|
gnasirator
|
 |
March 20, 2017, 10:11:24 AM |
|
Great! Now it only has to stay this way (which over time is the most work)  -> I'd still be thankful for a statically linked exe. Or some help installing libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.15' / 2.14. I tried once but all I found online ended up not working or requiring me to compile from scratch. The only way working so far is by using a trial version of Ermine - which only works because the expiration resets when redownloading it and recreating the static exe. Not really perfect for a server ... The license is way too expensive. Maybe Docker is a way to do it - but I have never used that stuff at all. And my vserver doesn't support it yet/nor does it come with a license. |
XCN: CJSECkHi7tTTTA1ze9qYRkkUCKfFiF8EEG
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
truckythin
|
|
March 20, 2017, 02:40:39 PM |
|
anyone have instruction for setting up pool that can support for XCN?
|
|
|
|
|
pallas (OP)
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 2716
Merit: 1094
Black Belt Developer
|
|
March 20, 2017, 02:46:54 PM |
|
anyone have instruction for setting up pool that can support for XCN?
I don't think anybody ever written some kind of instructions, but I can introduce you to some aspects you will need to consider: - PoW algo: M7 is used to hash the block header, so you will need to add the related routines. - Block header: there are some differences between the classic bitcoin header and XCNs, for example some fields are double the size (es. 64 bit nonce vs 32). That will affect merkle root generation and hash - There appears to be some issues with getblocktemplate on the wallet: it is different than recent implementations and/or has some incompatibilities with standard implementations by the pool software - The miner software is a mixed bag: for example it uses 32 bit nonces just like with other coins and doesn't support getblocktemplate. |
|
|
|
|
bogdanb
|
|
March 20, 2017, 02:57:57 PM |
|
xcn deposit disabled on bter.
withdraws still works, i've checked.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
pallas (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2716
Merit: 1094
Black Belt Developer
|
|
March 20, 2017, 04:56:18 PM |
|
Thanks! Could you please describe the build, if static or dynamic and which OS? |
|
|
|
|
bogdanb
|
|
March 20, 2017, 05:49:44 PM |
|
anyone worried about bter disabled deposits?
|
|
|
|
|
pallas (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2716
Merit: 1094
Black Belt Developer
|
|
March 20, 2017, 06:12:05 PM |
|
anyone worried about bter disabled deposits?
I will contact them ASAP. Probably the usual wallet issues. |
|
|
|
|
bogdanb
|
|
March 20, 2017, 06:29:29 PM |
|
anyone worried about bter disabled deposits?
I will contact them ASAP. Probably the usual wallet issues. withdraws works fine. i tested. |
|
|
|
|
George5
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1208
Merit: 1003
|
|
March 20, 2017, 08:05:07 PM |
|
Correct me if I'm wrong but Cryptonite is the only one of it's kind, I mean the coin that implemented mini-blockchain technology?
|
|
|
|
pallas (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2716
Merit: 1094
Black Belt Developer
|
|
March 20, 2017, 08:20:45 PM |
|
Correct me if I'm wrong but Cryptonite is the only one of it's kind, I mean the coin that implemented mini-blockchain technology?
AFAIK, there is no other coin using such a technology. Please refer to the wiki for the coin innovation details. |
|
|
|
George5
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1208
Merit: 1003
|
|
March 20, 2017, 08:29:48 PM |
|
Correct me if I'm wrong but Cryptonite is the only one of it's kind, I mean the coin that implemented mini-blockchain technology?
AFAIK, there is no other coin using such a technology. Please refer to the wiki for the coin innovation details. Yeah, that is what I was thinking of. XCN is def flying under the radar, cuz if more people were aware of that unique coin, it's marketcap would've been at least couple of millions $ imho.  |
|
|
|
|
JasonSW
|
|
March 21, 2017, 12:42:58 AM |
|
./trusty_amd64_cryptonited_14091021: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.15' not found
./trusty_amd64_cryptonited_14091021: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.14' not found That stuff is the missing db48, isn't it? This thing happens when binary was compiled on the machine with a newer gcc. I'll try to compile a wallet with all libs statically linked. |
|
|
|
|
|
gnasirator
|
|
March 21, 2017, 02:51:50 AM
Last edit: March 21, 2017, 03:44:11 AM by gnasirator |
|
I'll try to compile a wallet with all libs statically linked. Great, thanks heaps! |
XCN: CJSECkHi7tTTTA1ze9qYRkkUCKfFiF8EEG
|
|
|
pallas (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2716
Merit: 1094
Black Belt Developer
|
|
March 21, 2017, 02:36:32 PM |
|
I've committed a fix for the wallet backup issue. Works fine now, if you use the latest sources from github.
Of course it will be in the new binaries as well.
|
|
|
|
Bilbo Bagacoins
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 40
Merit: 0
|
|
March 21, 2017, 04:34:13 PM |
|
Nice one. What are your thoughts on the amount of coins issue? Both addresses are showing balances similar to
web wallet shots posted. Not much point in trying to revive a compromised coin.
|
|
|
|
|
George5
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1208
Merit: 1003
|
|
March 21, 2017, 04:47:11 PM |
|
Nice one. What are your thoughts on the amount of coins issue? Both addresses are showing balances similar to
web wallet shots posted. Not much point in trying to revive a compromised coin.
I have some thoughts about this. Possibly, BTC38 wallet shows the wrong amount because they were having issues with it and it's been out of sync for a long time. Wait for them to update their wallet and we'll see. |
|
|
|
|
gnasirator
|
|
March 21, 2017, 08:54:05 PM |
|
pallas, you're using the new wallet on ubuntu 16, right?
Is the binary available somewhere? I had to update my home server to ubuntu 16.04, so I now have to use a wallet built for 16.04 for the statifying.
|
XCN: CJSECkHi7tTTTA1ze9qYRkkUCKfFiF8EEG
|
|
|
pallas (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2716
Merit: 1094
Black Belt Developer
|
|
March 21, 2017, 09:16:59 PM |
|
pallas, you're using the new wallet on ubuntu 16, right?
Is the binary available somewhere? I had to update my home server to ubuntu 16.04, so I now have to use a wallet built for 16.04 for the statifying.
I use the same Ubuntu version, here is the wallet daemon and cli: https://mega.nz/#!QchXTQZJ!uHYxaflRUEjgliQVbSHOBn83mymxrSTYfKgGei8YVUM |
|
|
|
|
gnasirator
|
|
March 21, 2017, 10:46:58 PM |
|
pallas, you're using the new wallet on ubuntu 16, right?
Is the binary available somewhere? I had to update my home server to ubuntu 16.04, so I now have to use a wallet built for 16.04 for the statifying.
I use the same Ubuntu version, here is the wallet daemon and cli: https://mega.nz/#!QchXTQZJ!uHYxaflRUEjgliQVbSHOBn83mymxrSTYfKgGei8YVUM Awesome, explorer is running new wallet now. Any chance to get that statically linked? |
XCN: CJSECkHi7tTTTA1ze9qYRkkUCKfFiF8EEG
|
|
|
|
