[ANN] ChipMixer.com - Bitcoin mixer / Bitcoin tumbler - mixing reinvented

[moejoejay]

chipmixer tor service still down

best regards

[1714786645]

1714786645

[1714786645]

1714786645

[Gyrsur]

chipmixer tor service still down

best regards

confirmed

[btc2usd.biz]

very very strange that tor down and regular domain working

[Gyrsur]

very very strange that tor down and regular domain working

tor side still down. honeypot?

[TryNinja]

tor side still down. honeypot?

Feel free to check the website SSL certificate.

[Gyrsur]

tor side still down. honeypot?

Feel free to check the website SSL certificate.

better you try to learn the differences of the OSI layers next time.  

EDIT: his response via PM:

better you try to learn the differences of the OSI layers next time. 

Ty for the well thought comment, troll.

[TryNinja]

EDIT: his response via PM:

better you try to learn the differences of the OSI layers next time. 

Ty for the well thought comment, troll.

Hey man, it's called "personal message" for a reason.

On a side note, I actually have an exam tomorrow about Cisco's CCNA chapter 09 and the transport layer. So that's funny for you to say. lol

[Gyrsur]

EDIT: his response via PM:

better you try to learn the differences of the OSI layers next time.  

Ty for the well thought comment, troll.

Hey man, it's called "personal message" for a reason.

On a side note, I actually have an exam tomorrow about Cisco's CCNA chapter 09 and the transport layer. So that's funny for you to say. lol

ok, then this quick escalation is maybe usefull:

encryption (SSL) and addressing (IP) are using different layers. if a service is reachable via ordinary IP (and not Tor) collection of metadata is possible even if the data exchange is encrypted itself.

https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/tcp-ip-model/

EDIT: but could be CM is too lazy to update their Tor implementation because there was a DDOS fix not long time ago. but if I want to mix my coins I will ever connect via Tor to this service.

[moejoejay]

I've got an problem

i have forgot to note down the last 3 digits from my voucher code  ( yes i know incredibly stupid )

any chance to recover ?

best regards

[jackg]

I've got an problem

i have forgot to note down the last 3 digits from my voucher code  ( yes i know incredibly stupid )

any chance to recover ?

best regards

Send them an email they might be able to help you. If you have the session token or the deposit address they will be more likely to work out its yours better (did you do it recently)?

[moejoejay]

(did you do it recently)?

about 10 min before i have posted here

Update: i ve sent an email to chipmixer

thnx for guidance

best regards

[jackg]

(did you do it recently)?

about 10 min before i have posted here

Update: i ve sent an email to chipmixer

Ah yeah they should be able to recover it then as long as you've sent either the deposit address or session token... You're fairly active on this thread so you probably already know it make take some time for then to respond so make sure your session doesn't expire before they do.

[ChipMixer]

@chipmixer:
Did u take precautions after fixing ?
https://fossbytes.com/tor-project-fixing-ddos-vulnerable-bug-in-onion-sites/

There is no fix yet  https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/29607

Tor project have plan what should be fixed, idea how to do that and vague idea how exactly to do that. Issue is 7 months old - it will not be ready this year.

[btctaipei]

@chipmixer:
Did u take precautions after fixing ?
https://fossbytes.com/tor-project-fixing-ddos-vulnerable-bug-in-onion-sites/

There is no fix yet  https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/29607
Tor project have plan what should be fixed, idea how to do that and vague idea how exactly to do that. Issue is 7 months old - it will not be ready this year.

Analysis on Tor Ticket#29607:
===================
I think tor dev team need to realize that going after establish_intro() and place proof of work(PoW) burden on client and have guard enforce it with Enble_PoW_Defenese set by your service node isn't going to help.  From what I've seen a resourceful attacker (like government and banking sector with access to big data) can outperform standard user by order of magnitude >  2^10 or better; so the issue here isn't about how to make establish circuit more expensive but it had to do with tor routing layer enhancement to permit propagation to scrub / packet at the guard node(s).  Which is not going to be easy (similar to how BGP flow-spec works) because this feature can cause Tor network can potentially be unstable if implemented incorrectly (alot of testing, IMHO).

as of Sat Sep 28 04:20:21 UTC 2019, both

http://chipmixerwzxtzbw.onion
https://chipmixer.com

are up and I've completed about 15 successful sessions in less then 2 minutes.

[moejoejay]

@chipmixer:

Noted in the fossbyte article:

Besides this, there will be a new option for .onion site operators, using which they can enable defenses for their sites. Whenever it is enabled, Tor users will be able to access those sites under attack, but it will take a longer time to establish the connection.

Noted in the Ticket related to the Tor Issue:

https://www.hackerfactor.com/blog/index.php?/archives/777-Stopping-Tor-Attacks.html

But i think ure have it discovered already

best regards

[moejoejay]

could someone explain to me how i can verify the receipt from chipmixer?

my receipt:

Code:

--- MESSAGE ---
This is a receipt / confirmation that you have received following
private keys from ChipMixer:
### CHIP SIZE: xxxxx BTC
Address: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Private key: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx


This message is signed with ChipMixer's Bitcoin address:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

--- SIGNATURE ---
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
--- END ---

In which way i have to insert these infos in electrum that im able to verify the receipt ?

best regards

[TryNinja]

could someoone explain to me how i can verify the receipt from chipmixer?

my receipt:

--- MESSAGE ---
This is a receipt / confirmation that you have received following
private keys from ChipMixer:
### CHIP SIZE: xxxxx BTC
Address: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Private key: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx


This message is signed with ChipMixer's Bitcoin address:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

--- SIGNATURE ---
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
--- END ---

In which way i have to insert these infos in electrum that im able to verify the receipt ?

best regards

Tools -> Sign/verify a message.

A window will popup.

Put the whole message (marked as green) in the "Message" field.
Put the whole signature (marked as red) in the "Signature" field.
Put the address indicated in the message (bolded, and which is indicated by "This message is signed with ChipMixer's Bitcoin address") in the "Address" field.

Now click "Verify" and it will show up as valid or invalid. Make sure you don't miss any space or character.

[moejoejay]

@TryNinja

everything doubleproofed

it says that the signature is wrong


best regards

[TryNinja]

@TryNinja

everything doubleproofed

it says that the signature is wrong

best regards

Did you put the empty line at the end?

Would you mind sharing it with me?

[moejoejay]

@TryNinja

u got an pm

best regards