Evolution is a hoax

[Astargath]

Of course, we all know you are into propaganda rather than science. All the scientists who extrapolate into the past, state that they don't know if they missed something. They all state that it only looks like. That isn't proof. That is exactly the opposite of proof.

Regarding the eye witnesses, none of them paint an exact picture with all the details. Many of them explain what they saw with descriptions of what it looked like to them. But the genealogies and dating times are accurate.

No reason to trust ''eye witnesses'' Do you know someone that knew someone that knew someone, etc etc until God?

That's why the things the eye witnesses saw were immediately written down, and the writings were meticulously copied perfectly. Moses and the people saw and heard God on Mt. Sinai. Shortly after this, Moses wrote the whole thing down so that there would be a record. And the two stone tablets with the 10 Commandments written on them... the ones that wound up in the Ark of the Covenant... were written in stone by the finger of God.

Not so with the stuff that says that the universe is billions of years old. All of that is guesswork, and the scientists who made the guesses essentially say so in their writings about the subject.

''
That's why the things the eye witnesses saw were immediately written down'' How do you know LOL. How do you know what it's written down it's what happened?

Israel. It exists. The people stubbornly hang onto the Old Testament. They stubbornly exist after being gone as a nation for almost 1900 years. They are an extremely stubborn people. The 2000-y-o Dead Sea Scrolls show how stubborn Israel is, by the accuracy when comparing the Bible Scrolls to the O.T. of today.

Or are you trying to say that Israel and the Dead Sea Scrolls don't exist?

Yea they exist, so do Muslims, Hindus, etc etc. They all claim the same things for their gods but how do you know? What method are you using to verify their claims? Are all books then true? Science proves the earth is older than 10.000 years with many different methods.

Scientists don't know what went on 10,000 years ago, or even that 10,000 years ago existed. The best evidence they have for 10,000 years ago is backward extrapolation of things that go on today. But they don't know that things worked like they do today, beyond about 5,000 years ago. And even 5,000 years ago is partly guesstimation.

Dead Sea Scrolls evidence that the Bible is the same today as it was back then. There are billions of copies of the Bible, but only a few copies of other religious writings in comparison. There is strength in the Bible, as there is strength in the People of Israel, and strength in God.

How are Dead Sea Scrolls of anything? In any case you can say it's evidence that people wrote the stupid bible a few thousand years ago, the problem is, how do you know what they wrote is real?

[RyanPruitt54]

Of course, we all know you are into propaganda rather than science. All the scientists who extrapolate into the past, state that they don't know if they missed something. They all state that it only looks like. That isn't proof. That is exactly the opposite of proof.

Regarding the eye witnesses, none of them paint an exact picture with all the details. Many of them explain what they saw with descriptions of what it looked like to them. But the genealogies and dating times are accurate.

No reason to trust ''eye witnesses'' Do you know someone that knew someone that knew someone, etc etc until God?

That's why the things the eye witnesses saw were immediately written down, and the writings were meticulously copied perfectly. Moses and the people saw and heard God on Mt. Sinai. Shortly after this, Moses wrote the whole thing down so that there would be a record. And the two stone tablets with the 10 Commandments written on them... the ones that wound up in the Ark of the Covenant... were written in stone by the finger of God.

Not so with the stuff that says that the universe is billions of years old. All of that is guesswork, and the scientists who made the guesses essentially say so in their writings about the subject.

''
That's why the things the eye witnesses saw were immediately written down'' How do you know LOL. How do you know what it's written down it's what happened?

Israel. It exists. The people stubbornly hang onto the Old Testament. They stubbornly exist after being gone as a nation for almost 1900 years. They are an extremely stubborn people. The 2000-y-o Dead Sea Scrolls show how stubborn Israel is, by the accuracy when comparing the Bible Scrolls to the O.T. of today.

Or are you trying to say that Israel and the Dead Sea Scrolls don't exist?

Yea they exist, so do Muslims, Hindus, etc etc. They all claim the same things for their gods but how do you know? What method are you using to verify their claims? Are all books then true? Science proves the earth is older than 10.000 years with many different methods.

