Bitcoin Forum
March 25, 2019, 03:09:02 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 0.17.1 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 856 857 858 859 860 861 862 863 864 865 866 867 868 869 870 871 872 873 874 875 876 877 878 879 880 881 882 883 884 885 886 887 888 889 890 891 892 893 894 895 896 897 898 899 900 901 902 903 904 905 [906] 907 908 909 910 911 912 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [ANN] Bitcoin Cash - Pro on-chain scaling - Cheaper fees  (Read 642588 times)
cAPSLOCK
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 2128
Merit: 1274


UNLEASH THE FURY!


View Profile
February 20, 2019, 06:49:01 AM
 #18101


Mmm Hmm... Meanwhile, the average BTC block size has been creeping up again. We may already be on the edge of the next blockalypse.

The first blockalypse never happened. What has happened since December 2017? BCH's market share has plummeted and bitcoin has survived just fine.

Un Hunh. And what happened to all that adoption that was building - right up until the point that BTC could not handle the demand?

Quote
Which of course will be accompanied by ever-lengthening confirmation times, and soaring fees. Once BTC returns to its eventual equilibrium of unusability, where do you think the tx demand is going to go?

Well that's easy: Lightning Network.

No. LN cannot onboard enough people fast enough to be a contender. Not to mention all the evil that will be unleashed when the chain does not have the capacity to handle renewals or cashouts. Even if it had the value capacity for meaningful commerce. Or even if it had simple clients. Or the ability to route in a malleable environment of channels coming and going, with users wanting trustless, permissionless, decentralized operation.

Wow... I know enough about you to know you, more than the average person,  have the skills to do simple deductive reasoning...  If lightning doesn't have the ability to onboard people fast enough for OFF CHAIN... then  how will BSV be able to confirm that may payments ON CHAIN without centralizing?  It takes ONE TX to go off chain and then to do do millions of transactions using that SINGLE off chain TX.

Doing everything on chain is an interesting future goal... but it is decades out.


(key words "on chain")
1553526542
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1553526542

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1553526542
Reply with quote  #2

1553526542
Report to moderator
1553526542
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1553526542

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1553526542
Reply with quote  #2

1553526542
Report to moderator
1553526542
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1553526542

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1553526542
Reply with quote  #2

1553526542
Report to moderator
+
=
Equity on offer
in the world's largest
crypto enabled
marketplace
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1553526542
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1553526542

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1553526542
Reply with quote  #2

1553526542
Report to moderator
1553526542
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1553526542

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1553526542
Reply with quote  #2

1553526542
Report to moderator
1553526542
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1553526542

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1553526542
Reply with quote  #2

1553526542
Report to moderator
nutildah
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1330
Merit: 1421


Permanent Tourist


View Profile
February 20, 2019, 07:04:38 AM
 #18102

LN cannot onboard enough people fast enough to be a contender. Not to mention all the evil that will be unleashed when the chain does not have the capacity to handle renewals or cashouts. Even if it had the value capacity for meaningful commerce. Or even if it had simple clients. Or the ability to route in a malleable environment of channels coming and going, with users wanting trustless, permissionless, decentralized operation.

It's already a contender, and the process of onboarding is already happening with or without your consent. All your arguments always revolve around "what could be" instead of "what is."

I know enough about you to know you, more than the average person,  have the skills to do simple deductive reasoning...  If lightning doesn't have the ability to onboard people fast enough for OFF CHAIN... then  how will BSV be able to confirm that may payments ON CHAIN without centralizing?  It takes ONE TX to go off chain and then to do do millions of transactions using that SINGLE off chain TX.

Regardless of the level of his deductive reasoning skills, he is committed to propagating falsehoods in order to shove his weird views down the throats of others. It's not a commendable behavior and frankly he's consistently, unapologetically one of the wrongest people on the forum.

jbreher at work:


███████████
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
███████████
#1
███████████
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
███████████
BTC 
  ●
   BTC
  BTC  
.
    ▄▄▄▀▀▀▀
 ▄██▀
███        ▄▄▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▄▄▄
▀███▄▄▄▄▀▀▀                 ▀▀▄▄
  ▀▀▀██████████████████████████▀
   ▄█▄     ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
    ▀▀██▄▄█▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▀▀
      ▄  ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
      ▀██▄  ▄▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▄
        ▀█▀██████████████▀▀
         ▀█▄▄ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
            █▀▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▀
             ▀▀▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
.
     BTC
  BTC   
  ●
  BTC  
███████████
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
███████████
███████████
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
███████████
BitcoinFX
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1792
Merit: 1074


youtu.be/jO5VV5PISHU


View Profile WWW
February 20, 2019, 09:12:16 AM
Last edit: February 20, 2019, 09:33:40 AM by BitcoinFX
 #18103


Already read that in great detail.

