Bitcoin Forum
February 17, 2020, 03:01:18 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 0.19.0.1 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 [58] 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [ANN] ChipMixer.com - Bitcoin mixer / Bitcoin tumbler - mixing reinvented  (Read 65075 times)
LoyceV
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 1764
Merit: 5786


Most of loyce.club works again


View Profile WWW
July 30, 2018, 03:16:21 PM
 #1141

escrow address was funded (2017-05-26) before the chipmixer address (2017-08-16). makes no sense to me in this order.
Why exactly does this matter?
I don't think the ChipMixer signing address was supposed to be funded. My guess is someone send their coins to that address by mistake.

Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1581951678
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1581951678

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1581951678
Reply with quote  #2

1581951678
Report to moderator
1581951678
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1581951678

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1581951678
Reply with quote  #2

1581951678
Report to moderator
1581951678
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1581951678

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1581951678
Reply with quote  #2

1581951678
Report to moderator
jackg
Copper Member
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1652
Merit: 1542


https://bit.ly/387FXHi ← lightning theory


View Profile
July 30, 2018, 07:06:14 PM
 #1142

escrow address was funded (2017-05-26) before the chipmixer address (2017-08-16). makes no sense to me in this order.
Why exactly does this matter?
I don't think the ChipMixer signing address was supposed to be funded. My guess is someone send their coins to that address by mistake.

They'd have done that after mixing their coins though.
I followed one of the chains and it brought me here: https://www.blockchain.com/btc/address/18HecYpFRs4s54oiLKnXLpfzFUb1VFQMvt - maybe it was a small chip, they liked the service and wanted to donate?

HCP
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1246
Merit: 2231

<insert witty quote here>


View Profile
July 30, 2018, 09:32:12 PM
 #1143

escrow address was funded (2017-05-26) before the chipmixer address (2017-08-16). makes no sense to me in this order.

EDIT: it's more an indicator that cipmixer created this escrow address and not the campiagn manager. or they are both the same.
It doesn't indicate anything of the sort. Chipmixer may have created their "1Chip" address 2 years ago... or the day it got funded, there is no way to tell from simply looking at transactions on the blockchain.


Quote
EDIT2: if this chipmixer address has an operational need (which it has) then you will create and fund it with the start of the operation or before. after your business is working and you have too less customers your are thinking about to improve it. then comes the escrow address into the game. in this order.
You would not necessarily fund it, if the "operational need" is that it is simply used to create signed messages. You don't need funds in an address to sign messages.

It is fairly obvious looking at the transaction history for this address, that it isn't an "operational" account at all. It has had 2 incoming transactions, which occurred 3 months after the Alpha tests and the service was opened. More likely, someone liked their service and dropped a donation instead of using the internal "donate chip" option.

Without knowing the actual details... I'd say that Chipmixer saw that DarkStar_ had created the "1Chip" address to escrow the sig campaign funds, and liked the idea of a vanity address so went and made one for themselves.

audaciousbeing
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1176
Merit: 565


View Profile
July 31, 2018, 10:48:58 AM
 #1144


EDIT3: Alpha test thread --> https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1923170.0

it was a single man show from the begining. even the reaction time if issues occure proves this.

IMO, chipmixer and campaign manager does not involves more then 2 people. maybe even just one. and if not just one both are strong connected in the same local community.

I am really trying to understand what your end goal is here because I don't believe someone would embark on an activity without and end in mind and I feel its better you come out with that for everyone to see so that any concerns you have can be adequately responded to and attended to as necessary. The link you are trying to make are purely circumstantial that would not even take one to have any special skills to find out if one dedicate your time to it. @DarkStar has said where he is from and I wonder if the @chipmixer would do you the honor of saying where he is resident and answer such as that could mean he is just out of business.
BTCforJoe
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 882
Merit: 973



View Profile WWW
August 02, 2018, 04:44:20 AM
 #1145


EDIT3: Alpha test thread --> https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1923170.0

it was a single man show from the begining. even the reaction time if issues occure proves this.

IMO, chipmixer and campaign manager does not involves more then 2 people. maybe even just one. and if not just one both are strong connected in the same local community.

I am really trying to understand what your end goal is here because I don't believe someone would embark on an activity without and end in mind and I feel its better you come out with that for everyone to see so that any concerns you have can be adequately responded to and attended to as necessary. The link you are trying to make are purely circumstantial that would not even take one to have any special skills to find out if one dedicate your time to it. @DarkStar has said where he is from and I wonder if the @chipmixer would do you the honor of saying where he is resident and answer such as that could mean he is just out of business.

Obvious sig spammer is obvious. Roll Eyes

I have the user on ignore, but it's hard to keep ignoring if y'all are gonna keep quoting. Y'all should just stop addressing him, and if he continues to spam here, I'd recommend reporting him to his campaign manager.

Thirdspace
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1232
Merit: 720


Mixing reinvented for your privacy | chipmixer.com


View Profile
August 02, 2018, 11:28:49 AM
 #1146

I have the user on ignore, but it's hard to keep ignoring if y'all are gonna keep quoting. Y'all should just stop addressing him, and if he continues to spam here, I'd recommend reporting him to his campaign manager.
I doubt his campaign manager would do much to him, probably just telling him to tone it down
his signature and this thread is exactly in the same business field, both are bitcoin mixers
so that makes us as his competitor Cool that's why he keeps bugging this thread

ChipMixer
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 356
Merit: 293


ChipMixer.com | ChipMixerwzxtzbw.onion


View Profile WWW
August 07, 2018, 11:20:36 PM
 #1147

Chipmixer.com was down for about 20 hours. It is online again.
Tor service (chipmixerwzxtzbw.onion) was not interrupted.

