Bitcoin Forum
December 16, 2017, 12:20:57 AM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.15.1  [Torrent].
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 [17] 18 19 »  All
  Print  
Author Topic: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 52.5+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE]  (Read 37644 times)
thesmokingman
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 211



View Profile
August 13, 2017, 05:17:52 PM
 #321

Sp-mod #6 is 9% faster than sp-mod #3 on the gtx 1070 if you use the latest driver. (384.94) and 100% tdp. (Donate 0.05B BTC to subscribe to my private miner)
The krnlx kernel is broken if you mine on high difficulty (vardiff).  Try supernova with highend cards rigs.
You only get payed for 80% of the  hash showed in the miner.

so you're saying to fix this mine at a lower difficulty? got it....

PIMP your AMD & Nvidia Farm. Finally a Multi-Miner Linux 16.04 Distro with Web Monitoring and On the Fly Algo-Switching. My PIMP AMD/Nvidia FARM: https://miner.farm/farmer/554/farmstatus
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1513383657
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1513383657

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1513383657
Reply with quote  #2

1513383657
Report to moderator
1513383657
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1513383657

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1513383657
Reply with quote  #2

1513383657
Report to moderator
1513383657
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1513383657

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1513383657
Reply with quote  #2

1513383657
Report to moderator
sp_
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1246

Ccminer developer


View Profile
August 13, 2017, 05:36:13 PM
 #322

Mining on lower diff increase the hashrate on the pool, but the miner is still broken.
Some solutions are skipped, so you loose a few percent. And suprnova and many other pools doesn't support static diff, because static diff can be abused and used to steal from the other miners..
Bibi187
Full Member
***
Online Online

Activity: 168


https://steemit.com/@bibi187


View Profile WWW
August 13, 2017, 05:52:27 PM
 #323

Sp-mod #6 is 9% faster than sp-mod #3 on the gtx 1070 if you use the latest driver. (384.94) and 100% tdp. (Donate 0.05B BTC to subscribe to my private miner)
The krnlx kernel is broken if you mine on high difficulty (vardiff).  Try supernova with highend cards rigs.
You only get payed for 80% of the  hash showed in the miner.

send me spmod 6 and I will run the test again. It can be that there is an issue on variable diff. I didn't test that yet as I set it to static 1.0 diff.

Wath pool do u use for static diff ?
Can u explain where u grab the number of share u validate ? I dont found it on suprnova / pool.mn

▀     DeepOnion  |  TOR Integrated & Secured  [ Facebook  Telegram  Bitcointalk  Twitter  Youtube  Reddit ]     ▀
Your Anonymity Guaranteed  ★  Your Assets Secured by TOR  ★  Guard Your Privacy!   ❱❱❱ JOIN AIRDROP NOW!
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬  File Authenticity Guaranteed by DeepVault  ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
yunihuni
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 70


View Profile
August 13, 2017, 06:22:08 PM
 #324

Sp-mod #6 is 9% faster than sp-mod #3 on the gtx 1070 if you use the latest driver. (384.94) and 100% tdp. (Donate 0.05B BTC to subscribe to my private miner)
The krnlx kernel is broken if you mine on high difficulty (vardiff).  Try supernova with highend cards rigs.
You only get payed for 80% of the  hash showed in the miner.

Stop talking shit. You are forcing people to buy your miner with worsening other miners.
You greedy son of a bitch.

SATILIK MSI Geforce GTX1080 GAMING X 8GB [2 AYLIK]
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2140881
sp_
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1246

Ccminer developer


View Profile
August 13, 2017, 07:23:54 PM
 #325

 I spend my free time to test this miner, and finds out the claimed speed in the miner window is not showing on the pool. This has been confirmed by many users on this thread already. The only way to fix this is to fix the code.
Epsylon3
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 1176


ccminer/cpuminer developer


View Profile WWW
August 13, 2017, 11:53:04 PM
 #326

super parasite  Angry supernova high diff jumps is not new and is not a miner issue...

