BitcoinWisdom.com - Live Bitcoin/LiteCoin Charts

[najimi]

Could you add DOGE/BTC? Major sites that currently support it seem to be Cryptsy, Coins-E, Bter, and Vircurex.

[BitcoinWisdom]

Hello, I love your product very much. It would be awesome if you could any of the exchanges that support Dogecoin. Its trading volume recently surpassed LTC and even BTC, lots of people are trading it and it would be awesome if your platform would support it because right now people are pretty much trading it blindly. I would even consider paying if such service existed, thank you very much!

Could you add DOGE/BTC? Major sites that currently support it seem to be Cryptsy, Coins-E, Bter, and Vircurex.

Cryptsy DOGE/BTC is added.
http://bitcoinwisdom.com/markets/cryptsy/dogebtc

[bmanzzs]

Hello, I love your product very much. It would be awesome if you could any of the exchanges that support Dogecoin. Its trading volume recently surpassed LTC and even BTC, lots of people are trading it and it would be awesome if your platform would support it because right now people are pretty much trading it blindly. I would even consider paying if such service existed, thank you very much!

Could you add DOGE/BTC? Major sites that currently support it seem to be Cryptsy, Coins-E, Bter, and Vircurex.

Cryptsy DOGE/BTC is added.
http://bitcoinwisdom.com/markets/cryptsy/dogebtc

Wow, that was incredibly quick. I'm impressed! Thanks for doing this, I know the dogecoin community appreciates it.

[najimi]

Hello, I love your product very much. It would be awesome if you could any of the exchanges that support Dogecoin. Its trading volume recently surpassed LTC and even BTC, lots of people are trading it and it would be awesome if your platform would support it because right now people are pretty much trading it blindly. I would even consider paying if such service existed, thank you very much!

Could you add DOGE/BTC? Major sites that currently support it seem to be Cryptsy, Coins-E, Bter, and Vircurex.

Cryptsy DOGE/BTC is added.
http://bitcoinwisdom.com/markets/cryptsy/dogebtc

Fantastically fast, thanks!

[Montago]

The SELL direction should be inverse...

like this:

___.150
951.000
___.885
___.520
950.000

the way it is now, is slightly confusing because the direction of numbers are inverse (per whole number) to BUY orders.

https://i.imgur.com/bN5NaSN.png

[Montago]

Some option to group SELL and BUY orders would be awesome...

I don't need to know the EXACT orders, only a avarage view...

grouped orders makes it easier to estimate the distribution of 'weight'

I KNOW that there already IS a grouped distribution to the right of the orders,
but imho it should be an option instead, and then only display one orderbook...

only showing the numbers once, also make room for other stuff.

(note this image is from ClarkMoody... just to show what i mean)
https://i.imgur.com/JN4XOkl.png

[severance26]

Some option to group SELL and BUY orders would be awesome...

I don't need to know the EXACT orders, only a avarage view...

grouped orders makes it easier to estimate the distribution of 'weight'

I KNOW that there already IS a grouped distribution to the right of the orders,
but imho it should be an option instead, and then only display one orderbook...

only showing the numbers once, also make room for other stuff.

(note this image is from ClarkMoody... just to show what i mean)

I think this has come up previously in the thread.

Some people like it one way, others another.

Personally I find the current system more intuitive than Clarkmoody.

[prof7bit]

(note this image is from ClarkMoody... just to show what i mean)

ClarkMoody is actually grouping it wrong, see for example how goxtool (the reference for MtGox) does it. On both sides it should be summed up from the top of the book down¹ to (and including) the round level, this would then also be the same value you could read from a cumulative depth chart where it is summed up to and including that price. This means the number always represents the amount to buy (or sell) to break this price, its perfectly symmetrical.

¹) Note that on the ask side "down" (deeper into the book) actually means the prices become higher, therefore the inverse sort order and usage of the next higher round price.

[akujin]

How about DOGE/LTC?
And can you put more data on the orderbook? Maybe scrollable or a dedicated page for the orderbook

[thiandre]

Hi.
I think that when one changes the Scale from Normal to Logarithmic the Y axis labels do not change accordingly.

[prof7bit]

Hi.
I think that when one changes the Scale from Normal to Logarithmic the Y axis labels do not change accordingly.

Yes, this is new, the tick marks are correct but not the labels. BTW it should not be called "Normal", it should be called "Linear" and the default for new users should be logarithmic since this is the only scale that actually makes sense for such kind of data.

[marcus03]

Would it be possible to add NXT/BTC from Bter?

http://bter.com/api


http://bter.com/api/1/ticker/nxt_btc
http://bter.com/api/1/trade/nxt_btc
http://bter.com/api/1/depth/nxt_btc  (Orderbook)


Thanks for your consideration!

[najimi]

How about DOGE/LTC?

I'd really appreciate this as well.

[akujin]

I think you should sell your graphs to the exchanges so they could replace their shitty graphs..

[severance26]

I think you should sell your graphs to the exchanges so they could replace their shitty graphs..

Find some youtube videos of mtgox's office and you'll notice they are already using other people's graphs...

[moppedup]

Hi There, thanks so much for adding Doge on Cryptsy!

Is it possible to add additional indicators like %R for example??

Maybe some other nice features from tradingview? Yes you should whitelabel your stuff out to these exchanges for a monthly/annual service/maitenence fee.

[BitcoinWisdom]

Hi.
I think that when one changes the Scale from Normal to Logarithmic the Y axis labels do not change accordingly.

Yes, this is new, the tick marks are correct but not the labels. BTW it should not be called "Normal", it should be called "Linear" and the default for new users should be logarithmic since this is the only scale that actually makes sense for such kind of data.

Thank you for report. The bug has been fixed. and I have changed axis name to 'Linear' which is more properly. Because some users maybe don't know what is logarithmic scale, so I still keep the entry simple.

[Fayens]

Would it be possible to add (Cryptsy) MOON/BTC-LTC

https://www.cryptsy.com/pages/api


Best regards!

[oda.krell]

Hi.
I think that when one changes the Scale from Normal to Logarithmic the Y axis labels do not change accordingly.

Yes, this is new, the tick marks are correct but not the labels. BTW it should not be called "Normal", it should be called "Linear" and the default for new users should be logarithmic since this is the only scale that actually makes sense for such kind of data.

Thank you for report. The bug has been fixed. and I have changed axis name to 'Linear' which is more properly. Because some users maybe don't know what is logarithmic scale, so I still keep the entry simple.

+1

Logarithmic as default would be a terrible choice, especially considering that the default time frame is a "narrow" one, ie one of the last hours or so.

[ericisback]

As of 8:58am ET, the new default difficulty in the earnings calculator here:

 http://bitcoinwisdom.com/bitcoin/difficulty

seem to be a negative number?!?

http://i650.photobucket.com/albums/uu229/ericisback1/2014-01-24_085727.jpg