Bitcoin Forum
May 12, 2024, 01:39:40 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Poll
Question: What happens first:
New ATH - 43 (69.4%)
<$60,000 - 19 (30.6%)
Total Voters: 62

Pages: « 1 ... 9140 9141 9142 9143 9144 9145 9146 9147 9148 9149 9150 9151 9152 9153 9154 9155 9156 9157 9158 9159 9160 9161 9162 9163 9164 9165 9166 9167 9168 9169 9170 9171 9172 9173 9174 9175 9176 9177 9178 9179 9180 9181 9182 9183 9184 9185 9186 9187 9188 9189 [9190] 9191 9192 9193 9194 9195 9196 9197 9198 9199 9200 9201 9202 9203 9204 9205 9206 9207 9208 9209 9210 9211 9212 9213 9214 9215 9216 9217 9218 9219 9220 9221 9222 9223 9224 9225 9226 9227 9228 9229 9230 9231 9232 9233 9234 9235 9236 9237 9238 9239 9240 ... 33343 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion  (Read 26382244 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic. (174 posts by 3 users with 9 merit deleted.)
janos666
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 588
Merit: 500


View Profile
October 22, 2014, 04:30:48 AM

I am going to start using the term "bits" from now on when quoting prices.  I agree with Gavin.

Price is currently about $0.000387 per bit.  Let's go for bit-dollar parity!  Wink


To be honest, I think this whole 21M thing and even more so the utilization of the decimal fractions make absolutely no f¤ked sense for something like Bitcoin. This is just retarded in my opinion. A stupid mind trick fling and/or superstition service which sacrifices logic and ease of use. Not an optimal, not logical, not convenient, not nice.

If I were the one to set up a maximum number for the coin supply, my first candidate would have been the highest possible number granted by the size of the underlaying integer or floating point variable but I would have revised it to an y=10^x (where x is a convenient whole number, something close to 20).

Even if I make myself not caring about the 21 thing, but... decimal fractions?
DECIMAL FRACTIONS?

REALLY???
REALLY?HuhHuh Huh Huh

Makes no f¤cked sense. No no no... It's just wrong. Illogic and inconvenient = suboptimal ~ stupid.
I HATE TABLES I HATE TABLES I HA(╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻ TABLES I HATE TABLES I HATE TABLES
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1715521180
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715521180

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715521180
Reply with quote  #2

1715521180
Report to moderator
1715521180
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715521180

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715521180
Reply with quote  #2

1715521180
Report to moderator
Adrian-x
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1372
Merit: 1000



View Profile
October 22, 2014, 04:39:54 AM

I am going to start using the term "bits" from now on when quoting prices.  I agree with Gavin.

Price is currently about $0.000387 per bit.  Let's go for bit-dollar parity!  Wink


To be honest, I think this whole 21M thing and even more so the utilization of the decimal fractions make absolutely no f¤ked sense for something like Bitcoin. This is just retarded in my opinion. A stupid mind trick and/or superstitious act which sacrifices logic and ease of use.
If I were the one to set up a maximum number for the coin supply, my first candidate would have been the highest possible number granted by the size of the underlaying integer or floating point variable but I would have revised it to an y=10^x (where x is a convenient whole number, something around 15 or 20).

Even if I make myself not caring about the 21 thing, but...
A decimal fractions?
DECIMAL FRACTIONS?

REALLY???
REALLY?HuhHuh

Makes no f¤cked sense. No no no... It's just wrong. Illogic and inconvenient = suboptimal ~ stupid.
Just as well then, it doesn't seem to me Satoshi thought we'd be using so many decimals, early on he proposed just moving the decimal point, and calling the new fraction Bitcoin. Seems some over enthusiastic programmers went and named and solidified the denominations making it impractical or confusing to go and just move the decimal point.
nanobrain
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1008
Merit: 1000


Dumb broad


View Profile
October 22, 2014, 04:41:08 AM

Cryptocurrencies are meant to allow payments that governments (and banks, which can be conflated with them)  cannot see, block, divert, or undo.

In your mind maybe.  You don't get to speak for any cryptocurrency developers.  We can speak for ourselves thanks.


Quote
That is not explicit in Satoshi's paper, but seems to have been a basic assumption by most of the crypto fans, especially the most ardent ones. (Reducing credit card fees is not something that would get people that excited about, is it?).

