Walsoraj
|
|
November 05, 2013, 02:20:39 AM |
|
What's even more shocking is the level of support above $215 (unless those are fake buy walls of course :p).
Aren't walls always fake? If I've learned anything from my years in bitcoins, it's that all walls everywhere are fake. Walls are simultaneously fake and real, until observed. Then they become one or the other, depending on the testing conditions. This is called Quantum Speculation. It's science, bro.
|
|
|
|
spooderman
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1652
Merit: 1029
|
|
November 05, 2013, 02:23:49 AM |
|
wow such liquid
ATH very fast
many bid depth
wow
|
|
|
|
mccorvic
|
|
November 05, 2013, 02:25:45 AM |
|
What's even more shocking is the level of support above $215 (unless those are fake buy walls of course :p).
Aren't walls always fake? If I've learned anything from my years in bitcoins, it's that all walls everywhere are fake. Walls are simultaneously fake and real, until observed. Then they become one or the other, depending on the testing conditions. This is called Quantum Speculation. It's science, bro. Dude like...whoaa man. Like....whoa.
|
|
|
|
Walsoraj
|
|
November 05, 2013, 02:27:25 AM |
|
What's even more shocking is the level of support above $215 (unless those are fake buy walls of course :p).
Aren't walls always fake? If I've learned anything from my years in bitcoins, it's that all walls everywhere are fake. Walls are simultaneously fake and real, until observed. Then they become one or the other, depending on the testing conditions. This is called Quantum Speculation. It's science, bro. Dude like...whoaa man. Like....whoa. I'm high w/ a bag of popcorn, watching several tickers.
|
|
|
|
notme
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1002
|
|
November 05, 2013, 02:30:29 AM |
|
What's even more shocking is the level of support above $215 (unless those are fake buy walls of course :p).
Aren't walls always fake? If I've learned anything from my years in bitcoins, it's that all walls everywhere are fake. Walls are simultaneously fake and real, until observed. Then they become one or the other, depending on the testing conditions. This is called Quantum Speculation. It's science, bro. Dude like...whoaa man. Like....whoa. I'm high w/ a bag of popcorn, watching several tickers. popcorn.... that's what I'm missing
|
|
|
|
SheHadMANHands
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1168
Merit: 1000
|
|
November 05, 2013, 02:31:11 AM |
|
What's even more shocking is the level of support above $215 (unless those are fake buy walls of course :p).
Aren't walls always fake? If I've learned anything from my years in bitcoins, it's that all walls everywhere are fake. Walls are simultaneously fake and real, until observed. Then they become one or the other, depending on the testing conditions. This is called Quantum Speculation. It's science, bro. wow, just blew my mind. Please change thread title to "Super-positioned Wall Observer..."
|
|
|
|
Richy_T
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2604
Merit: 2321
1RichyTrEwPYjZSeAYxeiFBNnKC9UjC5k
|
|
November 05, 2013, 02:32:45 AM |
|
Why aren't we at 250 already? This is so lame...
|
|
|
|
SheHadMANHands
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1168
Merit: 1000
|
|
November 05, 2013, 02:33:47 AM |
|
Why aren't we at 250 already? This is so lame...
Right? So sick of 240.. (Gox)
|
|
|
|
mah87
Donator
Hero Member
Offline
Activity: 756
Merit: 500
-Bitcoin & Ripple-
|
|
November 05, 2013, 02:34:14 AM |
|
Why aren't we at 250 already? This is so lame...
Bitcoin is compromised. Crash incoming. Not kidding. End is near. http://arxiv.org/abs/1311.0243v1
|
|
|
|
TERA
|
|
November 05, 2013, 02:35:40 AM |
|
What's even more shocking is the level of support above $215 (unless those are fake buy walls of course :p).
