AMD Ryzen hashrate?

[rdluffy]

Some RandomX Benchmarks:

RYZEN 9 3900X ~ 12326 H/s (https://randomx.monerobenchmarks.info/shareExportCPU.php?s=VFRkWlJVRkJQVDA9)
THREADRIPPER 1950X ~ 8235 H/s (https://randomx.monerobenchmarks.info/shareExportCPU.php?s=VFhkRlFRPT0=)
RYZEN 7 2700 ~ 4713 H/s (https://randomx.monerobenchmarks.info/shareExportCPU.php?s=VFRkSlFVRkJQVDA9)

Wow, it's really amazing the hashrate of 3900x
I used to have some rigs with Ryzen 1700 and it was easy to pay for them mining XMR, and now I'm curious to see XMR with this new algo

[1714200903]

1714200903

[1714200903]

1714200903

[1714200903]

1714200903

[1714200903]

1714200903

[Set Ready Go]

how to use RandomX Benchmarks?

You just go to this github page and download and extract the folder https://github.com/tevador/RandomX/releases/tag/v1.0.4

Then you open up command window in windows and write in cd/User/yourusername/Downloads/RandomX-benchmark-windows-x64-v1.0.4

then you write in randomx-benchmark.exe --help    and you will get up diffrent parameters you can use for example threads largepages etc

Supported options:
  --help        shows this message
  --mine        mining mode: 2080 MiB
  --verify      verification mode: 256 MiB
  --jit         x86-64 JIT compiled mode (default: interpreter)
  --largePages  use large pages
  --softAes     use software AES (default: x86 AES-NI)
  --threads T   use T threads (default: 1)
  --affinity A  thread affinity bitmask (default: 0)
  --init Q      initialize dataset with Q threads (default: 1)
  --nonces N    run N nonces (default: 1000)
  --seed S      seed for cache initialization (default: 0)

for example Ryzen 5 1600 can write in parameters like:

Code:

randomx-benchmark.exe --mine --jit --largepages --nonces 100000 --init 6 --threads 6

If you dont got largePages enabled just do this:

To enable the lock pages in memory option
On the Start menu, click Run. In the Open box, type gpedit.msc.

On the Local Group Policy Editor console, expand Computer Configuration, and then expand Windows Settings.

Expand Security Settings, and then expand Local Policies.

Select the User Rights Assignment folder.

The policies will be displayed in the details pane.

In the pane, double-click Lock pages in memory.

In the Local Security Setting - Lock pages in memory dialog box, click Add User or Group.

Also if you got windows 10 home you wont have it by default but will have to do a workaround.

[joblo]

Anyone test AVX2? Any algo with Lyra2 is good for testing as it has both AVX2 and SSE2 versions.
AVX2 on  Ryzen 1xxx is slower than SSE2.

[Set Ready Go]

I have tested the Ryzen 5 3600 and with all 12 threads i was getting around 6100h/s this with msi b450m gaming and 2x4gb cheap 2666 memory. Algo: RandomX benchmark.

Pretty much expected, half of the 3900x hashrate.

[deskless]

I have a rig that is using windows10+Phoenix miner with single RadeonVII mining Ethereum. I wanted to see if I can replace the CPU with the 3900 and mine XMR as well. Would that make sense ? Currently it has a i3 + LGA 1151 motherboard. I understand I need to replace CPU/Mobo and RAM.
I can't increase number of Rigs. Just want to see I can expand by putting CPU mining along with existing GPU mining.
Thanks for help.

[rdluffy]

I have a rig that is using windows10+Phoenix miner with single RadeonVII mining Ethereum. I wanted to see if I can replace the CPU with the 3900 and mine XMR as well. Would that make sense ? Currently it has a i3 + LGA 1151 motherboard. I understand I need to replace CPU/Mobo and RAM.
I can't increase number of Rigs. Just want to see I can expand by putting CPU mining along with existing GPU mining.
Thanks for help.

Totally possible to mine GPU + CPUs, but you have to do the math, because you'll have to buy the CPU + motherboard

I used to mine with CPUs + GPUs but I build the rig with Ryzen at the beginning

[deskless]

I have a rig that is using windows10+Phoenix miner with single RadeonVII mining Ethereum. I wanted to see if I can replace the CPU with the 3900 and mine XMR as well. Would that make sense ? Currently it has a i3 + LGA 1151 motherboard. I understand I need to replace CPU/Mobo and RAM.
I can't increase number of Rigs. Just want to see I can expand by putting CPU mining along with existing GPU mining.
Thanks for help.

