Bitcoin Forum
August 01, 2025, 01:43:27 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 29.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Poll
Question: How far will this leg take us?
$110K - 9 (8.3%)
$120K - 19 (17.6%)
$130K - 17 (15.7%)
$140K - 9 (8.3%)
$150K - 19 (17.6%)
$160K - 2 (1.9%)
$170K+ - 33 (30.6%)
Total Voters: 108

Pages: « 1 ... 18532 18533 18534 18535 18536 18537 18538 18539 18540 18541 18542 18543 18544 18545 18546 18547 18548 18549 18550 18551 18552 18553 18554 18555 18556 18557 18558 18559 18560 18561 18562 18563 18564 18565 18566 18567 18568 18569 18570 18571 18572 18573 18574 18575 18576 18577 18578 18579 18580 18581 [18582] 18583 18584 18585 18586 18587 18588 18589 18590 18591 18592 18593 18594 18595 18596 18597 18598 18599 18600 18601 18602 18603 18604 18605 18606 18607 18608 18609 18610 18611 18612 18613 18614 18615 18616 18617 18618 18619 18620 18621 18622 18623 18624 18625 18626 18627 18628 18629 18630 18631 18632 ... 34781 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion  (Read 26817630 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic. (174 posts by 1 users with 9 merit deleted.)
xhomerx10
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4284
Merit: 10064



View Profile
December 09, 2017, 10:41:48 PM

Who decided that Bitcoin would be denominated in Y and Y weren't we consulted? 

You will have to find out if the universe is deterministic or not to answer that question:

http://steemit.com/science/@r0achtheunsavory/the-r0ach-report-25-computer-science-proves-the-existence-of-a-variable-known-as-god-but-not-what-god-actually-is

 

 Mindblowing
bones261
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1806
Merit: 1828



View Profile
December 09, 2017, 10:48:08 PM

Who decided that Bitcoin would be denominated in Y and Y weren't we consulted?  

You will have to find out if the universe is deterministic or not to answer that question:

http://steemit.com/science/@r0achtheunsavory/the-r0ach-report-25-computer-science-proves-the-existence-of-a-variable-known-as-god-but-not-what-god-actually-is

Of course the universe is not deterministic. It's called quantum mechanics. Unless you want to consider things falling within certain probabilities deterministic.

If you are locked inside an internal system with an external system surrounding you, it can still be deterministic and you're doing the equivalent of being played like a VCR tape to see predetermined events.  Whatever is at the top of the hierarchy takes precedent.


I'm an agnostic. However, if I were to adopt a Protestant Christian belief system, I am more inclined to go with Wesley than Calvin.
xhomerx10
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4284
Merit: 10064



View Profile
December 09, 2017, 10:49:15 PM

Who decided that Bitcoin would be denominated in Y and Y weren't we consulted? 

You will have to find out if the universe is deterministic or not to answer that question:

http://steemit.com/science/@r0achtheunsavory/the-r0ach-report-25-computer-science-proves-the-existence-of-a-variable-known-as-god-but-not-what-god-actually-is

Of course the universe is not deterministic. It's called quantum mechanics. Unless you want to consider things falling within certain probabilities deterministic.

 Okay, that's enough.  I'm going to have to put you guys on ignore because I have no idea what you're talking about.

JayJuanGee
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4158
Merit: 12615


Self-Custody is a right. Say no to "non-custodial"


View Profile
December 09, 2017, 10:53:34 PM

Was Gemini hacked or is this just scheduled maintenance like their status page claims?

https://status.gemini.com/incidents/k4qvyflfmm24



Yep.. it is surely taking them a long time to get back online, and they have been having quite a few of these issues in recent weeks, which does not bode well for them in terms of attracting institutional investors and even partnering with CBOE

It appears that those quasi- "non traditional financial fucks" aka Gemini, did not participate in our "crash" from a few hours ago.

I was just able to log in and none of my buy orders below $15k executed, and the Gemini price is currently bouncing in the $15k territory.

Perhaps they will dip a little bit to get more in line with the other exchanges, but I am having my doubts, since in recent days they have been lining up a lot more closely with GDAX, which seems to be their current bouncing around price point.
HairyMaclairy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1442
Merit: 2284


Degenerate bull hatter & Bitcoin monotheist


View Profile
December 09, 2017, 11:00:48 PM

Was Gemini hacked or is this just scheduled maintenance like their status page claims?

https://status.gemini.com/incidents/k4qvyflfmm24



Yep.. it is surely taking them a long time to get back online, and they have been having quite a few of these issues in recent weeks, which does not bode well for them in terms of attracting institutional investors and even partnering with CBOE

It appears that those "non traditional financial fucks" aka Gemini, did not participate in our "crash" from a few hours ago.