Most cryptocoins seem to be designed and supported with that goal in mind.  Some bitcoiners are even adopting other coins because they do not see bitcoin as sufficiently robust in that regard.  Few coins, if any (Ripple perhaps? I don't  know about it)  are designed to allow the same level of control that governments now have on bank transfers.

Bitcoiners are a broad church and you, especially you, don't get to speak for all of us.  Stop trying to paint Bitcoin as a political tool invented by political extremists.  YOU are the bloody extremist here, prof.  Bitcoin is a technology.  Like Bittorrent.  Like the Internet.  Like electricity.  Like guns.  Like fire.  Some people use it to make things; others to break and/or take things.  Some people just sit at the sidelines hurling abuse and shouting "heresy" right up to the point where they're drowned out by the sound of change inexorably passing them by.

You're not a skeptic; you're an intellectually dishonest, disingenuous shit-slinger with absolutely nothing worthwhile to contribute to this conversation. 



BTW, been meaning to tell you something...
You rock.

Wink


Yeah...rocking: I always think you've won an argument when you're the first to ignore the points made and start calling people names instead....almost Platonic.
molecular
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2772
Merit: 1019



View Profile
October 22, 2014, 04:48:33 AM

I am going to start using the term "bits" from now on when quoting prices.  I agree with Gavin.

Price is currently about $0.000387 per bit.  Let's go for bit-dollar parity!  Wink


The next parity target is 1bit = 1USDbit (12.5c)

back in July I made a thread: BIT parity - the rise of the BIT against world fiat currencies and other things

For 1 bit, one can currently buy:

  • 16 Iranian Rial
  • 13 Viet Nam Dong
  • 7 Indonesian Rupiah
  • 1.17 Colombian Peso

I'll try to think of reviving it when we go above the peso again (I think we dropped below Columbioan Pesos parity)
molecular
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2772
Merit: 1019



View Profile
October 22, 2014, 04:50:34 AM

I am going to start using the term "bits" from now on when quoting prices.  I agree with Gavin.

Price is currently about $0.000387 per bit.  Let's go for bit-dollar parity!  Wink


To be honest, I think this whole 21M thing and even more so the utilization of the decimal fractions make absolutely no f¤ked sense for something like Bitcoin. This is just retarded in my opinion. A stupid mind trick and/or superstitious act which sacrifices logic and ease of use.
If I were the one to set up a maximum number for the coin supply, my first candidate would have been the highest possible number granted by the size of the underlaying integer or floating point variable but I would have revised it to an y=10^x (where x is a convenient whole number, something around 15 or 20).

Even if I make myself not caring about the 21 thing, but...
A decimal fractions?
DECIMAL FRACTIONS?

REALLY???
REALLY?HuhHuh

Makes no f¤cked sense. No no no... It's just wrong. Illogic and inconvenient = suboptimal ~ stupid.
Just as well then, it doesn't seem to me Satoshi thought we'd be using so many decimals, early on he proposed just moving the decimal point, and calling the new fraction Bitcoin. Seems some over enthusiastic programmers went and named and solidified the denominations making it impractical or confusing to go and just move the decimal point.

Well, moving the decimal point is impractical and confusing.

We should migrate to XBT/bits and be done with it.
cheekychap
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 182
Merit: 100


View Profile
October 22, 2014, 04:56:21 AM

Bid support on Stamp looks solid.

2000BTC to 380$
5000BTC to 370$

Huobi

14000BTC to 2300CNY
lol

Conclusion:

Breakout imminent!


Buy orders are definitely solid. We should be going over 400 soon.
ChartBuddy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2170
Merit: 1776


1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ


View Profile
October 22, 2014, 05:00:45 AM


Explanation
molecular
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2772
Merit: 1019



View Profile
October 22, 2014, 05:01:53 AM

Bid support on Stamp looks solid.

2000BTC to 380$
5000BTC to 370$

Huobi

14000BTC to 2300CNY
lol

Conclusion:

Breakout imminent!


Buy orders are definitely solid. We should be going over 400 soon.

We could be sliding sideways for a while, too.
ShroomsKit
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 672
Merit: 500



View Profile
October 22, 2014, 05:13:48 AM

Bid support on Stamp looks solid.

2000BTC to 380$
5000BTC to 370$

Huobi

14000BTC to 2300CNY
lol

Conclusion:

Breakout imminent!


Buy orders are definitely solid. We should be going over 400 soon.

We could be sliding sideways for a while, too.


Or down.
janos666
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 588
Merit: 500


View Profile
October 22, 2014, 05:22:01 AM

Bid support on Stamp looks solid.

