pfrtlpfmpf
|
 |
August 24, 2017, 02:42:59 AM |
|
So, you all got your BCC, no problem whatsoever ? ?
Easy peasy. I spent the whole weekend securing her 50 Btc / BCC (it´s thursday). And my 100 Bcc is still in "limbo". My spouse thinks i´m talking BS. Can´t work for two, I´ll shoot myself rather ! Poloniex ? Think twice about them !
|
|
|
|
|
marcus_of_augustus
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3920
Merit: 2349
Eadem mutata resurgo
|
 |
August 24, 2017, 02:48:02 AM |
|
 wow!, ya gotta try find some of that lightning.
|
|
|
|
JayJuanGee
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4200
Merit: 12853
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to "non-custodial"
|
 |
August 24, 2017, 02:52:03 AM |
|
Guys, i had 100 bitcoin on polo and made sure, that i didn´t lend out on 01.08. 13:16 UTC, and transfered all to my exchange account before that date, on 31.07.2017.
I got 3.8 BCC credited for my 100 bitcoin !
Turns out, that my lending on Polo went on through that time (history-lending). So, the persons who lended from me have 96.2 BCC, which is a lot of money, as of now. I suspect it´s employees of polo, they can´t keep their fingers off of it.
Careful with polo, guys !
If you really had your BTC, and they were not loaned out at the time of the hardforkening, then it seems that you should write a support ticket to Poloniex and asked them (based on the facts) how come they did not credit your account with 100BCH. Have you communicated your concerns to Poloniex support? Maybe there was a glitch, rather than something intentional, as you seem to be asserting?
|
|
|
|
eXpl0sive
|
 |
August 24, 2017, 02:55:11 AM |
|
THE SEGWIT PARTY IS HERE!! 
|
|
|
|
fichtn12345
|
 |
August 24, 2017, 02:56:51 AM |
|
So, you all got your BCC, no problem whatsoever ? ?
Easy peasy. Confirmed.
|
|
|
|
JayJuanGee
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4200
Merit: 12853
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to "non-custodial"
|
 |
August 24, 2017, 03:01:07 AM |
|
So, you all got your BCC, no problem whatsoever ? ?
I finally got access to most of mine (except about 8% that I still would have on Gemini, Stamp and Coinbase). It took me 3 weeks to get those little fucks off of my Blockchain.info wallet - but I learned quite a bit in the process (or at least I think that I did)... becoming a bit more edumacated of a bitcoiner. 
|
|
|
|
jbreher
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3108
Merit: 1765
lose: unfind ... loose: untight
|
 |
August 24, 2017, 03:04:40 AM |
|
So, you all got your BCC, no problem whatsoever ? ?
Sorry, man. Got mine. Moved a big chunk from coinbase to kraken, because I read the fine print. What were poloniex's claims leading up to the fork? Edit:FWIW, I do feel for ya.
|
|
|
|
jbreher
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3108
Merit: 1765
lose: unfind ... loose: untight
|
 |
August 24, 2017, 03:12:10 AM |
|
To my core-ian crypto brethren... Congratulations on achieving segwit. Sincerely. 'Tis a red letter day in your camp. I salute you.
|
|
|
|
Addressed
Member

Offline
Activity: 96
Merit: 10
|
 |
August 24, 2017, 03:18:00 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
deepcolderwallet
|
 |
August 24, 2017, 03:22:06 AM Last edit: August 24, 2017, 03:50:29 AM by deepcolderwallet |
|
Another empty block... Because mempool isn't enough full.
|
|
|
|
xhomerx10
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4326
Merit: 10239
|
 |
August 24, 2017, 03:27:18 AM |
|
'cause Jihan Wu is a fukn dick. I mean because freedom! 
|
|
|
|
pfrtlpfmpf
|
 |
August 24, 2017, 03:28:49 AM |
|
So, you all got your BCC, no problem whatsoever ? ?
Sorry, man. Got mine. Moved a big chunk from coinbase to kraken, because I read the fine print. What were poloniex's claims leading up to the fork? Edit:FWIW, I do feel for ya. It´s the staff of poloniex, they can´t keep the finger off of it !
|
|
|
|
BlindMayorBitcorn
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1116
|
 |
August 24, 2017, 03:34:18 AM Last edit: August 24, 2017, 03:53:53 AM by BlindMayorBitcorn |
|
Have Xapo and Coinbase and such released their BCH's to users yet? I'm sure there will be a pump before that happens. And a monumental dump when they do.
Gemini and Stamp have not released the BCH on their service, either.... For nearly 2 weeks, Uphold has release the BCH (so it shows up in member accounts), but you cannot do anything with the BCH, yet. That's a lot of stuck fun bucks. You need to come up with a better slogan - something-like "Bucks Critically Heldup" Your "stuck fun bucks" makes no little to no sense in the whole scheme of things. Stuck fuck bucks then. 
|
|
|
|
dakiller
Member