I was just able to log in and none of my buy orders below $15k executed, and the Gemini price is currently bouncing in the $15k territory.

Perhaps they will dip a little bit to get more in line with the other exchanges, but I am having my doubts, since in recent days they have been lining up a lot more closely with GDAX, which seems to be their current bouncing around price point.

If institutional money stabilises Gdax and Gemini, then arb will eventually clean up BFx and Bitstamp. I think we all risk being bored silly.
pfrtlpfmpf
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 420
Merit: 257


View Profile
December 09, 2017, 11:08:17 PM

*prayforbitcoin*

Wait, we´ve got the fork for that, soon: "bitcoin god", for all you believers out there. It´s no problem, to believe, but be carefull in what you believe.
realr0ach
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 924
Merit: 311


#TheGoyimKnow


View Profile
December 09, 2017, 11:13:40 PM

After launch of bitcoin at CBOE futures

Then bitcoin becomes a casino gulag where the house always wins and there is no reason to go near it instead of metals.  In metals they can only naked short it to cost of production.  In bitcoin, cost of production is fully floating and recursive based on it's own demand via hashrate, so they can literally naked short it to 0 instead of some type of cost of production floor because no such thing even exists in bitcoin.  Shorting metals below cost of production causes miners to stop bringing gold and silver to market, so it's counterintuitive because it would just create scarcity, so they don't do it (or at least not for long periods of time).  Shorting bitcoin below cost of production forces miners to turn off, thus lowering the temporary cost of production floor even further while the supply from miners recirculating coins remains unchanged.  This is why naked shorting is FAR MORE detrimental to bitcoin than metals.
savetherainforest
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1876
Merit: 612


Plant 1xTree for each Satoshi earned!


View Profile
December 09, 2017, 11:27:28 PM

After launch of bitcoin at CBOE futures

Then bitcoin becomes a casino gulag where the house always wins and there is no reason to go near it instead of metals.  In metals they can only naked short it to cost of production.  In bitcoin, cost of production is fully floating and recursive based on it's own demand via hashrate, so they can literally naked short it to 0 instead of some type of cost of production floor because no such thing even exists in bitcoin.  Shorting metals below cost of production causes miners to stop bringing gold and silver to market, so it's counterintuitive because it would just create scarcity, so they don't do it (or at least not for long periods of time).  Shorting bitcoin below cost of production forces miners to turn off, thus lowering the temporary cost of production floor even further while the supply from miners recirculating coins remains unchanged.  This is why naked shorting is FAR MORE detrimental to bitcoin than metals.


If "the house" consists of the "hodlers" and the money comes from the banks. I'm fine with that. Smiley
gembitz
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1848
Merit: 640


*Brute force will solve any Bitcoin problem*


View Profile
December 09, 2017, 11:28:09 PM



Cool 

BTCBTC astronomical price explained^
realr0ach
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 924
Merit: 311


#TheGoyimKnow


View Profile
December 09, 2017, 11:31:57 PM

After launch of bitcoin at CBOE futures

Then bitcoin becomes a casino gulag where the house always wins and there is no reason to go near it instead of metals.  In metals they can only naked short it to cost of production.  In bitcoin, cost of production is fully floating and recursive based on it's own demand via hashrate, so they can literally naked short it to 0 instead of some type of cost of production floor because no such thing even exists in bitcoin.  Shorting metals below cost of production causes miners to stop bringing gold and silver to market, so it's counterintuitive because it would just create scarcity, so they don't do it (or at least not for long periods of time).  Shorting bitcoin below cost of production forces miners to turn off, thus lowering the temporary cost of production floor even further while the supply from miners recirculating coins remains unchanged.  This is why naked shorting is FAR MORE detrimental to bitcoin than metals.


