adamstgBit
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1037
Trusted Bitcoiner
|
|
December 09, 2013, 08:29:22 PM |
|
Price bumping around a lot, but with volume that makes it more or less meaningless as an indicator. The pro's seem to be on the sidelines.
how many coin were sold in the last 5 seconds? a couple hundred maybe? Wait- is that one of those mBTC adjusted charts? no.
|
|
|
|
mb300sd
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1000
Drunk Posts
|
|
December 09, 2013, 08:45:18 PM |
|
Price bumping around a lot, but with volume that makes it more or less meaningless as an indicator. The pro's seem to be on the sidelines.
how many coin were sold in the last 5 seconds? a couple hundred maybe? Wait- is that one of those mBTC adjusted charts? Low volume on the 28th as well. Maybe monday is just a slow day on BTCChina...
|
|
|
|
macsga
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1484
Merit: 1002
Strange, yet attractive.
|
|
December 09, 2013, 08:47:01 PM |
|
Ah, THAT'S WHY!
|
|
|
|
saekki
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 31
Merit: 0
|
|
December 09, 2013, 08:55:21 PM |
|
Price bumping around a lot, but with volume that makes it more or less meaningless as an indicator. The pro's seem to be on the sidelines.
how many coin were sold in the last 5 seconds? a couple hundred maybe? http://s16.postimg.org/5jsqnllph/Untitled.png Wait- is that one of those mBTC adjusted charts? Low volume on the 28th as well. Maybe monday is just a slow day on BTCChina... Those are weekly volumes. And last is just this monday. So that is why "low" instead of low.
|
|
|
|
molecular
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2772
Merit: 1019
|
|
December 09, 2013, 08:58:51 PM |
|
Those are weekly volumes. And last is just this monday. So that is why "low" instead of low.
I see that. But why is it "volmue" instead of volume?
|
|
|
|
ChartBuddy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2338
Merit: 1802
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
|
|
December 09, 2013, 09:01:54 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
adamstgBit
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1037
Trusted Bitcoiner
|
|
December 09, 2013, 09:02:17 PM |
|
Those are weekly volumes. And last is just this monday. So that is why "low" instead of low.
I see that. But why is it "volmue" instead of volume? because adam. just buy.....
|
|
|
|
adamstgBit
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1037
Trusted Bitcoiner
|
|
December 09, 2013, 09:03:31 PM |
|
woot woot 900 32,000 here we come!
|
|
|
|
|
P_Shep
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1795
Merit: 1208
This is not OK.
|
|
December 09, 2013, 09:07:36 PM |
|
OK guys, I ran the calculations. I incorporated S curve adoption, trigonometric functions, a cold beer on a Friday night, a pair of jeans that fit just right, and something I pulled from my underwear while I was wearing them. This all results in a new exponential trendline, demonstrated below: Looks good, can't wait!
|
|
|
|
molecular
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2772
Merit: 1019
|
|
December 09, 2013, 09:07:49 PM |
|
Those are weekly volumes. And last is just this monday. So that is why "low" instead of low.
I see that. But why is it "volmue" instead of volume? because adam. just buy..... I can't
|
|
|
|
adamstgBit
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1037
Trusted Bitcoiner
|
|
December 09, 2013, 09:08:56 PM |
|
OK guys, I ran the calculations. I incorporated S curve adoption, trigonometric functions, a cold beer on a Friday night, a pair of jeans that fit just right, and something I pulled from my underwear while I was wearing them. This all results in a new exponential trendline, demonstrated below: finally poeple are catching on.
|
|
|
|
byronbb
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1414
Merit: 1000
HODL OR DIE
|
|
December 09, 2013, 09:13:50 PM |
|
OK guys, I ran the calculations. I incorporated S curve adoption, trigonometric functions, a cold beer on a Friday night, a pair of jeans that fit just right, and something I pulled from my underwear while I was wearing them. This all results in a new exponential trendline, demonstrated below: Not sure how relevant 2011 data is anymore, might have to adjust it by volume in usd.
|
|
|
|
tarmi
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1232
Merit: 1011
|
|
December 09, 2013, 09:15:15 PM |
|
OK guys, I ran the calculations. I incorporated S curve adoption, trigonometric functions, a cold beer on a Friday night, a pair of jeans that fit just right, and something I pulled from my underwear while I was wearing them. This all results in a new exponential trendline, demonstrated below: Not sure how relevant 2011 data is anymore, might have to adjust it by volume in usd. what does that mean? are we going to 32 000 next year? should I buy?
|
|
|
|
11ams
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
|
|
December 09, 2013, 09:18:09 PM |
|
I think it's great but I wouldn't expect to hear a definitive answer for a few weeks.
|
|
|
|
ardana123
|
|
December 09, 2013, 09:18:35 PM |
|
Should I buy? Should I buy? Should I buy? Should I buy? Should I buy? Should I buy? Should I buy? Should I buy?
|
|
|
|
macsga
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1484
Merit: 1002
Strange, yet attractive.
|
|
December 09, 2013, 09:19:03 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
macsga
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1484
Merit: 1002
Strange, yet attractive.
|
|
December 09, 2013, 09:19:33 PM |
|
Should I buy? Should I buy? Should I buy? Should I buy? Should I buy? Should I buy? Should I buy? Should I buy?
No - don't do it! DON'T!!!!
|
|
|
|
crazy_rabbit
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1204
Merit: 1002
RUM AND CARROTS: A PIRATE LIFE FOR ME
|
|
December 09, 2013, 09:21:08 PM |
|
Those are weekly volumes. And last is just this monday. So that is why "low" instead of low.
I see that. But why is it "volmue" instead of volume? because adam. just buy..... I can't because you must be out of fiat, meaning your all in. Ooooh boy.
|
|
|
|
Davyd05
|
|
December 09, 2013, 09:24:29 PM |
|
Should I buy? Should I buy? Should I buy? Should I buy? Should I buy? Should I buy? Should I buy? Should I buy?
but you sold at 700.. how could you buy .. now oh yeah..
|
|
|
|
|