BTC: 1FhDPLPpw18X4srecguG3MxJYe4a1JsZnd - My Projects: ccminer - cpuminer-multi - yiimp - Forum threads : ccminer - cpuminer-multi - yiimp
bigjee
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 154



View Profile
August 14, 2017, 12:53:08 AM
 #327

super parasite  Angry supernova high diff jumps is not new and is not a miner issue...

Which pool would you recommend for low diff
ryanlitwiller
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 120


View Profile WWW
August 14, 2017, 01:00:25 AM
 #328

I spend my free time to test this miner, and finds out the claimed speed in the miner window is not showing on the pool. This has been confirmed by many users on this thread already. The only way to fix this is to fix the code.


I did see a considerable jump in my reported hashrate with this miner but my average hashrate at the pool dropped 20%

BTG Pool - BTG.CryptoPros.us | PIRL Pool - PIRL.CryptoPros.us | ELLA Pool - ella.CryptoPros.us | DBIX Pool - DBIX.CryptoPros.us | PGC Pool - pega.Litwiller.us | CRC, TZC, INN, FTC, VIVO, DSR, LUX - crc.CryptoPros.us
damniatx
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 100


View Profile
August 14, 2017, 01:02:17 AM
 #329

I spend my free time to test this miner, and finds out the claimed speed in the miner window is not showing on the pool. This has been confirmed by many users on this thread already. The only way to fix this is to fix the code.


I did see a considerable jump in my reported hashrate with this miner but my average hashrate at the pool dropped 20%

weird though. the latest ccminer from tpruvot also use this code. giving the same performance. Sad

https://github.com/tpruvot/ccminer/releases
altfinance
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 140



View Profile
August 14, 2017, 02:37:17 AM
 #330

You can all try it for yourselves. Test with palgin and krnlx and spmod3/5 miners. I tested these with suprnova. Since the hash rate in the dashboard being shown by suprnova is continuously changing, I decided to test the miners with the SIGT coins I'm mining.

Yes, it was not a scientific test, I just wanted to have a rough estimate because I noticed the coins I'm mining suddenly dropped when I used krnlx. I wasn't sure at first if it was because of the difficulty in SIGT and the many miners in suprnova or it was due to krnlx. So I created 2 accounts in suprnova. I have  2 almost identical rigs, 6 x GTX1060 on rig1 and 5 x GTX 1060 on rig2. The first test was running spmod3 on rig2 and krnlx on rig1. I didn't configure the rigs to be of the exact number of gpus because I will lose mining time for a couple of hours if disable one gpu. After more than an hour, I had almost the same number of coins mined. It meant krnlx was mining slower than spmod3 because it was using 6 gpus. The next test was running palginmod on rig 1 and spmod3 on rig2. This time, palginmod mined more coins, which should be the case since it is running on 6 gpus. If I divide the number of coins per gpu, the average coin per gpu was the same for palginmod and spmod3, which meant in my crude test that both miners seem to be performing equally.

There seems to be a problem with krnlx even it is showing more hash rate per second. Those of you who have a lot more resources and time can test krnlx more extensively.  For now, I'm going back to palginmod or spmod. Check also a test run by jimboscott here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2030529.4700   He has the same observations.

▀     DeepOnion  |  TOR Integrated & Secured  [ Facebook  Telegram  Bitcointalk  Twitter  Youtube  Reddit ]     ▀
Your Anonymity Guaranteed  ★  Your Assets Secured by TOR  ★  Guard Your Privacy!   ❱❱❱ JOIN AIRDROP NOW!
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬  File Authenticity Guaranteed by DeepVault  ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
TobiasVR
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 331


