Plainkoin
|
|
July 28, 2017, 11:06:50 AM |
|
Hello -
Curious if anyone has come across this (Win7 Pro x64 Wallet v. 1.0.1.6)
After I transfer coins to another wallet, leaving an Available balance 0.49. When it finds another block I get an error in Amount and Rounds (in red text) ~ 0 Biblepay / 2 Rounds: Error: Not enough compatible inputs to anonymize 1000.00000000 Biblepay, will anonymize 0.49995020 instead.
I have seen this on two different wallets after transferring funds to a 3rd.
Thank you for any suggestions.
|
|
|
|
bible_pay (OP)
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 1176
Merit: 215
Jesus is the King of Kings and Lord of Lords
|
|
July 28, 2017, 12:33:11 PM |
|
Hello -
Curious if anyone has come across this (Win7 Pro x64 Wallet v. 1.0.1.6)
After I transfer coins to another wallet, leaving an Available balance 0.49. When it finds another block I get an error in Amount and Rounds (in red text) ~ 0 Biblepay / 2 Rounds: Error: Not enough compatible inputs to anonymize 1000.00000000 Biblepay, will anonymize 0.49995020 instead.
I have seen this on two different wallets after transferring funds to a 3rd.
Thank you for any suggestions.
Hi Plain, So most of the features Dash has (anonymous tx, instantsend, masternodes) are in the wallet but shut off right now until Christmas when we enable Sanctuaries (these are similar to masternodes but are going to have some Humanitarian features added), so without one Sanctuary running, the alerts just hang there. You should not have to worry about it as it should not affect standard slow sending/receiving of funds, just ignore for now. =-=-=-=-=-=-= To all others mining: My two AMD nodes finally exploited the 'mining thread dying' bug (you can see when this happens when the node stays running but the getmininginfo shows the same khps with no updates). So I have a list of things to fix in our next non-mandatory and I am trying to tackle this problem now, and I will also make the khps update a little slower, so the miner is more similar to our first as far as performance goes (I think that is only 1% however) - with any luck I might have a release tonight to at least test the stability throughout the next few days. I want to put that bug to bed, before we go to the exchange as I want a rock solid client for the exchanges to run. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-= As far as a pool: Yes, on the X11 hash wrapped inside a BibleHash with both being checked that is correct, but the problem I think we run into with traditional pools is the client mining software reqd to interoperate at the HTTP level with the pool is not compatible with BiblePay hashes (another words CGMiner or SgMiner or any of those wont be smart enough to generate the biblehash and send the solution to the pool) so we need some custom software written. I was thinking we could build the mining software into BiblePay (no additional dependencies, just c++ changes to enhance the existing miners capabilities) in a way that would allow biblepayd or biblepay-qt to connect to a pool, but only if the pool option was enabled, if the pool is down, it would shut off the setting and revert back to solo mining. Then we could make an opensource web pool and let people run those sites (pools) and expose the URL to us. The setting in biblepay would be something like pool=http://poolurl.biblepay.url . Basically you could sign up on the pool web site with your BBP receiving address as a username and create an account and hopefully the client could be smart enough to do the rest.
|
|
|
|
bible_pay (OP)
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 1176
Merit: 215
Jesus is the King of Kings and Lord of Lords
|
|
July 28, 2017, 12:48:45 PM |
|
Regarding the pool, I am thinking of writing one, but if someone else is already considering doing that please let us know.
I'm not really an expert on this sort of thing, but looking through the source code BiblePay basically wraps Dash in a BibleHash? It looks like a normal x11 hash which is fed into the BibleHash algo and if both the x11 hash and BibleHash hash satisfy the target for the current difficulty then it's a solution? If that's the case, I don't think it'd be terribly difficult to extend existing x11 cpu miners and pool frameworks to work with BBP. Probably a little bit too advanced for me currently, or I'd give it a shot myself. Happy, Btw, I wanted to say you are definitely on the right track and what you explained is a good idea, and would almost work - that is to pull the core miner out of biblepay, and extend the X11 miner standalone EXE program to generate biblehashes, and modify the Web side of the Pool to accept biblehash as a solution, but there is one thing that I am trying to accomplish in BBP to keep it from growing into the run of the mill rat-race type greed system, where everyone just wants to spend money on hardware instead of running a full node: that is early on, I attempted to make the biblehash algo itself reference a historical tx in the chain, so that to run the biblepay miner, you had to run a full node (giving us network stability) by the hash algo itself exercising the ability to find historical chain info when reqd. More recently I settled on passing in things about the current and previous block into the miner, meaning that, the X11 standalone EXE would only be able to run a miner if we pass it those things - or if it is a fullnode it already knows those things. Thats good however, as it adds value to our full node network. (The question is do we want to add something in to make it impossible to run a standalone X11 miner? Im mostly against the standalone miner and Pro-full node hashing). So I hope that explains why it would be more of a preferred choice for me to make the "standalone X11 bible miner" an extension of the qt clients capabilities (so as to future proof the algo cemented inside the wallet) - and then just write a web pool interface (OR, pull the X11 pool web code first, that is sort of a 50-50).
