|
|
|
|
No Gods or Kings. Only Bitcoin
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
criptix
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2464
Merit: 1145
|
|
May 14, 2017, 04:00:13 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
joebrook
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 644
Merit: 259
CryptoTalk.Org - Get Paid for every Post!
|
|
May 14, 2017, 04:28:01 PM |
|
There has been no definite evidence to prove these theories at all. Shouldn't all monkeys have evolved to being man by now.
|
|
|
|
rizkyrz
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 560
Merit: 250
CryptoTalk.Org - Get Paid for every Post!
|
|
May 14, 2017, 05:27:13 PM |
|
I do not believe in the theory of evolution , Because the theory is not clear
|
|
|
|
criptix
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2464
Merit: 1145
|
|
May 14, 2017, 05:46:28 PM Last edit: May 16, 2017, 04:01:24 PM by criptix |
|
^ Ay 6000 year old earth. Of course evolution is impossible... /edit oh ridery99 - why did you delete your christian 6000 year old earth post :S
|
|
|
|
scourgette
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 22
Merit: 0
|
|
May 14, 2017, 06:34:50 PM |
|
Why there are still monkeys around if they were part of our evolutionary beginnings ?
Cause the aliens didn't send them the monolith they gave our ancestors at the end of 2001 A Space Odyssey. Therefore monkeys couldn't comprehend how to use a dead animal's bone as a weapon and got defeated in the famous battle for the water source of 1000000000BC. The rest of their once mighty tribe were forced to scatter around the African wilderness in search of their true identity. A search which continues to this day.
|
|
|
|
ridery99 (OP)
|
|
May 14, 2017, 06:56:42 PM |
|
Why there are still monkeys around if they were part of our evolutionary beginnings ?
Cause the aliens didn't send them the monolith they gave our ancestors at the end of 2001 A Space Odyssey. Therefore monkeys couldn't comprehend how to use a dead animal's bone as a weapon and got defeated in the famous battle for the water source of 1000000000BC. The rest of their once mighty tribe were forced to scatter around the African wilderness in search of their true identity. A search which continues to this day. Ok, so that's why there's LGBT rights movement. So that those monkeys could be recognized and find their true identity
|
|
|
|
Eternu
|
|
May 14, 2017, 07:04:08 PM |
|
Lets assume that fact that we descended from monkeys are true. Why there are still monkeys around you ask. Well first of all, i guess that not all monkeys would be able to evolve. Some of them would stay monkeys, and that explain your question. And it would take a lot of time for evolution, from one specie to another.
|
|
|
|
PcChip
|
|
May 14, 2017, 07:46:52 PM |
|
I can't believe this is even a thread on this forum
|
Legacy signature from 2011: All rates with Phoenix 1.50 / PhatK 5850 - 400 MH/s | 5850 - 355 MH/s | 5830 - 310 MH/s | GTX570 - 115 MH/s | 5770 - 210 MH/s | 5770 - 200 MH/s
|
|
|
anubisath
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 16
Merit: 0
|
|
May 14, 2017, 08:04:10 PM |
|
There has been no definite evidence to prove these theories at all. Shouldn't all monkeys have evolved to being man by now.
Man evolved from a species of monkeys which for some reason felt the need to get down from the trees and walk the earth. Everything else was triggered by this. The rest of the monkeys didn't need to get down to the ground and you can see most of them living happily up there in the tree tops to this day. It was probably some circumstance specific to where the proto-humans lived and which wasn't present anywhere else. Just the same way as there are amazonian tribes who still haven't set foot into the 11th, let alone the 21th century.
|
|
|
|
BADecker
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3766
Merit: 1368
|
|
May 14, 2017, 08:07:34 PM |
|
The monkey question might be a little silly. But the fact that evolution is a hoax is true, and not funny at all. Things like: 1. probability math, 2. Irreversible Complexity, 3. no beneficial mutations ever having been found, not even once, 4. no proof of missing links in the fossils, all show that evolution is simply a hoax, used to build scientists up in the eyes of the people, so that the scientists can make money off them, one way or another.
|
|
|
|
ridery99 (OP)
|
|
May 14, 2017, 08:10:32 PM |
|
There has been no definite evidence to prove these theories at all. Shouldn't all monkeys have evolved to being man by now.
