Bitcoin Forum
October 25, 2020, 11:25:14 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 0.20.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 [17] 18 19 »  All
  Print  
Author Topic: Signatum (skunk) ccminer-krnlx 30+mh 1070, 52.5+ mh 1080ti [FREE,OPENSOURCE]  (Read 39062 times)
Bibi187
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 420
Merit: 106


https://steemit.com/@bibi187


View Profile WWW
August 13, 2017, 05:52:27 PM
 #321

Sp-mod #6 is 9% faster than sp-mod #3 on the gtx 1070 if you use the latest driver. (384.94) and 100% tdp. (Donate 0.05B BTC to subscribe to my private miner)
The krnlx kernel is broken if you mine on high difficulty (vardiff).  Try supernova with highend cards rigs.
You only get payed for 80% of the  hash showed in the miner.

send me spmod 6 and I will run the test again. It can be that there is an issue on variable diff. I didn't test that yet as I set it to static 1.0 diff.

Wath pool do u use for static diff ?
Can u explain where u grab the number of share u validate ? I dont found it on suprnova / pool.mn

DeepOnion    ▬▬  Anonymous and Untraceable  ▬▬    ENJOY YOUR PRIVACY  •  JOIN DEEPONION
▐▐▐▐▐▐▐▐   ANN  Whitepaper  Facebook  Twitter  Telegram  Discord    ▌▌▌▌▌▌▌▌
Get $ONION  (✔Cryptopia  ✔KuCoin)  |  VoteCentral  Register NOW!  |  Download DeepOnion
1603668314
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1603668314

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1603668314
Reply with quote  #2

1603668314
Report to moderator
1603668314
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1603668314

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1603668314
Reply with quote  #2

1603668314
Report to moderator
1603668314
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1603668314

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1603668314
Reply with quote  #2

1603668314
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1603668314
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1603668314

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1603668314
Reply with quote  #2

1603668314
Report to moderator
yunihuni
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 70
Merit: 10


View Profile
August 13, 2017, 06:22:08 PM
 #322

Sp-mod #6 is 9% faster than sp-mod #3 on the gtx 1070 if you use the latest driver. (384.94) and 100% tdp. (Donate 0.05B BTC to subscribe to my private miner)
The krnlx kernel is broken if you mine on high difficulty (vardiff).  Try supernova with highend cards rigs.
You only get payed for 80% of the  hash showed in the miner.

Stop talking shit. You are forcing people to buy your miner with worsening other miners.
You greedy son of a bitch.

SATILIK MSI Geforce GTX1080 GAMING X 8GB [2 AYLIK]
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2140881
sp_
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1862
Merit: 1053

Ccminer developer


View Profile
August 13, 2017, 07:23:54 PM
 #323

 I spend my free time to test this miner, and finds out the claimed speed in the miner window is not showing on the pool. This has been confirmed by many users on this thread already. The only way to fix this is to fix the code.
Epsylon3
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1484
Merit: 1082


ccminer/cpuminer developer


View Profile WWW
August 13, 2017, 11:53:04 PM
 #324

super parasite  Angry supernova high diff jumps is not new and is not a miner issue...

BTC: 1FhDPLPpw18X4srecguG3MxJYe4a1JsZnd - My Projects: ccminer - cpuminer-multi - yiimp - Forum threads : ccminer - cpuminer-multi - yiimp
bigjee
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 434
Merit: 107



View Profile
August 14, 2017, 12:53:08 AM
 #325

super parasite  Angry supernova high diff jumps is not new and is not a miner issue...

Which pool would you recommend for low diff
ryanlitwiller
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 155
Merit: 100



View Profile WWW
August 14, 2017, 01:00:25 AM
 #326

I spend my free time to test this miner, and finds out the claimed speed in the miner window is not showing on the pool. This has been confirmed by many users on this thread already. The only way to fix this is to fix the code.


I did see a considerable jump in my reported hashrate with this miner but my average hashrate at the pool dropped 20%

CRC, TZC, INN, FTC, VIVO, DSR, LUX - pool.CryptoPros.us
damniatx
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 109
Merit: 10


View Profile
August 14, 2017, 01:02:17 AM
 #327

I spend my free time to test this miner, and finds out the claimed speed in the miner window is not showing on the pool. This has been confirmed by many users on this thread already. The only way to fix this is to fix the code.


I did see a considerable jump in my reported hashrate with this miner but my average hashrate at the pool dropped 20%

weird though. the latest ccminer from tpruvot also use this code. giving the same performance. Sad

https://github.com/tpruvot/ccminer/releases
altfinance
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 314
Merit: 100


View Profile
August 14, 2017, 02:37:17 AM
 #328

You can all try it for yourselves. Test with palgin and krnlx and spmod3/5 miners. I tested these with suprnova. Since the hash rate in the dashboard being shown by suprnova is continuously changing, I decided to test the miners with the SIGT coins I'm mining.