|
|
|
|
msvsk
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 9
Merit: 0
|
|
July 28, 2017, 01:42:22 PM Last edit: July 28, 2017, 02:23:00 PM by msvsk |
|
Block source not available
node.biblepay.org is added have 8 active connection...
What can i do?
1 hour and is sinhronised =))
tnx )
|
|
|
|
btctradingonline
|
|
July 28, 2017, 02:06:46 PM |
|
It is excited to know new algorithm. May I know if this algorithm for CPU mining only and resist to gpu?
And what is the requirement to setup a masternode? Thinking to try setup a masternode by using one of my vps machine.
Yes, CPU only. It resists GPU by including the AES512 Encrypt+Md5+the 31000 chained bible verses in the hash function, things that are hard to port to plain c. As far as Sanctuaries, you will be able to run one on a cheap linux VPS, but it must be dedicated IP and on a dedicated VPS node, and with a certain biblepay stake amount (not determined yet) sent to an escrow address, we will need to see what our average trade price is for 90 days and then determine these things. so sad, only CPU mining
|
..................... ........Finally C is ......... .............. ........... ............ ............ ............ ................... ....................
|
|
|
gameparadise007
|
|
July 28, 2017, 02:12:10 PM |
|
Hello,
DO I have any chance to get a block ?
Below is my stats-  { "blocks": 697, "currentblocksize": 1000, "currentblocktx": 0, "difficulty": 0.002779185900518826, "errors": "", "genproclimit": 90, "networkhashps": 1673.446772752131, "hashps": 22010.90600526033, "minerstarttime": 1501237694818, "pooledtx": 0, "testnet": false, "chain": "main", "biblepay-generate": true }
|
|
|
|
PewPewGoesTheDuck
|
|
July 28, 2017, 02:15:10 PM |
|
Block source not available
node.biblepay.org is added have 8 active connection...
What can i do?
Try closing the wallet and then deleting your blk00000.dat file. Then relaunching the wallet. You might be on the wrong chain. When in doubt backup your wallet in two places and then just delete the folder and restore your wallet.dat
|
|
|
|
PewPewGoesTheDuck
|
|
July 28, 2017, 02:16:53 PM |
|
Hello,
DO I have any chance to get a block ?
Below is my stats-  { "blocks": 697, "currentblocksize": 1000, "currentblocktx": 0, "difficulty": 0.002779185900518826, "errors": "", "genproclimit": 90, "networkhashps": 1673.446772752131, "hashps": 22010.90600526033, "minerstarttime": 1501237694818, "pooledtx": 0, "testnet": false, "chain": "main", "biblepay-generate": true }
My hashps is only a little higher then yours and I've gotten three over the past two days. Don't give up it can be very random but on a long enough timeline it'll work out.
|
|
|
|
msvsk
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 9
Merit: 0
|
|
July 28, 2017, 02:27:15 PM |
|
Hello,
DO I have any chance to get a block ?