Scientists don't know what went on 10,000 years ago, or even that 10,000 years ago existed. The best evidence they have for 10,000 years ago is backward extrapolation of things that go on today. But they don't know that things worked like they do today, beyond about 5,000 years ago. And even 5,000 years ago is partly guesstimation.

Dead Sea Scrolls evidence that the Bible is the same today as it was back then. There are billions of copies of the Bible, but only a few copies of other religious writings in comparison. There is strength in the Bible, as there is strength in the People of Israel, and strength in God.

How are Dead Sea Scrolls of anything? In any case you can say it's evidence that people wrote the stupid bible a few thousand years ago, the problem is, how do you know what they wrote is real?

Evolution? Can anyone prove it to me? Isn't it a theory? If there was proof wouldn't it be a law? Then please say again you base your opinions on science not on faith.

[Astargath]

Of course, we all know you are into propaganda rather than science. All the scientists who extrapolate into the past, state that they don't know if they missed something. They all state that it only looks like. That isn't proof. That is exactly the opposite of proof.

Regarding the eye witnesses, none of them paint an exact picture with all the details. Many of them explain what they saw with descriptions of what it looked like to them. But the genealogies and dating times are accurate.

No reason to trust ''eye witnesses'' Do you know someone that knew someone that knew someone, etc etc until God?

That's why the things the eye witnesses saw were immediately written down, and the writings were meticulously copied perfectly. Moses and the people saw and heard God on Mt. Sinai. Shortly after this, Moses wrote the whole thing down so that there would be a record. And the two stone tablets with the 10 Commandments written on them... the ones that wound up in the Ark of the Covenant... were written in stone by the finger of God.

Not so with the stuff that says that the universe is billions of years old. All of that is guesswork, and the scientists who made the guesses essentially say so in their writings about the subject.

''
That's why the things the eye witnesses saw were immediately written down'' How do you know LOL. How do you know what it's written down it's what happened?

Israel. It exists. The people stubbornly hang onto the Old Testament. They stubbornly exist after being gone as a nation for almost 1900 years. They are an extremely stubborn people. The 2000-y-o Dead Sea Scrolls show how stubborn Israel is, by the accuracy when comparing the Bible Scrolls to the O.T. of today.

Or are you trying to say that Israel and the Dead Sea Scrolls don't exist?

Yea they exist, so do Muslims, Hindus, etc etc. They all claim the same things for their gods but how do you know? What method are you using to verify their claims? Are all books then true? Science proves the earth is older than 10.000 years with many different methods.

Scientists don't know what went on 10,000 years ago, or even that 10,000 years ago existed. The best evidence they have for 10,000 years ago is backward extrapolation of things that go on today. But they don't know that things worked like they do today, beyond about 5,000 years ago. And even 5,000 years ago is partly guesstimation.

Dead Sea Scrolls evidence that the Bible is the same today as it was back then. There are billions of copies of the Bible, but only a few copies of other religious writings in comparison. There is strength in the Bible, as there is strength in the People of Israel, and strength in God.

How are Dead Sea Scrolls of anything? In any case you can say it's evidence that people wrote the stupid bible a few thousand years ago, the problem is, how do you know what they wrote is real?

Evolution? Can anyone prove it to me? Isn't it a theory? If there was proof wouldn't it be a law? Then please say again you base your opinions on science not on faith.

''Isn't it a theory? If there was proof wouldn't it be a law?'' Define for me Scientific theory, please. You can facepalm yourself now btw.

[clareyancey215]

Of course, we all know you are into propaganda rather than science. All the scientists who extrapolate into the past, state that they don't know if they missed something. They all state that it only looks like. That isn't proof. That is exactly the opposite of proof.

Regarding the eye witnesses, none of them paint an exact picture with all the details. Many of them explain what they saw with descriptions of what it looked like to them. But the genealogies and dating times are accurate.

No reason to trust ''eye witnesses'' Do you know someone that knew someone that knew someone, etc etc until God?

