The Movement DAO | Fully Decentralized Organization | Borderless Collaboration

[vlom]

Dev Dropper, why do we suddenly need ETH in our address? If i recall correctly this wasn't one of the requirements when the thread started.
I did comply per request, however if you are unable to read the thread for a couple of days (like i did) and then you don't have the time to read through all posts (which i did read) and req are changed then you have a problem
Just my 2 cents

Yeah, it changed. Maybe the dev has logical reasons why he changed that. Let's see. But it's good thing that he applied the -70%, at least, it will be fair to those who voted though they spent lil effort on that.  Means that to those who didn't get the -70%, they wanted to participate whatever activity the movement has and not only just waiting for the free coins... 

If I'm not wrong this was an airdrop rule from the beginning, you must have something like 0.01 eth (I don't remember exactly). Dev didn't changed or maybe I'm missing latest news

in the OP they write now:

Address must hold any amount above 0.01 ETH for an unspecified amount of time.

this has changed. at the beginning they just wrote address has to hold ETH.

[1714239183]

1714239183

[1714239183]

1714239183

[1714239183]

1714239183

[SlowGrowth]

as the results are in of the first vote... needless to say both results are very damaging to this project. time is passing and investors are certainly not going to take this as a serious investment if either of those results are to be respected! and furthermore.... if we keep wiating it only gets worst! at the moment  the entire list is just over 600 so those that voted with high numbers did alot more damage then anything else! i actually dont have to say "I TOLD YOU GUYS SO'  AND PUTTING A NAME ON THAT KIND OF VOTE LIKE DIPSHIT OR ASS OR ANYTHING ELSE  WOULD BE LIKE POST PAR TUM DEPRESSION!
i think we need to make a structured poll and allow only the valid participants vote, structured as in give them the choice of maybe 5 different results and not allow zero happy children play their games.

I do not agree that whatever happends in this first few weeks\months will in any way damage this project in the long run..  It will be up to the community and Founding Members to determine that with their actions... However i have to agree that inaction in this situation is not beneficial and a pool should be made with a few more " locked " results in order for us to be able to move along... If we allow so many different opinions and results in every vote that the founders will have to do then we wont be able to pregress... This is also a reason that leads me to think that we should also have a " king Arthur  round table " where all founding members can disscuss within themselfs what are the best possible options and present them to vote in a more concise way...

[Jarod1231]

as the results are in of the first vote... needless to say both results are very damaging to this project. time is passing and investors are certainly not going to take this as a serious investment if either of those results are to be respected! and furthermore.... if we keep wiating it only gets worst! at the moment  the entire list is just over 600 so those that voted with high numbers did alot more damage then anything else! i actually dont have to say "I TOLD YOU GUYS SO'  AND PUTTING A NAME ON THAT KIND OF VOTE LIKE DIPSHIT OR ASS OR ANYTHING ELSE  WOULD BE LIKE POST PAR TUM DEPRESSION!
i think we need to make a structured poll and allow only the valid participants vote, structured as in give them the choice of maybe 5 different results and not allow zero happy children play their games.

I do not agree that whatever happends in this first few weeks\months will in any way damage this project in the long run..  It will be up to the community and Founding Members to determine that with their actions... However i have to agree that inaction in this situation is not beneficial and a pool should be made with a few more " locked " results in order for us to be able to move along... If we allow so many different opinions and results in every vote that the founders will have to do then we wont be able to pregress... This is also a reason that leads me to think that we should also have a " king Arthur  round table " where all founding members can disscuss within themselfs what are the best possible options and present them to vote in a more concise way...

I suggest we have a second vote to finalize participant number, to keep it fair, any new user that was not on the list when consensus was originally reached is not allowed to vote in this one, however new users may be added to the list while the vote is taking place.

This second vote should also not be a write in, it should be multiple choice only, with the choices being something like:

Option A: Consensus reached average, no votes disregarded - cap set at 15116

Option B: Consensus reached average, high limit outlier votes #430 and #588 disregarded - cap set at 2433

Option C: Cap set at 622, the number of participants when consensus was reached.

The vote should also have a reasonable date limit set for voting instead of simply when consensus is reached

[AmoreJaz]

as the results are in of the first vote... needless to say both results are very damaging to this project. time is passing and investors are certainly not going to take this as a serious investment if either of those results are to be respected! and furthermore.... if we keep wiating it only gets worst! at the moment  the entire list is just over 600 so those that voted with high numbers did alot more damage then anything else! i actually dont have to say "I TOLD YOU GUYS SO'  AND PUTTING A NAME ON THAT KIND OF VOTE LIKE DIPSHIT OR ASS OR ANYTHING ELSE  WOULD BE LIKE POST PAR TUM DEPRESSION!
i think we need to make a structured poll and allow only the valid participants vote, structured as in give them the choice of maybe 5 different results and not allow zero happy children play their games.

