Bitcoin Forum
May 14, 2024, 12:03:07 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Poll
Question: What happens first:
New ATH - 43 (69.4%)
<$60,000 - 19 (30.6%)
Total Voters: 62

Pages: « 1 ... 28697 28698 28699 28700 28701 28702 28703 28704 28705 28706 28707 28708 28709 28710 28711 28712 28713 28714 28715 28716 28717 28718 28719 28720 28721 28722 28723 28724 28725 28726 28727 28728 28729 28730 28731 28732 28733 28734 28735 28736 28737 28738 28739 28740 28741 28742 28743 28744 28745 28746 [28747] 28748 28749 28750 28751 28752 28753 28754 28755 28756 28757 28758 28759 28760 28761 28762 28763 28764 28765 28766 28767 28768 28769 28770 28771 28772 28773 28774 28775 28776 28777 28778 28779 28780 28781 28782 28783 28784 28785 28786 28787 28788 28789 28790 28791 28792 28793 28794 28795 28796 28797 ... 33348 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion  (Read 26383004 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic. (174 posts by 3 users with 9 merit deleted.)
Richy_T
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2436
Merit: 2121


1RichyTrEwPYjZSeAYxeiFBNnKC9UjC5k


View Profile
May 28, 2021, 04:54:29 PM

This is what I do... I will write only hints about what I’m writing and I will write only encoded details which only I can understand. For example for a password I may write few characters from start and end. So even if someone gets access to my notes they will understand nothing.

Use a proper password manager. It will store all that shit encrypted.
1715688187
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715688187

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715688187
Reply with quote  #2

1715688187
Report to moderator
There are several different types of Bitcoin clients. The most secure are full nodes like Bitcoin Core, which will follow the rules of the network no matter what miners do. Even if every miner decided to create 1000 bitcoins per block, full nodes would stick to the rules and reject those blocks.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1715688187
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715688187

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715688187
Reply with quote  #2

1715688187
Report to moderator
1715688187
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715688187

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715688187
Reply with quote  #2

1715688187
Report to moderator
1715688187
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715688187

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715688187
Reply with quote  #2

1715688187
Report to moderator
ChartBuddy
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 2170
Merit: 1776


1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ


View Profile
May 28, 2021, 05:01:26 PM


Explanation
Biodom
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3752
Merit: 3874



View Profile
May 28, 2021, 05:08:16 PM
Merited by JayJuanGee (1)

This is what I do... I will write only hints about what I’m writing and I will write only encoded details which only I can understand. For example for a password I may write few characters from start and end. So even if someone gets access to my notes they will understand nothing.

That's exactly what I did for one account...and then I did not use it for a few years...and then when i looked at my notes I could not remember what I meant.
The brain cell that had this info died or something like that. No clue, complete blank. A few days of intense thinking-still nothing. Luckily, I found all notes associated with time when I worked on that account and some OTHER password gave me a hint, so I was able to solve the problem.

Bottom line-if you think now that your hint would be with you with perfect recall for half a decade or longer, don't.
As Richy_T said-use password manager.
Gyrsur
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2856
Merit: 1520


Bitcoin Legal Tender Countries: 2 of 206


View Profile WWW
May 28, 2021, 05:18:39 PM
Last edit: May 28, 2021, 05:29:15 PM by Gyrsur

This is what I do... I will write only hints about what I’m writing and I will write only encoded details which only I can understand. For example for a password I may write few characters from start and end. So even if someone gets access to my notes they will understand nothing.

That's exactly what I did for one account...and then I did not use it for a few years...and then when i looked at my notes I could not remember what I meant.
The brain cell that had this info died or something like that. No clue, complete blank. A few days of intense thinking-still nothing. Luckily, I found all notes associated with time when I worked on that account and some OTHER password gave me a hint, so I was able to solve the problem.

Bottom line-if you think now that your hint would be with you with perfect recall for half a decade or longer, don't.
As Richy_T said-use password manager.

my experience too but not so hard like Biodom. back to work after a 3 week vacation in Brazil I don't remember the passwords of the admin accounts. terrible because I was the f***ing BOFH in this small company years ago.  Grin
OutOfMemory
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1540
Merit: 3016


Man who stares at charts


View Profile
May 28, 2021, 05:47:13 PM

Since it's shortly before EOM i bought a little of this dip  Cool
It's going on and on and on  Grin
Sayeds56
Copper Member
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1288
Merit: 713


Eloncoin.org - Mars, here we come!