Man evolved from a species of monkeys which for some reason felt the need to get down from the trees and walk the earth. Everything else was triggered by this. The rest of the monkeys didn't need to get down to the ground and you can see most of them living happily up there in the tree tops to this day. It was probably some circumstance specific to where the proto-humans lived and which wasn't present anywhere else. Just the same way as there are amazonian tribes who still haven't set foot into the 11th, let alone the 21th century. My poop evolved to become a horse. That's true. I can't show it to you but I have evidence: You see, it took a lot of time to evolve.
|
|
|
|
BADecker
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3766
Merit: 1368
|
|
May 14, 2017, 08:13:16 PM |
|
There has been no definite evidence to prove these theories at all. Shouldn't all monkeys have evolved to being man by now.
Man evolved from a species of monkeys which for some reason felt the need to get down from the trees and walk the earth. Everything else was triggered by this. The rest of the monkeys didn't need to get down to the ground and you can see most of them living happily up there in the tree tops to this day. It was probably some circumstance specific to where the proto-humans lived and which wasn't present anywhere else. Just the same way as there are amazonian tribes who still haven't set foot into the 11th, let alone the 21th century. My poop evolved to become a horse. That's true. I can't show it to you but I have evidence: You see, it took a lot of time to evolve. How in the world old are you?
|
|
|
|
ridery99 (OP)
|
|
May 14, 2017, 08:18:23 PM |
|
There has been no definite evidence to prove these theories at all. Shouldn't all monkeys have evolved to being man by now.
Man evolved from a species of monkeys which for some reason felt the need to get down from the trees and walk the earth. Everything else was triggered by this. The rest of the monkeys didn't need to get down to the ground and you can see most of them living happily up there in the tree tops to this day. It was probably some circumstance specific to where the proto-humans lived and which wasn't present anywhere else. Just the same way as there are amazonian tribes who still haven't set foot into the 11th, let alone the 21th century. My poop evolved to become a horse. That's true. I can't show it to you but I have evidence: You see, it took a lot of time to evolve. How in the world old are you? There's poop and horses in the world so they must have evolved from each other. I don't know how and it doesn't make sense but Richard Dawkins told me so so it must be true because he is famous scientist or something
|
|
|
|
Okurkabinladin
|
|
May 14, 2017, 08:18:51 PM |
|
I can't believe this is even a thread on this forum
Why not? Questions are meant to be asked. This is good topic, since public state education does terrible job at explaining complex issues like evolution or universe for that matter. Science should be capable of carefully explaining and proving its basic tenets to even dumbest of humans. Otherwise, it would be no different from cults, dont you agree? Anyway, I find evolution plausible, but see basic problem with the way its still reliant on theories (ie. abstract faith). HOW do you go from species A to species B and C, that arent genetically compatible, anymore? How does that happen, when both species share same geographic area?
|
|
|
|
BADecker
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3766
Merit: 1368
|
|
May 14, 2017, 08:26:12 PM |
|
There has been no definite evidence to prove these theories at all. Shouldn't all monkeys have evolved to being man by now.
Man evolved from a species of monkeys which for some reason felt the need to get down from the trees and walk the earth. Everything else was triggered by this. The rest of the monkeys didn't need to get down to the ground and you can see most of them living happily up there in the tree tops to this day. It was probably some circumstance specific to where the proto-humans lived and which wasn't present anywhere else. Just the same way as there are amazonian tribes who still haven't set foot into the 11th, let alone the 21th century. My poop evolved to become a horse. That's true. I can't show it to you but I have evidence: You see, it took a lot of time to evolve. How in the world old are you? There's poop and horses in the world so they must have evolved from each other. I don't know how and it doesn't make sense but Richard Dawkins told me so so it must be true because he is famous scientist or something Dawkins - Politician disguised as a scientist.
