Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion

[Arriemoller]

Is that not a problem?  According to an earlier post (no pun intended!) the purple paint must be “placed so that the bottom of the mark is not less than 3 feet from the ground or more than 5 feet from the ground.“ so if it goes right down to the ground it's not compliant.
Probably not serious, but you wouldn't want an issue on a technicality.

tl;dr: Posts painted entirely purple are more than is required.

Texas Penal Code § 30.05. Criminal Trespass

Sec 2 (D) the placement of identifying purple paint marks on trees or posts on the property, provided that the marks are:

(ii) placed so that the bottom of the mark is not less than three feet from the ground or more than five feet from the ground;  and

.... this seems quite clear that the mark needs to end 3 to 5 feet above the ground

.... a post painted all the way to the ground is just a purple post, not a purple-marked post

... at least it's an upgrade on a rusty old pipe

Doesn't the "not less than" part mean that you can paint it more if you so desire

[1714500184]

1714500184

[1714500184]

1714500184

[1714500184]

1714500184

[1714500184]

1714500184

[1714500184]

1714500184

[ChartBuddy]

Explanation

[tertius993]

Is that not a problem?  According to an earlier post (no pun intended!) the purple paint must be “placed so that the bottom of the mark is not less than 3 feet from the ground or more than 5 feet from the ground.“ so if it goes right down to the ground it's not compliant.
Probably not serious, but you wouldn't want an issue on a technicality.

tl;dr: Posts painted entirely purple are more than is required.

Texas Penal Code § 30.05. Criminal Trespass

Sec 2 (D) the placement of identifying purple paint marks on trees or posts on the property, provided that the marks are:

(ii) placed so that the bottom of the mark is not less than three feet from the ground or more than five feet from the ground;  and

.... this seems quite clear that the mark needs to end 3 to 5 feet above the ground

.... a post painted all the way to the ground is just a purple post, not a purple-marked post

... at least it's an upgrade on a rusty old pipe

Doesn't the "not less than" part mean that you can paint it more if you so desire

Don’t think so. I am not a lawyer but that reads as “at least” to me. E.g. two feet or even no feet is “less than” three feet and so fails the “not less than” test.  I assume the point being that it shows as a clearly applied mark rather than simply happening to be a purple bit of material that was used to it make a fence.

It may be that it has become common for the posts to be wholly purple and it will be thus generally understood that that is equally acceptable.

[ChartBuddy]

Explanation

[Arriemoller]

Is that not a problem?  According to an earlier post (no pun intended!) the purple paint must be “placed so that the bottom of the mark is not less than 3 feet from the ground or more than 5 feet from the ground.“ so if it goes right down to the ground it's not compliant.
Probably not serious, but you wouldn't want an issue on a technicality.

tl;dr: Posts painted entirely purple are more than is required.

Texas Penal Code § 30.05. Criminal Trespass

Sec 2 (D) the placement of identifying purple paint marks on trees or posts on the property, provided that the marks are:

(ii) placed so that the bottom of the mark is not less than three feet from the ground or more than five feet from the ground;  and

.... this seems quite clear that the mark needs to end 3 to 5 feet above the ground

.... a post painted all the way to the ground is just a purple post, not a purple-marked post

... at least it's an upgrade on a rusty old pipe

Doesn't the "not less than" part mean that you can paint it more if you so desire

Don’t think so. I am not a lawyer but that reads as “at least” to me. E.g. two feet or even no feet is “less than” three feet and so fails the “not less than” test.  I assume the point being that it shows as a clearly applied mark rather than simply happening to be a purple bit of material that was used to it make a fence.

It may be that it has become common for the posts to be wholly purple and it will be thus generally understood that that is equally acceptable.

I read that as a minimum requirement that you can exceed if you so desire. But I'm not a native speaker.

[ChartBuddy]

Explanation

[tertius993]

Is that not a problem?  According to an earlier post (no pun intended!) the purple paint must be “placed so that the bottom of the mark is not less than 3 feet from the ground or more than 5 feet from the ground.“ so if it goes right down to the ground it's not compliant.
Probably not serious, but you wouldn't want an issue on a technicality.

tl;dr: Posts painted entirely purple are more than is required.

Texas Penal Code § 30.05. Criminal Trespass

Sec 2 (D) the placement of identifying purple paint marks on trees or posts on the property, provided that the marks are:

(ii) placed so that the bottom of the mark is not less than three feet from the ground or more than five feet from the ground;  and

.... this seems quite clear that the mark needs to end 3 to 5 feet above the ground

.... a post painted all the way to the ground is just a purple post, not a purple-marked post

... at least it's an upgrade on a rusty old pipe

Doesn't the "not less than" part mean that you can paint it more if you so desire

Don’t think so. I am not a lawyer but that reads as “at least” to me. E.g. two feet or even no feet is “less than” three feet and so fails the “not less than” test.  I assume the point being that it shows as a clearly applied mark rather than simply happening to be a purple bit of material that was used to it make a fence.

It may be that it has become common for the posts to be wholly purple and it will be thus generally understood that that is equally acceptable.

I read that as a minimum requirement that you can exceed if you so desire. But I'm not a native speaker.