View Profile
May 28, 2021, 05:54:03 PM

Since it's shortly before EOM i bought a little of this dip  Cool
It's going on and on and on  Grin

ChartBuddy
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 2170
Merit: 1776


1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ


View Profile
May 28, 2021, 06:01:34 PM


Explanation
LoyceV
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3304
Merit: 16655


Thick-Skinned Gang Leader and Golden Feather 2021


View Profile WWW
May 28, 2021, 06:09:55 PM
Merited by Torque (1), UnDerDoG81 (1)

Bank of Japan governor slams Bitcoin, calls BTC a speculative asset
The real question is: why do they feel the need to even mention Bitcoin? Baseball cards are a speculative asset, but you don't see any banker mentioning them. The fact that they feel the need to tell me Bitcoin is bad, makes me feel the exact opposite.
Torque
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3556
Merit: 5041



View Profile
May 28, 2021, 06:26:01 PM

Bank of Japan governor slams Bitcoin, calls BTC a speculative asset
The real question is: why do they feel the need to even mention Bitcoin? Baseball cards are a speculative asset, but you don't see any banker mentioning them. The fact that they feel the need to tell me Bitcoin is bad, makes me feel the exact opposite.

Funny how after a decade of this behavior along with all the MSM bashing, the Average Joes still haven't figured this out.  Wink
Torque
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3556
Merit: 5041



View Profile
May 28, 2021, 06:34:31 PM
Merited by JayJuanGee (1)

Massive bitcoin mine discovered in UK after police raid suspected cannabis farm
https://www.cnbc.com/2021/05/28/bitcoin-mine-discovered-by-uk-police-on-cannabis-farm-raid-.html

"Massive"  Roll Eyes  Tongue  Grin
JayJuanGee
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3710
Merit: 10248


Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"


View Profile
May 28, 2021, 06:35:24 PM
Merited by vapourminer (1), bitebits (1)

story [...] 21 coins.. if peeps are interested, [...]


By the way AlcoHoDL, is this diptwat cousin of yours starting out with zero coins, which seems to be the case.... I can surely excuse someone who already has some coins to take a bit more of an aggressive stance or have a more greedy stance in terms of buying more coins.. but I was getting the sense that your  cousin is a nocoiner until the BTC price crosses below $34,100.   Surely better than nothing, but still... Roll Eyes

Please go ahead JJG, love to hear stories about lost fortunes.

This seems to me to be more of a story about peeps having differing perspectives and matters seeming to work out pretty well, even though there are differing perspectives, so it is not even really a story about lost fortunes, even though some peeps are kicking themselves to fuck because they used to have 21 bitcoins or they were damned close to having that quantity of coins.

I went back and looked at some of my bitcoin related communications and even transactions from late 2014 (and bitcoin was around $385 at that time), and I bet that I had more than 40 people that I sent e-mails, text messages or had other kinds of communications to let them know about bitcoin and that I thought it was the greatest thing since sliced bread...... or some variation of that.  There were perhaps somewhere more than 20 in which I made some kind of follow up and maybe somewhere in the ballpark of 15.. maybe even 20 if we spread out the timeline a wee bit, who I sent some small amounts of bitcoin.. usually at least $5, but sometimes $10 or $20 or even up to $80-$100 in the case of a few event-related gifts that i gave out.

It was quite rare that anyone would get into any detailed discussions with me about the bitcoin topic, but this person decided to actively buy some bitcoin and expressed quite a bit of hesitations, but still bought around $4k worth of bitcoin in that $385 territory.  So let's call that an initial purchase of 10.5BTC.

As we realize the BTC price did not really do so well after late 2014, so throughout 2015, the BTC price bounced above and below $250.. and $250 might have even been considered a higher point for that period, so I am not even really sure about all the details of how this person had gotten to 21 BTC by late 2016 and into early 2017 because sometimes I would make strong recommendations NOT to get involved in various shitcoins (which the person did anyhow and even made some money and lost some money) and not to be trading very much of their bitcoin stash (which the person had fucked around with that a few times too - and probably lost over all.. so it is sometimes difficult to know when peeps have admitted gambling tendencies if they are telling the truth about their gains and their losses), and I even suggested several times in late 2015 and throughout 2016 that BTC prices would likely be going to between $3k and $5k at some point in the coming 1-3 years but that it was quite difficult to know with any kind of precision, and such person would proclaim that I was living in a fantasy and blah blah blah... but still mostly seemed to have hung onto the acquired coins and probably overall had an investment of somewhere between $8k and $10k in the whole scheme of things that ended up reaching 21 BTC at some point... so somewhere in the ballpark of $400 to $500 per BTC.

