xhomerx10
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4284
Merit: 10064
|
 |
December 09, 2017, 10:41:48 PM |
|
 Mindblowing
|
|
|
|
bones261
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1806
Merit: 1828
|
 |
December 09, 2017, 10:48:08 PM |
|
Of course the universe is not deterministic. It's called quantum mechanics. Unless you want to consider things falling within certain probabilities deterministic. If you are locked inside an internal system with an external system surrounding you, it can still be deterministic and you're doing the equivalent of being played like a VCR tape to see predetermined events. Whatever is at the top of the hierarchy takes precedent. I'm an agnostic. However, if I were to adopt a Protestant Christian belief system, I am more inclined to go with Wesley than Calvin.
|
|
|
|
xhomerx10
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4284
Merit: 10064
|
 |
December 09, 2017, 10:49:15 PM |
|
Of course the universe is not deterministic. It's called quantum mechanics. Unless you want to consider things falling within certain probabilities deterministic. Okay, that's enough. I'm going to have to put you guys on ignore because I have no idea what you're talking about. 
|
|
|
|
JayJuanGee
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4158
Merit: 12615
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to "non-custodial"
|
 |
December 09, 2017, 10:53:34 PM |
|
Yep.. it is surely taking them a long time to get back online, and they have been having quite a few of these issues in recent weeks, which does not bode well for them in terms of attracting institutional investors and even partnering with CBOE It appears that those quasi- "non traditional financial fucks" aka Gemini, did not participate in our "crash" from a few hours ago. I was just able to log in and none of my buy orders below $15k executed, and the Gemini price is currently bouncing in the $15k territory. Perhaps they will dip a little bit to get more in line with the other exchanges, but I am having my doubts, since in recent days they have been lining up a lot more closely with GDAX, which seems to be their current bouncing around price point.
|
|
|
|
HairyMaclairy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1442
Merit: 2284
Degenerate bull hatter & Bitcoin monotheist
|
 |
December 09, 2017, 11:00:48 PM |
|
Yep.. it is surely taking them a long time to get back online, and they have been having quite a few of these issues in recent weeks, which does not bode well for them in terms of attracting institutional investors and even partnering with CBOE It appears that those "non traditional financial fucks" aka Gemini, did not participate in our "crash" from a few hours ago. I was just able to log in and none of my buy orders below $15k executed, and the Gemini price is currently bouncing in the $15k territory. Perhaps they will dip a little bit to get more in line with the other exchanges, but I am having my doubts, since in recent days they have been lining up a lot more closely with GDAX, which seems to be their current bouncing around price point. If institutional money stabilises Gdax and Gemini, then arb will eventually clean up BFx and Bitstamp. I think we all risk being bored silly.
|
|
|
|
pfrtlpfmpf
|
 |
December 09, 2017, 11:08:17 PM |
|
*prayforbitcoin*
Wait, we´ve got the fork for that, soon: "bitcoin god", for all you believers out there. It´s no problem, to believe, but be carefull in what you believe.
|
|
|
|
realr0ach
Sr. Member
  
Offline
Activity: 924
Merit: 311
#TheGoyimKnow
|
 |
December 09, 2017, 11:13:40 PM |
|
After launch of bitcoin at CBOE futures
Then bitcoin becomes a casino gulag where the house always wins and there is no reason to go near it instead of metals. In metals they can only naked short it to cost of production. In bitcoin, cost of production is fully floating and recursive based on it's own demand via hashrate, so they can literally naked short it to 0 instead of some type of cost of production floor because no such thing even exists in bitcoin. Shorting metals below cost of production causes miners to stop bringing gold and silver to market, so it's counterintuitive because it would just create scarcity, so they don't do it (or at least not for long periods of time). Shorting bitcoin below cost of production forces miners to turn off, thus lowering the temporary cost of production floor even further while the supply from miners recirculating coins remains unchanged. This is why naked shorting is FAR MORE detrimental to bitcoin than metals.
|
|
|
|
savetherainforest
|
 |
December 09, 2017, 11:27:28 PM |
|
After launch of bitcoin at CBOE futures
Then bitcoin becomes a casino gulag where the house always wins and there is no reason to go near it instead of metals. In metals they can only naked short it to cost of production. In bitcoin, cost of production is fully floating and recursive based on it's own demand via hashrate, so they can literally naked short it to 0 instead of some type of cost of production floor because no such thing even exists in bitcoin. Shorting metals below cost of production causes miners to stop bringing gold and silver to market, so it's counterintuitive because it would just create scarcity, so they don't do it (or at least not for long periods of time). Shorting bitcoin below cost of production forces miners to turn off, thus lowering the temporary cost of production floor even further while the supply from miners recirculating coins remains unchanged. This is why naked shorting is FAR MORE detrimental to bitcoin than metals. If "the house" consists of the "hodlers" and the money comes from the banks. I'm fine with that. 
