Elwar
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 3584
Merit: 2386
Viva Ut Vivas
|
 |
August 25, 2017, 12:10:27 PM |
|
Price ticker pics. This one is made to hang on the wall but I wanted it next to the TV and I'm not going to put a hole in the wall in this apartment.  |
|
|
|
|
YourMother
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1281
Merit: 1046
|
|
August 25, 2017, 12:27:29 PM |
|
^ Use the big screen as a ticker and watch the TV on the laptop. This is how i do it, even with the guests.
|
|
|
|
|
Searing
Copper Member
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3052
Merit: 1864
Clueless!
|
|
August 25, 2017, 12:33:56 PM |
|
Almost every week an account being hacked.
Back to the game, still on $4300 and no ATH.
I still can't fathom how they did it. I only signed in from one device. The password was stored in Chrome's manager and on my desktop, and that's it. I had a Chrome extension that wasn't properly vetted, but then I'd have thought they'd try and access my trade accounts, but nope, just Bitcointalk. It does makes me wonder if this site is compromised. Anyway, back to up, up, up. Congrats to all hodlers.  It's the site (or so it was in the past...2014 I think it was a big hack....you still see accounts being sold from that) |
|
|
|
|
AlcoHoDL
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3080
Merit: 6940
Addicted to HoDLing!
|
|
August 25, 2017, 01:09:13 PM |
|
@{Meuh6879, ghandi, Elwar}: Wow, you guys are pros! I like Elwar's big font ticker, I could watch it at night with one eye, while sleeping next to the PC...  |
|
|
|
|
Wekkel
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3122
Merit: 1538
yes
|
|
August 25, 2017, 01:20:46 PM |
|
Can anybody explain why this is possible and valid? Segwit should only make room for more Transactions, but doesn't change the Blocksize cap? Only Segwit2x would allow bigger blocks? I cannot find a simple explanation quickly, but I understand that, first of all, Segwit is compatible with the old chain. So Segwit can work with ordinary blocks and new types of blocks (containing more information that an ordinary block). I understand that in essence, a block - think of it as a box - is made more empty so that more transactions fit into it, by cutting off a signature part that in the ordinary block takes about 50% of all space. Such modified block can contain more transactions and thus would lead to a higher tx/s limit. I have not found an easier explanation than this article: https://segwit.org/understanding-segregated-witness-905cc712c692Questions I still have is whether Bitcoin integrity is harmed by cutting off a signature part of a block and how the new type of (Segwit) blocks and ordinary blocks (Core) co-exist. The comments under the article also pose that question (without answers for now). |
|
|
|
|
|
ghandi
|
|
August 25, 2017, 01:41:45 PM |
|
Can anybody explain why this is possible and valid? Segwit should only make room for more Transactions, but doesn't change the Blocksize cap? Only Segwit2x would allow bigger blocks? I cannot find a simple explanation quickly, but I understand that, first of all, Segwit is compatible with the old chain. So Segwit can work with ordinary blocks and new types of blocks (containing more information that an ordinary block). I understand that in essence, a block - think of it as a box - is made more empty so that more transactions fit into it, by cutting off a signature part that in the ordinary block takes about 50% of all space. Such modified block can contain more transactions and thus would lead to a higher tx/s limit. I have not found an easier explanation than this article: https://segwit.org/understanding-segregated-witness-905cc712c692Questions I still have is whether Bitcoin integrity is harmed by cutting off a signature part of a block and how the new type of (Segwit) blocks and ordinary blocks (Core) co-exist. The comments under the article also pose that question (without answers for now). Thanks, that's all correct (and known to me). But still the box (as you call it) is limited to 1MB equal to 1024KB. So this block is ~8KB to big. Or is it just a number formatting issues (powers of 10 vs. powers of 2?). After looking at blocktrail, blockcypher and blockexplorer it looks like, blockchain.info is messing something up... // Confusing. My bitcoin-core client (0.14.2) is reporting 1032119Bytes, equal to 1032KiloBytes (10^3), or 1007KiBi (2^10). |
|
|
|
|
AlexGR
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1708
Merit: 1049
|
|
August 25, 2017, 01:46:58 PM |
|