I recall detecting quite a bit of skepticism from this person about how long to keep HODLing BTC and even to cash out of some or all BTC at various points.  We specifically had a conversation in early 2017 when the BTC price had gone into the $1.5k to $1.8k arena, and I reminded such person that the old time high of $1,163 created a kind of no man's land dynamic and that I am not really going to blame such person if cashing out some or all BTC once the price went above $2k, but there should not be any meaningful touching or shaving off of BTC before that point, and who fucking cares what I said because such person was nervous and ended up shaving off a few BTC around $1.5k to largely get a decent chunk of the principle back... so let's just say at that point, the person's BTC stack was down to 17.5 BTC-ish and there was some comfort in mostly playing with house money.

I said whatever do what you like.  I already gave my suggestion of what I would consider a reasonable approach based on the size of the investment and attempting to account for the circumstances.  So, we preceded to pretty much spend quite a bit of that time just below $3k..and then of course an exploding of BTC price from $3k to $20k.. and I think that the person was so damned frustrated by having had sold several BTC around $1,500 that there was considerable hesitancies to sell more.. but the price went from that $20k high and then had some correction that caused an additional desire to sell some more around $14k. .. around 3 more BTC were sold (which would have been late 2017).. to get close to $35k from that sale.. and to reduce that persons stash from 17.5 BTC to 14 BTC... and some goodie luxury item was bought with that $35k..

I am not exactly sure but I believe that during the 2018-2019 period there were a few more BTC bought that brought the stash up to around 16.5 BTC again and then sold, so somewhere along the way another $30k was cashed out that brought the stash back down to around 14.5BTC... which I believe would have been counted in the tax year 2020.  

I remember some of these various conversations between about 2017 and 2020 with assertions that "I don't think that I will be able to get up to 21 BTC again" and even later some suggestions that "I don't want to get up to 21 BTC again because I don't have a long time to live, and this is already a potential problem to be cashing out $30k to $50k every year and to still continue to have more value each year in such a way that "I am never going to be able to cash all of it out at this rate."

But then when BTC prices went up to new ATHs there was some holding back on cashing out, but decisions to cash out 0.5 BTC on a couple of occasions in early 2021 that would have resulted in around $50k in proceeds and cause the BTC stash to go down to around 13BTC.

So, I have my doubts about his story being exactly any kind of tragedy, because the total invested was likely less than $10k in those initial days and there might have been some farting around with buying and selling that caused some further investing that went over the $10k, but in the end any of that further money had been cashed out again along the way.

So if you look at 13.5 BTC in terms of the $65k high then that would have reached a dollar value of $877,500, but even when the BTC price dropped to $30k, the dollar value of the BTC would still have been a bit over $400k, so over the years of continuing to cash out BTC there has built increasing confidence over the years in terms of the ability of BTC to continue to retain its value even though the number of BTC in the stash continues to get smaller little by little... and sometimes when a person is older, they are not in a stage of trying to build wealth but instead either maintaining or liquidating or a combination of both so even if there had seemed to have been liquidating going on, the person was considering that the value of that BTC just continues to go up in a kind of maintenance kind of way.. so yeah, even if there are not guarantees about what is going to happen to the BTC price, there is also some assurance that the amount withdrawn continues to be way more than the amount invested.

I think that the essence of the story is that this person had been playing their BTC in such a way that they were mostly withdrawing gains of close to $50k every year since 2017.. and the 2021 gains have already been taken, so that person has largely taken out $250k from an investment of perhaps around $10k (that has been taken out too), and still has a portfolio that has bottomed out at around $400k from an earlier high of $877.5k.. which hardly seems like either a sad story of losing BTC or one of irresponsibility - even though a younger person might feel way more compelled to either just let the BTC profits continue to ride and get folded into the BTC holdings, there are differing kinds of opinions and approaches that can allow for considerable prosperity and even life changing increases in living standards... in the ballpark of doubling income in the past 5 years.. and no real sign that will not be able to continue at least some variation of that even with our current BTC price dynamics that are not really even close to guaranteed, either.

Agree with JJG @AlcoHoDL, very risky strategy. Any current price is a good price, waiting for it to go lower is just speculating (against a 12-year trend!).

