Bitcoin Forum
September 27, 2021, 01:21:40 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 22.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 852 853 854 855 856 857 858 859 860 861 862 863 864 865 866 867 868 869 870 871 872 873 874 875 876 877 878 879 880 881 882 883 884 885 886 887 888 889 890 891 892 893 894 895 896 897 898 899 900 901 [902] 903 904 905 906 907 908 909 910 911 912 913 914 915 916 917 918 919 920 921 922 923 924 925 926 927 928 929 930 931 932 933 934 935 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [ANN] Bitcoin Cash - Pro on-chain scaling - Cheaper fees  (Read 695835 times)
BitcoinFX
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2492
Merit: 1577


https://youtu.be/DsAVx0u9Cw4 ... Dr. WHO < KLF


View Profile WWW
February 20, 2019, 09:12:16 AM
Last edit: February 20, 2019, 09:33:40 AM by BitcoinFX
 #18021


Already read that in great detail.

Foul play alleged from all sides.

CSW claims to be Satoshi and yet has still not Signed any block as definitive proof.

I'm certainly not a troll, I used to communicate with Satoshi (on this very forum).

Unlike Craig, I have verified myself ...
- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4630066.0

Craig (currently) being unable or unwilling to (legitimately) Sign anything has caused 2 major problems for BSV / nchain.

1) Not signing a stated claim is a false pretence.

2) The continuing duration of this false pretence has impacted on the entire crypto space, including the market.

...

If folks actually digested my own posts you would likely discover that I have not referred to Craig as a 'Faketoshi' or otherwise.

Innocent until proven guilty. However ...

Why does Craig avoid Bitcoin 'old timers' like the plague and/or not just come back to this forum to set the record straight? According to Craig's own story he had moved on to other things ... whilst leaving the Bitcoin community to both establish, maintain and build the project in his absence (and off their own backs!).

Do you think it is OK to retain the (metaphorical) last piece of the puzzle, to place the final piece and to proclaim wholeheartedly "I built all this" and "You are all wrong!" etc.,

...

People in the world
Do not doubt
It is teaching
Which is the
beginning of doubt.
- Zen poem

...

Again, this is Financial Cryptography, so do not trust. Sign and Verify.
Simply, Put up, or Shut up.
- https://idioms.thefreedictionary.com/put+up+or+shut+up



- https://youtu.be/4oPddS8HujA  Roll Eyes

Cross talk  Smiley

"Bitcoin OG" Bored/Board of making others wealthy! | 1JXFXUBGs2ZtEDAQMdZ3tkCKo38nT2XSEp | Bitcoin is BTC | CSW is NOT Satoshi Nakamoto | I Mine BTC, LTC, ZEC, XMR and GAP | Support my BTC on Tor addnodes Project | Media enquiries : Wu Ming | Enjoy The Money Machine | "You cannot compete with Open Source" and "Cryptography != Banana"
1632705700
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1632705700

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1632705700
Reply with quote  #2

1632705700
Report to moderator
1632705700
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1632705700

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1632705700
Reply with quote  #2

1632705700
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
Bitcoin Cash
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 37
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 20, 2019, 04:49:10 PM
Last edit: June 14, 2019, 02:27:30 PM by Bitcoin Cash
 #18022

Bitcoin Cash fulfilling the original promise of Bitcoin as "Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash"
jbreher
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2912
Merit: 1515


lose: unfind ... loose: untight


View Profile
February 20, 2019, 05:18:32 PM
Merited by sirsplashalot (1)
 #18023


Mmm Hmm... Meanwhile, the average BTC block size has been creeping up again. We may already be on the edge of the next blockalypse.

The first blockalypse never happened. What has happened since December 2017? BCH's market share has plummeted and bitcoin has survived just fine.

Un Hunh. And what happened to all that adoption that was building - right up until the point that BTC could not handle the demand?

Quote
Which of course will be accompanied by ever-lengthening confirmation times, and soaring fees. Once BTC returns to its eventual equilibrium of unusability, where do you think the tx demand is going to go?

Well that's easy: Lightning Network.