I do not agree that whatever happends in this first few weeks\months will in any way damage this project in the long run..  It will be up to the community and Founding Members to determine that with their actions... However i have to agree that inaction in this situation is not beneficial and a pool should be made with a few more " locked " results in order for us to be able to move along... If we allow so many different opinions and results in every vote that the founders will have to do then we wont be able to pregress... This is also a reason that leads me to think that we should also have a " king Arthur  round table " where all founding members can disscuss within themselfs what are the best possible options and present them to vote in a more concise way...

I suggest we have a second vote to finalize participant number, to keep it fair, any new user that was not on the list when consensus was originally reached is not allowed to vote in this one, however new users may be added to the list while the vote is taking place.

This second vote should also not be a write in, it should be multiple choice only, with the choices being something like:

Option A: Consensus reached average, no votes disregarded - cap set at 15116

Option B: Consensus reached average, high limit outlier votes #430 and #588 disregarded - cap set at 2433

Option C: Cap set at 622, the number of participants when consensus was reached.

The vote should also have a reasonable date limit set for voting instead of simply when consensus is reached

that kind of poll would be acceptable but one thing i do want to know.... those that did not vote the first time... ?> are they still considered dormant or defunct?obviously if they simply neglected the first ,, i would have to say cherio joe!  
if they are allowed to vote and they still do not participate then i would seriously raise a big stink for their removal and a fat I told you so ... Another time!  at this moment there are 260 aprox. that did not vote!!

[Jarod1231]

as the results are in of the first vote... needless to say both results are very damaging to this project. time is passing and investors are certainly not going to take this as a serious investment if either of those results are to be respected! and furthermore.... if we keep wiating it only gets worst! at the moment  the entire list is just over 600 so those that voted with high numbers did alot more damage then anything else! i actually dont have to say "I TOLD YOU GUYS SO'  AND PUTTING A NAME ON THAT KIND OF VOTE LIKE DIPSHIT OR ASS OR ANYTHING ELSE  WOULD BE LIKE POST PAR TUM DEPRESSION!
i think we need to make a structured poll and allow only the valid participants vote, structured as in give them the choice of maybe 5 different results and not allow zero happy children play their games.

I do not agree that whatever happends in this first few weeks\months will in any way damage this project in the long run..  It will be up to the community and Founding Members to determine that with their actions... However i have to agree that inaction in this situation is not beneficial and a pool should be made with a few more " locked " results in order for us to be able to move along... If we allow so many different opinions and results in every vote that the founders will have to do then we wont be able to pregress... This is also a reason that leads me to think that we should also have a " king Arthur  round table " where all founding members can disscuss within themselfs what are the best possible options and present them to vote in a more concise way...

I suggest we have a second vote to finalize participant number, to keep it fair, any new user that was not on the list when consensus was originally reached is not allowed to vote in this one, however new users may be added to the list while the vote is taking place.

This second vote should also not be a write in, it should be multiple choice only, with the choices being something like:

Option A: Consensus reached average, no votes disregarded - cap set at 15116

Option B: Consensus reached average, high limit outlier votes #430 and #588 disregarded - cap set at 2433

Option C: Cap set at 622, the number of participants when consensus was reached.

The vote should also have a reasonable date limit set for voting instead of simply when consensus is reached

that kind of poll would be acceptable but one thing i do want to know.... those that did not vote the first time... ?> are they still considered dormant or defunct?obviously if they simply neglected the first ,, i would have to say cherio joe!  
if they are allowed to vote and they still do not participate then i would seriously raise a big stink for their removal and a fat I told you so ... Another time!  at this moment there are 260 aprox. that did not vote!!

They are already losing a 70% penalty for not voting the first time, maybe increase the penalty to 80% or something? I would say only penalize the original idlers at this point though, users that made the first consensus vote but miss this one shouldn't be penalized as long as we put a date on it

[evergrow]

hi I'm excited about getting the tokens in my wallet some day. My understanding is that I have to raise my activity to get more TAO. and voting will happen with our ethereum tokens once the dao is established correct?

[AdobeWriter]

hi I'm excited about getting the tokens in my wallet some day. My understanding is that I have to raise my activity to get more TAO. and voting will happen with our ethereum tokens once the dao is established correct?

As far as I know being active on Bitcointalk counts as activity. Am I correct Dropper?