Totally possible to mine GPU + CPUs, but you have to do the math, because you'll have to buy the CPU + motherboard

I used to mine with CPUs + GPUs but I build the rig with Ryzen at the beginning

I wonder if I need to get RAM as well. currently the rig using a 4GB RAM.
I am trying to expand. Just that I don't have capacity for more GPUs

[rdluffy]

I have a rig that is using windows10+Phoenix miner with single RadeonVII mining Ethereum. I wanted to see if I can replace the CPU with the 3900 and mine XMR as well. Would that make sense ? Currently it has a i3 + LGA 1151 motherboard. I understand I need to replace CPU/Mobo and RAM.
I can't increase number of Rigs. Just want to see I can expand by putting CPU mining along with existing GPU mining.
Thanks for help.

Totally possible to mine GPU + CPUs, but you have to do the math, because you'll have to buy the CPU + motherboard

I used to mine with CPUs + GPUs but I build the rig with Ryzen at the beginning

I wonder if I need to get RAM as well. currently the rig using a 4GB RAM.
I am trying to expand. Just that I don't have capacity for more GPUs

The use of ram will increase but not so much
I don't think it's worth to change motherboard and cpu if you already have the rigs
You can start a new rig with ryzen, it's easier this way

[joblo]

I have a rig that is using windows10+Phoenix miner with single RadeonVII mining Ethereum. I wanted to see if I can replace the CPU with the 3900 and mine XMR as well. Would that make sense ? Currently it has a i3 + LGA 1151 motherboard. I understand I need to replace CPU/Mobo and RAM.
I can't increase number of Rigs. Just want to see I can expand by putting CPU mining along with existing GPU mining.
Thanks for help.

Totally possible to mine GPU + CPUs, but you have to do the math, because you'll have to buy the CPU + motherboard

I used to mine with CPUs + GPUs but I build the rig with Ryzen at the beginning

I wonder if I need to get RAM as well. currently the rig using a 4GB RAM.
I am trying to expand. Just that I don't have capacity for more GPUs

You definitely need more RAM with a 8C/16T CPU, especially if you want to mine with it.
I recommend 512MB per thread to handle the most memory hard algos.

[fapar]

I have tested the Ryzen 5 3600 and with all 12 threads i was getting around 6100h/s this with msi b450m gaming and 2x4gb cheap 2666 memory. Algo: RandomX benchmark.

Pretty much expected, half of the 3900x hashrate.

I tested RandomX on Ryzen 2600 (ASRock B450 Steel Legend + 2x8Gb@3200) and get hashrate 2000h/s. Strange result if we take into account your data. I choose 6 or 12 threads - there are no differences in the hashrate. I doubt that such a great progress was made by the change of the technological process.
Who else has the results for 2600?

[Set Ready Go]

I have tested the Ryzen 5 3600 and with all 12 threads i was getting around 6100h/s this with msi b450m gaming and 2x4gb cheap 2666 memory. Algo: RandomX benchmark.

Pretty much expected, half of the 3900x hashrate.

I tested RandomX on Ryzen 2600 (ASRock B450 Steel Legend + 2x8Gb@3200) and get hashrate 2000h/s. Strange result if we take into account your data. I choose 6 or 12 threads - there are no differences in the hashrate. I doubt that such a great progress was made by the change of the technological process.
Who else has the results for 2600?

More then 4gb ram for first/second gen is not necessery.

For example my Ryzen 5 1600s  do around 3500h/s on RandomX.  DDR4 memory is limited to about 4000-6000 H/s per channel (depending on frequency and timings)

I belive you havent enabled largePages because then your hashrate should be 3500+

your test file should look like: 

Code:

--mine --jit --largePages --threads 6 --init 6 --nonces 300000

The high increase in hashrate for this generation is the higher cache which lets us utilize all the threads we like.

[fapar]

I have tested the Ryzen 5 3600 and with all 12 threads i was getting around 6100h/s this with msi b450m gaming and 2x4gb cheap 2666 memory. Algo: RandomX benchmark.