Spectiv VR Crowdsale: 12/08/17


View Profile
August 14, 2017, 02:49:05 AM
 #331

now it is not profit, I use 6 pieces 470 rx series vga


              ▄▄████████████▄▄             
          ▄███▀▀▀░░░░░░░░░░▀▀▀███▄▄        
       ▄██▀▀░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░▀██▄      
     ▄██▀░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░▀███    
   ▄██▀░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░▄▄▄▄▄█████████████▄  
  ▄██░░░░░░░░░░░▄▄█████████░░░░░░░░░░░░▀█▌ 
 ▐██░░░░░░░░▄█████▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀████▄░░░░░░░░▀█▌
▐██░░░░░░▄███▀▀███████████████▀▀██▄░░░░░░██▌
████▄░░▄██▀███████▄██████▄████████▀██▄░░░▐██
██░▀████▀██████████████████████████████▄░░██
██░░░▀██▄█████████████████████████▄██▀▀██▄██
██▌░░░░▀███▄████████▀▀▀▀███████▄██▀░░░░░▀███
▐██░░░░░░░▀███▄▄███████████▄▄██▀▀░░░░░░░░██▌
 ▐██░░░░░░░░░░▀▀████████████▀░░░░░░░░░░░▄█▌
  ▀██▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄████████▀▀▀░░░░░░░░░░░░░░▄█▌ 
   ▀███▀▀▀▀▀▀░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░▄██▀  
     ▀██▄░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░▄██▀    
       ▀███▄░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░▄▄██▀      
          ▀████▄▄░░░░░░░░░░▄▄▄███▀         
              ▀▀▀██████████▀▀▀             

    
                         [ Website ]                    
    
WarrenP
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 238

AltCommunity AL9LFBb598V8t3fXUWQGZKatgnhAKU1msW


View Profile
August 14, 2017, 08:10:51 AM
 #332

You can all try it for yourselves. Test with palgin and krnlx and spmod3/5 miners. I tested these with suprnova. Since the hash rate in the dashboard being shown by suprnova is continuously changing, I decided to test the miners with the SIGT coins I'm mining.

Yes, it was not a scientific test, I just wanted to have a rough estimate because I noticed the coins I'm mining suddenly dropped when I used krnlx. I wasn't sure at first if it was because of the difficulty in SIGT and the many miners in suprnova or it was due to krnlx. So I created 2 accounts in suprnova. I have  2 almost identical rigs, 6 x GTX1060 on rig1 and 5 x GTX 1060 on rig2. The first test was running spmod3 on rig2 and krnlx on rig1. I didn't configure the rigs to be of the exact number of gpus because I will lose mining time for a couple of hours if disable one gpu. After more than an hour, I had almost the same number of coins mined. It meant krnlx was mining slower than spmod3 because it was using 6 gpus. The next test was running palginmod on rig 1 and spmod3 on rig2. This time, palginmod mined more coins, which should be the case since it is running on 6 gpus. If I divide the number of coins per gpu, the average coin per gpu was the same for palginmod and spmod3, which meant in my crude test that both miners seem to be performing equally.

There seems to be a problem with krnlx even it is showing more hash rate per second. Those of you who have a lot more resources and time can test krnlx more extensively.  For now, I'm going back to palginmod or spmod. Check also a test run by jimboscott here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2030529.4700   He has the same observations.

Interesting observation. Thank you for the information. I am going to do some investigation myself.

█▀▀▀▀▀▀   ★  TOKUGAWA COIN @ 50 cents in ICO  ★    1000% ROI Masternodes    |    First 100 MN @ 50 cents    |    On Exchanges in 1 Month   ▀▀▀▀▀▀█
Join Our ICO   [ From Nob 10th, 2017 ]   @ 75 Cents in Stage 2 of ICO
█▄▄▄▄▄▄     ★   ★   ★    ★   ★   ★    ★   ★   ★   Whitepaper     Facebook     Slack     Twitter     Telegram     ANN Thread         ★   ★   ★   ★   ★   ★   ★   ★   ★      ▄▄▄▄▄▄█
FFI2013
Hero Member
*****
Online Online

Activity: 488


View Profile
August 14, 2017, 10:53:27 AM
 #333

wow I just bought some 1070s to replace my r9 cards there killing me on power compared to my rx cards but wanted to mine signatum now I read the miner issues what miner is recommend I  never owned a nivida  card in my life so the help is appreciated thanks