|
|
|
|
gembitz
|
 |
December 09, 2017, 11:28:09 PM |
|
 BTCBTC astronomical price explained^
|
|
|
|
realr0ach
Sr. Member
  
Offline
Activity: 924
Merit: 311
#TheGoyimKnow
|
 |
December 09, 2017, 11:31:57 PM |
|
After launch of bitcoin at CBOE futures
Then bitcoin becomes a casino gulag where the house always wins and there is no reason to go near it instead of metals. In metals they can only naked short it to cost of production. In bitcoin, cost of production is fully floating and recursive based on it's own demand via hashrate, so they can literally naked short it to 0 instead of some type of cost of production floor because no such thing even exists in bitcoin. Shorting metals below cost of production causes miners to stop bringing gold and silver to market, so it's counterintuitive because it would just create scarcity, so they don't do it (or at least not for long periods of time). Shorting bitcoin below cost of production forces miners to turn off, thus lowering the temporary cost of production floor even further while the supply from miners recirculating coins remains unchanged. This is why naked shorting is FAR MORE detrimental to bitcoin than metals. If "the house" consists of the "hodlers" and the money comes from the banks. I'm fine with that.  No, "the house" is not the hodlers, because the transactions are settled in USD, so the house is the US govt, the fed, or something like the BIS/cult of usury jews if you go up the totem pole.
|
|
|
|
becoin
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3431
Merit: 1233
|
 |
December 09, 2017, 11:43:41 PM |
|
After launch of bitcoin at CBOE futures
Then bitcoin becomes a casino gulag where the house always wins and there is no reason to go near it instead of metals. In metals they can only naked short it to cost of production. In bitcoin, cost of production is fully floating and recursive based on it's own demand via hashrate, so they can literally naked short it to 0 instead of some type of cost of production floor because no such thing even exists in bitcoin. Shorting metals below cost of production causes miners to stop bringing gold and silver to market, so it's counterintuitive because it would just create scarcity, so they don't do it (or at least not for long periods of time). Shorting bitcoin below cost of production forces miners to turn off, thus lowering the temporary cost of production floor even further while the supply from miners recirculating coins remains unchanged. This is why naked shorting is FAR MORE detrimental to bitcoin than metals. This is nonsense for a very simple reason. If there is gold price increase there will be increase in supply by opening more gold mines. if there is bitcoin price increase you can't increase supply by opening more bitcoin mines!
|
|
|
|
PoolMinor
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1845
Merit: 1348
XXXVII Fnord is toast without bread
|
 |
December 09, 2017, 11:52:08 PM |
|
This is nonsense for a very simple reason. If there is gold price increase there will be increase in supply by opening more gold mines. if there is bitcoin price increase you can't increase supply by opening more bitcoin mines!
Really? How many blocks are normally produced each day? 
|
|
|
|
Heater
|
 |
December 09, 2017, 11:56:23 PM |
|
CBOE futures launch in 24 hours.
Each contract is for a US$ cash payment equal to 1 Bitcoin at the Gemini price at the Settlement Time, which is 4 pm Central Time on the Settlement Date. Minimum price tick is $10. Contracts settle in January, February and March.
XBT/F8 January
XBT/G8 February
XBT/H8 March
Please place your price predictions for the opening price of each of the three futures contracts. Note: I am still trying to work out the Settlement Date in each month. If someone has that info I will edit this post.
The expiration dates are here: http://cfe.cboe.com/cfe-products/xbt-cboe-bitcoin-futuresSymbol Expiration Last Change High Low Settlement Volume GXBT 16250.00 -572.59 16350.10 14500.00 XBT/F8 01/17/2018 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 XBT/G8 02/14/2018 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 XBT/H8 03/14/2018 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0
I feel sorry for the poor sod trying to price these. If any of you are reading this - good luck! This is the lol part: XBT futures provides a way for you to buy and sell bitcoin futures in a highly regulated marketplace nearly 24 hours a day, five days per week. This gives you the flexibility to invest and divest at the optimal time for your specific trading strategy. So flexible!
|
|
|
|
Ludwig Von
|
 |
December 09, 2017, 11:57:03 PM |
|
After launch of bitcoin at CBOE futures
Then bitcoin becomes a casino gulag where the house always wins and there is no reason to go near it instead of metals. In metals they can only naked short it to cost of production. In bitcoin, cost of production is fully floating and recursive based on it's own demand via hashrate, so they can literally naked short it to 0 instead of some type of cost of production floor because no such thing even exists in bitcoin. Shorting metals below cost of production causes miners to stop bringing gold and silver to market, so it's counterintuitive because it would just create scarcity, so they don't do it (or at least not for long periods of time). Shorting bitcoin below cost of production forces miners to turn off, thus lowering the temporary cost of production floor even further while the supply from miners recirculating coins remains unchanged. This is why naked shorting is FAR MORE detrimental to bitcoin than metals. This is nonsense for a very simple reason. If there is gold price increase there will be increase in supply by opening more gold mines. if there is bitcoin price increase you can't increase supply by opening more bitcoin mines! The whole futures narative will be a turd and fizzle into the coke filled brains of Wallstreet in a few days. Nothing to see in Coinlandia.
