|
|
BADecker
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 3962
Merit: 1380
|
 |
October 12, 2018, 01:11:32 PM |
|
Hmm, what is the alternative? Let’s assume that evolution is not true, what is the alternative? I know you think it’s irrelevant to the question whether Evolution is true or not, but it’s not irrelevant. It raises a whole horde of other questions that is equal interesting.
Was all species just created from the beginning? Must have been a crowded place to begin with! We know many species have dies out, where they all there to begin with, at the same time? Did dinosaurs live at the same time as humans?, did prehistoric sharks (what we call prehistoric sharks) live at the same time as modern sharks, etc... How come all these prehistoric monsters, all lost out to more “soft” species with us today. I mean not many carnivores today can match prehistoric carnivores in a one-on-one battle; still they all lost, in the water, on land, in the air.
These are just a few questions popping up if evolution is not true. Can you help me out with understand how this works?
Start a thread something like, "Alternatives to Evolution." Evolution is not true because, among many other things, there is no random in nature. Everything operates through cause and effect. There are no random mutations. We might think that there are because of our inability to see most causes, directly. But science shows us more and more all the time that there are causes for everything. You have a bunch of questions, many of which we don't have answers to, and never will until we can make a time viewer that can see into the past. All those questions would be there if evolution was real. The point isn't those questions. The point is that evolution is a hoax because we know reasons why it can't be real. But, the biggest reason why evolution is a hoax is that we don't have even one proof for it, yet it is touted as being real. Evolution is a hoax.  |
|
|
|
BADecker
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3962
Merit: 1380
|
|
October 12, 2018, 01:14:34 PM |
|
"To every action there is an equal and opposite reaction." "... every ..." |
|
|
|
|
Astargath
|
|
October 12, 2018, 01:29:34 PM |
|
"To every action there is an equal and opposite reaction." "... every ..." XDDD and you just showed your IQ again. FOR EVERY ACTION , means that if there is a ACTION, not that everything has a cause, how fucking dumb can a human being be? |
|
|
|
BADecker
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3962
Merit: 1380
|
|
October 12, 2018, 01:56:46 PM |
|
"To every action there is an equal and opposite reaction." "... every ..." XDDD and you just showed your IQ again. FOR EVERY ACTION , means that if there is a ACTION, not that everything has a cause, how fucking dumb can a human being be? LOL! Action >>> reaction... cause >>> effect. Did you ever think of going to school?  |
|
|
|
|
Moloch
|
|
October 12, 2018, 01:58:45 PM |
|
XDDD and you just showed your IQ again. FOR EVERY ACTION , means that if there is a ACTION, not that everything has a cause, how fucking dumb can a human being be?
He basically proves evolution to be true by his own argument... He says everything is based on cause and effect (ergo, god does not do anything after the big bang) This is exactly like evolution... there is no difference... everything is based on the initial conditions and evolved naturally without interference from any supernatural intervention The only thing he seems to have a problem with is the word random... which, as anyone knows, doesn't really exist... there is no such thing as a random number... we (scientists) only call it random because it is not possible to calculate with any degree of certainty (literally impossible due to the uncertainty principle)... anything impossible to calculate is considered random, because that's the definition of random... |
|
|
|
|
BADecker
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3962
Merit: 1380
|
|
October 12, 2018, 02:04:12 PM |
|
XDDD and you just showed your IQ again. FOR EVERY ACTION , means that if there is a ACTION, not that everything has a cause, how fucking dumb can a human being be?
Honestly, he basically proves evolution to be true by his own argument... He says everything is based on cause and effect (ergo, god does not do anything after the big bang) This is exactly like evolution... there is no difference... everything is based on the initial conditions and evolved naturally without interference from any supernatural intervention The only thing he seems to have a problem with is the word random... which, as anyone knows, doesn't really exist... there is no such thing as a random number... we (scientists) only call it random because it is not possible to calculate with any degree of certainty (literally impossible due to the uncertainty principle)... anything impossible to calculate is considered random, because that's the definition of random... Actually, this proves the greatness of God. Even if God made something like evolution, He did it through cause and effect. God's C&E works with with countless numbers of subatomic particles and energies, all according to the laws of physics, to produce things like beauty and aesthetics and intelligence. But mankind can only control C&E reactions over a few levels on a pool table. Since it is all C&E, evolution theory doesn't fit in the area of random. Evolution is a complete hoax. |
|
|
|
|
Moloch
|
|
October 12, 2018, 02:13:13 PM |
|
XDDD and you just showed your IQ again. FOR EVERY ACTION , means that if there is a ACTION, not that everything has a cause, how fucking dumb can a human being be?