If "the house" consists of the "hodlers" and the money comes from the banks. I'm fine with that. Smiley

No, "the house" is not the hodlers, because the transactions are settled in USD, so the house is the US govt, the fed, or something like the BIS/cult of usury jews if you go up the totem pole. 
becoin
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3431
Merit: 1233



View Profile
December 09, 2017, 11:43:41 PM

After launch of bitcoin at CBOE futures

Then bitcoin becomes a casino gulag where the house always wins and there is no reason to go near it instead of metals.  In metals they can only naked short it to cost of production.  In bitcoin, cost of production is fully floating and recursive based on it's own demand via hashrate, so they can literally naked short it to 0 instead of some type of cost of production floor because no such thing even exists in bitcoin.  Shorting metals below cost of production causes miners to stop bringing gold and silver to market, so it's counterintuitive because it would just create scarcity, so they don't do it (or at least not for long periods of time).  Shorting bitcoin below cost of production forces miners to turn off, thus lowering the temporary cost of production floor even further while the supply from miners recirculating coins remains unchanged.  This is why naked shorting is FAR MORE detrimental to bitcoin than metals.

This is nonsense for a very simple reason. If there is gold price increase there will be increase in supply by opening more gold mines. if there is bitcoin price increase you can't increase supply by opening more bitcoin mines!
PoolMinor
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1845
Merit: 1348


XXXVII Fnord is toast without bread


View Profile
December 09, 2017, 11:52:08 PM



This is nonsense for a very simple reason. If there is gold price increase there will be increase in supply by opening more gold mines. if there is bitcoin price increase you can't increase supply by opening more bitcoin mines!


Really?

How many blocks are normally produced each day?

Heater
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 406
Merit: 361


View Profile
December 09, 2017, 11:56:23 PM

CBOE futures launch in 24 hours.

Each contract is for a US$ cash payment equal to 1 Bitcoin at the Gemini price at the Settlement Time, which is 4 pm Central Time on the Settlement Date.  Minimum price tick is $10.  Contracts settle in January, February and March.

XBT/F8 January

XBT/G8 February

XBT/H8 March

Please place your price predictions for the opening price of each of the three futures contracts.  Note:   I am still trying to work out the Settlement Date in each month. If someone has that info I will edit this post.

The expiration dates are here:

http://cfe.cboe.com/cfe-products/xbt-cboe-bitcoin-futures

Quote
Symbol   Expiration   Last   Change   High   Low   Settlement   Volume
GXBT      16250.00   -572.59   16350.10   14500.00      
XBT/F8   01/17/2018   0.0   0.0   0.0   0.0   0.0   0
XBT/G8   02/14/2018   0.0   0.0   0.0   0.0   0.0   0
XBT/H8   03/14/2018   0.0   0.0   0.0   0.0   0.0   0

I feel sorry for the poor sod trying to price these. If any of you are reading this - good luck!


This is the lol part:
Quote
XBT futures provides a way for you to buy and sell bitcoin futures in a highly regulated marketplace nearly 24 hours a day, five days per week. This gives you the flexibility to invest and divest at the optimal time for your specific trading strategy.

So flexible!
Ludwig Von
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 854
Merit: 307



View Profile
December 09, 2017, 11:57:03 PM

After launch of bitcoin at CBOE futures

Then bitcoin becomes a casino gulag where the house always wins and there is no reason to go near it instead of metals.  In metals they can only naked short it to cost of production.  In bitcoin, cost of production is fully floating and recursive based on it's own demand via hashrate, so they can literally naked short it to 0 instead of some type of cost of production floor because no such thing even exists in bitcoin.  Shorting metals below cost of production causes miners to stop bringing gold and silver to market, so it's counterintuitive because it would just create scarcity, so they don't do it (or at least not for long periods of time).  Shorting bitcoin below cost of production forces miners to turn off, thus lowering the temporary cost of production floor even further while the supply from miners recirculating coins remains unchanged.  This is why naked shorting is FAR MORE detrimental to bitcoin than metals.

This is nonsense for a very simple reason. If there is gold price increase there will be increase in supply by opening more gold mines. if there is bitcoin price increase you can't increase supply by opening more bitcoin mines!


The whole futures narative will be a turd and fizzle into the coke filled brains of Wallstreet in a few days. Nothing to see in Coinlandia.
TERA2
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 266
Merit: 222


Deb Rah Von Doom


View Profile
December 10, 2017, 12:01:53 AM

BitThumb looks just like Huobi...
Heater
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 406
Merit: 361


View Profile
December 10, 2017, 12:07:36 AM

After launch of bitcoin at CBOE futures

Then bitcoin becomes a casino gulag where the house always wins and there is no reason to go near it instead of metals.  In metals they can only naked short it to cost of production.  In bitcoin, cost of production is fully floating and recursive based on it's own demand via hashrate, so they can literally naked short it to 0 instead of some type of cost of production floor because no such thing even exists in bitcoin.  Shorting metals below cost of production causes miners to stop bringing gold and silver to market, so it's counterintuitive because it would just create scarcity, so they don't do it (or at least not for long periods of time).  Shorting bitcoin below cost of production forces miners to turn off, thus lowering the temporary cost of production floor even further while the supply from miners recirculating coins remains unchanged.  This is why naked shorting is FAR MORE detrimental to bitcoin than metals.