Foul play alleged from all sides.

CSW claims to be Satoshi and yet has still not Signed any block as definitive proof.

I'm certainly not a troll, I used to communicate with Satoshi (on this very forum).

Unlike Craig, I have verified myself ...
- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4630066.0

Craig (currently) being unable or unwilling to (legitimately) Sign anything has caused 2 major problems for BSV / nchain.

1) Not signing a stated claim is a false pretence.

2) The continuing duration of this false pretence has impacted on the entire crypto space, including the market.

...

If folks actually digested my own posts you would likely discover that I have not referred to Craig as a 'Faketoshi' or otherwise.

Innocent until proven guilty. However ...

Why does Craig avoid Bitcoin 'old timers' like the plague and/or not just come back to this forum to set the record straight? According to Craig's own story he had moved on to other things ... whilst leaving the Bitcoin community to both establish, maintain and build the project in his absence (and off their own backs!).

Do you think it is OK to retain the (metaphorical) last piece of the puzzle, to place the final piece and to proclaim wholeheartedly "I built all this" and "You are all wrong!" etc.,

...

People in the world
Do not doubt
It is teaching
Which is the
beginning of doubt.
- Zen poem

...

Again, this is Financial Cryptography, so do not trust. Sign and Verify.
Simply, Put up, or Shut up.
- https://idioms.thefreedictionary.com/put+up+or+shut+up



- https://youtu.be/4oPddS8HujA  Roll Eyes

Cross talk  Smiley

Bitcoin without polity !?! | Get a Gapcoin slice of Mathematically constant π + new world record and attempt ongoing! | "The industry of the integrated spectacle and immaterial command owes me (us all) money." | We do not Forgive. We do not Forget. Expect Revolution Renaissance! for we are all Satoshi now? | Vision does not = Prescient | "the multiple and the multiplex!" | HODL BTC and/or buy Pizza's | Read the first chapter ... | P.S. "I Eye love found you!" 456 | Mostly harmless ... 42 | "INSERT COIN" break blocks!
Bitcoin Cash
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 20, 2019, 04:49:10 PM
 #18104

Coinbase Adds Bitcoin Cash Support to Wallet App
https://cointelegraph.com/news/coinbase-adds-bitcoin-cash-support-to-wallet-app

jbreher
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 2324
Merit: 1205


lose: unfind ... loose: untight


View Profile
February 20, 2019, 05:18:32 PM
Merited by sirsplashalot (1)
 #18105


Mmm Hmm... Meanwhile, the average BTC block size has been creeping up again. We may already be on the edge of the next blockalypse.

The first blockalypse never happened. What has happened since December 2017? BCH's market share has plummeted and bitcoin has survived just fine.

Un Hunh. And what happened to all that adoption that was building - right up until the point that BTC could not handle the demand?

Quote
Which of course will be accompanied by ever-lengthening confirmation times, and soaring fees. Once BTC returns to its eventual equilibrium of unusability, where do you think the tx demand is going to go?

Well that's easy: Lightning Network.

No. LN cannot onboard enough people fast enough to be a contender. Not to mention all the evil that will be unleashed when the chain does not have the capacity to handle renewals or cashouts. Even if it had the value capacity for meaningful commerce. Or even if it had simple clients. Or the ability to route in a malleable environment of channels coming and going, with users wanting trustless, permissionless, decentralized operation.

Wow... I know enough about you to know you, more than the average person,  have the skills to do simple deductive reasoning...  If lightning doesn't have the ability to onboard people fast enough for OFF CHAIN... then  how will BSV be able to confirm that may payments ON CHAIN without centralizing?  It takes ONE TX to go off chain and then to do do millions of transactions using that SINGLE off chain TX.

Doing everything on chain is an interesting future goal... but it is decades out.

(key words "on chain")

You seem to be missing the fact that everyone who wants to employ LN needs to perform at least one onchain tx. Only then can they engage in gajillions of off chain channel txs. No room on the chain, no room for more LN adopters.

How many Bitcoin txs have you done in the last year? What percentage of those were opening, closing, or maintaining LN channels?

