Bitcoin Forum
November 02, 2024, 06:35:43 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 28.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Poll
Question: When will BTC get back above $70K:
7/14 - 0 (0%)
7/21 - 1 (0.8%)
7/28 - 11 (9.1%)
8/4 - 16 (13.2%)
8/11 - 7 (5.8%)
8/18 - 6 (5%)
8/25 - 8 (6.6%)
After August - 72 (59.5%)
Total Voters: 121

Pages: « 1 ... 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 [526] 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 ... 33873 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion  (Read 26485147 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic. (174 posts by 3 users with 9 merit deleted.)
icekiss
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 70
Merit: 10



View Profile
May 24, 2013, 10:23:16 AM
 #10501

bitstamp:
Wall got bought up (well, 356BTC out of 400BTC anyway, so its not a wall anymore).
Would not have thought that would happen so fast, with all the buying pressure...


Rampion
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1148
Merit: 1018


View Profile
May 24, 2013, 10:24:30 AM
 #10502

bitstamp:
Wall got bought up (well, 356BTC out of 400BTC anyway, so its not a wall anymore).
Would not have thought that would happen so fast, with all the buying pressure...


400BTC is such a small amount that I wouldn't even call that a wall. Maybe a mini-wall.

But I get that Bitstamp and Gox standards are different.
icekiss
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 70
Merit: 10



View Profile
May 24, 2013, 10:26:34 AM
 #10503

bitstamp:
Wall got bought up (well, 356BTC out of 400BTC anyway, so its not a wall anymore).
Would not have thought that would happen so fast, with all the buying pressure...


400BTC is such a small amount that I wouldn't even call that a wall. Maybe a mini-wall.

But I get that Bitstamp and Gox standards are different.

believe me, 400BTC counts as a (small) wall on bitstamp...  Roll Eyes

200BTC is a miniwall, 1000BTC is a really big one  Wink
Rampion
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1148
Merit: 1018


View Profile
May 24, 2013, 10:28:14 AM
 #10504

bitstamp:
Wall got bought up (well, 356BTC out of 400BTC anyway, so its not a wall anymore).
Would not have thought that would happen so fast, with all the buying pressure...


400BTC is such a small amount that I wouldn't even call that a wall. Maybe a mini-wall.

But I get that Bitstamp and Gox standards are different.

believe me, 400BTC counts as a (small) wall on bitstamp...  Roll Eyes

Well, be happy for the buyer. He managed to buy 400BTC without having to move his wall upwards by a single cent. I love that when I'm buying.
Its About Sharing
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1442
Merit: 1000


Antifragile


View Profile
May 24, 2013, 10:34:10 AM
 #10505

7 days high broken again.

Next milestone, breaking the 30d high ($166.43). That should take a while, but with BTC you never know. Breaking $130 with nice volume could trigger some nice panic buys Cheesy


If you look back at the top of the candles on April 20, 21, 22nd, (http://bitcoin.clarkmoody.com/) that is exactly where we sit right now. And that was right before a move up. I would really like for us to be around $130 or so and sitting on that support, rather than below it.

IAS
icekiss
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 70
Merit: 10



View Profile
May 24, 2013, 10:35:18 AM
 #10506

Well, be happy for the buyer. He managed to buy 400BTC without having to move his wall upwards by a single cent. I love that when I'm buying.

He did move the wall up from 123.5 to 124.0, with the bid wall standing at 124.15. So I guess it was a fair offer and both buyer and seller can be happy about a deal well struck.  Cool
kiko
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 453
Merit: 250


View Profile
May 24, 2013, 10:49:19 AM
 #10507


Agreed, moonshot bids for $20 coins don't really count. I keep meaning to create an index that divides each bid/ask by the % distance from the current MMR. I think it would be much more insightful. I just can't square the maths to adjust for the fact that bids only differ by 100% but asks can be many 1000% higher. Anyone know how to properly adjust for that?

Simple, just base it on the logarithm of the price.

Thanks, but I think I've got it now. It's simpler than that.

One re-bases the order book so MMR is 1. lets call it $125. A $100 dollar bid at $10 dollars gets weighted by 0.08. An equally weighted ask of $100 would be priced at $1562 (the price at which current MMR represents only 8%.)

So who do I need to beg for historical daily snapshots of the full depth API?

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=88054

I'll pitch in half the 200btm if you share it with me.
Bingo. Thanks. I almost missed that reply. I'll get in touch with the dude after some tests on the old data.

As an aside; I can't help but feel I'm re-inventing the wheel here though. Brokers have had Level 2 data for years, why don't we have common TA indicators for depth like we do for Volume and Price. Am I missing something? Is this kind of thing common in CFA textbooks?
icekiss
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 70
Merit: 10



View Profile
May 24, 2013, 11:11:38 AM
 #10508

I am seeing a very interesting technique being used on bitstamp right now:

Instead of placing a huge ask wall, someone is setting down ~40BTC orders spaced 0.01 apart. But only a few at once, and filling them up as they get eaten.
This means that the upward trend does not get broken, it just slows down to a crawl. And the person gets to sell all of his BTC at high prices, because the confidence of the buyers is unshaken.