2000BTC to 380$
5000BTC to 370$

Huobi

14000BTC to 2300CNY
lol

Conclusion:

Breakout imminent!


Buy orders are definitely solid. We should be going over 400 soon.

We could be sliding sideways for a while, too.


Or down.

Well, if it doesn't jump then it probably will slowly but constantly go down. Constant slow growth just isn't possible here.
lyth0s
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260
Merit: 1000


World Class Cryptonaire


View Profile
October 22, 2014, 05:35:09 AM

Bid support on Stamp looks solid.

2000BTC to 380$
5000BTC to 370$

Huobi

14000BTC to 2300CNY
lol

Conclusion:

Breakout imminent!


Buy orders are definitely solid. We should be going over 400 soon.

We could be sliding sideways for a while, too.


Or down.


Yes I completely agree. From here we could be going up, down or sideways....wait isn't that always the case?
hmmmstrange
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 669
Merit: 500


View Profile
October 22, 2014, 05:55:49 AM

Canada listened to Andreas and made me almost believe in elected representation.

NY didn't.

Except those guys were not elected...

Appointed lifetime trough swillers.

face it canadians are just cooler poeple.

Except that Canada has no 2nd amendment protections.  No legal firearms  to defend against tyranny and criminals, only guns for the criminals and govt.

One word, Oka

ChartBuddy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2170
Merit: 1776


1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ


View Profile
October 22, 2014, 06:00:45 AM


Explanation
touhonoob
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 42
Merit: 0


View Profile
October 22, 2014, 06:07:36 AM


The bid side becomes higher and higher  Shocked
noobtrader
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1456
Merit: 1000



View Profile
October 22, 2014, 06:40:14 AM

Bid support on Stamp looks solid.

2000BTC to 380$
5000BTC to 370$

Huobi

14000BTC to 2300CNY
lol

Conclusion:

Breakout imminent!


Buy orders are definitely solid. We should be going over 400 soon.

We could be sliding sideways for a while, too.


Or down.


woww...  you havent close your short then ?

seljo
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1178
Merit: 1014


Hodling since 2011.®


View Profile
October 22, 2014, 06:48:05 AM

Chinese 10k wall still here? Someone is buying coinz for peanuts...  Shocked
solex
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1078
Merit: 1002


100 satoshis -> ISO code


View Profile
October 22, 2014, 06:56:00 AM

Chinese 10k wall still here? Someone is buying coinz for peanuts...  Shocked

That wall hasn't bought 1 BTC yet, and when there was a dip it was pulled and then dropped 20 yuan. Sellers see it and are holding back.
ChartBuddy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2170
Merit: 1776


1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ


View Profile
October 22, 2014, 07:00:49 AM


Explanation
Totscha
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1276
Merit: 622



View Profile
October 22, 2014, 07:44:40 AM

I thought BTC would be a space bound rocketship by now. Oh well, it's gonna happen sooner or later. And even though I would rather it be sooner, I can keep my coins in cold storage until later. It's not like I don't have anything else to do.

In the meantime, I can't wait to install Gems on my iPhone (Getgems.org). I would love to see it, or something like it, kill Facebook. Or do you guys think Facebook would sooner do the same kind of thing to keep from going the way of MySpace? lol


 Cheesy

Nah, no way. The market still hasn't decided if we stopped falling.

My guess would be a silent accumulation until early 2015 with some swings, but the price will be $400-ish.

After that ETFs will come in and hopefully we get some nice slow steady growth...
ChartBuddy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2170
Merit: 1776


1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ


View Profile
October 22, 2014, 08:00:45 AM


Explanation
Pages: « 1 ... 9140 9141 9142 9143 9144 9145 9146 9147 9148 9149 9150 9151 9152 9153 9154 9155 9156 9157 9158 9159 9160 9161 9162 9163 9164 9165 9166 9167 9168 9169 9170 9171 9172 9173 9174 9175 9176 9177 9178 9179 9180 9181 9182 9183 9184 9185 9186 9187 9188 9189 [9190] 9191 9192 9193 9194 9195 9196 9197 9198 9199 9200 9201 9202 9203 9204 9205 9206 9207 9208 9209 9210 9211 9212 9213 9214 9215 9216 9217 9218 9219 9220 9221 9222 9223 9224 9225 9226 9227 9228 9229 9230 9231 9232 9233 9234 9235 9236 9237 9238 9239 9240 ... 33343 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!