Below is my stats-  { "blocks": 697, "currentblocksize": 1000, "currentblocktx": 0, "difficulty": 0.002779185900518826, "errors": "", "genproclimit": 90, "networkhashps": 1673.446772752131, "hashps": 22010.90600526033, "minerstarttime": 1501237694818, "pooledtx": 0, "testnet": false, "chain": "main", "biblepay-generate": true }
My hashps is only a little higher then yours and I've gotten three over the past two days. Don't give up it can be very random but on a long enough timeline it'll work out. how you get 22010??? on my i7 2600k i have only { "blocks": 699, "currentblocksize": 1000, "currentblocktx": 0, "difficulty": 0.003793990490425215, "errors": "", "genproclimit": 60, "networkhashps": 1690.294283792872, "hashps": 9968.42558859247, "minerstarttime": 1501251844899, "pooledtx": 0, "testnet": false, "chain": "main", "biblepay-generate": true }
|
|
|
|
gameparadise007
|
|
July 28, 2017, 02:50:18 PM |
|
I have a core i7 6700k and genproclimit = 90.
The CPU sits at around 50% load.
|
|
|
|
teeneffigy
Member
Offline
Activity: 90
Merit: 10
|
|
July 28, 2017, 03:11:10 PM |
|
I have a core i7 6700k and genproclimit = 90.
The CPU sits at around 50% load.
I have a 20 core xeon cpu and I can run 40, 80, 256, 512 threads and my cpu still sits at 25%-30%. I think there is a hard limit on thread count.
|
|
|
|
msvsk
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 9
Merit: 0
|
|
July 28, 2017, 03:14:59 PM |
|
I have a core i7 6700k and genproclimit = 90.
The CPU sits at around 50% load.
I try genproclimit = from 60 to 90 CPU load aroud 80% and hashrate around 10k. tnx
|
|
|
|
TidusQQ
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 39
Merit: 0
|
|
July 28, 2017, 03:21:38 PM |
|
Ill be waiting for another version built without any virus warning. Even if virustotal doesn't show any real threat, when I open the client I get warnings everywhere...
So sad because seems a new concept.
|
|
|
|
|
viljy
|
|
July 28, 2017, 03:37:26 PM |
|
Do you need a pool for mining now? Can leave so far only solo mining? When complexity grows significantly, then you can pool.
|
|
|
|
canonical
|
|
July 28, 2017, 05:29:57 PM |
|
Been trying to build this on a VPS but the build always fails on the make step. Is it possible to build just 'biblepayd' only? For context, I've been building other wallet daemons with a 'make -f makefile.unix' without problem.
Do you mean to build Biblepay wallet in Linux? I have tried to build biblepay in Ubuntu 14.04 but failed with openssl version issue. Then I built again in Ubuntu 16.04 without problem. Just follow the instructions of a file named something like "build biblepayforlinux.txt" in the git will do. Yeah, on a linux VPS. tried agin while paying closer attention last night and I think I'm just running out of RAM.
|
|
|
|
emdes
|
|
July 28, 2017, 05:30:59 PM |
|
Do you need a pool for mining now? Can leave so far only solo mining? When complexity grows significantly, then you can pool.
Yeah man, my laptop with 3000hashps found a block yesterday
|
|
|
|
bible_pay (OP)
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 1176
Merit: 215
Jesus is the King of Kings and Lord of Lords
|
|
July 28, 2017, 07:03:10 PM |
|
Ill be waiting for another version built without any virus warning. Even if virustotal doesn't show any real threat, when I open the client I get warnings everywhere...
So sad because seems a new concept.
The build has the same dependencies as bitcoin, so there should not be a virus warning. Try downloading from chrome.
|
|
|
|
Plainkoin
|
|
July 28, 2017, 07:11:16 PM |
|
Would anyone happen to know how to setup a Windows based VPS node for BBP? I would really like to be able to support this network.
Thank you. : )
Bible_Pay - Thank you for the explanation about the anonymous feature.
|
|
|
|
jc12345
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1638
Merit: 1013
|
|
July 28, 2017, 07:13:53 PM |
|
Ill be waiting for another version built without any virus warning. Even if virustotal doesn't show any real threat, when I open the client I get warnings everywhere...
So sad because seems a new concept.
You can install it on Linux if you are concerned. If you want to mine, use a VPS and if you just want a wallet use a Raspberry Pi. As long as there is a built in miner in the wallet there will be one or two "virus" warnings. This originated from the days when Bitcoin was mined with CPUs and malware was distributed to botnets to mine Bitcoin for the malware owner. Bitcoin mining wallets were then started to be flagged as a "virus". The only way to get rid of the warnings will be to remove the built in miner which actually defeats the purpose of a CPU minable coin. You will be waiting a long time.
|
|
|
|
|