Until a cabal of subverters decided to cripple BTC, doing everything on chain was just The Way Bitcoin Worked. Fortunately, in the cases of SV and BCH, doing everything on chain is still just the way Bitcoin works.

You have any metrics to share that may quantify the centralization you imply is a necessary effect of large amounts of onchain txs? No? No metrics? Color me shocked.

Anyone with a campaign ad in their signature -- for an organization with which they are not otherwise affiliated -- is automatically deducted credibility points.

I've been convicted of heresy. Convicted by a mere known extortionist. Read my Trust for details.
Bitbobb
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 980
Merit: 523


Less hops. More wins.


View Profile
February 20, 2019, 05:23:46 PM
 #18106


Mmm Hmm... Meanwhile, the average BTC block size has been creeping up again. We may already be on the edge of the next blockalypse.

The first blockalypse never happened. What has happened since December 2017? BCH's market share has plummeted and bitcoin has survived just fine.

Un Hunh. And what happened to all that adoption that was building - right up until the point that BTC could not handle the demand?

Quote
Which of course will be accompanied by ever-lengthening confirmation times, and soaring fees. Once BTC returns to its eventual equilibrium of unusability, where do you think the tx demand is going to go?

Well that's easy: Lightning Network.

No. LN cannot onboard enough people fast enough to be a contender. Not to mention all the evil that will be unleashed when the chain does not have the capacity to handle renewals or cashouts. Even if it had the value capacity for meaningful commerce. Or even if it had simple clients. Or the ability to route in a malleable environment of channels coming and going, with users wanting trustless, permissionless, decentralized operation.

Wow... I know enough about you to know you, more than the average person,  have the skills to do simple deductive reasoning...  If lightning doesn't have the ability to onboard people fast enough for OFF CHAIN... then  how will BSV be able to confirm that may payments ON CHAIN without centralizing?  It takes ONE TX to go off chain and then to do do millions of transactions using that SINGLE off chain TX.

Doing everything on chain is an interesting future goal... but it is decades out.

(key words "on chain")

You seem to be missing the fact that everyone who wants to employ LN needs to perform at least one onchain tx. Only then can they engage in gajillions of off chain channel txs. No room on the chain, no room for more LN adopters.

How many Bitcoin txs have you done in the last year? What percentage of those were opening, closing, or maintaining LN channels?

Until a cabal of subverters decided to cripple BTC, doing everything on chain was just The Way Bitcoin Worked. Fortunately, in the cases of SV and BCH, doing everything on chain is still just the way Bitcoin works.

Some of the same subversive items that crippled btc are being added to BCH so it is only a matter of time before both liability and subversion becomes obvious on the BCH chain also.  

sirsplashalot
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 410
Merit: 115



View Profile
February 20, 2019, 05:24:30 PM
 #18107


Mmm Hmm... Meanwhile, the average BTC block size has been creeping up again. We may already be on the edge of the next blockalypse.

The first blockalypse never happened. What has happened since December 2017? BCH's market share has plummeted and bitcoin has survived just fine.

Un Hunh. And what happened to all that adoption that was building - right up until the point that BTC could not handle the demand?

Quote
Which of course will be accompanied by ever-lengthening confirmation times, and soaring fees. Once BTC returns to its eventual equilibrium of unusability, where do you think the tx demand is going to go?

Well that's easy: Lightning Network.

No. LN cannot onboard enough people fast enough to be a contender. Not to mention all the evil that will be unleashed when the chain does not have the capacity to handle renewals or cashouts. Even if it had the value capacity for meaningful commerce. Or even if it had simple clients. Or the ability to route in a malleable environment of channels coming and going, with users wanting trustless, permissionless, decentralized operation.

Wow... I know enough about you to know you, more than the average person,  have the skills to do simple deductive reasoning...  If lightning doesn't have the ability to onboard people fast enough for OFF CHAIN... then  how will BSV be able to confirm that may payments ON CHAIN without centralizing?  It takes ONE TX to go off chain and then to do do millions of transactions using that SINGLE off chain TX.

Doing everything on chain is an interesting future goal... but it is decades out.

(key words "on chain")

You seem to be missing the fact that everyone who wants to employ LN needs to perform at least one onchain tx. Only then can they engage in gajillions of off chain channel txs. No room on the chain, no room for more LN adopters.

How many Bitcoin txs have you done in the last year? What percentage of those were opening, closing, or maintaining LN channels?