|
|
|
|
ridery99 (OP)
|
|
May 14, 2017, 08:26:23 PM |
|
I can't believe this is even a thread on this forum
Why not? Questions are meant to be asked. This is good topic, since public state education does terrible job at explaining complex issues like evolution or universe for that matter. Science should be capable of carefully explaining and proving its basic tenets to even dumbest of humans. Otherwise, it would be no different from cults, dont you agree? Anyway, I find evolution plausible, but see basic problem with the way its still reliant on theories (ie. abstract faith). HOW do you go from species A to species B and C, that arent genetically compatible, anymore? How does that happen, when both species share same geographic area? Yes we intelligent people (by our own standards) should band together and explain how we evolved from the fish and why there's no evidence but it's still the truth. We should join our forces with flat earth community to reveal truth to all dumb people out there.
|
|
|
|
BADecker
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3766
Merit: 1368
|
|
May 14, 2017, 08:28:12 PM |
|
I can't believe this is even a thread on this forum
Why not? Questions are meant to be asked. This is good topic, since public state education does terrible job at explaining complex issues like evolution or universe for that matter. Science should be capable of carefully explaining and proving its basic tenets to even dumbest of humans. Otherwise, it would be no different from cults, dont you agree? Anyway, I find evolution plausible, but see basic problem with the way its still reliant on theories (ie. abstract faith). HOW do you go from species A to species B and C, that arent genetically compatible, anymore? How does that happen, when both species share same geographic area? Yes we intelligent people (by our own standards) should band together and explain how we evolved from the fish and why there's no evidence but it's still the truth. We should join our forces with flat earth community to reveal truth to all dumb people out there. The least you could do is put a laughing smiley after that!
|
|
|
|
ridery99 (OP)
|
|
May 14, 2017, 08:29:53 PM |
|
There has been no definite evidence to prove these theories at all. Shouldn't all monkeys have evolved to being man by now.
Man evolved from a species of monkeys which for some reason felt the need to get down from the trees and walk the earth. Everything else was triggered by this. The rest of the monkeys didn't need to get down to the ground and you can see most of them living happily up there in the tree tops to this day. It was probably some circumstance specific to where the proto-humans lived and which wasn't present anywhere else. Just the same way as there are amazonian tribes who still haven't set foot into the 11th, let alone the 21th century. My poop evolved to become a horse. That's true. I can't show it to you but I have evidence: You see, it took a lot of time to evolve. How in the world old are you? There's poop and horses in the world so they must have evolved from each other. I don't know how and it doesn't make sense but Richard Dawkins told me so so it must be true because he is famous scientist or something Dawkins - Politician disguised as a scientist. It seems you are not very intelligent, unlike me because I believe what Dawkins says, By the way, he is very popular. And you are hurting my feelings and my ego is under a threat by your claims. I must use my secret weapon to discredit you: YOU MUST BE A CREATIONIST! Now since I said that, you can't win.
|
|
|
|
BADecker
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3766
Merit: 1368
|
|
May 14, 2017, 08:34:34 PM |
|
There has been no definite evidence to prove these theories at all. Shouldn't all monkeys have evolved to being man by now.
Man evolved from a species of monkeys which for some reason felt the need to get down from the trees and walk the earth. Everything else was triggered by this. The rest of the monkeys didn't need to get down to the ground and you can see most of them living happily up there in the tree tops to this day. It was probably some circumstance specific to where the proto-humans lived and which wasn't present anywhere else. Just the same way as there are amazonian tribes who still haven't set foot into the 11th, let alone the 21th century. My poop evolved to become a horse. That's true. I can't show it to you but I have evidence: You see, it took a lot of time to evolve. How in the world old are you? There's poop and horses in the world so they must have evolved from each other. I don't know how and it doesn't make sense but Richard Dawkins told me so so it must be true because he is famous scientist or something Dawkins - Politician disguised as a scientist. It seems you are not very intelligent, unlike me because I believe what Dawkins says, By the way, he is very popular. And you are hurting my feelings and my ego is under a threat by your claims. I must use my secret weapon to discredit you: YOU MUST BE A CREATIONIST! Now since I said that, you can't win. Every scientific thing that Dawkins says in favor of evolution is provably false.
|
|
|
|
|