No. LN cannot onboard enough people fast enough to be a contender. Not to mention all the evil that will be unleashed when the chain does not have the capacity to handle renewals or cashouts. Even if it had the value capacity for meaningful commerce. Or even if it had simple clients. Or the ability to route in a malleable environment of channels coming and going, with users wanting trustless, permissionless, decentralized operation.

Wow... I know enough about you to know you, more than the average person,  have the skills to do simple deductive reasoning...  If lightning doesn't have the ability to onboard people fast enough for OFF CHAIN... then  how will BSV be able to confirm that may payments ON CHAIN without centralizing?  It takes ONE TX to go off chain and then to do do millions of transactions using that SINGLE off chain TX.

Doing everything on chain is an interesting future goal... but it is decades out.

(key words "on chain")

You seem to be missing the fact that everyone who wants to employ LN needs to perform at least one onchain tx. Only then can they engage in gajillions of off chain channel txs. No room on the chain, no room for more LN adopters.

How many Bitcoin txs have you done in the last year? What percentage of those were opening, closing, or maintaining LN channels?

Until a cabal of subverters decided to cripple BTC, doing everything on chain was just The Way Bitcoin Worked. Fortunately, in the cases of SV and BCH, doing everything on chain is still just the way Bitcoin works.

You have any metrics to share that may quantify the centralization you imply is a necessary effect of large amounts of onchain txs? No? No metrics? Color me shocked.

Anyone with a campaign ad in their signature -- for an organization with which they are not otherwise affiliated -- is automatically deducted credibility points.

I've been convicted of heresy. Convicted by a mere known extortionist. Read my Trust for details.
Bitbobb
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1134
Merit: 525


Less hops. More wins.


View Profile
February 20, 2019, 05:23:46 PM
 #18024


Mmm Hmm... Meanwhile, the average BTC block size has been creeping up again. We may already be on the edge of the next blockalypse.

The first blockalypse never happened. What has happened since December 2017? BCH's market share has plummeted and bitcoin has survived just fine.

Un Hunh. And what happened to all that adoption that was building - right up until the point that BTC could not handle the demand?

Quote
Which of course will be accompanied by ever-lengthening confirmation times, and soaring fees. Once BTC returns to its eventual equilibrium of unusability, where do you think the tx demand is going to go?

Well that's easy: Lightning Network.

No. LN cannot onboard enough people fast enough to be a contender. Not to mention all the evil that will be unleashed when the chain does not have the capacity to handle renewals or cashouts. Even if it had the value capacity for meaningful commerce. Or even if it had simple clients. Or the ability to route in a malleable environment of channels coming and going, with users wanting trustless, permissionless, decentralized operation.

Wow... I know enough about you to know you, more than the average person,  have the skills to do simple deductive reasoning...  If lightning doesn't have the ability to onboard people fast enough for OFF CHAIN... then  how will BSV be able to confirm that may payments ON CHAIN without centralizing?  It takes ONE TX to go off chain and then to do do millions of transactions using that SINGLE off chain TX.

Doing everything on chain is an interesting future goal... but it is decades out.

(key words "on chain")

You seem to be missing the fact that everyone who wants to employ LN needs to perform at least one onchain tx. Only then can they engage in gajillions of off chain channel txs. No room on the chain, no room for more LN adopters.

How many Bitcoin txs have you done in the last year? What percentage of those were opening, closing, or maintaining LN channels?

Until a cabal of subverters decided to cripple BTC, doing everything on chain was just The Way Bitcoin Worked. Fortunately, in the cases of SV and BCH, doing everything on chain is still just the way Bitcoin works.

Some of the same subversive items that crippled btc are being added to BCH so it is only a matter of time before both liability and subversion becomes obvious on the BCH chain also.  

sirsplashalot
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 521
Merit: 123



View Profile
February 20, 2019, 05:24:30 PM
 #18025


Mmm Hmm... Meanwhile, the average BTC block size has been creeping up again. We may already be on the edge of the next blockalypse.

The first blockalypse never happened. What has happened since December 2017? BCH's market share has plummeted and bitcoin has survived just fine.