Until a cabal of subverters decided to cripple BTC, doing everything on chain was just The Way Bitcoin Worked. Fortunately, in the cases of SV and BCH, doing everything on chain is still just the way Bitcoin works.

And apparently shrinking the blocksize is a solution now  Cheesy

Bitcoin SV (BSV) - A P2P Electronic Cash System Built for Everyday Global Use.
HandCash: $PayTheKid
hv_
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1134
Merit: 538

Remove The Middlemen


View Profile WWW
February 21, 2019, 10:17:45 AM
 #18108


Mmm Hmm... Meanwhile, the average BTC block size has been creeping up again. We may already be on the edge of the next blockalypse.

The first blockalypse never happened. What has happened since December 2017? BCH's market share has plummeted and bitcoin has survived just fine.

Un Hunh. And what happened to all that adoption that was building - right up until the point that BTC could not handle the demand?

Quote
Which of course will be accompanied by ever-lengthening confirmation times, and soaring fees. Once BTC returns to its eventual equilibrium of unusability, where do you think the tx demand is going to go?

Well that's easy: Lightning Network.

No. LN cannot onboard enough people fast enough to be a contender. Not to mention all the evil that will be unleashed when the chain does not have the capacity to handle renewals or cashouts. Even if it had the value capacity for meaningful commerce. Or even if it had simple clients. Or the ability to route in a malleable environment of channels coming and going, with users wanting trustless, permissionless, decentralized operation.

Wow... I know enough about you to know you, more than the average person,  have the skills to do simple deductive reasoning...  If lightning doesn't have the ability to onboard people fast enough for OFF CHAIN... then  how will BSV be able to confirm that may payments ON CHAIN without centralizing?  It takes ONE TX to go off chain and then to do do millions of transactions using that SINGLE off chain TX.

Doing everything on chain is an interesting future goal... but it is decades out.


(key words "on chain")

How can that bitcoin that is written and specked up in the Satoshi Whitpaper AND correctly implemented on purpose be ever centralized?    Smtp  nodes are only some big entities like gmail gmx ...  but that doesn t make smtp  centralized by any means.       BSV   is  that  smtp analogon by definition , commitment and roadmap.

Carpe diem  -  cut the down side  -  be anti-fragile - don't dillute Bitcoin - mine honest!
Memo: 1AHUYNJKPfY7PjVK1hNQFo5LrdGixuiybw  -  https://metanet.icu/
The simple way is the genius way - in Moore's Law and Satoshi's WP we trust.
Globb0
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1820
Merit: 1287


Natty Dread


View Profile
February 21, 2019, 10:49:31 AM
 #18109

Im sticking to running a POP node its the original vision



hat an idiot W
hv_
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1134
Merit: 538

Remove The Middlemen


View Profile WWW
February 21, 2019, 03:39:50 PM
 #18110

Im sticking to running a POP node its the original vision




A node described in the white paper does .... ?

It is a miner

Carpe diem  -  cut the down side  -  be anti-fragile - don't dillute Bitcoin - mine honest!
Memo: 1AHUYNJKPfY7PjVK1hNQFo5LrdGixuiybw  -  https://metanet.icu/
The simple way is the genius way - in Moore's Law and Satoshi's WP we trust.
adamvp
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 812
Merit: 510



View Profile
February 21, 2019, 04:02:49 PM
 #18111

"Together we stand - divided we fall"
This all BCC BCH BCD BCG BCV BCS drama leads to somewehere where I was afraid it has to lead - divided community is much weaker and weaker. And looking
realistically there is no sign of recovery Sad

100% inevitable.

no one should be surprised by the outcome. forks of forks are not a sound basis to build something that others will trust.

compare how litecoin have conducted themselves to this. it's pitiful.

Yeah, initially consensus mechanism in Bitcoin was supposed to be based on higher hashrate and it happened very bad that it was allowed so many forks survived. It would be much better cryptocurrencies with lower hashrate would never survive and to focus all developement on best projects! World do not need thousands of crypto to transfer money...

.BITWIN.

██████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████████
████████████████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████████████████████
████████████████████████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████████████████████████
████████████████████████████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████████████████████████████
████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
█████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
█████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████████████████████████████
█████████████████████████████████████████████████████
███████████████████████████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████████████████████████
████████████████████████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████████████████
████████████████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████
hv_
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1134
Merit: 538

Remove The Middlemen


View Profile WWW
February 21, 2019, 06:31:05 PM
 #18112

"Together we stand - divided we fall"
This all BCC BCH BCD BCG BCV BCS drama leads to somewehere where I was afraid it has to lead - divided community is much weaker and weaker. And looking
realistically there is no sign of recovery Sad

100% inevitable.

no one should be surprised by the outcome. forks of forks are not a sound basis to build something that others will trust.

compare how litecoin have conducted themselves to this. it's pitiful.