Pretty slick operator, if you ask me...
kiko
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 453
Merit: 250


View Profile
May 24, 2013, 11:29:27 AM
 #10509

I am seeing a very interesting technique being used on bitstamp right now:

Instead of placing a huge ask wall, someone is setting down ~40BTC orders spaced 0.01 apart. But only a few at once, and filling them up as they get eaten.
This means that the upward trend does not get broken, it just slows down to a crawl. And the person gets to sell all of his BTC at high prices, because the confidence of the buyers is unshaken.

Pretty slick operator, if you ask me...

If you could see the pattern with your bare eyes, it's hardly subtle. HFTs would eat this kind of obvious pattern for breakfast in real markets, the price would run constantly just out of reach of all but the highest bid, knowing they had a big fish on the line. Just my 0.02
icekiss
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 70
Merit: 10



View Profile
May 24, 2013, 11:36:57 AM
 #10510

I am seeing a very interesting technique being used on bitstamp right now:

Instead of placing a huge ask wall, someone is setting down ~40BTC orders spaced 0.01 apart. But only a few at once, and filling them up as they get eaten.
This means that the upward trend does not get broken, it just slows down to a crawl. And the person gets to sell all of his BTC at high prices, because the confidence of the buyers is unshaken.

Pretty slick operator, if you ask me...

If you could see the pattern with your bare eyes, it's hardly subtle. HFTs would eat this kind of obvious pattern for breakfast in real markets, the price would run constantly just out of reach of all but the highest bid, knowing they had a big fish on the line. Just my 0.02

I don't think the bots on our exchanges are that sophisticated yet...

But you are right, there are still obvious ways to improve on it: don't place as many orders in advance, and vary the spacing, timing and amount more, to make it look disconnected.

Still, it is working, and he is doing it at the right point of time, so he is slick enough.  Wink

Edit: here you can see him placing new sell orders:

samson
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2097
Merit: 1070


View Profile
May 24, 2013, 11:54:30 AM
 #10511

I am seeing a very interesting technique being used on bitstamp right now:

Instead of placing a huge ask wall, someone is setting down ~40BTC orders spaced 0.01 apart. But only a few at once, and filling them up as they get eaten.
This means that the upward trend does not get broken, it just slows down to a crawl. And the person gets to sell all of his BTC at high prices, because the confidence of the buyers is unshaken.

Pretty slick operator, if you ask me...


You have to ask yourself why someone's so desperate to sell off a large amount of Bitcoin.
MickeyT2008
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 350
Merit: 250

This account was recently hacked


View Profile
May 24, 2013, 11:56:36 AM
 #10512

Bye bye $128 wall
icekiss
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 70
Merit: 10



View Profile
May 24, 2013, 11:58:22 AM
 #10513

You have to ask yourself why someone's so desperate to sell off a large amount of Bitcoin.
Looking at the buy pressure on both bitstamp and mt.gox - not enough for me to follow his lead, not even short term.

And yes, ask wall at 128.0$ on mt.gox just got eaten! (850BTC)
smoothie
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2492
Merit: 1474


LEALANA Bitcoin Grim Reaper


View Profile
May 24, 2013, 11:58:50 AM
 #10514

Have you bought your bitcoin yet as the choo choo leaves the station?

Get it now... Tongue
ManBearPig
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 350
Merit: 250


"Don't go in the trollbox, trollbox, trollbox"


View Profile WWW
May 24, 2013, 11:59:26 AM
 #10515



That spike was no doubt instigated by the transfer of most of my coins into cold storage.

Bitcoin's way of saying to me, "Oh so you don't want to trade eh?"

That wall at $130 is being eroded.
kiko
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 453
Merit: 250


View Profile
May 24, 2013, 12:00:42 PM
 #10516

I am seeing a very interesting technique being used on bitstamp right now:

Instead of placing a huge ask wall, someone is setting down ~40BTC orders spaced 0.01 apart. But only a few at once, and filling them up as they get eaten.
This means that the upward trend does not get broken, it just slows down to a crawl. And the person gets to sell all of his BTC at high prices, because the confidence of the buyers is unshaken.

Pretty slick operator, if you ask me...


You have to ask yourself why someone's so desperate to sell off a large amount of Bitcoin.

CoinBase and BitPay are the ETF's of the bitcoin world. Merchants throw them a lot of bitcoin and they need to hedge that risk and pay back out in USD.
Rampion
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1148
Merit: 1018


View Profile
May 24, 2013, 12:03:04 PM
Last edit: May 24, 2013, 12:19:29 PM by Rampion
 #10517

Have you bought your bitcoin yet as the choo choo leaves the station?

Get it now... Tongue



(man, we used to post this pic when we had a 30% increase in one day, but....)
Rampion
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1148
Merit: 1018


View Profile
May 24, 2013, 12:04:14 PM
 #10518

99€ is a nice figure.

ChartBuddy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2352
Merit: 1803


1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ


View Profile
May 24, 2013, 12:05:14 PM
 #10519

Ivanhoe
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 841
Merit: 1000



View Profile
May 24, 2013, 12:05:22 PM
 #10520

Murica says: "Goodmorning bitcoin!"
Pages: « 1 ... 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 [526] 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 ... 33873 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!