Un Hunh. And what happened to all that adoption that was building - right up until the point that BTC could not handle the demand?

Quote
Which of course will be accompanied by ever-lengthening confirmation times, and soaring fees. Once BTC returns to its eventual equilibrium of unusability, where do you think the tx demand is going to go?

Well that's easy: Lightning Network.

No. LN cannot onboard enough people fast enough to be a contender. Not to mention all the evil that will be unleashed when the chain does not have the capacity to handle renewals or cashouts. Even if it had the value capacity for meaningful commerce. Or even if it had simple clients. Or the ability to route in a malleable environment of channels coming and going, with users wanting trustless, permissionless, decentralized operation.

Wow... I know enough about you to know you, more than the average person,  have the skills to do simple deductive reasoning...  If lightning doesn't have the ability to onboard people fast enough for OFF CHAIN... then  how will BSV be able to confirm that may payments ON CHAIN without centralizing?  It takes ONE TX to go off chain and then to do do millions of transactions using that SINGLE off chain TX.

Doing everything on chain is an interesting future goal... but it is decades out.

(key words "on chain")

You seem to be missing the fact that everyone who wants to employ LN needs to perform at least one onchain tx. Only then can they engage in gajillions of off chain channel txs. No room on the chain, no room for more LN adopters.

How many Bitcoin txs have you done in the last year? What percentage of those were opening, closing, or maintaining LN channels?

Until a cabal of subverters decided to cripple BTC, doing everything on chain was just The Way Bitcoin Worked. Fortunately, in the cases of SV and BCH, doing everything on chain is still just the way Bitcoin works.

And apparently shrinking the blocksize is a solution now  Cheesy

Worried about my trust rating? I am too. Bitcointalk users ‘Lauda’ and ‘gmaxwell’ have abused their superior powers in trust system to align their views with the ‘correct views.’ In no legal system in any jurisdiction do we have a definition for what Bitcoin is, they do not have the power to tell us what it is based on the rule of law.
hv_
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2030
Merit: 1049

Clean Code and Scale


View Profile WWW
February 21, 2019, 10:17:45 AM
 #18026


Mmm Hmm... Meanwhile, the average BTC block size has been creeping up again. We may already be on the edge of the next blockalypse.

The first blockalypse never happened. What has happened since December 2017? BCH's market share has plummeted and bitcoin has survived just fine.

Un Hunh. And what happened to all that adoption that was building - right up until the point that BTC could not handle the demand?

Quote
Which of course will be accompanied by ever-lengthening confirmation times, and soaring fees. Once BTC returns to its eventual equilibrium of unusability, where do you think the tx demand is going to go?

Well that's easy: Lightning Network.

No. LN cannot onboard enough people fast enough to be a contender. Not to mention all the evil that will be unleashed when the chain does not have the capacity to handle renewals or cashouts. Even if it had the value capacity for meaningful commerce. Or even if it had simple clients. Or the ability to route in a malleable environment of channels coming and going, with users wanting trustless, permissionless, decentralized operation.

Wow... I know enough about you to know you, more than the average person,  have the skills to do simple deductive reasoning...  If lightning doesn't have the ability to onboard people fast enough for OFF CHAIN... then  how will BSV be able to confirm that may payments ON CHAIN without centralizing?  It takes ONE TX to go off chain and then to do do millions of transactions using that SINGLE off chain TX.

Doing everything on chain is an interesting future goal... but it is decades out.


(key words "on chain")

How can that bitcoin that is written and specked up in the Satoshi Whitpaper AND correctly implemented on purpose be ever centralized?    Smtp  nodes are only some big entities like gmail gmx ...  but that doesn t make smtp  centralized by any means.       BSV   is  that  smtp analogon by definition , commitment and roadmap.

Carpe diem  -  understand the White Paper and mine honest.
Fix real world issues: Check out b-vote.com
The simple way is the genius way - Satoshi's Rules: humana veris _
Globb0
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2660
Merit: 2029


Free spirit


View Profile
February 21, 2019, 10:49:31 AM
 #18027

Im sticking to running a POP node its the original vision


hv_
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2030
Merit: 1049

Clean Code and Scale


View Profile WWW
February 21, 2019, 03:39:50 PM
 #18028

Im sticking to running a POP node its the original vision




A node described in the white paper does .... ?