Aren't walls always fake? If I've learned anything from my years in bitcoins, it's that all walls everywhere are fake. Walls are simultaneously fake and real, until observed. Then they become one or the other, depending on the testing conditions. This is called Quantum Speculation. It's science, bro. Schrödinger's wall. Now can you explain again how and why we are going to see single digits again?
|
|
|
|
tbcoin
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1022
Merit: 1000
|
|
November 05, 2013, 02:36:26 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
mccorvic
|
|
November 05, 2013, 02:38:15 AM |
|
Bless his little, feeble heart for trying?
|
|
|
|
mah87
Donator
Hero Member
Offline
Activity: 756
Merit: 500
-Bitcoin & Ripple-
|
|
November 05, 2013, 02:41:15 AM |
|
Just found that. I'm not able to evaluate this. Any authoritative source to discuss this paper ?
|
|
|
|
justusranvier
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1013
|
|
November 05, 2013, 02:41:55 AM |
|
From #bitcoin-dev: [02:22:57] <phantomcircuit> and finally and i suspect most significantly they dont answer the question of what happens when two selfish pools are operating at roughly equivalent hashing rates [02:22:59] <HaltingState> its ripple's security model [02:23:02] <sipa> but we should aim for a system that doesn't need such assumptions to be secure [02:23:07] <phantomcircuit> i suspect that they both lose out in the end [02:23:09] <HaltingState> "nobody will ever try attacking the system as it decreases the long term value" <-- ripple ahaha [02:23:52] ericmuyser [~ericmuyse@173.180.1.169] has quit IRC: Ping timeout: 268 seconds [02:24:18] <phantomcircuit> sipa, it's the combination of all of them that has the largest impact [02:24:27] <phantomcircuit> by itself that's not a significant consideration [02:24:42] <phantomcircuit> but if they tried and only were able to increase their revenues 25% [02:24:46] <phantomcircuit> well that's just pointless [02:24:53] independent [~default@201.243.48.51] has joined #bitcoin-dev [02:25:01] independent [~default@201.243.48.51] has quit IRC: K-Lined [02:25:17] <HaltingState> if one mining pool increases revenue against another; does not affect bitcoin; mining is just unfair now, but security is same and does not affect anyone except miners [02:26:26] <@gmaxwell> phantomcircuit: not just a little more variance, a LOT, this was elu's almost instant comment on the subject. [02:29:57] <phantomcircuit> gmaxwell, yeah i assumed as much but wasn't sure [02:30:18] <phantomcircuit> either way it's pretty clear to me that their conclusion is wrong [02:31:52] <@gmaxwell> phantomcircuit: when successful it makes you get more blocks by orphaning the other guys more, but you get less blocks (because you get orphaned more too) so you don't really enjoy _gains_ until the difficulty drops.[02:33:09] oPen_syLar [~newos@unaffiliated/open-sylar/x-7698563] has quit IRC: Quit: Lost terminal [02:34:41] <phantomcircuit> gmaxwell, ah i hadn't thought of that [02:34:50] <phantomcircuit> im sure it's much easier to just ddos everybody :/
|
|
|
|
|
spooderman
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1652
Merit: 1029
|
|
November 05, 2013, 02:49:36 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
Walsoraj
|
|
November 05, 2013, 02:50:04 AM |
|
What's even more shocking is the level of support above $215 (unless those are fake buy walls of course :p).
Aren't walls always fake? If I've learned anything from my years in bitcoins, it's that all walls everywhere are fake. Walls are simultaneously fake and real, until observed. Then they become one or the other, depending on the testing conditions. This is called Quantum Speculation. It's science, bro. Schrödinger's wall. Now can you explain again how and why we are going to see single digits again? Well, it's simple really. Lots of traders will quickly sell lots of coins. *edit* And plz just stfu and leave me alone. I'm high and enjoying the show. You should too.
|
|
|
|
SheHadMANHands
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1168
Merit: 1000
|
|
November 05, 2013, 02:53:56 AM |
|
Wow, they're everywhere... Forget everything you thought you knew about trading. Or don't. Or do both, at the same time...
|
|
|
|
jojo69
Legendary
Online
Activity: 3346
Merit: 4636
diamond-handed zealot
|
|
November 05, 2013, 03:14:04 AM |
|
yawn
|
|
|
|
JimboToronto
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4186
Merit: 4865
You're never too old to think young.
|
|
November 05, 2013, 03:17:11 AM |
|
I predict a BIG CRASH IN 24hours
Weak troll-sauce, stfu. You need to explain why, in exquisite detail with infallible logic. Otherwise, attention = undeserving. You tell him. At least your trolls are semi-amusing. Silly pup. Kids nowadays. I'm driven to drink.
|
|
|
|
|