gentlemand
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2604
Merit: 3088
Welt Am Draht
|
 |
December 14, 2017, 08:23:05 PM |
|
Any other alternative currencies anybody would like to casually drop in the conversation? Transaction fees got you down? Come share your concerns. Perhaps bigger blocks are the answer, because nobody ever thought of that.
Ugh.
No. Let's talk about new 'opportunities'. Check this out - https://nebeus.comThey haven't even filled in the 'how it works' page.
|
|
|
|
jojo69
Legendary
Online
Activity: 3570
Merit: 5152
diamond-handed zealot
|
 |
December 14, 2017, 08:25:57 PM |
|
Any other alternative currencies anybody would like to casually drop in the conversation? Transaction fees got you down? Come share your concerns. Perhaps bigger blocks are the answer, because nobody ever thought of that.
Ugh.
I saw a sig ad for "bitcoin green" I like green
|
|
|
|
|
HairyMaclairy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1442
Merit: 2284
Degenerate bull hatter & Bitcoin monotheist
|
 |
December 14, 2017, 08:29:34 PM |
|
We need more throughput. Stop being a fucking tribalist and focus on what matters.
Of course we need more throughput. But you need to come up with something better than just increasing blocksize by itself because that’s a shit solution from a decentralization point of view. And I’m not seeing any other options other than LN and other second layer networks. I’m all ears if you can point to a solution.
|
|
|
|
Rosewater Foundation
|
 |
December 14, 2017, 08:33:11 PM |
|
Any other alternative currencies anybody would like to casually drop in the conversation? Transaction fees got you down? Come share your concerns. Perhaps bigger blocks are the answer, because nobody ever thought of that.
Ugh.
I saw a sig ad for "bitcoin green" I like green Well played sir.
|
|
|
|
HairyMaclairy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1442
Merit: 2284
Degenerate bull hatter & Bitcoin monotheist
|
 |
December 14, 2017, 08:33:53 PM |
|
Now that we have Bitcoin God, can we fork it to make Bitcoin Jesus?
|
|
|
|
milkshock100
Member

Offline
Activity: 242
Merit: 14
|
 |
December 14, 2017, 08:34:32 PM |
|
No it’s more meaningless bankster propaganda
|
|
|
|
luckygenough56
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1526
Merit: 1012
|
 |
December 14, 2017, 08:35:30 PM |
|
who cares we have infinite tethers
|
|
|
|
mike4001
|
 |
December 14, 2017, 08:37:12 PM |
|
everybody is now crazy about ripple.They missed the train with bitcoin and now are buying ripple, eth, etc, but surprisingly bitcoin price is still holding very well  . This is exactly the same that happened a few months ago (march? may?) when Bitcoin price stalled and alts were pumped big time. In the end, most of those profits returned to Bitcoin, alts stalled, and... here we are again. It's the logical step. Wait for your altcoin to pump and pump and when you are satisfied return to the "gold-standard" and buy bitcoin to get out your profits to a (more or less) safe place. Bitcoin's price rises and the altcoins fall again. And at the moment MANY altcoins are pumped!
|
|
|
|
JayJuanGee
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4130
Merit: 12470
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to "non-custodial"
|
 |
December 14, 2017, 08:38:58 PM |
|
Sideways for days - means we will go south soon... Watching this pattern for years now. Only one guy needs to start a dump and well be at 4 digits....
I have been watching these patterns for years now, too. and for the first two years, during 2014 and 2015, there was a tendency to break down after sideways; however, the past two years (2016 and 2017), there has been a tendency to break up, after sideways. So you seem to be suggesting that we are reverting to the 2014-2015 pattern? Seems way too early to call that kind of reversion, no?
|
|
|
|
RayX12
|
 |
December 14, 2017, 08:41:48 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
milkshock100
Member

Offline
Activity: 242
Merit: 14
|
 |
December 14, 2017, 08:43:07 PM |
|
Sideways for days - means we will go south soon... Watching this pattern for years now. Only one guy needs to start a dump and well be at 4 digits....
I have been watching these patterns for years now, too. and for the first two years, during 2014 and 2015, there was a tendency to break down after sideways; however, the past two years (2016 and 2017), there has been a tendency to break up, after sideways. So you seem to be suggesting that we are reverting to the 2014-2015 pattern? Seems way too early to call that kind of reversion, no? Need to keep an eye on the alts if they’re pumping then the stall is for that reason. As stated above The scam coins will stop being pumped and the profits will go back to btc.
|
|
|
|
luckygenough56
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1526
Merit: 1012
|
 |
December 14, 2017, 08:43:31 PM |
|
when people will want to redeem fiat 180 millions usd will be missing - go tether
|
|
|
|
RayX12
|
 |
December 14, 2017, 08:44:43 PM |
|
Sideways for days - means we will go south soon... Watching this pattern for years now. Only one guy needs to start a dump and well be at 4 digits....