Yeah, initially consensus mechanism in Bitcoin was supposed to be based on higher hashrate and it happened very bad that it was allowed so many forks survived. It would be much better cryptocurrencies with lower hashrate would never survive and to focus all developement on best projects! World do not need thousands of crypto to transfer money...

Sure. Good point. So what defines the protocol that an honest miner should follow?  Where are the legit specs for?


Carpe diem  -  cut the down side  -  be anti-fragile - don't dillute Bitcoin - mine honest!
Memo: 1AHUYNJKPfY7PjVK1hNQFo5LrdGixuiybw  -  https://metanet.icu/
The simple way is the genius way - in Moore's Law and Satoshi's WP we trust.
LUCKMCFLY
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 532
Merit: 122


Free crypto every day here: discord.gg/pXB9nuZ


View Profile
February 22, 2019, 12:26:12 AM
 #18113

"Together we stand - divided we fall"
This all BCC BCH BCD BCG BCV BCS drama leads to somewehere where I was afraid it has to lead - divided community is much weaker and weaker. And looking
realistically there is no sign of recovery Sad

100% inevitable.

no one should be surprised by the outcome. forks of forks are not a sound basis to build something that others will trust.

compare how litecoin have conducted themselves to this. it's pitiful.

Yeah, initially consensus mechanism in Bitcoin was supposed to be based on higher hashrate and it happened very bad that it was allowed so many forks survived. It would be much better cryptocurrencies with lower hashrate would never survive and to focus all developement on best projects! World do not need thousands of crypto to transfer money...

Sure. Good point. So what defines the protocol that an honest miner should follow?  Where are the legit specs for?


Bitcoin Cash dared to make a Hard Fork to generate Bitcoin SV, at the precise moment that Roger had his problem with his partner, I do not know how important these people believe, but the only thing that Hard Fork does is Bitcoin, I mean, For my Bitcoin Cash it does not have and will never have a life of its own.

cool4y
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 501
Merit: 12


View Profile
February 24, 2019, 05:02:06 AM
 #18114

I can't believe my eyes that this misconception and purposeless hybrid fork is still around. What we need in the cryptocurrency space is cleansing from the trash coins.

alevlaslo
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1120
Merit: 565


View Profile
February 24, 2019, 06:34:23 AM
Last edit: February 24, 2019, 06:12:56 PM by alevlaslo
 #18115

 Are you sure that inside the BTC LN channel you can not print unnoticed new coins according to the Ponzi scheme?
mindrust
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1372
Merit: 1304



View Profile WWW
February 24, 2019, 07:54:27 AM
 #18116

"Together we stand - divided we fall"
This all BCC BCH BCD BCG BCV BCS drama leads to somewehere where I was afraid it has to lead - divided community is much weaker and weaker. And looking
realistically there is no sign of recovery Sad

100% inevitable.

no one should be surprised by the outcome. forks of forks are not a sound basis to build something that others will trust.

compare how litecoin have conducted themselves to this. it's pitiful.

Yeah, initially consensus mechanism in Bitcoin was supposed to be based on higher hashrate and it happened very bad that it was allowed so many forks survived. It would be much better cryptocurrencies with lower hashrate would never survive and to focus all developement on best projects! World do not need thousands of crypto to transfer money...

They survive because nobody wants to waste their time and money just to prove a point. Bitcoin Gold already was attacked and proved that weak hash rate coins are not safe.

After seeing what happened to BTG, if you are still buying weak coins like BCH and BSV, you deserve what's coming to you.