That's why the things the eye witnesses saw were immediately written down, and the writings were meticulously copied perfectly. Moses and the people saw and heard God on Mt. Sinai. Shortly after this, Moses wrote the whole thing down so that there would be a record. And the two stone tablets with the 10 Commandments written on them... the ones that wound up in the Ark of the Covenant... were written in stone by the finger of God.

Not so with the stuff that says that the universe is billions of years old. All of that is guesswork, and the scientists who made the guesses essentially say so in their writings about the subject.

''
That's why the things the eye witnesses saw were immediately written down'' How do you know LOL. How do you know what it's written down it's what happened?

Israel. It exists. The people stubbornly hang onto the Old Testament. They stubbornly exist after being gone as a nation for almost 1900 years. They are an extremely stubborn people. The 2000-y-o Dead Sea Scrolls show how stubborn Israel is, by the accuracy when comparing the Bible Scrolls to the O.T. of today.

Or are you trying to say that Israel and the Dead Sea Scrolls don't exist?

Yea they exist, so do Muslims, Hindus, etc etc. They all claim the same things for their gods but how do you know? What method are you using to verify their claims? Are all books then true? Science proves the earth is older than 10.000 years with many different methods.

Scientists don't know what went on 10,000 years ago, or even that 10,000 years ago existed. The best evidence they have for 10,000 years ago is backward extrapolation of things that go on today. But they don't know that things worked like they do today, beyond about 5,000 years ago. And even 5,000 years ago is partly guesstimation.

Dead Sea Scrolls evidence that the Bible is the same today as it was back then. There are billions of copies of the Bible, but only a few copies of other religious writings in comparison. There is strength in the Bible, as there is strength in the People of Israel, and strength in God.

How are Dead Sea Scrolls of anything? In any case you can say it's evidence that people wrote the stupid bible a few thousand years ago, the problem is, how do you know what they wrote is real?

Evolution? Can anyone prove it to me? Isn't it a theory? If there was proof wouldn't it be a law? Then please say again you base your opinions on science not on faith.

''Isn't it a theory? If there was proof wouldn't it be a law?'' Define for me Scientific theory, please. You can facepalm yourself now btw.

Theory: “a proposed explanation whose status is still conjectural and subject to experimentation, in contrast to well-established propositions that are regarded as reporting matters of actual fact.”

You may need to review the "Scientific Method" again, then you will come to conclusion about the real meaning of a "Scientific Theory" and learn to differentiate facts from opinions.

[michaelkelly8798]

Of course, we all know you are into propaganda rather than science. All the scientists who extrapolate into the past, state that they don't know if they missed something. They all state that it only looks like. That isn't proof. That is exactly the opposite of proof.

Regarding the eye witnesses, none of them paint an exact picture with all the details. Many of them explain what they saw with descriptions of what it looked like to them. But the genealogies and dating times are accurate.

No reason to trust ''eye witnesses'' Do you know someone that knew someone that knew someone, etc etc until God?

That's why the things the eye witnesses saw were immediately written down, and the writings were meticulously copied perfectly. Moses and the people saw and heard God on Mt. Sinai. Shortly after this, Moses wrote the whole thing down so that there would be a record. And the two stone tablets with the 10 Commandments written on them... the ones that wound up in the Ark of the Covenant... were written in stone by the finger of God.

Not so with the stuff that says that the universe is billions of years old. All of that is guesswork, and the scientists who made the guesses essentially say so in their writings about the subject.

''
That's why the things the eye witnesses saw were immediately written down'' How do you know LOL. How do you know what it's written down it's what happened?

Israel. It exists. The people stubbornly hang onto the Old Testament. They stubbornly exist after being gone as a nation for almost 1900 years. They are an extremely stubborn people. The 2000-y-o Dead Sea Scrolls show how stubborn Israel is, by the accuracy when comparing the Bible Scrolls to the O.T. of today.

Or are you trying to say that Israel and the Dead Sea Scrolls don't exist?

Yea they exist, so do Muslims, Hindus, etc etc. They all claim the same things for their gods but how do you know? What method are you using to verify their claims? Are all books then true? Science proves the earth is older than 10.000 years with many different methods.