Can anybody explain why this is possible and valid? Segwit should only make room for more Transactions, but doesn't change the Blocksize cap? Only Segwit2x would allow bigger blocks? Segwit is 1mb+3mb (data are "segregated" into two). So, if you add up the parts that go into the 1mb segment and the parts that go into the 3mb segment, you can go up to 4mb. A block explorer might opt to show only the 1mb segment when counting the size, or the aggregate data of the two segments (1+3mb) to show the total size. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ludwig Von
|
|
August 25, 2017, 02:34:17 PM |
|
I just sold a part. And the price is only hammered down further... . Gold will only rise when the TBTF 's Fail again... |
|
|
|
|
Torque
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3822
Merit: 5504
|
|
August 25, 2017, 02:40:46 PM |
|
I just sold a part. And the price is only hammered down further... . Gold will only rise when the TBTF 's Fail again... I think this is canary in the coal mine action. Big players closing shorts, the club trying to keep Gold down below 1300, but each drive by less and less effective. If Gold breaks 1300 and Silver breaks 20, we could see the start of something... I also noticed that even when the Silver paper market was smashed down all the way to $14.50 not long ago, the physical Silver market never adjusted lower than $16.90. Very telling. |
|
|
|
|
|
Ludwig Von
|
|
August 25, 2017, 03:10:34 PM |
|
I just sold a part. And the price is only hammered down further... . Gold will only rise when the TBTF 's Fail again... I think this is canary in the coal mine action. Big players closing shorts, the club trying to keep Gold down below 1300, but each drive by less and less effective. If Gold breaks 1300 and Silver breaks 20, we could see the start of something... I also noticed that even when the Silver paper market was smashed down all the way to $14.50 not long ago, the physical Silver market never adjusted lower than $16.90. Very telling. Yes, but that will not be so fast... . At a certain point, gold and BTC will evolve similar... . |
|
|
|
|
|
ghandi
|
|
August 25, 2017, 03:12:47 PM |
|
BTCUSD heading towards $4400.  Do we get a weekend ATH?  |
|
|
|
|
podyx
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2338
Merit: 1035
|
|
August 25, 2017, 03:16:51 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
BlindMayorBitcorn
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1116
|
|
August 25, 2017, 03:19:24 PM |
|
I'm with Searing, just waiting for doom and my 30% haircut. A guy like me has no business having this kind of money. And that's a fact.
|
|
|
|
|
ssmc2
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2002
Merit: 1040
|
|
August 25, 2017, 03:23:13 PM |
|
If we break 4500 here ain't no doom in sight lol
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paashaas
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4002
Merit: 6120
|
|
August 25, 2017, 03:35:30 PM |
|
Jihan is still mining empty blocks, he lost $100.000 of potential profits. So the biggest miner refusing to help the network for the better good?
This asshole Jihan is systematic plannning to kill Bitcoin to push and enforcing this unwanted BCash coin..
How do we cure this cancer from Bitcoin?
|
|
|
|
|
JimboToronto
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4690
Merit: 6169
You're never too old to think young.
|
|
August 25, 2017, 03:40:05 PM |
|
Good AM Bitcoinland.
Still creeping upward... currently $4438USD/$5548CAD (Bitcoinaverage).
AltcoinCash maintaining up at $643USD/$804CAD (Coinmarketcap).
New ATH coming soon?
|
|
|
|
|
Torque
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3822
Merit: 5504
|
|
August 25, 2017, 03:44:30 PM |
|
This asshole Jihan is systematic plannning to kill Bitcoin to push and enforcing this unwanted BCash coin..
Repeat after me: No one can kill Bitcoin. No one can force bitcoin users to buy and transact in BCash. No one can kill Bitcoin. No one can force bitcoin users to buy and transact in BCash. No one can kill Bitcoin. No one can force bitcoin users to buy and transact in BCash. No one can kill Bitcoin. No one can force bitcoin users to buy and transact in BCash. No one can kill Bitcoin. No one can force bitcoin users to buy and transact in BCash. Also, stop whining and peeing in your diaper. |
|
|
|
|
|
Dakustaking76
|
|
August 25, 2017, 03:45:45 PM |
|
Were going steady And slow, this is a good sign of going upwards.
Do something bitcoin
2020 were expecting $500.000 So we need to fly upwards now!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Poll