██████▄  ▄▄▄█████████▄▄▄        
██████████████████████████▄▄    
█████████████████████████████▄  
▄███████████████████████████████ 
▄▄███▄     ▄██████████  ████████▀▀▀██████████
▄██████   ████████████  ████████   ███████████
▄████████▀   █████████    ██    ████████▀▀▀███████
▀████▄  ▄   ████████████  ████████████   ███████
▀████▀     ▀██████████  █████████████████████
▀███████████████████████████████ 
█████████████████████████████▀  
██████████████████████████▀▀    
██████▀  ▀▀▀█████████▀▀▀        
ROCKET

▄▄    ▄▄





▄▄    ▄▄

ENTHRALLING GRAPHICS
● NEW TYPE OF GAMES
100% REFERRAL BONUS
((
▄▄█████████▄▄
▄█████████████████▄
▄████████ ██ █████████▄
▄█████▀▀▀▀ ▀▀ ▀▀████████▄
▄███████▄   ▄▄▄▄  ▀███████▄
█████████   ████   ████████
█████████         ▀████▀▀██
█████████   ████    ███▄▄██
▀███████▀   ▀▀▀▀   ▄██▀  █▀
▀█████▄▄▄▄ ▄▄ ▄▄▄███▀  █▀
▀████████ ██ ████▀  ▄█▀
▀████████████▀ ▄▄█▀
▀▀█████████▀▀
▄▄█████████▄▄
▄█████████████████▄
▄██████████▀▀▀▀███████▄
▄█████████▀     ████████▄
▄██████████   ████████████▄
█████████        ██████████
█████████▄▄   ▄▄███████▀▀██
███████████   █████████▄▄██
▀██████████   ████████▀  █▀
▀█████████   ███████▀  █▀
▀████████▄▄▄█████▀  ▄█▀
▀████████████▀ ▄▄█▀
▀▀█████████▀▀
))
BitcoinFX
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1792
Merit: 1074


youtu.be/jO5VV5PISHU


View Profile WWW
February 24, 2019, 10:25:13 AM
 #18117

... snip ...

And apparently shrinking the blocksize is a solution now  Cheesy

Where the alternative solution is to make money (a digital cash !) 'heavier' ? ...

- https://news.mlh.io/i-hacked-the-middle-out-compression-from-silicon-valley-06-16-2015

"... Please let me know if I overlooked anything that could make me a member of the Three Comma Club. I want a boat. And doors that open vertically..."

- https://www.hoover.org/research/middle-out-economics

"... in which he advanced a middle-out thesis for economic growth: “The fundamental law of capitalism is, if workers don’t have any money, businesses . . . don’t have any customers.” ..."

  Roll Eyes

Bitcoin without polity !?! | Get a Gapcoin slice of Mathematically constant π + new world record and attempt ongoing! | "The industry of the integrated spectacle and immaterial command owes me (us all) money." | We do not Forgive. We do not Forget. Expect Revolution Renaissance! for we are all Satoshi now? | Vision does not = Prescient | "the multiple and the multiplex!" | HODL BTC and/or buy Pizza's | Read the first chapter ... | P.S. "I Eye love found you!" 456 | Mostly harmless ... 42 | "INSERT COIN" break blocks!
hv_
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1134
Merit: 538

Remove The Middlemen


View Profile WWW
February 24, 2019, 07:39:11 PM
 #18118

I can't believe my eyes that this misconception and purposeless hybrid fork is still around. What we need in the cryptocurrency space is cleansing from the trash coins.

There haven't been enough trolling, so it's still there.

Or

There is so much recognition also due to much trolling, so it's still there.

 Huh

Carpe diem  -  cut the down side  -  be anti-fragile - don't dillute Bitcoin - mine honest!
Memo: 1AHUYNJKPfY7PjVK1hNQFo5LrdGixuiybw  -  https://metanet.icu/
The simple way is the genius way - in Moore's Law and Satoshi's WP we trust.
mrRen_
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 59
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 26, 2019, 04:45:01 PM
 #18119

Hello,

can someone help me varifiy if BCH was claimed (and spend) for this btc adress?
I talk about fork on 31. aug 2017

13dsx9MWoNDtPqupziDZ4QZDf8pRzP81eA

Kind regards
cAPSLOCK
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 2128
Merit: 1274


UNLEASH THE FURY!


View Profile
February 26, 2019, 08:44:31 PM
 #18120

Hello,

can someone help me varifiy if BCH was claimed (and spend) for this btc adress?
I talk about fork on 31. aug 2017

13dsx9MWoNDtPqupziDZ4QZDf8pRzP81eA

Kind regards

https://explorer.bitcoin.com/bch/address/13dsx9MWoNDtPqupziDZ4QZDf8pRzP81eA
Pages: « 1 ... 856 857 858 859 860 861 862 863 864 865 866 867 868 869 870 871 872 873 874 875 876 877 878 879 880 881 882 883 884 885 886 887 888 889 890 891 892 893 894 895 896 897 898 899 900 901 902 903 904 905 [906] 907 908 909 910 911 912 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!