Scientists don't know what went on 10,000 years ago, or even that 10,000 years ago existed. The best evidence they have for 10,000 years ago is backward extrapolation of things that go on today. But they don't know that things worked like they do today, beyond about 5,000 years ago. And even 5,000 years ago is partly guesstimation.

Dead Sea Scrolls evidence that the Bible is the same today as it was back then. There are billions of copies of the Bible, but only a few copies of other religious writings in comparison. There is strength in the Bible, as there is strength in the People of Israel, and strength in God.

How are Dead Sea Scrolls of anything? In any case you can say it's evidence that people wrote the stupid bible a few thousand years ago, the problem is, how do you know what they wrote is real?

Evolution? Can anyone prove it to me? Isn't it a theory? If there was proof wouldn't it be a law? Then please say again you base your opinions on science not on faith.

''Isn't it a theory? If there was proof wouldn't it be a law?'' Define for me Scientific theory, please. You can facepalm yourself now btw.

Theory: “a proposed explanation whose status is still conjectural and subject to experimentation, in contrast to well-established propositions that are regarded as reporting matters of actual fact.”

You may need to review the "Scientific Method" again, then you will come to conclusion about the real meaning of a "Scientific Theory" and learn to differentiate facts from opinions.

You wont believe the definition so called scientists give to scientific theory XD

[Astargath]

Of course, we all know you are into propaganda rather than science. All the scientists who extrapolate into the past, state that they don't know if they missed something. They all state that it only looks like. That isn't proof. That is exactly the opposite of proof.

Regarding the eye witnesses, none of them paint an exact picture with all the details. Many of them explain what they saw with descriptions of what it looked like to them. But the genealogies and dating times are accurate.

No reason to trust ''eye witnesses'' Do you know someone that knew someone that knew someone, etc etc until God?

That's why the things the eye witnesses saw were immediately written down, and the writings were meticulously copied perfectly. Moses and the people saw and heard God on Mt. Sinai. Shortly after this, Moses wrote the whole thing down so that there would be a record. And the two stone tablets with the 10 Commandments written on them... the ones that wound up in the Ark of the Covenant... were written in stone by the finger of God.

Not so with the stuff that says that the universe is billions of years old. All of that is guesswork, and the scientists who made the guesses essentially say so in their writings about the subject.

''
That's why the things the eye witnesses saw were immediately written down'' How do you know LOL. How do you know what it's written down it's what happened?

Israel. It exists. The people stubbornly hang onto the Old Testament. They stubbornly exist after being gone as a nation for almost 1900 years. They are an extremely stubborn people. The 2000-y-o Dead Sea Scrolls show how stubborn Israel is, by the accuracy when comparing the Bible Scrolls to the O.T. of today.

Or are you trying to say that Israel and the Dead Sea Scrolls don't exist?

Yea they exist, so do Muslims, Hindus, etc etc. They all claim the same things for their gods but how do you know? What method are you using to verify their claims? Are all books then true? Science proves the earth is older than 10.000 years with many different methods.

Scientists don't know what went on 10,000 years ago, or even that 10,000 years ago existed. The best evidence they have for 10,000 years ago is backward extrapolation of things that go on today. But they don't know that things worked like they do today, beyond about 5,000 years ago. And even 5,000 years ago is partly guesstimation.

Dead Sea Scrolls evidence that the Bible is the same today as it was back then. There are billions of copies of the Bible, but only a few copies of other religious writings in comparison. There is strength in the Bible, as there is strength in the People of Israel, and strength in God.

How are Dead Sea Scrolls of anything? In any case you can say it's evidence that people wrote the stupid bible a few thousand years ago, the problem is, how do you know what they wrote is real?

Evolution? Can anyone prove it to me? Isn't it a theory? If there was proof wouldn't it be a law? Then please say again you base your opinions on science not on faith.

''Isn't it a theory? If there was proof wouldn't it be a law?'' Define for me Scientific theory, please. You can facepalm yourself now btw.

Theory: “a proposed explanation whose status is still conjectural and subject to experimentation, in contrast to well-established propositions that are regarded as reporting matters of actual fact.”