This is nonsense for a very simple reason. If there is gold price increase there will be increase in supply by opening more gold mines. if there is bitcoin price increase you can't increase supply by opening more bitcoin mines!


The whole futures narative will be a turd and fizzle into the coke filled brains of Wallstreet in a few days. Nothing to see in Coinlandia.

Agree. The only valid use case I can think of would be a whale protecting their position at the top of the market when they know they have a large fiat expense coming up (eg tax) and they don't want to cash out yet. The problem is they can't use BTC to underwrite the trade (it has to be Fiat) so it's useless even for simple hedging.

Tone's recent interview with Ugly Goat explains the whole scenario well:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gXUEfZY4zRk

600watt
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2338
Merit: 2106



View Profile
December 10, 2017, 12:08:53 AM

After launch of bitcoin at CBOE futures, I'm predicting many would sell it off and money from bitcoin will flow towards alt-coins. This might have never happened in the past, but I'm sure it'd happen this time, when bitcoin would crash a bit, wealthy and healthy alts like ETH/ETC will steal the spotlight.

Let's wait and watch the graphs though, things are getting very interesting.


lol.
Torque
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3822
Merit: 5504



View Profile
December 10, 2017, 12:32:14 AM

To all those geniuses out there saying that the Futures market will be the end of Bitcoin.

If they really wanted to crash and end Bitcoin, then there wouldn't be a "future" to the Futures market that they have worked so hard and so diligently to create in the first place. Now would there?

Capisce?

Long term, it's going up. Guaranteed.
HairyMaclairy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1442
Merit: 2284


Degenerate bull hatter & Bitcoin monotheist


View Profile
December 10, 2017, 12:36:23 AM
Last edit: December 10, 2017, 12:46:36 AM by HairyMaclairy


This is nonsense for a very simple reason. If there is gold price increase there wr

Agree. The only valid use case I can think of would be a whale protecting their position at the top of the market when they know they have a large fiat expense coming up (eg tax) and they don't want to cash out yet. The problem is they can't use BTC to underwrite the trade (it has to be Fiat) so it's useless even for simple hedging.

Tone's recent interview with Ugly Goat explains the whole scenario well:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gXUEfZY4zRk



CBOE rules allow the futures to be linked to trades of underlying positions held on Gemini, called an “Exchange of Contract for Underlying Position”.  So you can trade BTC on Gemini for BTC futures on CBOE.  And you can sell your future for real bitcoin.  


Thank
Heater
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 406
Merit: 361


View Profile
December 10, 2017, 12:42:39 AM


This is nonsense for a very simple reason. If there is gold price increase there wr

Agree. The only valid use case I can think of would be a whale protecting their position at the top of the market when they know they have a large fiat expense coming up (eg tax) and they don't want to cash out yet. The problem is they can't use BTC to underwrite the trade (it has to be Fiat) so it's useless even for simple hedging.

Tone's recent interview with Ugly Goat explains the whole scenario well:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gXUEfZY4zRk



CBOE rules allow the futures to be linked to trades of underlying positions held on Gemini, called an “Exchange of Contract for Underlying Position”.  So you can trade BTC on Gemini for BTC futures on CBOE.  And you can sell your future for real bitcoin. 

Then it can be useful.

The CME one doesn't have that AFAIK.
Pages: « 1 ... 18532 18533 18534 18535 18536 18537 18538 18539 18540 18541 18542 18543 18544 18545 18546 18547 18548 18549 18550 18551 18552 18553 18554 18555 18556 18557 18558 18559 18560 18561 18562 18563 18564 18565 18566 18567 18568 18569 18570 18571 18572 18573 18574 18575 18576 18577 18578 18579 18580 18581 [18582] 18583 18584 18585 18586 18587 18588 18589 18590 18591 18592 18593 18594 18595 18596 18597 18598 18599 18600 18601 18602 18603 18604 18605 18606 18607 18608 18609 18610 18611 18612 18613 18614 18615 18616 18617 18618 18619 18620 18621 18622 18623 18624 18625 18626 18627 18628 18629 18630 18631 18632 ... 34781 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!