I know that you did not ask me bitebits, but I am having trouble resisting to suggest that any new money should be considered in three categories and then apportioned accordingly.  So there is lump sum investing, DCA and buying on dips.  Of course, the apportionment can be made in accordance with personal preferences, yet the initial default position should be 1/3 in each category.  Of course, personal circumstances should allow for both not ONLY how much to apportion in each category, but then how to manage such apportionment within the categories in terms of how much, price intervals and time intervals.  

So my suggestion is to start with the defaults and then tailorize.  

If a person is a no coiner, then it would seem to be smarter (not saying that no coiners are capable of being smart) to be more aggressive in terms of making sure to get a starting stake in BTC.. whichever categories of achieving the initial allocations, and of course, if someone has been a coiner for a long time, including reaching fairly aggressive accumulation levels of something like 10% or more, then they they would have more psychological and financial liberty to spread out their amounts more and not to be worried if they end up NOT buying more BTC with whatever cash that they have had stumbled across.

Seems to me that AlcoHoDL's cousin is approaching this whole matter as if he is already a coiner with a decent allocation into bitcoin, but whatever, peeps can do whatever they are going to do.. including failing and refusing to appreciate that when they do not make sure that they get a stake into bitcoin, that they already tend to have a lot of other investments (including their income) that is likely already allocated into various kinds of fiat denominations.
ChartBuddy
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 2170
Merit: 1776


1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ


View Profile
May 28, 2021, 07:01:27 PM


Explanation
Sayeds56
Copper Member
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1288
Merit: 713


Eloncoin.org - Mars, here we come!


View Profile
May 28, 2021, 07:46:55 PM



https://www.coindesk.com/sec-sues-5-over-2b-bitconnect-ponzi
gallianooo
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 680
Merit: 346


View Profile
May 28, 2021, 07:48:57 PM

BTC looks still very weak unfortunately... 50% drop from 60 to 30K vertically. Still no (real) rebound and staying in the 35K range.. Hmm I don't want to see this but it's smell not good if BTC are not able to bounce and stay over 42K+ soon. Otherwise more dip (below 30K) is really on the table unfortunately...

Good week end for everyone  Wink
ChartBuddy
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 2170
Merit: 1776


1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ


View Profile
May 28, 2021, 08:01:28 PM


Explanation
Hueristic
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3808
Merit: 4906


Doomed to see the future and unable to prevent it


View Profile
May 28, 2021, 08:04:21 PM

Quote
More than half of the state’s 28 black start generators, which are crucial for bringing a collapsed grid back to life, experienced outages themselves, according to a new report by The Wall Street Journal. Of the 13 primary generators, nine encountered trouble, as did six of 15 secondary generators acting as backups in case the primary backups failed. Some had trouble getting enough fuel to run, while others were damaged by the cold weather.

“Having had experience for almost two decades with utilities, it’s genuinely inconceivable to me—even in today’s massively deregulated environment—I cannot imagine how any regulatory oversight got itself into this position,” said Evan Wilner, who served as Delaware’s first public advocate representing utility customers.

https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2021/05/texas-power-outage-almost-became-weeks-long-catastrophe/
bitebits
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2211
Merit: 3178


Flippin' burgers since 1163.


View Profile
May 28, 2021, 08:04:35 PM
Merited by JayJuanGee (1)

Agree with JJG @AlcoHoDL, very risky strategy. Any current price is a good price, waiting for it to go lower is just speculating (against a 12-year trend!).

I know that you did not ask me bitebits, but I am having trouble resisting to suggest that any new money should be considered in three categories and then apportioned accordingly.  So there is lump sum investing, DCA and buying on dips.  Of course, the apportionment can be made in accordance with personal preferences, yet the initial default position should be 1/3 in each category.  Of course, personal circumstances should allow for both not ONLY how much to apportion in each category, but then how to manage such apportionment within the categories in terms of how much, price intervals and time intervals.  

So my suggestion is to start with the defaults and then tailorize.  

If a person is a no coiner, then it would seem to be smarter (not saying that no coiners are capable of being smart) to be more aggressive in terms of making sure to get a starting stake in BTC.. whichever categories of achieving the initial allocations, and of course, if someone has been a coiner for a long time, including reaching fairly aggressive accumulation levels of something like 10% or more, then they they would have more psychological and financial liberty to spread out their amounts more and not to be worried if they end up NOT buying more BTC with whatever cash that they have had stumbled across.

