Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion

[Walsoraj]

What's even more shocking is the level of support above $215 (unless those are fake buy walls of course :p).

Aren't walls always fake? If I've learned anything from my years in bitcoins, it's that all walls everywhere are fake.  

Walls are simultaneously fake and real, until observed. Then they become one or the other, depending on the testing conditions.

This is called Quantum Speculation. It's science, bro.

[1715139806]

1715139806

[1715139806]

1715139806

[1715139806]

1715139806

[1715139806]

1715139806

[1715139806]

1715139806

[spooderman]

wow such liquid

ATH very fast

many bid depth

wow

[mccorvic]

What's even more shocking is the level of support above $215 (unless those are fake buy walls of course :p).

Aren't walls always fake? If I've learned anything from my years in bitcoins, it's that all walls everywhere are fake.  

Walls are simultaneously fake and real, until observed. Then they become one or the other, depending on the testing conditions.

This is called Quantum Speculation. It's science, bro.

Dude like...whoaa man. Like....whoa.

[Walsoraj]

What's even more shocking is the level of support above $215 (unless those are fake buy walls of course :p).

Aren't walls always fake? If I've learned anything from my years in bitcoins, it's that all walls everywhere are fake.  

Walls are simultaneously fake and real, until observed. Then they become one or the other, depending on the testing conditions.

This is called Quantum Speculation. It's science, bro.

Dude like...whoaa man. Like....whoa.

I'm high w/ a bag of popcorn, watching several tickers.

[notme]

What's even more shocking is the level of support above $215 (unless those are fake buy walls of course :p).

Aren't walls always fake? If I've learned anything from my years in bitcoins, it's that all walls everywhere are fake.  

Walls are simultaneously fake and real, until observed. Then they become one or the other, depending on the testing conditions.

This is called Quantum Speculation. It's science, bro.

Dude like...whoaa man. Like....whoa.

I'm high w/ a bag of popcorn, watching several tickers.

popcorn.... that's what I'm missing

[SheHadMANHands]

What's even more shocking is the level of support above $215 (unless those are fake buy walls of course :p).

Aren't walls always fake? If I've learned anything from my years in bitcoins, it's that all walls everywhere are fake.  

Walls are simultaneously fake and real, until observed. Then they become one or the other, depending on the testing conditions.

This is called Quantum Speculation. It's science, bro.

wow, just blew my mind.

Please change thread title to "Super-positioned Wall Observer..."

[Richy_T]

Why aren't we at 250 already? This is so lame...

[SheHadMANHands]

Why aren't we at 250 already? This is so lame...

Right?  So sick of 240..  (Gox)

[mah87]

Why aren't we at 250 already? This is so lame...

Bitcoin is compromised. Crash incoming. Not kidding. End is near.

http://arxiv.org/abs/1311.0243v1

[TERA]

What's even more shocking is the level of support above $215 (unless those are fake buy walls of course :p).

Aren't walls always fake? If I've learned anything from my years in bitcoins, it's that all walls everywhere are fake.  

Walls are simultaneously fake and real, until observed. Then they become one or the other, depending on the testing conditions.

This is called Quantum Speculation. It's science, bro.

Schrödinger's wall.

Now can you explain again how and why we are going to see single digits again?

[tbcoin]

Why aren't we at 250 already? This is so lame...

Bitcoin is compromised. Crash incoming. Not kidding. End is near.

http://arxiv.org/abs/1311.0243v1

old news and bullshit...

[mccorvic]

Why aren't we at 250 already? This is so lame...

Bitcoin is compromised. Crash incoming. Not kidding. End is near.

http://arxiv.org/abs/1311.0243v1

old news and bullshit...

Bless his little, feeble heart for trying?

[mah87]

Why aren't we at 250 already? This is so lame...

Bitcoin is compromised. Crash incoming. Not kidding. End is near.

http://arxiv.org/abs/1311.0243v1

old news and bullshit...