Yes, it was not a scientific test, I just wanted to have a rough estimate because I noticed the coins I'm mining suddenly dropped when I used krnlx. I wasn't sure at first if it was because of the difficulty in SIGT and the many miners in suprnova or it was due to krnlx. So I created 2 accounts in suprnova. I have  2 almost identical rigs, 6 x GTX1060 on rig1 and 5 x GTX 1060 on rig2. The first test was running spmod3 on rig2 and krnlx on rig1. I didn't configure the rigs to be of the exact number of gpus because I will lose mining time for a couple of hours if disable one gpu. After more than an hour, I had almost the same number of coins mined. It meant krnlx was mining slower than spmod3 because it was using 6 gpus. The next test was running palginmod on rig 1 and spmod3 on rig2. This time, palginmod mined more coins, which should be the case since it is running on 6 gpus. If I divide the number of coins per gpu, the average coin per gpu was the same for palginmod and spmod3, which meant in my crude test that both miners seem to be performing equally.

There seems to be a problem with krnlx even it is showing more hash rate per second. Those of you who have a lot more resources and time can test krnlx more extensively.  For now, I'm going back to palginmod or spmod. Check also a test run by jimboscott here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2030529.4700   He has the same observations.

▀    ★★★ LETHEAN ★★★ 
┊┈ VPN + BLOCKCHAIN, Absolute Internet Privacy: ┈┊
█ █  Linkedin Twitter Youtube Discord RedditFacebook Whitepaper Bitcointalk Ann  █ █ 
TobiasVR
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 629
Merit: 251



View Profile
August 14, 2017, 02:49:05 AM
 #329

now it is not profit, I use 6 pieces 470 rx series vga
WarrenP
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 406
Merit: 250

PHqpBmGrA3V6GqzmyQWEaQTjCMDGfSDbcn


View Profile
August 14, 2017, 08:10:51 AM
 #330

You can all try it for yourselves. Test with palgin and krnlx and spmod3/5 miners. I tested these with suprnova. Since the hash rate in the dashboard being shown by suprnova is continuously changing, I decided to test the miners with the SIGT coins I'm mining.

Yes, it was not a scientific test, I just wanted to have a rough estimate because I noticed the coins I'm mining suddenly dropped when I used krnlx. I wasn't sure at first if it was because of the difficulty in SIGT and the many miners in suprnova or it was due to krnlx. So I created 2 accounts in suprnova. I have  2 almost identical rigs, 6 x GTX1060 on rig1 and 5 x GTX 1060 on rig2. The first test was running spmod3 on rig2 and krnlx on rig1. I didn't configure the rigs to be of the exact number of gpus because I will lose mining time for a couple of hours if disable one gpu. After more than an hour, I had almost the same number of coins mined. It meant krnlx was mining slower than spmod3 because it was using 6 gpus. The next test was running palginmod on rig 1 and spmod3 on rig2. This time, palginmod mined more coins, which should be the case since it is running on 6 gpus. If I divide the number of coins per gpu, the average coin per gpu was the same for palginmod and spmod3, which meant in my crude test that both miners seem to be performing equally.

There seems to be a problem with krnlx even it is showing more hash rate per second. Those of you who have a lot more resources and time can test krnlx more extensively.  For now, I'm going back to palginmod or spmod. Check also a test run by jimboscott here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2030529.4700   He has the same observations.

Interesting observation. Thank you for the information. I am going to do some investigation myself.

                 ░▒▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▒▒░
           ░▒█████████████████████▒░
         ▓███████████████████████████▓░
      ░███████████████▓░▒███████████████░
     ▓██████████▓▓▒░        ▒▒▓▓██████████
   ░███▓                               ▒███▒
  ░████               ▒▒▒               ████▒
 ░█████░           ░███████░            █████▒
 ██████░          ░██      ██▒          ██████
░██████░          ██       ██           ██████▒
▓██████           ██░ ░   ░██           ███████
▓██████         ████████████████        ███████
▓██████        █████████████████        ███████
░██████▒       ███████████████       ░██████▓
 ███████       █████████████████       ▓██████
 ░███████       ████████████████      ▓██████▒
  ▒███████▒       ░ ░     ░ ░       ░███████▒
   ░████████▒                     ▒████████▒
     ▓████████▓░               ░▓█████████
      ░██████████▓░          ▓██████████░
         ▓██████████▒     ▒██████████▓░
           ░▒██████████▒▓█████████▓░
                 ░▒▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▒▒░
FFI2013
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 908
Merit: 507