Honestly, he basically proves evolution to be true by his own argument... He says everything is based on cause and effect (ergo, god does not do anything after the big bang) This is exactly like evolution... there is no difference... everything is based on the initial conditions and evolved naturally without interference from any supernatural intervention The only thing he seems to have a problem with is the word random... which, as anyone knows, doesn't really exist... there is no such thing as a random number... we (scientists) only call it random because it is not possible to calculate with any degree of certainty (literally impossible due to the uncertainty principle)... anything impossible to calculate is considered random, because that's the definition of random... Thanks for proving my point Also, If EVERY effect has a cause... who caused god? Welcome to the "Problem of the creator of God" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Problem_of_the_creator_of_GodThe problem of the creator of God is the controversy regarding the hypothetical cause responsible for the existence of God, presuming God exists. A common challenge to theistic propositions of a creator deity as a necessary first-cause explanation for the universe is the question: "Who created God?". It contests the proposition that the universe cannot exist without a creator by asserting that the creator of the universe must have the same restrictions. This, in turn, may lead to a problem of infinite regress wherein each newly presumed creator of a creator is itself presumed to have its own creator.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Astargath
|
|
October 12, 2018, 02:33:48 PM |
|
XDDD and you just showed your IQ again. FOR EVERY ACTION , means that if there is a ACTION, not that everything has a cause, how fucking dumb can a human being be?
Honestly, he basically proves evolution to be true by his own argument... He says everything is based on cause and effect (ergo, god does not do anything after the big bang) This is exactly like evolution... there is no difference... everything is based on the initial conditions and evolved naturally without interference from any supernatural intervention The only thing he seems to have a problem with is the word random... which, as anyone knows, doesn't really exist... there is no such thing as a random number... we (scientists) only call it random because it is not possible to calculate with any degree of certainty (literally impossible due to the uncertainty principle)... anything impossible to calculate is considered random, because that's the definition of random... Thanks for proving my point Also, If EVERY effect has a cause... who caused god? Welcome to the "Problem of the creator of God" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Problem_of_the_creator_of_GodThe problem of the creator of God is the controversy regarding the hypothetical cause responsible for the existence of God, presuming God exists. A common challenge to theistic propositions of a creator deity as a necessary first-cause explanation for the universe is the question: "Who created God?". It contests the proposition that the universe cannot exist without a creator by asserting that the creator of the universe must have the same restrictions. This, in turn, may lead to a problem of infinite regress wherein each newly presumed creator of a creator is itself presumed to have its own creator.
It was actually Zeus who made everything through cause and effect, he planted the idea of a christian god into badecker's mind. |
|
|
|
|
Moloch
|
|
October 12, 2018, 03:08:11 PM |
|
XDDD and you just showed your IQ again. FOR EVERY ACTION , means that if there is a ACTION, not that everything has a cause, how fucking dumb can a human being be?
Honestly, he basically proves evolution to be true by his own argument... He says everything is based on cause and effect (ergo, god does not do anything after the big bang) This is exactly like evolution... there is no difference... everything is based on the initial conditions and evolved naturally without interference from any supernatural intervention The only thing he seems to have a problem with is the word random... which, as anyone knows, doesn't really exist... there is no such thing as a random number... we (scientists) only call it random because it is not possible to calculate with any degree of certainty (literally impossible due to the uncertainty principle)... anything impossible to calculate is considered random, because that's the definition of random... Thanks for proving my point Also, If EVERY effect has a cause... who caused god? Welcome to the "Problem of the creator of God" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Problem_of_the_creator_of_GodThe problem of the creator of God is the controversy regarding the hypothetical cause responsible for the existence of God, presuming God exists. A common challenge to theistic propositions of a creator deity as a necessary first-cause explanation for the universe is the question: "Who created God?". It contests the proposition that the universe cannot exist without a creator by asserting that the creator of the universe must have the same restrictions. This, in turn, may lead to a problem of infinite regress wherein each newly presumed creator of a creator is itself presumed to have its own creator.
It was actually Zeus who made everything through cause and effect, he planted the idea of a christian god into badecker's mind. He's like an open book... I see how he replies to every post I make within 5-10 minutes... except for ones like this... he won't respond to this one at all because he knows he cant, and doesn't want to continue this conversation any further because he is scared of what he might find |
|
|
|
|
BADecker
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3962
Merit: 1380
|
|
October 12, 2018, 09:02:31 PM |
|
It was actually Zeus who made everything through cause and effect, he planted the idea of a christian god into badecker's mind.
Well, now that we have C&E settled, we can go on to the faulty use of "random" in evolution theory, which shows that evolution theory is wrong. Then we still need to find some proof of evolution... somewhere. And finally, we need to dispel all those "things" that show that evolution is impossible. If we can do all this, we might have a start at proving evolution as a possible theme of nature. Then comes the hard part, proving evolution is a main theme of nature. |
|
|
|
BADecker
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3962
Merit: 1380
|
|
October 12, 2018, 09:25:49 PM |
|
It was actually Zeus who made everything through cause and effect, he planted the idea of a christian god into badecker's mind.
