turboblade
Member

Offline
Activity: 115
Merit: 10
|
 |
March 07, 2017, 12:17:29 PM |
|
I just asked Siri about the EFT approval using eight ball and she said, "Nope."  Asked Cortana too: she also said nope. They don't know how to resolve "ETF" in the question, so default to a negative response. Yes you do understand this is a joke
|
|
|
|
|
Totscha
|
 |
March 07, 2017, 12:21:22 PM |
|
I just asked Siri about the EFT approval using eight ball and she said, "Nope."  Asked Cortana too: she also said nope. They don't know how to resolve "ETF" in the question, so default to a negative response. Yes you do understand this is a joke You do understand this is German humor?
|
|
|
|
turboblade
Member

Offline
Activity: 115
Merit: 10
|
 |
March 07, 2017, 12:24:22 PM |
|
I just asked Siri about the EFT approval using eight ball and she said, "Nope."  Asked Cortana too: she also said nope. They don't know how to resolve "ETF" in the question, so default to a negative response. Yes you do understand this is a joke You do understand this is German humor? That explains it!
|
|
|
|
york780
|
 |
March 07, 2017, 12:33:28 PM |
|
This dump is quite dissapointing guys. The dumps are getting smaller and smaller every year. The volatility of bitcoin is improving fast! Bitcoin is growing up! TO tha MOON
|
|
|
|
numismatist
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1245
Merit: 1004
|
 |
March 07, 2017, 12:35:53 PM |
|
I just asked Siri about the EFT approval using eight ball and she said, "Nope."  Asked Cortana too: she also said nope. They don't know how to resolve "ETF" in the question, so default to a negative response. Yes you do understand this is a joke Because I am human. This is just another very good example upon how machine intelligence will fail us. They are not much more like some database, maybe called ontology map, capable of drawing conclusions from known data. No creative thinking.
|
|
|
|
bitcoinvest
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1120
Merit: 1000
13eJ4feC39JzbdY2K9W3ytQzWhunsxL83X
|
 |
March 07, 2017, 12:42:11 PM |
|
i have to say i sold some bitcoins at 1180 euro and not going to buy back.. no matter where this will take us i love and enjoy this game  is the pump finished? second dump incoming?
|
|
|
|
york780
|
 |
March 07, 2017, 12:49:01 PM |
|
We have reached the bottom of the january 2017 trend. When it breaks down we will reach the 2016 trend which is the ultimate bottom. Unlikely.
|
|
|
|
starmman
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1484
Merit: 1029
|
 |
March 07, 2017, 12:52:56 PM |
|
Haha, got to live bitcoin - I go out for lunch and my 1200 and 1170 buy order were hit, and its on the way back up again.
|
|
|
|
jackjack
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1281
May Bitcoin be touched by his Noodly Appendage
|
 |
March 07, 2017, 12:53:50 PM |
|
 Same story, again PBOC moves a finger, Bitcoin moves 10% Meanwhile at PBOC: 
|
|
|
|
jossiel
|
 |
March 07, 2017, 12:59:16 PM |
|
This dump is quite dissapointing guys. The dumps are getting smaller and smaller every year. The volatility of bitcoin is improving fast! Bitcoin is growing up! TO tha MOON
Too bad for you but I'm a bit disappointed when seeing the price to fall and be dump. And seeing the price to come back again makes me fly high. And that's a sure thing now with bitcoin it's flying high to the moon though the price fall a couple of tens a few moments ago. It's fluctuating and I guess it's getting ready again to pump higher.
|
|
|
|
spooderman
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1708
Merit: 1047
|
 |
March 07, 2017, 12:59:42 PM |
|
we got problems right now imo.
the game theory of the blocksize split is becoming interesting to say the least.
it annoys me that it had to come to this, but bitcoin was always going to be attacked in the worst ways possible and this has proven to be the most effective.
right now we are on a jumbo jet mid flight, that so far (and thanks to the hard work of stunning people) has not crashed (no pun intended).
during this flight a bunch of passengers with poor understanding have decided that the pilots and engineers are clueless and need to be undermined.
how anyone thinks making the blocksize larger would solve anything (other than temporarily buying some time at the cost of sacrificing some decentralisation) in the long run is beyond me.
i've been in this thread for years and hedl through all the unpleasantness we have encountered without complaint.
i can handle propaganda campaigns, china bans, governments buying and dumping at opportune times, volatility, and year long bear markets.
i'm finding it very difficult to handle the sheer idiocy that is bitcoin unlimited.