I don’t think so, though I agree it is poorly worded.  I believe what it is trying to say is that the bottom (i.e. the lowest point) of the mark must be between 3 and 5 feet above the ground.

[philipma1957]

Is that not a problem?  According to an earlier post (no pun intended!) the purple paint must be “placed so that the bottom of the mark is not less than 3 feet from the ground or more than 5 feet from the ground.“ so if it goes right down to the ground it's not compliant.
Probably not serious, but you wouldn't want an issue on a technicality.

tl;dr: Posts painted entirely purple are more than is required.

Texas Penal Code § 30.05. Criminal Trespass

Sec 2 (D) the placement of identifying purple paint marks on trees or posts on the property, provided that the marks are:

(ii) placed so that the bottom of the mark is not less than three feet from the ground or more than five feet from the ground;  and

.... this seems quite clear that the mark needs to end 3 to 5 feet above the ground

.... a post painted all the way to the ground is just a purple post, not a purple-marked post

... at least it's an upgrade on a rusty old pipe

Doesn't the "not less than" part mean that you can paint it more if you so desire

Don’t think so. I am not a lawyer but that reads as “at least” to me. E.g. two feet or even no feet is “less than” three feet and so fails the “not less than” test.  I assume the point being that it shows as a clearly applied mark rather than simply happening to be a purple bit of material that was used to it make a fence.

It may be that it has become common for the posts to be wholly purple and it will be thus generally understood that that is equally acceptable.

I read that as a minimum requirement that you can exceed if you so desire. But I'm not a native speaker.

As a native speaker taught in Brooklyn , NY

I read it as inbetween 36 and 60 inches.

Interestedly it does mean it could be a small mark about an inch of purple say at the 48 inch mark.

Which is cooler since the piece of shit may not see it.


Bob can paint a rainbow at the 12 inch to 36 inch mark to correct his error.

pun intended

[ChartBuddy]

Explanation

[El duderino_]

Who’s selling at bottom ?

Or at -38% ?

Anything from here to lower is considered very very weird to say the least

[cAPSLOCK]

Wasn't that long ago that we were celebrating BTC hitting WO post parity.

I wish.

If Bitcoin does not fail, and is not superseded by another project, your wish will be granted.

[cAPSLOCK]

30,000 pages and still no new forum software.

SMF really is nice forum software.  I ran a little forum for a while using it.

But it's amazingly odd that this forum has withstood the sorts of pressures it has running an outdated version of what was an early release of the software.

Seriously... it sort of does not make any sense at all.  I have noticed mods combining sequential posts a lot recently.  I assume the database is becoming unwieldy.

[cAPSLOCK]

https://twitter.com/fairfreedigital/status/1461144630972534788?t=g5rKryzv28SLKvoj8bTdHg&s=03

Read the paper.

SPOILER ALERT
I skip to the main part:

Well... That is a wacky sort of graph.  But I kind of like it!  Still, I feel certain Proudhon would not approve of the math/science behind that one.

[ChartBuddy]

Explanation

[Gachapin]

Who’s selling at bottom ?

Or at -38% ?

Anything from here to lower is considered very very weird to say the least

I woke up, saw the push back down and thought exactly the same.

Maybe manipulation to buy cheap OTC.
But def. some frustration to the short term bulls.

[ChartBuddy]

Explanation

[philipma1957]

Who’s selling at bottom ?

Or at -38% ?

Anything from here to lower is considered very very weird to say the least

Just got a my buy $50 a day in btc going on and on and on.

I will hopefully get out of the 1-10 btc status by Jan 1 2023.

[Gachapin]

Who’s selling at bottom ?

Or at -38% ?

Anything from here to lower is considered very very weird to say the least

Just got a my buy $50 a day in btc going on and on and on.

I will hopefully get out of the 1-10 btc status by Jan 1 2023.

Every time I read about someone cracking the 10btc mark, I'm forced to think about mindrust. He was so proud of his 10   ...for a few days.

Please note: Not a comparison to you! I read you are mining shit for bit, and that you most likely have a totally different approach to Bitcoin than him.

[Richy_T]

I read that as a minimum requirement that you can exceed if you so desire. But I'm not a native speaker.

You can exceed it but that is height above the ground. So the bottom of the mark must be three feet or more above the ground. If you painted it extra, then it would be less than three feet above the ground.

[philipma1957]

Who’s selling at bottom ?

Or at -38% ?

Anything from here to lower is considered very very weird to say the least

Just got a my buy $50 a day in btc going on and on and on.

I will hopefully get out of the 1-10 btc status by Jan 1 2023.

Every time I read about someone cracking the 10btc mark, I'm forced to think about mindrust. He was so proud of his 10   ...for a few days.

Please note: Not a comparison to you! I read you are mining shit for bit, and that you most likely have a totally different approach to Bitcoin than him.

If I get to ten coins by Jan 2023 I will be approaching my 66th birthday.

I would be looking to opt out of btc and the game in 2027.

So I am not dropping out like mindrust did 😊

We have four guys in on this.

64 me
58 warehouse owner
44 buysolar my partner since 2014
24  son of warehouse owner.

once the solar array is in place at the warehouse this spring or summer. The mine will always make profits.

Oh we may not be like 2021 profits but we will always make profits.