|
|
|
|
TERA2
Full Member
 
Offline
Activity: 266
Merit: 222
Deb Rah Von Doom
|
 |
December 10, 2017, 12:01:53 AM |
|
BitThumb looks just like Huobi...
|
|
|
|
Heater
|
 |
December 10, 2017, 12:07:36 AM |
|
After launch of bitcoin at CBOE futures
Then bitcoin becomes a casino gulag where the house always wins and there is no reason to go near it instead of metals. In metals they can only naked short it to cost of production. In bitcoin, cost of production is fully floating and recursive based on it's own demand via hashrate, so they can literally naked short it to 0 instead of some type of cost of production floor because no such thing even exists in bitcoin. Shorting metals below cost of production causes miners to stop bringing gold and silver to market, so it's counterintuitive because it would just create scarcity, so they don't do it (or at least not for long periods of time). Shorting bitcoin below cost of production forces miners to turn off, thus lowering the temporary cost of production floor even further while the supply from miners recirculating coins remains unchanged. This is why naked shorting is FAR MORE detrimental to bitcoin than metals. This is nonsense for a very simple reason. If there is gold price increase there will be increase in supply by opening more gold mines. if there is bitcoin price increase you can't increase supply by opening more bitcoin mines! The whole futures narative will be a turd and fizzle into the coke filled brains of Wallstreet in a few days. Nothing to see in Coinlandia. Agree. The only valid use case I can think of would be a whale protecting their position at the top of the market when they know they have a large fiat expense coming up (eg tax) and they don't want to cash out yet. The problem is they can't use BTC to underwrite the trade (it has to be Fiat) so it's useless even for simple hedging. Tone's recent interview with Ugly Goat explains the whole scenario well: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gXUEfZY4zRk
|
|
|
|
600watt
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2338
Merit: 2106
|
 |
December 10, 2017, 12:08:53 AM |
|
After launch of bitcoin at CBOE futures, I'm predicting many would sell it off and money from bitcoin will flow towards alt-coins. This might have never happened in the past, but I'm sure it'd happen this time, when bitcoin would crash a bit, wealthy and healthy alts like ETH/ETC will steal the spotlight.
Let's wait and watch the graphs though, things are getting very interesting.
lol.
|
|
|
|
Torque
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3822
Merit: 5504
|
 |
December 10, 2017, 12:32:14 AM |
|
To all those geniuses out there saying that the Futures market will be the end of Bitcoin.
If they really wanted to crash and end Bitcoin, then there wouldn't be a "future" to the Futures market that they have worked so hard and so diligently to create in the first place. Now would there?
Capisce?
Long term, it's going up. Guaranteed.
|
|
|
|
HairyMaclairy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1442
Merit: 2284
Degenerate bull hatter & Bitcoin monotheist
|
 |
December 10, 2017, 12:36:23 AM Last edit: December 10, 2017, 12:46:36 AM by HairyMaclairy |
|
This is nonsense for a very simple reason. If there is gold price increase there wr Agree. The only valid use case I can think of would be a whale protecting their position at the top of the market when they know they have a large fiat expense coming up (eg tax) and they don't want to cash out yet. The problem is they can't use BTC to underwrite the trade (it has to be Fiat) so it's useless even for simple hedging. Tone's recent interview with Ugly Goat explains the whole scenario well: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gXUEfZY4zRkCBOE rules allow the futures to be linked to trades of underlying positions held on Gemini, called an “Exchange of Contract for Underlying Position”. So you can trade BTC on Gemini for BTC futures on CBOE. And you can sell your future for real bitcoin. Thank
|
|
|
|
Heater
|
 |
December 10, 2017, 12:42:39 AM |
|
This is nonsense for a very simple reason. If there is gold price increase there wr Agree. The only valid use case I can think of would be a whale protecting their position at the top of the market when they know they have a large fiat expense coming up (eg tax) and they don't want to cash out yet. The problem is they can't use BTC to underwrite the trade (it has to be Fiat) so it's useless even for simple hedging. Tone's recent interview with Ugly Goat explains the whole scenario well: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gXUEfZY4zRkCBOE rules allow the futures to be linked to trades of underlying positions held on Gemini, called an “Exchange of Contract for Underlying Position”. So you can trade BTC on Gemini for BTC futures on CBOE. And you can sell your future for real bitcoin. Then it can be useful. The CME one doesn't have that AFAIK.
|
|
|
|
|