ChartBuddy
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 2170
Merit: 1776
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
|
 |
July 04, 2015, 10:01:47 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The block chain is the main innovation of Bitcoin. It is the
first distributed timestamping system.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
rich93
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 595
Merit: 101
Chromia - Relational Blockchain
|
 |
July 04, 2015, 10:17:50 AM |
|
Not to ruin the plot... but it's over already. The panic was less than impressive. We can't be sure until it is confirmed that all the pools have stopped SPV mining and upgraded to the latest version of Bitcoin core. I read that whole thread and nobody knows for certain. Here's one post from it that suggests the problem might be fixed, but clearly says nobody knows for certain. We don't know until an expert posts some conclusive proof that it's fixed. ... We just need someone to confirm this. I think that everything is fine now, however I can't be sure. |
|
|
|
|
|
JorgeStolfi
|
|
July 04, 2015, 10:18:27 AM |
|
Not to ruin the plot... but it's over already. The panic was less than impressive. Of course. It was just an accident, some core devs were awake watching anxiously the onset of BIP66, the two pools involved cooperated promptly, etc.. That was not an attack: someone just sneezed. See, the building stopped shaking already. |
|
|
|
|
|
Bagatell
|
|
July 04, 2015, 10:35:10 AM |
|
That was not an attack: someone just sneezed. See, the building stopped shaking already.
Unlike the fiat system that seems to have contracted Parkinsons. |
|
|
|
|
shmadz
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1000
@theshmadz
|
|
July 04, 2015, 10:35:58 AM |
|
Not to ruin the plot... but it's over already. The panic was less than impressive. Of course. It was just an accident, some core devs were awake watching anxiously the onset of BIP66, the two pools involved cooperated promptly, etc.. That was not an attack: someone just sneezed. See, the building stopped shaking already. Right. If bitcoin can survive the scorn and ridicule of a Brazilian professor, it can survive this little kerfuffle. This will just be used as ammo in the argument against larger blocks (rightly so, imo) |
|
|
|
|
ChartBuddy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2170
Merit: 1776
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
|
|
July 04, 2015, 11:01:50 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ChartBuddy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2170
Merit: 1776
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
|
|
July 04, 2015, 12:01:58 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
JorgeStolfi
|
|
July 04, 2015, 12:33:37 PM |
|
Right. If bitcoin can survive the scorn and ridicule of a Brazilian professor, it can survive this little kerfuffle.
I don't know about bitcoin itself, but the bitcoiners' faith in it can survive anything.  This will just be used as ammo in the argument against larger blocks (rightly so, imo)
Indeed, it has already been used... However the problem is not the block size per se, but miners skipping the validation of the previous block in order to save a few milliseconds. It is roughly the same reasoning that results in empty blocks being mined while the queues are full. Bigger blocks will make these "optimizations" more tempting, but they are tempting enough even with 1 MB blocks. Ideally, the protocol should force the miners to validate the previous block(s), and take as many transactions from the queues as possible. Then the block size would not matter, for this issue at least. |
|
|
|
|
ChartBuddy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2170
Merit: 1776
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
|
|
July 04, 2015, 01:01:50 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Greendragon
Member
Offline
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
|
|
July 04, 2015, 01:48:13 PM |
|
CCMF time  This time without LTC... What do you mean by ccfm time? |
|
|
|
|
LFC_Bitcoin
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3528
Merit: 9556
#1 VIP Crypto Casino
|
|
July 04, 2015, 01:51:09 PM |
|
CCMF time Is it? I can see we've gone up a dollar or two but I'm not sure about CCMF, moon etc  Hope you're right, it'd be nice to get above 260 a stay there. Nice slow, sustainable price increases are good. I prefer it that way over pumps followed by profit taking dumps. Let's see what the weekend brings. |
|
|
|
|
ssmc2
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2002
Merit: 1040
|
|
July 04, 2015, 01:52:48 PM |
|
Seems more likely we'll have another dip into the 250-252 region before starting our climb back up to and over 270.
|
|
|
|
|
ChartBuddy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2170
Merit: 1776
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
|
|
July 04, 2015, 02:01:46 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
otto93
Member
Offline
Activity: 216
Merit: 10
Live, Hope, Win
|
|
July 04, 2015, 02:42:05 PM |
|
CCMF time This time without LTC... What do you mean by ccfm time? I'd like to know what CCMF means too. I Googled for it and still couldn't get a straight answer. The closest I got was "it means choo choo". It's not in the newbie technical terms page either. Is it a secret term that only really "cool" people are allowed to know? WTF does CCMF mean? |
|
|
|
|
inca
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1000
|
|
July 04, 2015, 02:42:18 PM |
|
I think we are shortly about to launch.
|
|
|
|
|
Sitarow
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1792
Merit: 1047
|
|
July 04, 2015, 02:43:23 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
betterangels
|
|
July 04, 2015, 02:44:23 PM |
|
uptrend seems good, til $262
|
|
|
|
|
|
kaykawa
|
|
July 04, 2015, 02:48:50 PM |
|
what does means "CCFM"? i saw guys in BTC-E trollboxchat saying the same.
|
|
|
|
|
gentlemand
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2590
Merit: 3013
Welt Am Draht
|
|
July 04, 2015, 02:51:18 PM |
|
what does means "CCFM"? i saw guys in BTC-E trollboxchat saying the same.
Choo Choo Mother Fucker. |
|
|
|
|
BlindMayorBitcorn
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1115
|
|
July 04, 2015, 02:52:27 PM |
|
what does means "CCFM"? i saw guys in BTC-E trollboxchat saying the same.
Choo Choo Mother Fucker.  |
|
|
|
|
|
Poll