Offline
Activity: 174
Merit: 10
|
 |
August 24, 2017, 03:59:53 AM |
|
Shit like that should be fucking rejected. Should be a network rule that if there are sufficient transactions to fill a block, that if you don't >90% fill it then your block is invalid. 481831 (Main Chain) 2017-08-24 03:49:31 BitFury 0000000000000000008c40ba590fe957fb31ba256c82ae3ea4c378f46e3aa9b3 999.11 481830 (Main Chain) 2017-08-24 03:34:51 BitFury 000000000000000000168d1252b6df5a1d58085e3553522b88760dd79a614e4b 999.23 481829 (Main Chain) 2017-08-24 03:30:37 Bixin 000000000000000000917cba69f69b758fe396c8e30ae97bbcf08c4eb975e726 998.32 481828 (Main Chain) 2017-08-24 02:54:58 AntPool 000000000000000000bc331eb461d522cb3673b3881217dc30c6a5cf91710f23 0.3 481827 (Main Chain) 2017-08-24 02:51:10 BATPOOL 000000000000000000509863d58a52dbe2ec811d91619f164dab3fe9177874b4 999.29 481826 (Main Chain) 2017-08-24 02:44:20 BitFury 000000000000000000df9314ff6dd5aa8ce15d4e418fa3f5c4fa9fff4e480811 999.2 481825 (Main Chain) 2017-08-24 02:26:36 Unknown 000000000000000000daf7a26d903543377d5cdddb962077e58fd11212479eea 999.17 481824 (Main Chain) 2017-08-24 01:57:37 BTCC Pool 0000000000000000001c8018d9cb3b742ef25114f27563e3fc4a1902167f9893 989.32 Roll it back to 481827, all those after should be orphaned
|
|
|
|
cAPSLOCK
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4130
Merit: 6349
|
 |
August 24, 2017, 04:03:51 AM |
|
Shit like that should be fucking rejected. Should be a network rule that if there are sufficient transactions to fill a block, that if you don't >90% fill it then your block is invalid. 481831 (Main Chain) 2017-08-24 03:49:31 BitFury 0000000000000000008c40ba590fe957fb31ba256c82ae3ea4c378f46e3aa9b3 999.11 481830 (Main Chain) 2017-08-24 03:34:51 BitFury 000000000000000000168d1252b6df5a1d58085e3553522b88760dd79a614e4b 999.23 481829 (Main Chain) 2017-08-24 03:30:37 Bixin 000000000000000000917cba69f69b758fe396c8e30ae97bbcf08c4eb975e726 998.32 481828 (Main Chain) 2017-08-24 02:54:58 AntPool 000000000000000000bc331eb461d522cb3673b3881217dc30c6a5cf91710f23 0.3 481827 (Main Chain) 2017-08-24 02:51:10 BATPOOL 000000000000000000509863d58a52dbe2ec811d91619f164dab3fe9177874b4 999.29 481826 (Main Chain) 2017-08-24 02:44:20 BitFury 000000000000000000df9314ff6dd5aa8ce15d4e418fa3f5c4fa9fff4e480811 999.2 481825 (Main Chain) 2017-08-24 02:26:36 Unknown 000000000000000000daf7a26d903543377d5cdddb962077e58fd11212479eea 999.17 481824 (Main Chain) 2017-08-24 01:57:37 BTCC Pool 0000000000000000001c8018d9cb3b742ef25114f27563e3fc4a1902167f9893 989.32 Roll it back to 481827, all those after should be orphaned I was sort of sympathetic 'till that last part. Umm... no.
|
|
|
|
dakiller
Member

Offline
Activity: 174
Merit: 10
|
 |
August 24, 2017, 04:16:54 AM |
|
Shit like that should be fucking rejected. Should be a network rule that if there are sufficient transactions to fill a block, that if you don't >90% fill it then your block is invalid. 481831 (Main Chain) 2017-08-24 03:49:31 BitFury 0000000000000000008c40ba590fe957fb31ba256c82ae3ea4c378f46e3aa9b3 999.11 481830 (Main Chain) 2017-08-24 03:34:51 BitFury 000000000000000000168d1252b6df5a1d58085e3553522b88760dd79a614e4b 999.23 481829 (Main Chain) 2017-08-24 03:30:37 Bixin 000000000000000000917cba69f69b758fe396c8e30ae97bbcf08c4eb975e726 998.32 481828 (Main Chain) 2017-08-24 02:54:58 AntPool 000000000000000000bc331eb461d522cb3673b3881217dc30c6a5cf91710f23 0.3 481827 (Main Chain) 2017-08-24 02:51:10 BATPOOL 000000000000000000509863d58a52dbe2ec811d91619f164dab3fe9177874b4 999.29 481826 (Main Chain) 2017-08-24 02:44:20 BitFury 000000000000000000df9314ff6dd5aa8ce15d4e418fa3f5c4fa9fff4e480811 999.2 481825 (Main Chain) 2017-08-24 02:26:36 Unknown 000000000000000000daf7a26d903543377d5cdddb962077e58fd11212479eea 999.17 481824 (Main Chain) 2017-08-24 01:57:37 BTCC Pool 0000000000000000001c8018d9cb3b742ef25114f27563e3fc4a1902167f9893 989.32 Roll it back to 481827, all those after should be orphaned I was sort of sympathetic 'till that last part. Umm... no. Just my opinion, it is completely up to the network to decide what is valid, and if I was to have my say it would be made invalid.
|
|
|
|
jbreher
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3108
Merit: 1765
lose: unfind ... loose: untight
|
 |
August 24, 2017, 04:46:36 AM |
|
Just my opinion, it is completely up to the network to decide what is valid, and if I was to have my say it would be made invalid.
Because you seem to do your thinking from your adrenal gland, rather than from your cerebral cortex.
|
|
|
|
Starving_Marvin
Sr. Member
  
Offline
Activity: 511
Merit: 250
Open and Transparent Science Powered By Blockchain
|
 |
August 24, 2017, 05:55:15 AM |
|
So does anyone notice any difference in the transaction or confirmation speeds now when the segwit is finally activated?
|
|
|
|
Elwar
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3598
Merit: 2386
Viva Ut Vivas
|
 |
August 24, 2017, 06:20:59 AM |
|
So does anyone notice any difference in the transaction or confirmation speeds now when the segwit is finally activated?
My bitcoins came through the other side so shiny.
|
|
|
|
|