It is a miner

Carpe diem  -  understand the White Paper and mine honest.
Fix real world issues: Check out b-vote.com
The simple way is the genius way - Satoshi's Rules: humana veris _
adamvp
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1162
Merit: 708



View Profile
February 21, 2019, 04:02:49 PM
 #18029

"Together we stand - divided we fall"
This all BCC BCH BCD BCG BCV BCS drama leads to somewehere where I was afraid it has to lead - divided community is much weaker and weaker. And looking
realistically there is no sign of recovery Sad

100% inevitable.

no one should be surprised by the outcome. forks of forks are not a sound basis to build something that others will trust.

compare how litecoin have conducted themselves to this. it's pitiful.

Yeah, initially consensus mechanism in Bitcoin was supposed to be based on higher hashrate and it happened very bad that it was allowed so many forks survived. It would be much better cryptocurrencies with lower hashrate would never survive and to focus all developement on best projects! World do not need thousands of crypto to transfer money...

I am looking for signature campaign Wink pm me
hv_
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2030
Merit: 1049

Clean Code and Scale


View Profile WWW
February 21, 2019, 06:31:05 PM
 #18030

"Together we stand - divided we fall"
This all BCC BCH BCD BCG BCV BCS drama leads to somewehere where I was afraid it has to lead - divided community is much weaker and weaker. And looking
realistically there is no sign of recovery Sad

100% inevitable.

no one should be surprised by the outcome. forks of forks are not a sound basis to build something that others will trust.

compare how litecoin have conducted themselves to this. it's pitiful.

Yeah, initially consensus mechanism in Bitcoin was supposed to be based on higher hashrate and it happened very bad that it was allowed so many forks survived. It would be much better cryptocurrencies with lower hashrate would never survive and to focus all developement on best projects! World do not need thousands of crypto to transfer money...

Sure. Good point. So what defines the protocol that an honest miner should follow?  Where are the legit specs for?


Carpe diem  -  understand the White Paper and mine honest.
Fix real world issues: Check out b-vote.com
The simple way is the genius way - Satoshi's Rules: humana veris _
LUCKMCFLY
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 1456
Merit: 1431


Crypto Casino & Sportsbook


View Profile WWW
February 22, 2019, 12:26:12 AM
 #18031

"Together we stand - divided we fall"
This all BCC BCH BCD BCG BCV BCS drama leads to somewehere where I was afraid it has to lead - divided community is much weaker and weaker. And looking
realistically there is no sign of recovery Sad

100% inevitable.

no one should be surprised by the outcome. forks of forks are not a sound basis to build something that others will trust.

compare how litecoin have conducted themselves to this. it's pitiful.

Yeah, initially consensus mechanism in Bitcoin was supposed to be based on higher hashrate and it happened very bad that it was allowed so many forks survived. It would be much better cryptocurrencies with lower hashrate would never survive and to focus all developement on best projects! World do not need thousands of crypto to transfer money...

Sure. Good point. So what defines the protocol that an honest miner should follow?  Where are the legit specs for?


Bitcoin Cash dared to make a Hard Fork to generate Bitcoin SV, at the precise moment that Roger had his problem with his partner, I do not know how important these people believe, but the only thing that Hard Fork does is Bitcoin, I mean, For my Bitcoin Cash it does not have and will never have a life of its own.