Raj Malhotra
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 112
Merit: 10


View Profile
August 08, 2018, 06:37:38 PM
 #1148

Chipmixer.com & Tor service (chipmixerwzxtzbw.onion) Server is Down for more than 20-hours.
My BTC is struck due to this... Cry
This is happening frequently...
TryNinja
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1288
Merit: 1824



View Profile
August 08, 2018, 06:41:40 PM
 #1149

Chipmixer.com & Tor service (chipmixerwzxtzbw.onion) Server is Down for more than 20-hours.
My BTC is struck due to this... Cry
This is happening frequently...
The Tor service is working fine here.

I remember the old DDoS times (a simple attack can take the .com down for many hours). Maybe the attacker is back?

LoyceV
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 1764
Merit: 5786


Most of loyce.club works again


View Profile WWW
August 08, 2018, 06:55:04 PM
 #1150

Chipmixer.com & Tor service (chipmixerwzxtzbw.onion) Server is Down for more than 20-hours.
My BTC is struck due to this... Cry
The Tor service is working fine here.
I confirm, Tor works here too (just a bit slow, but that's probably normal for Tor).

Sondrax
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 13
Merit: 1


View Profile
August 08, 2018, 08:27:28 PM
 #1151

Again DDoS atack? I can't use noramal site (not TOR)

Regards.
jackg
Copper Member
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1652
Merit: 1542


https://bit.ly/387FXHi ← lightning theory


View Profile
August 08, 2018, 08:32:33 PM
 #1152

Again DDoS atack? I can't use noramal site (not TOR)

Regards.

Can you get round the issue by using tor - downloadable from torproject.org (if you can't wait for the site to come back on the light web).



Dot come still gives a 504 error, dot onion runs as normal.

Seems your problem is fixed with the dot onion site for now @Loyce

buwaytress
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260
Merit: 1164


https://bitcoin.watfordfc.com


View Profile
August 12, 2018, 09:56:27 AM
 #1153

Clearnet site works for me, very fast. Tor link loads about 2-3 seconds slower, but that's always the case for me no matter what my Internet speed. I'm sure sending a support request would have gotten things fixed quickly - any outstanding issues?

Also, OP: good suggestion from the campaign thread to update onion site into new format, quoted below. Don't know about faster though, they work as slowly on my end.

Chipmixer devs should look into porting the website into the new tor format. It's supposedly more secure, more private, faster. The address format is longer so the current one is definitely the classic one. It has been out for a couple of months with no problems that I know of.

jackg
Copper Member
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1652
Merit: 1542


https://bit.ly/387FXHi ← lightning theory


View Profile
August 12, 2018, 06:03:04 PM
 #1154

Clearnet site works for me, very fast. Tor link loads about 2-3 seconds slower, but that's always the case for me no matter what my Internet speed. I'm sure sending a support request would have gotten things fixed quickly - any outstanding issues?

Also, OP: good suggestion from the campaign thread to update onion site into new format, quoted below. Don't know about faster though, they work as slowly on my end.

Chipmixer devs should look into porting the website into the new tor format. It's supposedly more secure, more private, faster. The address format is longer so the current one is definitely the classic one. It has been out for a couple of months with no problems that I know of.

Unless they just put two relays between you and the site instead of 4 (which wouldn't be a bad idea)...

john.doe761
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 7
Merit: 0


View Profile
August 13, 2018, 05:48:44 PM
 #1155

Just mixed ~1 BTC via TOR, all worked fine.

Clear net don't work there too.
jacee
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1330
Merit: 1024


View Profile WWW
August 13, 2018, 05:54:30 PM
 #1156

Just mixed ~1 BTC via TOR, all worked fine.

Clear net don't work there too.
The clearnet is actually accessible. I just mixed a small amount a while ago and upon checking their website just now, it took a while to load maybe about 10-15 seconds but after that I was able to access the website normally.
ChipMixer
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 356
Merit: 293


ChipMixer.com | ChipMixerwzxtzbw.onion


View Profile WWW
August 14, 2018, 08:45:32 PM
 #1157

Again DDoS atack?
Third new type of attack this week. Previous attacks were synchronized with announcement of new Bitcoin mixer. This time nobody seems to be promoting theirs.

BTCforJoe
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 882
Merit: 973



View Profile WWW
August 15, 2018, 08:12:04 PM
 #1158

Again DDoS atack?
Third new type of attack this week. Previous attacks were synchronized with announcement of new Bitcoin mixer. This time nobody seems to be promoting theirs.

Just curious; have previous DDoS attacks typically been coincidental with other mixer launches?

ChipMixer
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 356
Merit: 293


ChipMixer.com | ChipMixerwzxtzbw.onion


View Profile WWW
August 17, 2018, 11:02:39 AM
 #1159

Third new type of attack this week. Previous attacks were synchronized with announcement of new Bitcoin mixer. This time nobody seems to be promoting theirs.

Just curious; have previous DDoS attacks typically been coincidental with other mixer launches?
Yes. This is kind of only reason to DDoS a mixer, eh?

jackg
Copper Member
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1652
Merit: 1542


https://bit.ly/387FXHi ← lightning theory


View Profile
August 17, 2018, 12:24:27 PM
 #1160

Yes. This is kind of only reason to DDoS a mixer, eh?

No, there could be companies that are against mixers or governments even. Maybe someone had a bad time with a scammy one and wanted to get their own back by ddosing others.

But it would mostly be other mixers as it's quite an expensive thing to do.

Pages: « 1 ... 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 [58] 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!