Just found that. I'm not able to evaluate this. Any authoritative source to discuss this paper ?

[justusranvier]

From #bitcoin-dev:

[02:22:57] <phantomcircuit> and finally and i suspect most significantly they dont answer the question of what happens when two selfish pools are operating at roughly equivalent hashing rates
[02:22:59] <HaltingState> its ripple's security model
[02:23:02] <sipa> but we should aim for a system that doesn't need such assumptions to be secure
[02:23:07] <phantomcircuit> i suspect that they both lose out in the end
[02:23:09] <HaltingState> "nobody will ever try attacking the system as it decreases the long term value" <-- ripple ahaha
[02:23:52] ericmuyser [~ericmuyse@173.180.1.169] has quit IRC: Ping timeout: 268 seconds
[02:24:18] <phantomcircuit> sipa, it's the combination of all of them that has the largest impact
[02:24:27] <phantomcircuit> by itself that's not a significant consideration
[02:24:42] <phantomcircuit> but if they tried and only were able to increase their revenues 25%
[02:24:46] <phantomcircuit> well that's just pointless
[02:24:53] independent [~default@201.243.48.51] has joined #bitcoin-dev
[02:25:01] independent [~default@201.243.48.51] has quit IRC: K-Lined
[02:25:17] <HaltingState> if one mining pool increases revenue against another; does not affect bitcoin; mining is just unfair now, but security is same and does not affect anyone except miners
[02:26:26] <@gmaxwell> phantomcircuit: not just a little more variance, a LOT, this was elu's almost instant comment on the subject.
[02:29:57] <phantomcircuit> gmaxwell, yeah i assumed as much but wasn't sure
[02:30:18] <phantomcircuit> either way it's pretty clear to me that their conclusion is wrong
[02:31:52] <@gmaxwell> phantomcircuit: when successful it makes you get more blocks by orphaning the other guys more, but you get less blocks (because you get orphaned more too) so you don't really enjoy _gains_ until the difficulty drops.
[02:33:09] oPen_syLar [~newos@unaffiliated/open-sylar/x-7698563] has quit IRC: Quit: Lost terminal
[02:34:41] <phantomcircuit> gmaxwell, ah i hadn't thought of that
[02:34:50] <phantomcircuit> im sure it's much easier to just ddos everybody :/

[tbcoin]

Why aren't we at 250 already? This is so lame...

Bitcoin is compromised. Crash incoming. Not kidding. End is near.

http://arxiv.org/abs/1311.0243v1

old news and bullshit...

Just found that. I'm not able to evaluate this. Any authoritative source to discuss this paper ?

more info https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=324413.0

[spooderman]

Why aren't we at 250 already? This is so lame...

Bitcoin is compromised. Crash incoming. Not kidding. End is near.

http://arxiv.org/abs/1311.0243v1

old news and bullshit...

lazy troll is lazy

[Walsoraj]

What's even more shocking is the level of support above $215 (unless those are fake buy walls of course :p).

Aren't walls always fake? If I've learned anything from my years in bitcoins, it's that all walls everywhere are fake.  

Walls are simultaneously fake and real, until observed. Then they become one or the other, depending on the testing conditions.

This is called Quantum Speculation. It's science, bro.

Schrödinger's wall.

Now can you explain again how and why we are going to see single digits again?

Well, it's simple really. Lots of traders will quickly sell lots of coins.

*edit*

And plz just stfu and leave me alone. I'm high and enjoying the show. You should too.

[SheHadMANHands]

Wow, they're everywhere...

Forget everything you thought you knew about trading.  Or don't.  Or do both, at the same time...   

[jojo69]

yawn

[JimboToronto]

I predict a BIG CRASH IN 24hours

Weak troll-sauce, stfu.

You need to explain why, in exquisite detail with infallible logic.

Otherwise, attention = undeserving.

You tell him.

At least your trolls are semi-amusing.

Silly pup. Kids nowadays.

I'm driven to drink.