Nousplatform██  ██  █
██  ██  █
██  ██  █
██  ██  █
██  ██  █
██  ██  █
██  ██  █
██  ██  █
██  ██  █
██  ██  █
██  ██  █
██  ██  █
██  ██  █
██  ██  █
██  ██  █
██  ██  █
██  ██  █
██  ██  █
██  ██  █
██  ██  █
██  ██  █
██  ██  █
██  ██  █
██  ██  █
██  ██  █
██  ██  █
|██  ██  █
██  ██  █
██  ██  █
██  ██  █
██  ██  █
██  ██  █
██  ██  █
██  ██  █
██  ██  █
██  ██  █
██  ██  █
██  ██  █
██  ██  █
Bibi187
Full Member
***
Online Online

Activity: 168


https://steemit.com/@bibi187


View Profile WWW
August 14, 2017, 12:12:43 PM
 #334

wow I just bought some 1070s to replace my r9 cards there killing me on power compared to my rx cards but wanted to mine signatum now I read the miner issues what miner is recommend I  never owned a nivida  card in my life so the help is appreciated thanks

I actually use krnlx, but i think u gone swap to epsylon ccminer build. He got improvement on 13 august on skunk, based on krnlx withtout the share problem Wink

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=770064.0

Link to source code :

https://github.com/tpruvot/ccminer

But u maybe want to go to another crypto actually, sigt is less rentable actually, lot of people sell it.

▀     DeepOnion  |  TOR Integrated & Secured  [ Facebook  Telegram  Bitcointalk  Twitter  Youtube  Reddit ]     ▀
Your Anonymity Guaranteed  ★  Your Assets Secured by TOR  ★  Guard Your Privacy!   ❱❱❱ JOIN AIRDROP NOW!
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬  File Authenticity Guaranteed by DeepVault  ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
kinzey
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 124


View Profile
August 14, 2017, 01:42:30 PM
 #335

thank you for the info guys...  Wink Wink Wink

▬▬▬ ▰ ▰ ▰ ▰ ▰ ▰ E i d o o ▬ your blockchain asset experience ▰ ▰ ▰ ▰ ▰ ▰ ▬▬▬
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬ " Token Sale Raised 82,372.33 ETH " ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
▬▬▬ ▰ ▰ ▰ ▰ ▰ ▰ TwitterFacebook  ▰ BountyDiscussion ▰ ▰ ▰ ▰ ▰ ▰ ▬▬▬
sundownz
Hero Member
*****
Online Online

Activity: 490


View Profile
August 14, 2017, 10:00:47 PM
 #336

Decided to update all 24 of my machines doing SIGT to the new CC miner 2.2 today. Results below so far.

https://ibb.co/kqkXjv
** Image Link

Seems to achieve the ~5% gain I noted on individual machines once it settles (the other machines averages 5% vs the 10% on the 1080 Ti I did this morning).
sundownz
Hero Member
*****
Online Online

Activity: 490


View Profile
August 14, 2017, 10:24:21 PM
 #337

Decided to update all 24 of my machines doing SIGT to the new CC miner 2.2 today. Results below so far.

https://ibb.co/kqkXjv
** Image Link

Seems to achieve the ~5% gain I noted on individual machines once it settles (the other machines averages 5% vs the 10% on the 1080 Ti I did this morning).

It seems to still be climbing on the pool side -- I will update again later this evening with another graph to see if it maintains the full gain.
sundownz
Hero Member
*****
Online Online

Activity: 490


View Profile
August 14, 2017, 11:53:36 PM
 #338

https://ibb.co/iZpH1a
** Image Link

I am seeing very solid holding at 2 GH (peaking at 2.2-2.3 GH) now vs seeing it peak at 2 GH and average 1.8-1.9 GH prior.

So I will say I am very satisfied with CC Miner 2.2
castillojim
Newbie
*
Online Online

Activity: 1


View Profile
August 15, 2017, 02:07:15 AM
 #339

Somebody if possible can put the link to compiled ccminer 2 August 13 with cuda 8 for Linux, i can´t do it.
faxxer
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 191


View Profile
August 15, 2017, 04:21:57 AM
 #340

What best rate u can achieve with 1060? I got around 40card to mine this coin.

Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 [17] 18 19 »  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!