Well, now that we have C&E settled, we can go on to the faulty use of "random" in evolution theory, which shows that evolution theory is wrong. Then we still need to find some proof of evolution... somewhere. And finally, we need to dispel all those "things" that show that evolution is impossible. If we can do all this, we might have a start at proving evolution as a possible theme of nature. Then comes the hard part, proving evolution is a main theme of nature. I would not worry about the evolution if I were you. You'll never understand it. Concentrate on tying your shoes. God used C&E to teach me how to tie my shoes. But I can't worry about evolution, because there isn't any evolution. Evolution is a hoax. |
|
|
|
|
Astargath
|
|
October 12, 2018, 10:34:35 PM |
|
It was actually Zeus who made everything through cause and effect, he planted the idea of a christian god into badecker's mind.
Well, now that we have C&E settled, we can go on to the faulty use of "random" in evolution theory, which shows that evolution theory is wrong. Then we still need to find some proof of evolution... somewhere. And finally, we need to dispel all those "things" that show that evolution is impossible. If we can do all this, we might have a start at proving evolution as a possible theme of nature. Then comes the hard part, proving evolution is a main theme of nature. Actually Zeus left it this way, he caused the universe and then left, he doesn't act anymore, therefore evolution is real. |
|
|
|
gokudera
Member
Offline
Activity: 256
Merit: 36
|
|
October 12, 2018, 11:28:38 PM |
|
Though others says that evolution of people exist from a monkey we can really tell if the fossils found in several studies that they are a monkeys. But maybe they are only monkey like but not as like much as a monkey. Having a similarities to their lifestyle and kind of living is one of the reasons why there's a lot who believe that we came from our ancestors, the monkeys |
|
|
|
af_newbie
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2702
Merit: 1468
|
|
October 12, 2018, 11:31:27 PM |
|
Though others says that evolution of people exist from a monkey we can really tell if the fossils found in several studies that they are a monkeys. But maybe they are only monkey like but not as like much as a monkey. Having a similarities to their lifestyle and kind of living is one of the reasons why there's a lot who believe that we came from our ancestors, the monkeys |
|
|
|
BADecker
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3962
Merit: 1380
|
|
October 13, 2018, 04:11:52 PM |
|
It was actually Zeus who made everything through cause and effect, he planted the idea of a christian god into badecker's mind.
Well, now that we have C&E settled, we can go on to the faulty use of "random" in evolution theory, which shows that evolution theory is wrong. Then we still need to find some proof of evolution... somewhere. And finally, we need to dispel all those "things" that show that evolution is impossible. If we can do all this, we might have a start at proving evolution as a possible theme of nature. Then comes the hard part, proving evolution is a main theme of nature. Actually Zeus left it this way, he caused the universe and then left, he doesn't act anymore, therefore evolution is real. That's exactly the thing we are talking about. Let's see the proof for evolution. We have countless examples of proof for adaptation, like-begets-like, and simple change. Show us the proof that even one of them is evolution. Evolution is a hoax. |
|
|
|
|
|
coins4commies
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 952
Merit: 175
@cryptocommies
|
|
October 14, 2018, 01:05:39 AM |
|
Though others says that evolution of people exist from a monkey we can really tell if the fossils found in several studies that they are a monkeys. But maybe they are only monkey like but not as like much as a monkey. Having a similarities to their lifestyle and kind of living is one of the reasons why there's a lot who believe that we came from our ancestors, the monkeys Its really important to clarify the difference between monkeys and apes. Humans have not evolved from monkeys and your video should clarify that. Its important to make sure you don't call chimpanzees, bonobos, gorillas, orangutans monkeys as they are all apes (as well as humans). Monkeys are not part of our family but are only part of our order (primates). Humans evolved from a common ape ancestor. All of our ancestors are extinct so the question "If humans evolved from x, then why are x still around" is double invalid. Also, the word "proof" is not very scientific. Evolution is a theory and scientific theories are built around the best evidence. Theories are falsifiable but no available evidence has ever falsified them. All evidence supports the theory of evolution as fact so it has withstood the test of time. |
|
|
|
|
BADecker
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3962
Merit: 1380
|
|
October 14, 2018, 02:27:57 PM |
|
The only thing in the link, is references to websites that say that they have proof for evolution, but prove that they don't by trying to prove that they do. Evolution is a hoax. |
|
|
|
|
Astargath
|
|
October 14, 2018, 02:44:58 PM |
|
The only thing in the link, is references to websites that say that they have proof for evolution, but prove that they don't by trying to prove that they do. Evolution is a hoax. The only thing you are posting is saying evolution is a hoax but you are not proving it is. |
|
|
|
|