██████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
████████▀▀▀        ▀▀█████████████████████████████████████████████████
██████▀    ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄    ███████████████████████████████████████████████
█████    ▄█████████▌   ▐█████▀  ▐███████████████▌  ▀██████████████████
████▌   ▐██████████    █████    ████████████████    ██████████████████
████▌   ▐█████████▄▄▄▄█████▌   ▐███████████████▌   ▐███▀▀█████████████
█████    ▀███████████████▀▀        ▄███████████    ██▀   ▐████████████
██████▄     ▀▀███████▀▀         ▄▄███▀▀▀▀█████▌   ▐▀   ▄███▀▀   ▀█████
█████████▄▄     ▀▀███▄  ▄▄    ████▀    ▄   ███       ▄███▀   ▄█  ▐████
█████████████▄▄     ▀████▌   ▐███▀   ███   ██▌      ████    ██▀  █████
██████▀▀   ▀█████▄    ███    ████   ███▌  ▐██    ▌  ▐██▌      ▄▄██████
█████    ▄████████    ▐██    ██▀▀   ██▀   ▐▀    ▐█   ██▌   ▀██▀▀  ████
████▌   ▐████████▀    ███▄     ▄▄▄     ▄    ▄   ▐██   ██▄      ▄▄█████
████▌   ███████▀    ▄███████████████████████████████▄  ▀▀██████▀▀ ████
█████    ▀▀▀▀     ▄█████████▀    ▀█▀    ▀█       ▀████▄▄         ▄████
██████▄▄    ▄▄▄▄████████████  █████  ██  █  █  █  ████████████████████
█████████████████████████  █▄    ▄█▄    ▄█  █  █  ████████████████████
██████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
▄▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▄
█  ▄▀▄             █▀▀▐▀▄▄
█  █▀█             █  ▐  ▐▌
█       ▄██▄       █  ▌  █
█     ▄██████▄     █  ▌ ▐▌
█    ██████████    █ ▐  █
█   ▐██████████▌   █ ▐ ▐▌
█    ▀▀██████▀▀    █ ▌ █
█     ▄▄▄██▄▄▄     █ ▌▐▌
█                  █▐ █
█                  █▐▐▌
█                  █▐█
▀▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▀█
▄▄█████████▄▄
▄█▀▀▀█████████▀▀▀█▄
▄█▀    ▄▀█████▀     ▀█▄
▄█▄    █        ▀▄   ███▄
▄████▀▀▀▀▄       ▄▀▀▀▀▀███▄
████      ▀▄▄▄▄▄▀       ███
███     ▄▄███████▄▄     ▄▀█
█  ▀▄ ▄▀ ▀███████▀ ▀▄ ▄▀  █
▀█   █     ▀███▀     ▀▄  █▀
▀█▄▄█▄      █        █▄█▀
▀█████▄ ▄▀▀ ▀▀▄▄ ▄▄███▀
▀█████        ████▀
▀▀█▄▄▄▄▄▄▄█▀▀
● OVER 1000 GAMES
● DAILY RACES AND BONUSES
● 24/7 LIVE SUPPORT
cool4y
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 496
Merit: 12


View Profile
February 24, 2019, 05:02:06 AM
 #18032

I can't believe my eyes that this misconception and purposeless hybrid fork is still around. What we need in the cryptocurrency space is cleansing from the trash coins.
alevlaslo
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1918
Merit: 591


View Profile
February 24, 2019, 06:34:23 AM
Last edit: February 24, 2019, 06:12:56 PM by alevlaslo
 #18033

 Are you sure that inside the BTC LN channel you can not print unnoticed new coins according to the Ponzi scheme?

mindrust
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2296
Merit: 2161



View Profile
February 24, 2019, 07:54:27 AM
 #18034

"Together we stand - divided we fall"
This all BCC BCH BCD BCG BCV BCS drama leads to somewehere where I was afraid it has to lead - divided community is much weaker and weaker. And looking
realistically there is no sign of recovery Sad

100% inevitable.

no one should be surprised by the outcome. forks of forks are not a sound basis to build something that others will trust.

compare how litecoin have conducted themselves to this. it's pitiful.

Yeah, initially consensus mechanism in Bitcoin was supposed to be based on higher hashrate and it happened very bad that it was allowed so many forks survived. It would be much better cryptocurrencies with lower hashrate would never survive and to focus all developement on best projects! World do not need thousands of crypto to transfer money...

They survive because nobody wants to waste their time and money just to prove a point. Bitcoin Gold already was attacked and proved that weak hash rate coins are not safe.