View Profile
August 14, 2017, 10:53:27 AM
 #331

wow I just bought some 1070s to replace my r9 cards there killing me on power compared to my rx cards but wanted to mine signatum now I read the miner issues what miner is recommend I  never owned a nivida  card in my life so the help is appreciated thanks
Bibi187
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 420
Merit: 106


https://steemit.com/@bibi187


View Profile WWW
August 14, 2017, 12:12:43 PM
 #332

wow I just bought some 1070s to replace my r9 cards there killing me on power compared to my rx cards but wanted to mine signatum now I read the miner issues what miner is recommend I  never owned a nivida  card in my life so the help is appreciated thanks

I actually use krnlx, but i think u gone swap to epsylon ccminer build. He got improvement on 13 august on skunk, based on krnlx withtout the share problem Wink

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=770064.0

Link to source code :

https://github.com/tpruvot/ccminer

But u maybe want to go to another crypto actually, sigt is less rentable actually, lot of people sell it.

DeepOnion    ▬▬  Anonymous and Untraceable  ▬▬    ENJOY YOUR PRIVACY  •  JOIN DEEPONION
▐▐▐▐▐▐▐▐   ANN  Whitepaper  Facebook  Twitter  Telegram  Discord    ▌▌▌▌▌▌▌▌
Get $ONION  (✔Cryptopia  ✔KuCoin)  |  VoteCentral  Register NOW!  |  Download DeepOnion
kinzey
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 255
Merit: 100


Blockchain with solar energy


View Profile
August 14, 2017, 01:42:30 PM
 #333

thank you for the info guys...  Wink Wink Wink

▀▀▀▀▀▀▀  [     CRYPTOS⚫LARTECH      ]  ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
  White Paper     ||   BLOCKCHAIN & ENERGY FOR A BETTER WORLD   ||     One Pager 
Telegram      Facebook      Twitter      [[     TOKEN SALE is LIVE     ]]      Medium      Youtube      Reddit
sundownz
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 714
Merit: 512


View Profile WWW
August 14, 2017, 10:00:47 PM
 #334

Decided to update all 24 of my machines doing SIGT to the new CC miner 2.2 today. Results below so far.

https://ibb.co/kqkXjv
** Image Link

Seems to achieve the ~5% gain I noted on individual machines once it settles (the other machines averages 5% vs the 10% on the 1080 Ti I did this morning).

For security, your account has been locked. Email acctcomp15@theymos.e4ward.com
sundownz
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 714
Merit: 512


View Profile WWW
August 14, 2017, 10:24:21 PM
 #335

Decided to update all 24 of my machines doing SIGT to the new CC miner 2.2 today. Results below so far.

https://ibb.co/kqkXjv
** Image Link

Seems to achieve the ~5% gain I noted on individual machines once it settles (the other machines averages 5% vs the 10% on the 1080 Ti I did this morning).

It seems to still be climbing on the pool side -- I will update again later this evening with another graph to see if it maintains the full gain.

For security, your account has been locked. Email acctcomp15@theymos.e4ward.com
sundownz
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 714
Merit: 512


View Profile WWW
August 14, 2017, 11:53:36 PM
 #336

https://ibb.co/iZpH1a
** Image Link

I am seeing very solid holding at 2 GH (peaking at 2.2-2.3 GH) now vs seeing it peak at 2 GH and average 1.8-1.9 GH prior.

So I will say I am very satisfied with CC Miner 2.2

For security, your account has been locked. Email acctcomp15@theymos.e4ward.com
castillojim
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 17
Merit: 0


View Profile
August 15, 2017, 02:07:15 AM
 #337

Somebody if possible can put the link to compiled ccminer 2 August 13 with cuda 8 for Linux, i can´t do it.
faxxer
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 230
Merit: 100


View Profile
August 15, 2017, 04:21:57 AM
 #338

What best rate u can achieve with 1060? I got around 40card to mine this coin.
antiycda
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 140
Merit: 100



View Profile WWW
August 15, 2017, 06:35:50 AM
 #339

What best rate u can achieve with 1060? I got around 40card to mine this coin.

17m per card

umine
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 414
Merit: 136



View Profile
August 15, 2017, 06:50:45 AM
 #340

Really great miner. Get about 29.5-30.0 Mh/s from single GTX1070 Palit SJS, downvolted to 950 mV. Rig with 6xGTX1070 is stable for some days and gets about 175-180 Mh/s:


Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 [17] 18 19 »  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!