ChartBuddy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2660
Merit: 2364
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
|
 |
October 21, 2014, 04:00:50 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
600watt
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2338
Merit: 2106
|
 |
October 21, 2014, 04:02:11 PM |
|
Prediction: W3C web payments group meeting in Santa Clara 27-31 October will take up integration of bitcoin payments into W3C global standards.
November is going to be a very good month for crypto.
Any source  ? A member of the committee where is the insider trading ?
|
|
|
|
findftp
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1022
Merit: 1012
Delusional crypto obsessionist
|
 |
October 21, 2014, 04:02:46 PM |
|
Looks like all the past countless 24 hours weren't crucial for bitcoin :/
They were not crucial, they were critical. yeah right  THE NEXT 24HOURS WILL DETERMINE THE FUTURE OF BITCOINTHE WORLD!!!!  There, fixed it.
|
|
|
|
touhonoob
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
|
 |
October 21, 2014, 04:05:52 PM |
|
Prediction: W3C web payments group meeting in Santa Clara 27-31 October will take up integration of bitcoin payments into W3C global standards.
November is going to be a very good month for crypto.
Any source  ? A member of the committee http://www.w3.org/community/webpayments/The purpose of the Web Payments Community Group is to discuss, research, prototype, and create working systems that enable Universal Payment for the Web. The goal is to create a safe, decentralized system and a set of open, patent and royalty-free specifications that allow people on the Web to send each other money as easily as they exchange instant messages and e-mail today.
The goal of Web Payments is amazingly similar to Bitcoin 
|
|
|
|
aminorex
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1596
Merit: 1030
Sine secretum non libertas
|
 |
October 21, 2014, 04:14:49 PM |
|
I expect the web payments committee to seek to be neutral to competing transmission vectors. However, among transparent blockchain vectors, bitcoin is the obvious beneficiary. Any expansion in crypto use-cases is likely to increase bitcoin's leadership over other transparent-chain systems.
|
|
|
|
isov
|
 |
October 21, 2014, 04:35:06 PM |
|
I expect the web payments committee to seek to be neutral to competing transmission vectors. However, among transparent blockchain vectors, bitcoin is the obvious beneficiary. Any expansion in crypto use-cases is likely to increase bitcoin's leadership over other transparent-chain systems.
I hope you are right and this is the case. Maybe some uptrend finally. It's also almost my first anniversary bitcoining 
|
|
|
|
|
ChartBuddy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2660
Merit: 2364
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
|
 |
October 21, 2014, 05:00:46 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Globb0
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2716
Merit: 2053
Free spirit
|
 |
October 21, 2014, 05:18:50 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
Velkro
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2296
Merit: 1014
|
 |
October 21, 2014, 05:40:03 PM |
|
Prediction: W3C web payments group meeting in Santa Clara 27-31 October will take up integration of bitcoin payments into W3C global standards.
November is going to be a very good month for crypto.
That would be huge, price would go to the actual moon 
|
|
|
|
NotLambchop
|
 |
October 21, 2014, 05:43:52 PM |
|
Prediction: W3C web payments group meeting in Santa Clara 27-31 October will take up integration of bitcoin payments into W3C global standards.
November is going to be a very good month for crypto.
That would be huge, price would go to the actual moon  So bigger than the PayPal news even? Aren't you afraid that Bitcoin will blow right by the moon and wind up in uranus?
|
|
|
|
|
riiiiising
|
 |
October 21, 2014, 05:51:20 PM |
|
It's kind of scary that there are people out there now who have been invested in bitcoin for almost a year, and are still underwater. Doesn't that tell you that we've been way overvalued in 2014?
|
|
|
|
jaberwock
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3024
Merit: 1131
|
 |
October 21, 2014, 05:51:58 PM |
|
prices changes, but figure the same Boring
|
|
|
|
aminorex
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1596
Merit: 1030
Sine secretum non libertas
|
 |
October 21, 2014, 05:58:18 PM |
|
It's kind of scary that there are people out there now who have been invested in bitcoin for almost a year, and are still underwater. Doesn't that tell you that we've been way overvalued in 2014?
Bizarro logic. If you are under-water, the price likely is low relative to the mean, which means probably under-valued. If you are black, the price is more likely high relative to the mean, which means probably over-valued. Here's the problem with any claim that BTC is under- or over-valued: The degree of uncertainty in future price predictions is too high to make either judgement. A second-order model treats epistemic uncertainty as an overlay to stochastic uncertainty, but there is no generally recognized quantitive analytic methodology for valuation under conditions of epistemic uncertainty. It would be a wonderful topic for a Ph.D. thesis in behavioural economics. I suspect there are already several of that sort, but I am not current on that literature. References are solicited.
|
|
|
|
Tzupy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2198
Merit: 1094
|
 |
October 21, 2014, 05:59:49 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
ChartBuddy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2660
Merit: 2364
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
|
 |
October 21, 2014, 06:00:46 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
hyphymikey
|
 |
October 21, 2014, 06:08:40 PM |
|
Does anyone know the Chinese common name for Willy?
|
|
|
|
|