After seeing what happened to BTG, if you are still buying weak coins like BCH and BSV, you deserve what's coming to you.




▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄    ▄▄▄▄                  ▄▄▄   ▄▄▄▄▄        ▄▄▄▄▄   ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄    ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄   ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄   ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
 ▀████████████████▄  ████                 █████   ▀████▄    ▄████▀  ▄██████████████   ████████████▀  ▄█████████████▀  ▄█████████████▄
              ▀████  ████               ▄███▀███▄   ▀████▄▄████▀               ████   ████                ████                   ▀████
   ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄█████  ████              ████   ████    ▀██████▀      ██████████████▄   ████████████▀       ████       ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄████▀
   ██████████████▀   ████            ▄███▀     ▀███▄    ████        ████        ████  ████                ████       ██████████████▀
   ████              ████████████▀  ████   ██████████   ████        ████████████████  █████████████▀      ████       ████      ▀████▄
   ▀▀▀▀              ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀   ▀▀▀▀   ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀  ▀▀▀▀        ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀   ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀        ▀▀▀▀       ▀▀▀▀        ▀▀▀▀▀

#1 CRYPTO CASINO & SPORTSBOOK
▄▄▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▄▄
▄█▀▄▄▀▀█▀▀▀█▀▀▄▄▀█▄
▄█▀▄▀▀█ ▄█▄▄▄█▄ █▀▀▄▀█▄
▄▀▄██▄▄▀▀▄▄ ▀▄▄▀▀▄▄██▄▀▄
▄█ ████ ███▌▐███ ████ █▄
█ ████ ████ ███ ████ ████ █
█ ████ ███ ▄▄▄▄▄ ███ ████ █
█ ████ █▀▄█▀▀▀▀▀█▄▀█ ████ █
▀█ ████ ██ ▄▀▀▀▄ ██ ████ █▀
▀▄▀██▀█▄▄ ▀▀▀▀▀ ▄▄█▀██▀▄▀
▀█▄▀█▄▄▀▀█████▀▀▄▄█▀▄█▀
▀█▄▀▀██▄▄▄▄▄██▀▀▄█▀
▀▀▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▀▀
OFFICIAL
BETTING
PARTNER
.INSTANT & FAST..
.TRANSACTION.....
.PROVABLY FAIR..
......& SECURE......
.24/7 CUSTOMER.
.............SUPPORT.
BTC      |      ETH      |      LTC      |      XRP      |      XMR      |      BNB      |     more
BitcoinFX
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2492
Merit: 1577


https://youtu.be/DsAVx0u9Cw4 ... Dr. WHO < KLF


View Profile WWW
February 24, 2019, 10:25:13 AM
 #18035

... snip ...

And apparently shrinking the blocksize is a solution now  Cheesy

Where the alternative solution is to make money (a digital cash !) 'heavier' ? ...

- https://news.mlh.io/i-hacked-the-middle-out-compression-from-silicon-valley-06-16-2015

"... Please let me know if I overlooked anything that could make me a member of the Three Comma Club. I want a boat. And doors that open vertically..."

- https://www.hoover.org/research/middle-out-economics

"... in which he advanced a middle-out thesis for economic growth: “The fundamental law of capitalism is, if workers don’t have any money, businesses . . . don’t have any customers.” ..."

  Roll Eyes

"Bitcoin OG" Bored/Board of making others wealthy! | 1JXFXUBGs2ZtEDAQMdZ3tkCKo38nT2XSEp | Bitcoin is BTC | CSW is NOT Satoshi Nakamoto | I Mine BTC, LTC, ZEC, XMR and GAP | Support my BTC on Tor addnodes Project | Media enquiries : Wu Ming | Enjoy The Money Machine | "You cannot compete with Open Source" and "Cryptography != Banana"
hv_
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2030
Merit: 1049

Clean Code and Scale


View Profile WWW
February 24, 2019, 07:39:11 PM
 #18036

I can't believe my eyes that this misconception and purposeless hybrid fork is still around. What we need in the cryptocurrency space is cleansing from the trash coins.

There haven't been enough trolling, so it's still there.