Pretty much expected, half of the 3900x hashrate.

I tested RandomX on Ryzen 2600 (ASRock B450 Steel Legend + 2x8Gb@3200) and get hashrate 2000h/s. Strange result if we take into account your data. I choose 6 or 12 threads - there are no differences in the hashrate. I doubt that such a great progress was made by the change of the technological process.
Who else has the results for 2600?

More then 4gb ram for first/second gen is not necessery.

For example my Ryzen 5 1600s  do around 3500h/s on RandomX.  DDR4 memory is limited to about 4000-6000 H/s per channel (depending on frequency and timings)

I belive you havent enabled largePages because then your hashrate should be 3500+

your test file should look like: 

Code:

--mine --jit --largePages --threads 6 --init 6 --nonces 300000

The high increase in hashrate for this generation is the higher cache which lets us utilize all the threads we like.

Yes, indeed, applying a new local policy for "Lock pages in memory" and in the test received 3650 h/s. Waiting for July 24, and to move Loki to RandomX algorithm.

[YentenCommunity]

Ryzen 2600 6 threads = 1220 h/s on yespowerr16 algo (Yenten coin)
ram: 2xddr4 3200
cooler: box


Ryzen 3 2200G 3 threads = 523 h/s

[bobben2]

Ryzen 5 2600 running at 3,4GHz

randomx-benchmark.exe --mine --jit --largePages --threads 6 --init 6 --nonces 300000

Performance: 3630 h/s

test bench:
Asus TUF B450
Memory 2 x 4Gb @ 2133 MHz 

[deskless]

Did a pre-order for Ryzen 9 3900x. What mobo/RAM is suggested?

[Set Ready Go]

Ryzen 5 2600 running at 3,4GHz

randomx-benchmark.exe --mine --jit --largePages --threads 6 --init 6 --nonces 300000

Performance: 3630 h/s

test bench:
Asus TUF B450
Memory 2 x 4Gb @ 2133 MHz 

Sounds about fight!
If possible would be nice IF you could redo benchmark with just one stick of The ram.

[fapar]

Ryzen 5 2600 running at 3,4GHz

randomx-benchmark.exe --mine --jit --largePages --threads 6 --init 6 --nonces 300000

Performance: 3630 h/s

test bench:
Asus TUF B450
Memory 2 x 4Gb @ 2133 MHz 

Sounds about fight!
If possible would be nice IF you could redo benchmark with just one stick of The ram.

Actual/real hashrate R5 2600 (no o/c) on the algorithm of RandomX (rx/Loki) is 3000 +/-10 h/s. Mine started right after the Loki fork and change the algorithm on RandomX.
I ask the others to confirm the hashrate.
P.S. Miner - xmrig 2.99.0

[rednoW]

Ryzen 5 2600 running at 3,4GHz

randomx-benchmark.exe --mine --jit --largePages --threads 6 --init 6 --nonces 300000

Performance: 3630 h/s

test bench:
Asus TUF B450
Memory 2 x 4Gb @ 2133 MHz 

Sounds about fight!
If possible would be nice IF you could redo benchmark with just one stick of The ram.

Actual/real hashrate R5 2600 (no o/c) on the algorithm of RandomX (rx/Loki) is 3000 +/-10 h/s. Mine started right after the Loki fork and change the algorithm on RandomX.
I ask the others to confirm the hashrate.
P.S. Miner - xmrig 2.99.0

ryzen 5 1600 @ 3.6ghz with 3200ddr4 16-17-17-1T is doing 3800h/s rx/Loki. (asus x370-f gaming)

[swogerino]

Anyone knows the new Ryzen 3900x which is said to be better than Intel 9900k and with a much better starting price. It seems AMD have taken the lead now and Intel is not responding at all until now.I think the hashrate should be very good feom this new Ryzen processor.

[Set Ready Go]

Anyone knows the new Ryzen 3900x which is said to be better than Intel 9900k and with a much better starting price. It seems AMD have taken the lead now and Intel is not responding at all until now.I think the hashrate should be very good feom this new Ryzen processor.

3900x you are looking at 12000+ h/s on random and 1500+ on CryptonightR

Its twice performance on Ryzen 5 3600.  All new ryzen are truly beasts.