EDIT:

Guys! 324 of 622 participants on the sheet have voted for closing date of the airdrop. That's about 52% of all participants. We have probably reached consensus. Just waiting for official statement.

Correct this. Even more people have voted - 352. We have definitely reached more than 51% votes.

[skadoosh1]

Hey Dropper, I noticed that you put me on the spreadsheet without my vote. Can i just send my vote in again through DM? I really want to vote and participate in the process.

[SEELE^^01]

as the results are in of the first vote... needless to say both results are very damaging to this project. time is passing and investors are certainly not going to take this as a serious investment if either of those results are to be respected! and furthermore.... if we keep wiating it only gets worst! at the moment  the entire list is just over 600 so those that voted with high numbers did alot more damage then anything else! i actually dont have to say "I TOLD YOU GUYS SO'  AND PUTTING A NAME ON THAT KIND OF VOTE LIKE DIPSHIT OR ASS OR ANYTHING ELSE  WOULD BE LIKE POST PAR TUM DEPRESSION!
i think we need to make a structured poll and allow only the valid participants vote, structured as in give them the choice of maybe 5 different results and not allow zero happy children play their games.

problem is, that you cant change a given vote anymore. i tried it now 3 times and my vote never changed T_T"

[princesskamilla27]

princesskamilla27

#1 Airdrop Closing Date Proposal: 09.09.17

#2 Airdrop Participant Hard Cap Proposal: 1000

Early Participant Bonus Structure: 40 %

Guys, I made votes according to the rules, but got -70% activity. Can you check please?

[FreshB]

hi I'm excited about getting the tokens in my wallet some day. My understanding is that I have to raise my activity to get more TAO. and voting will happen with our ethereum tokens once the dao is established correct?

I don't think our ether tokens are meant for any form of voting. May be used for gas, and transfer of tokens.

[NixXxo]

Hello, I did everything as stated in the rules I'm sure but I'm not in the spreadsheet still 
I'm newbie but my account was reg in 2014...
Dear Dev can you check please again?

[robocop3]

now has reach the voting threshold, waiting further news from the dev .

[daadog]

Just cast my second vote, remember to vote guys. I bookmarked this thread and check in about once or twice a week.

[NixXxo]

Hello, I did everything as stated in the rules I'm sure but I'm not in the spreadsheet still 
I'm newbie but my account was reg in 2014...
Dear Dev can you check please again?

I see my nickname in the spreadsheet now. Thanks dev! So glad to be in the team!

[evergrow]

hi I'm excited about getting the tokens in my wallet some day. My understanding is that I have to raise my activity to get more TAO. and voting will happen with our ethereum tokens once the dao is established correct?

I don't think our ether tokens are meant for any form of voting. May be used for gas, and transfer of tokens.

Mate I mean the TAO shares/tokens.
My understanding is that now we determine how many of those each founding member gets/
or in other words we are collecting tao according to our activity.
but once the movement launches on Ethereum we will vote with our tokens/founder addresses.

Dropper will the Whitepaper go into this,!?
And most importantly, looking forward to seeing the new voting results finalized.

I claimed this Sphere. Join me!

Sphere Name: German Knowledge Base
Description: I will help with creating and maintaing the German parts of the Movement's knowledge base.
I am going to connect with other "Movers" to create guides for newcomers!

[ramesh212]

  I got -70% but I sent my votes to dev before 11th august
Dropper, can I ask to check my votes too?
Thanks!

[qiwoman2]

I just posted a pm for creating a sphere..
<qiwoman2>

Sphere Name: CRYPTOPIA EDUCATION
Description: Help Newbies settle in and learn all about crypto and the DAO, would like to make video and written tutorials and also let Newbies feel loved and welcomed. 

I want to be welcoming Newbies into the fold, helping them feel loved and welcome, with easy video tutorials and files etc.
When I first came to crypto it was a 97% male dominated place and I was made to feel like poop because I was a middle aged lady and many times I was left to cry in the dark. I am a hard one to kill off though and don't want others to be treated the way I was when I first joined this wonderful crypto revolution.  . Hubby is in the other room doing the Chinese translation of the OP as we speak so I am hoping by tomorrow he will finish it. 

[prettybuds]

I sent a PM for sign up and voting to MovementAI some time ago,
never got any reply and i'm also not on the list.
what's up, am I blacklisted or something? I hope not
I want to get in - I'm a nice dude.  

[qiman]

Hello DAO Friends, sorry for voting a little late on vote 2 as I work full time during the week. I am in the process of Chinese translation and will also follow twitter and do retweet and tweet in Chinese.