Or

There is so much recognition also due to much trolling, so it's still there.

 Huh

Carpe diem  -  understand the White Paper and mine honest.
Fix real world issues: Check out b-vote.com
The simple way is the genius way - Satoshi's Rules: humana veris _
mrRen_
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 62
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 26, 2019, 04:45:01 PM
 #18037

Hello,

can someone help me varifiy if BCH was claimed (and spend) for this btc adress?
I talk about fork on 31. aug 2017

13dsx9MWoNDtPqupziDZ4QZDf8pRzP81eA

Kind regards
cAPSLOCK
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3052
Merit: 2859


Volcano Corn!


View Profile
February 26, 2019, 08:44:31 PM
 #18038

Hello,

can someone help me varifiy if BCH was claimed (and spend) for this btc adress?
I talk about fork on 31. aug 2017

13dsx9MWoNDtPqupziDZ4QZDf8pRzP81eA

Kind regards

https://explorer.bitcoin.com/bch/address/13dsx9MWoNDtPqupziDZ4QZDf8pRzP81eA
mrRen_
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 62
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 27, 2019, 08:03:53 AM
 #18039

Hello,

can someone help me varifiy if BCH was claimed (and spend) for this btc adress?
I talk about fork on 31. aug 2017

13dsx9MWoNDtPqupziDZ4QZDf8pRzP81eA

Kind regards

https://explorer.bitcoin.com/bch/address/13dsx9MWoNDtPqupziDZ4QZDf8pRzP81eA

Thanks.. so if you see any activity after 31.07.2017, that means coins were claimed?

Is there any tool, that i could see where the coins are? for example if they are on binance ?
could I track somehow if they are on any exchange ?

Regards
nutildah
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2254
Merit: 5146


Honey badger still don't care.


View Profile
February 27, 2019, 11:05:45 AM
 #18040

Hello,

can someone help me varifiy if BCH was claimed (and spend) for this btc adress?
I talk about fork on 31. aug 2017

13dsx9MWoNDtPqupziDZ4QZDf8pRzP81eA

Kind regards

https://explorer.bitcoin.com/bch/address/13dsx9MWoNDtPqupziDZ4QZDf8pRzP81eA

Thanks.. so if you see any activity after 31.07.2017, that means coins were claimed?

Is there any tool, that i could see where the coins are? for example if they are on binance ?
could I track somehow if they are on any exchange ?

Regards

Sure, you can use the block explorer in the link above to follow where the coins went. However, its a bit tricky because you have to follow all the different expenditures and will have to know what the Binance BCH address is. As far as I know there's no publicly available utility that will link to BCH addresses together for you, so it requires manual investigation.





.
.




░██████████████████░
████████████████████
█████████▀░░░███████
█████████░░▄████████
███████▀▀░░▀▀███████
███████▄▄░░▄▄███████
█████████░░█████████

█████████░░█████████

█████████▄▄█████████

████████████████████

░██████████████████░
░██████████████████░
████████████████████
████████████▀▀▀█▀███
███░▀█████▀░░░░░▀███
███▌░░░▀▀▀░░░░░░████
████▄░░░░░░░░░░░████
█████▀░░░░░░░░░█████

██████▄░░░░░▄▄██████

█████▄▄▄▄███████████

████████████████████

░██████████████████░
░██████████████████░
████████████████████
████████████████████
███████████▀▀░░▐████
███████▀▀░░░░░█████
████▀░░░▄█▀░░░▐█████
█████▄▄█▀░░░░░██████

███████▌▄▄▄▐██████

████████████████████

████████████████████

░██████████████████░
Pages: « 1 ... 852 853 854 855 856 857 858 859 860 861 862 863 864 865 866 867 868 869 870 871 872 873 874 875 876 877 878 879 880 881 882 883 884 885 886 887 888 889 890 891 892 893 894 895 896 897 898 899 900 901 [902] 903 904 905 906 907 908 909 910 911 912 913 914 915 916 917 918 919 920 921 922 923 924 925 926 927 928 929 930 931 932 933 934 935 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!