You're just repeating the same BS without any arguments.
How do you expect anyone else but you would be able to understand what you actually mean, which is backed by... accusations out of thin air.
All right. How can I prove it with arguments then?
After
four three years of reading you guys - I began to notice patterns. Very distinct ones too, coming from very specific accounts.
BTW, I’ll tell you why and how I started thinking about this.
I took in the literal meaning - one of your buddy’s claims - that we need the shill-onians to get us to where Bitcoin is going. [yousuck and titter promo]
You know, that beggar shill. Guess who trolled with his avatar subtext - “I need 3 Dogecoins, urgently”. Ring a bell?
Finally I know that you guys have very limited intellect, and you’re so full of shit. It’s because you’re sort of young and that also seems to be very common between you.
Nothing is proof of anything of course. But my gut, almost always, serves me right - without a fail.
No more benefits of a doubt for you. You’re a shill-onian, end of story.
DUDE, WHAT?!?!
What an awesome LOL that was!!!
Sorry, no offense (this time, i mean it)!
That "I need 3 Dogecoins, urgently" subtext was meant as
a parody on that (real) Cuntonian dude begging for 3 Bitcoin!!! (thus revealing himself after lurking for months, AFAIR).
And you really thought i meant that... uhm...
literally?!
Fuck, this explains every single of your posts about me (or my posts) recently! I'm fucking grateful, thanks Bro!
WHY did you wait so long to tell me?!
But read on: If you are registering distinct patterns in networked communication, chances are quite high that you have some light form of ASD. Again, i don't think ASD is any negative or "psycho", not in any way, for a reason. Some well known geniuses had ASD, it's just a different form of percepton and information processing.
I might go too far here maybe, but we were about some other thing originally.
To make it short: Sorry for my cuntonian parody subtext, why, not sorry, but sorry that you didn't get the irony. I change my subtext for fun, randomly, following ideas or feelings about some event, llike a Cuntonian finally revealing himself by begging, for example. You might notice that i had a subtext referring to one of your offensive posts about mine, in the range of days to weeks ago. And still my current subtext, which i just looked up again (my memory probs, if you remember), is a parody of that subtext which was a parody of the post(s) of yours.
(EDIT: quoted subtext for reference:
The original fake Bitcoin chuckold cunt!
)
You might feel as relieved as me, now.
EDIT: Good night as well!
(i lost the youtube link i wanted to put here)
* See, i just like life to be funny, it's full of too much shit anyway. That's all 
EDIT2:
Had to re-read your post again:
I took in the literal meaning - one of your buddy’s claims - that we need the shill-onians to get us to where Bitcoin is going. [yousuck and titter promo]
I have some vague idea about what you mean, no idea WHO you mean, though.
Can't remember details, but that might have been irony as well, IDK.
Also, i repeatedly stated in the past that i look at WO (regulars) like a family, but you can't choose who belongs to or how somebody thinks or acts in your family.
These here are the only Bitcoiners which i share thoughts about Bitcoin with, and also even quite private stuff sometimes, but i see all of them as collegues, excluding shills, trolls, fucking roach (thank god he's gone) and some of the other cunts, which i also really try to accept in their presence. I haven't used the ignore list for months now, for higher reasons. Sometimes certain people just connect more, but if you insist on the term "buddies", i 'd say i consider a
good amount most of WO's regulars would be such to me.
Finally I know that you guys have very limited intellect, and you’re so full of shit. It’s because you’re sort of young and that also seems to be very common between you.
Uhm, i don't want to brag, but in my case, the many scientific testings i gone through in the past simply prove you wrong, while i suck at social competence (IDC, though).
I am kind of young, right, but it's my lifestyle, not my physical age that determines my public image. So i'm kind of old AND kind of young simultaneously. That's why i don't really disagree, though i had lived probably more than the half of my life already, and it was a hell of a ride, sometimes.
"Hang loose!", as we oldschool skateboarders and our "ancestors" the surfers of the 70/80's used to say.
Nothing is proof of anything of course. But my gut, almost always, serves me right - without a fail.
Now i also understand that "benefit of doubt" argument of yours.
EDIT3:
WHO would really beg for 3 Doggiecoins!? Seriously! Thanks for all the laughs. Amazing!
Good night, for real this time
Poll