I have been watching these patterns for years now, too. and for the first two years, during 2014 and 2015, there was a tendency to break down after sideways; however, the past two years (2016 and 2017), there has been a tendency to break up, after sideways. So you seem to be suggesting that we are reverting to the 2014-2015 pattern? Seems way too early to call that kind of reversion, no? Need to keep an eye on the alts if they’re pumping then the stall is for that reason. As stated above The scam coins will stop being pumped and the profits will go back to btc. No pumping BTC untill the whales can cash out of ALT with 100% profit. 
|
|
|
|
Torque
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3822
Merit: 5504
|
 |
December 14, 2017, 08:49:21 PM |
|
Troll bears on WO are so funny.. You guys really think we don't notice that you vanish from here when alts are pumping, and then suddenly show up here whenever the Bitcoin price is going sideways? We notice, ok? And we put you in the 'troll' category, and many of you on /ignore. 
|
|
|
|
Ibian
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2268
Merit: 1278
|
 |
December 14, 2017, 08:49:32 PM |
|
We need more throughput. Stop being a fucking tribalist and focus on what matters.
Of course we need more throughput. But you need to come up with something better than just increasing blocksize by itself because that’s a shit solution from a decentralization point of view. And I’m not seeing any other options other than LN and other second layer networks. I’m all ears if you can point to a solution. Why? Bigger blocks means more throughput. What is this better that you demand? Suggest something better. Otherwise that's the best we got.
|
|
|
|
jojo69
Legendary
Online
Activity: 3570
Merit: 5152
diamond-handed zealot
|
 |
December 14, 2017, 08:52:43 PM |
|
We need more throughput. Stop being a fucking tribalist and focus on what matters.
Of course we need more throughput. But you need to come up with something better than just increasing blocksize by itself because that’s a shit solution from a decentralization point of view. And I’m not seeing any other options other than LN and other second layer networks. I’m all ears if you can point to a solution. Why? Bigger blocks means more throughput. What is this better that you demand? Suggest something better. Otherwise that's the best we got. Bigger blocks is like a hoarder building a new room on their house to store more crap. It doesn't solve the problem, it just allows the problem to get bigger. Also...a linear solution for an exponentially expanding problem... 
|
|
|
|
Torque
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3822
Merit: 5504
|
 |
December 14, 2017, 08:56:10 PM |
|
Why? Bigger blocks means more throughput. What is this better that you demand? Suggest something better. Otherwise that's the best we got.
Feel free to make a list of all the hundreds of things that you've been trying to buy online daily or monthly with bitcoin. I'm sure it's a mile long. Those daily fees, amiright? 
|
|
|
|
Ibian
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2268
Merit: 1278
|
 |
December 14, 2017, 08:57:56 PM |
|
We need more throughput. Stop being a fucking tribalist and focus on what matters.
Of course we need more throughput. But you need to come up with something better than just increasing blocksize by itself because that’s a shit solution from a decentralization point of view. And I’m not seeing any other options other than LN and other second layer networks. I’m all ears if you can point to a solution. Why? Bigger blocks means more throughput. What is this better that you demand? Suggest something better. Otherwise that's the best we got. Bigger blocks is like a hoarder building a new room on their house to store more crap. It doesn't solve the problem, it just allows the problem to get bigger. Also...a linear solution for an exponentially expanding problem...  It's like more throughput. Which is the issue here.
|
|
|
|
Ibian
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2268
Merit: 1278
|
 |
December 14, 2017, 08:59:10 PM |
|
Why? Bigger blocks means more throughput. What is this better that you demand? Suggest something better. Otherwise that's the best we got.
Feel free to make a list of all the hundreds of things that you've been trying to buy online daily or monthly with bitcoin. I'm sure it's a mile long. Those daily fees, amiright?  I have spent literally hundreds in fees over the last few months. I spent $50 just today. Just on transfers. It's real money out of my pocket. And everyone elses. Forget your fucking coffee. Fees don't need to be that big. It's a choice. That we have made. Time to make a better one.
|
|
|
|
|