You may need to review the "Scientific Method" again, then you will come to conclusion about the real meaning of a "Scientific Theory" and learn to differentiate facts from opinions.

See that's your issue, you searched for ''theory'' not ''scientific theory''.

''A scientific theory is an explanation of an aspect of the natural world that can be repeatedly tested and verified in accordance with the scientific method, using accepted protocols of observation, measurement, and evaluation of results. Where possible, theories are tested under controlled conditions in an experiment.[1][2] In circumstances not amenable to experimental testing, theories are evaluated through principles of abductive reasoning. Established scientific theories have withstood rigorous scrutiny and embody scientific knowledge.''

[BADecker]

Theory: “a proposed explanation whose status is still conjectural and subject to experimentation, in contrast to well-established propositions that are regarded as reporting matters of actual fact.”

You may need to review the "Scientific Method" again, then you will come to conclusion about the real meaning of a "Scientific Theory" and learn to differentiate facts from opinions.

See that's your issue, you searched for ''theory'' not ''scientific theory''.

''A scientific theory is an explanation of an aspect of the natural world that can be repeatedly tested and verified in accordance with the scientific method, using accepted protocols of observation, measurement, and evaluation of results. Where possible, theories are tested under controlled conditions in an experiment.[1][2] In circumstances not amenable to experimental testing, theories are evaluated through principles of abductive reasoning. Established scientific theories have withstood rigorous scrutiny and embody scientific knowledge.''

You seem to have forgotten, already, that the only difference between a theory and a scientific theory is a bunch of words and calculations.

Scientific theories can be changed with changing evidence just like other theories. The only difference is the amount of thought and calculation that usually goes into scientific theories.

[Astargath]

Theory: “a proposed explanation whose status is still conjectural and subject to experimentation, in contrast to well-established propositions that are regarded as reporting matters of actual fact.”

You may need to review the "Scientific Method" again, then you will come to conclusion about the real meaning of a "Scientific Theory" and learn to differentiate facts from opinions.

See that's your issue, you searched for ''theory'' not ''scientific theory''.

''A scientific theory is an explanation of an aspect of the natural world that can be repeatedly tested and verified in accordance with the scientific method, using accepted protocols of observation, measurement, and evaluation of results. Where possible, theories are tested under controlled conditions in an experiment.[1][2] In circumstances not amenable to experimental testing, theories are evaluated through principles of abductive reasoning. Established scientific theories have withstood rigorous scrutiny and embody scientific knowledge.''

You seem to have forgotten, already, that the only difference between a theory and a scientific theory is a bunch of words and calculations.

Scientific theories can be changed with changing evidence just like other theories. The only difference is the amount of thought and calculation that usually goes into scientific theories.

Your point being? Scientific theories change just like everything else.

[BADecker]

Consider the power of the universities...


The Bizarre Viral Story Of The Professor Who Hired Mercenaries To Rescue A Student From ISIS

An epic and unheard of story of a rescue operation to free a graduate student from ISIS captivity is grabbing world headlines after it was revealed that a professor at a Swedish university financed and put together the whole plan by hiring mercenaries for the high risk venture of entering Islamic State territory.

In 2014 a chemistry PhD student named Firas Jumaah returned to his native Iraq while on break from Lund University, located outside of Malmo, Sweden. He returned in order to help his family escape ISIS, which at that time was sweeping northern Iraq, especially decimating the ethno-religious Yazidi community, to which Jumaah's family belonged.

...

Professor Turner said in interviews that she couldn't just let her student die without exhausting all measures: "What was happening was completely unacceptable," she told LUM. "I got so angry that IS was pushing itself into our world, exposing my doctoral student and his family to this, and disrupting the research."

...

A few days later two Landcruisers carrying four heavily-armed mercenaries roared into the area where Jumaah was hiding, and sped him away to Erbil Airport together with his wife and two small children.

The point is, universities have way more strength than one might think. And they use this strength to keep the evolution hoax alive, for money, and for indoctrination of the world.

[BADecker]

Evolution is a hoax.