Seems to me that AlcoHoDL's cousin is approaching this whole matter as if he is already a coiner with a decent allocation into bitcoin, but whatever, peeps can do whatever they are going to do.. including failing and refusing to appreciate that when they do not make sure that they get a stake into bitcoin, that they already tend to have a lot of other investments (including their income) that is likely already allocated into various kinds of fiat denominations.


That is where you and I disagree or have a different strategy. To me you are just speculating by not investing lump sum. Go ahead and DCA if you can't stomach volatility, but it is a proven sub-optimal strategy versus lump sum. With buying dips you are just trying to outsmart the market. Fine if you like gambling but that has nothing to do with investing.
LFC_Bitcoin
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3528
Merit: 9563


#1 VIP Crypto Casino


View Profile
May 28, 2021, 08:12:33 PM
Merited by DeathAngel (4), vapourminer (1), xhomerx10 (1), Hueristic (1), JayJuanGee (1), El duderino_ (1), bitebits (1)

Number go down.

LFC’s car game go up - New ride.

JayJuanGee
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3710
Merit: 10248


Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"


View Profile
May 28, 2021, 08:15:09 PM

And it's gone... At the end of the year, do you think btc will ...

ah no, 1 btc will always be 1 btc Smiley.

enjoy your observations, and don't forget to have fun...

I have an alert on my smart toilets to attend to, it could be possible that I haven't followed the mandatory diet yesterday...

But I don't know, as it appears that I used all my yearly allotted alcohol drinking tokens, at least that's what the centralized individual management blockchain reads...

Did the same entity take over your account as did lucky enough?

Now we gots our lil selfies at least two confirmed dweebtwats spouting out conclusory know-it-all wannabe nonsense.

 Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Roll Eyes

my mood today: trying to appear like a bot as hard I can.

That's the spirit.

Don't fight it, join it.

 Tongue

what if bitcoin lose 20% during those 30 mins  Huh

That would suck, no?

Sounds scary, too.. especially when you frame bitcoin volatility like that.. lucky (or would it be not lucky?).
Biodom
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3752
Merit: 3874



View Profile
May 28, 2021, 08:19:48 PM

Quote
More than half of the state’s 28 black start generators, which are crucial for bringing a collapsed grid back to life, experienced outages themselves, according to a new report by The Wall Street Journal. Of the 13 primary generators, nine encountered trouble, as did six of 15 secondary generators acting as backups in case the primary backups failed. Some had trouble getting enough fuel to run, while others were damaged by the cold weather.

“Having had experience for almost two decades with utilities, it’s genuinely inconceivable to me—even in today’s massively deregulated environment—I cannot imagine how any regulatory oversight got itself into this position,” said Evan Wilner, who served as Delaware’s first public advocate representing utility customers.

https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2021/05/texas-power-outage-almost-became-weeks-long-catastrophe/

Yes, what was already unpleasant could have been worse.
Regulation (excessive) is bad, deregulation brings it's own troubles and deregulated entities DON'T spend money to support the grid. Yet, when the grid fails, they are not to blame...f-ers.
Maybe it is the age, but I start to foresee some upcoming civilization failures.
Maybe we are closer to the end than to beginning.
We don't have enough chips, GPUs, hard drives, lumber, etc, etc.
Inflation is running high, yet salaries are stagnating.
Debt is literally through the roof, money printing continues with abandon, yet the focus is on "bad' bitcoin and it's minuscule energy use.

We (the societal WE) are the scorpion that, instead of stinging the frog in the proverbial tale, stings itself and maybe dies.
Pages: « 1 ... 28697 28698 28699 28700 28701 28702 28703 28704 28705 28706 28707 28708 28709 28710 28711 28712 28713 28714 28715 28716 28717 28718 28719 28720 28721 28722 28723 28724 28725 28726 28727 28728 28729 28730 28731 28732 28733 28734 28735 28736 28737 28738 28739 28740 28741 28742 28743 28744 28745 28746 [28747] 28748 28749 28750 28751 28752 28753 28754 28755 28756 28757 28758 28759 28760 28761 28762 28763 28764 28765 28766 28767 28768 28769 28770 28771 28772 28773 28774 28775 28776 28777 28778 28779 28780 28781 28782 28783 28784 28785 28786 28787 28788 28789 28790 28791 28792 28793 28794 28795 28796 28797 ... 33348 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!