(in all earnestness, i am not qualified to judge the code itself, if there is something that you think i don't realise about big blocks, please point it out to me. my mind is open).
|
|
|
|
podyx
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2338
Merit: 1035
|
 |
March 07, 2017, 01:05:35 PM |
|
text
The blocksize will obviously need to be larger or the fees will become too big. Why is that hard to understand tho?
|
|
|
|
bitcoinvest
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1120
Merit: 1000
13eJ4feC39JzbdY2K9W3ytQzWhunsxL83X
|
 |
March 07, 2017, 01:20:50 PM |
|
no matter the block size that i will not comment, talking about the price movement today we have a massive movement and a downtrend seriously. put the charts in the 15 minutes or 1 day doesn't matter. there a a good bounce back at this moment but prove me wrong i think that in some exchanges happened and is happening a very good organized sell... i don't care about ETF and never will since we don't really need it. the point is that we all realized today that our dream to the moon need wait, and we don't know for how long. If you are holder you don't care but if you are trader you may or have not won money today or lost but the fact is that many people don't like this volatility. Keep in mind... we was much better when we was stable and at lower prices...this rally for up the last month is something that will have a correction and maybe bigger from what we saw today.. in my personal opinion this is not finished yet
|
|
|
|
becoin
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3431
Merit: 1233
|
 |
March 07, 2017, 01:22:27 PM |
|
text
The blocksize will obviously need to be larger or the fees will become too big. Why is that hard to understand tho? The fees need to become too big to accelerate development of long term scaling solutions like LN. Why is that hard to understand tho?
|
|
|
|
600watt
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2338
Merit: 2106
|
 |
March 07, 2017, 01:23:41 PM |
|
now i know what this dump is all about:
this is a "silk-road-got-busted" style dump. check the 2013 charts. check the dip before the mega rise in oct. hodlers enjoy...
|
|
|
|
Lauda
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2674
Merit: 3004
Terminated.
|
 |
March 07, 2017, 01:25:57 PM |
|
text
The blocksize will obviously need to be larger or the fees will become too big. Why is that hard to understand tho? You can't increase the block size without severely damaging the network as much as certain *groups* can spam it. A block size increase *solves nothing*. This is also quite likely going to negatively impact the price. during this flight a bunch of passengers with poor understanding have decided that the pilots and engineers are clueless and need to be undermined. -snip-
This is what it is in a tl;dr sense. Quite the absurd situation if you present it with a fitting analogy.
|
|
|
|
Paashaas
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3813
Merit: 5422
|
 |
March 07, 2017, 01:27:17 PM |
|
So, the BU Chinees mining Cartel Roger Ver are buying hashing power. 
|
|
|
|
abercrombie
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1159
Merit: 1001
|
 |
March 07, 2017, 01:32:43 PM |
|
is crypto done??  
|
|
|
|
Torque
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3822
Merit: 5504
|
 |
March 07, 2017, 01:35:10 PM |
|
text
The blocksize will obviously need to be larger or the fees will become too big. Why is that hard to understand tho? The fees need to become too big to accelerate development of long term scaling solutions like LN. Why is that hard to understand tho? The current code has a true "bug" (i.e., transaction malleability) that miners seem unwilling to fix (with SW). If miners won't fix semi-serious bugs now, then what trust do we have for them accepting fixes for more serious bugs going forward? Why is that hard to understand tho?
|
|
|
|
|