it is not much that you will earn (per post / in total), but atleast it is something. It might be actually more lucrative to actively participate on this forum instead of wasting time on a faucet or so. Goodluck with your new signature campaign! Remember, don't post spam; once you've ruined your period in a signature campaign you might get a negative feedback in return, which hinders you to join better signature campaigns later on.

[sgk]

Da Dice also have a 'Fixed Pay' campaign now, in addition to the 'Pay Per Post' they're running.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1078943.0

That should be added to OP.

[trinaldao]

helllo all i want to ask
are member with 1 negative feedback ( no from default trust) can use for signature campaign

[Quickseller]

helllo all i want to ask
are member with 1 negative feedback ( no from default trust) can use for signature campaign

Generally speaking, negative ratings from people not in the default trust network are not taken into consideration when determining eligibility for campaigns, however you should check with individual campaigns and their rules for more specific rules for each campaign

[trinaldao]

helllo all i want to ask
are member with 1 negative feedback ( no from default trust) can use for signature campaign

Generally speaking, negative ratings from people not in the default trust network are not taken into consideration when determining eligibility for campaigns, however you should check with individual campaigns and their rules for more specific rules for each campaign

Thank's
I ceck'ed some signature and
I think negative feedback from not default list is can join and roll sign campaign