 

[SANYOK95]

There has been no definite evidence to prove these theories at all. Shouldn't all monkeys have evolved to being man by now.

No, this is part of evolution.

[BADecker]

There has been no definite evidence to prove these theories at all. Shouldn't all monkeys have evolved to being man by now.

No, this is part of evolution.

Everything in so-called evolution, can be better explained by adaptation, like-begets-like, and simple change.

To prove evolution as part of how life came about, one would have to get DNA from plants and animals that showed the change taking place over thousands of years. It would have to be multitudes of varieties of plants and animals to prove that it wasn't just a few variations here and there. One would need a time machine to go back and get those samples.

Odds are evolution will never be proven, even if something in the lab approaches evolution.

[ATMD]

Odds are evolution will never be proven, even if something in the lab approaches evolution.

I was thinking about this too, speciation is rather difficult to observe, scientists have tried to observe speciation in a lab, and the findings could be used in evolutionists' favor.

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2016/11/161129152743.htm

[Joseph Brown]

If you live in African desert for just a week, you will notice your skin turn red. Live there for a month and your skin will gradually turn redder and eventually turn black after years.  Turning black is evolution that you won't feel much heat under the sun. Who knows you'll become a dinosaur after billion of years.  Grin

[Astargath]

There has been no definite evidence to prove these theories at all. Shouldn't all monkeys have evolved to being man by now.

No, this is part of evolution.

Everything in so-called evolution, can be better explained by adaptation, like-begets-like, and simple change.

To prove evolution as part of how life came about, one would have to get DNA from plants and animals that showed the change taking place over thousands of years. It would have to be multitudes of varieties of plants and animals to prove that it wasn't just a few variations here and there. One would need a time machine to go back and get those samples.

Odds are evolution will never be proven, even if something in the lab approaches evolution.

Evolution is indeed adaption over a few generations, so thank you for agreeing.

[af_newbie]

Evolution is a hoax.

 

Is it because the Jewish rabbi created the universe a few thousand years ago plus 6 days and evolution could not have happened in a few thousands of years? 

Or is it because there was a global flood where all animals and plants were killed and only the ones that were on a wooden boat survived, is that why the evolution is a hoax?

Is the evolution a hoax because the Jewish rabbi spirit created the first man from dirt?  Is that why?

You are a comedian.  Notbatman level.

[BADecker]

Evolution is a hoax.

 

Is it because the Jewish rabbi created the universe a few thousand years ago plus 6 days and evolution could not have happened in a few thousands of years? 

Or is it because there was a global flood where all animals and plants were killed and only the ones that were on a wooden boat survived, is that why the evolution is a hoax?

Is the evolution a hoax because the Jewish rabbi spirit created the first man from dirt?  Is that why?

You are a comedian.  Notbatman level.

NOW you think that a Jewish rabbi created the universe?

Evolution is a hoax for one major reason. That reason is not because it didn't happen. That reason is because deep thinking evolution scientists know it didn't happen, yet promote is as though it did.

Evolution is a hoax.

[BADecker]

Evolution is indeed adaption over a few generations, so thank you for agreeing.

The Model T Ford evolved into other vehicles. So, evolution happens with cars and trucks.

Evolution Theory Evolution (ETE) did not happen. But we have been through this before. And you still haven't been able to provide any proof for ETE.

Evolution remains a hoax.

[Astargath]

Evolution is indeed adaption over a few generations, so thank you for agreeing.

The Model T Ford evolved into other vehicles. So, evolution happens with cars and trucks.

Evolution Theory Evolution (ETE) did not happen. But we have been through this before. And you still haven't been able to provide any proof for ETE.

Evolution remains a hoax.

Different species of bears, dogs, etc etc easily prove evolution.

[af_newbie]

Evolution is indeed adaption over a few generations, so thank you for agreeing.

The Model T Ford evolved into other vehicles. So, evolution happens with cars and trucks.

Evolution Theory Evolution (ETE) did not happen. But we have been through this before. And you still haven't been able to provide any proof for ETE.

Evolution remains a hoax.

I think you don't know what the theory of evolution is.  That is why you keep saying it is a hoax.