DESCROW SECURE CROWDFUNDING PLATFORM

[atupolev]

I like this project's idea. It has long been time to remove centralization from the sphere of finance. This will allow developing such projects as yours and many others that help improve people's lives

[rotonda]

I like this project's idea. It has long been time to remove centralization from the sphere of finance. This will allow developing such projects as yours and many others that help improve people's lives

Yes
Decentralization is capable of revolutionizing the storage and exchange of assets. Decentralized markets have no national borders — they allow users from all over theworld to freely interact with each other. Decentralization improves robustness against random errors, as well as against attacks and collusion attempts by individual participants Removal of intermediary parties helps to significantly simplify and speed up interactions between users.

[Zeppelins]

Did I understand correctly among the many sources of information that some of the tokens can be stored on exchanges without access to the functionality of smart contracts for voting?

Here everything is decided just by the introduction into the process of experts or communities who will lead the project on the DES platform and will vote independently of any tokens and changing owners.

So how to solve the issue of organizing these experts? Which sources is from? And how can we be trusted to them?

I think It may be some organizations with a team of experts. I think there are such sources. But I can not name exact references  

No matter where. If this system itself is working, then the source of good specialists and experts will always be found

What kind of source can this be? Can you give some examples? And what can be the gaoanty for the rest of the participants in the fact that the experts will not be from interested groups that will be able to influence the voting process in someone's favor?

Good. In this case, can investors select participants of this platform by voting? Or can they offer their candidates for consideration and voting?
I thought about the already existing site with the participants who already have a rating. For example, it is from habrahabr.ru. It will be the third independent expert who will want to value his reputation

[RisiexlA2]

I love the idea of this project. But it take too long time for this project can have real product for people. 

[spawn4ever]

I love the idea of this project. But it take too long time for this project can have real product for people. 

I am totally agree with you. Token price cant rise without working product. Also its better for crypto word if DES will release their product as soon as posible

[spawn4ever]

Maybe. Although if the team is strong and experienced, I do not think that third-party organizations need audit. Look at the opinion of the developers about this.

Lol man are ypu kiddin me? You can trust no one on crypto market. Audit is simple thing for every project. You cant trust in dev's words

[nshrd]

I came to the conclusion that this ANTI-SCAM-ICO platform will work mainly with large ICO projects.
For small projects, it will not be in demand

I don't understand. What does it mean small, but what does big projects mean? What is a measure? , hardcape, softcape or the number of participating in projects...

i don't understand too, what is the difference between large and small project if the mechanism is the same for all

[2bfree]

I like this project's idea. It has long been time to remove centralization from the sphere of finance. This will allow developing such projects as yours and many others that help improve people's lives

Yes
Decentralization is capable of revolutionizing the storage and exchange of assets. Decentralized markets have no national borders — they allow users from all over theworld to freely interact with each other. Decentralization improves robustness against random errors, as well as against attacks and collusion attempts by individual participants Removal of intermediary parties helps to significantly simplify and speed up interactions between users.

As can be seen from the appearance of this project, regulators are still necessary. But not as terrible as traditional governments and officials. Self-regulation is our choice, I wish the project good luck.

What is those with power don't give a shit about your self regulation and tell you what to do by force?

[Zeppelins]

Good. In this case, can investors select participants of this platform by voting? Or can they offer their candidates for consideration and voting?
I thought about the already existing site with the participants who already have a rating. For example, it is from habrahabr.ru. It will be the third independent expert who will want to value his reputation

I think investors will not be able to choose the composition of experts. Unless to put restrictions on participation on the minimum rating for voting was qualified. All the parts of this system are independent and balanced in this sense.

In this case, it should be really authoritative participants who have long proven themselves on the positive side and have a good rating.

[nshrd]

What is those with power don't give a shit about your self regulation and tell you what to do by force?

it is, but no one has yet been able to conquer the world completely
internet connects people around the world

[spawn4ever]

i don't understand too, what is the difference between large and small project if the mechanism is the same for all

Difference between big and small project is needed funds for developing. Small project no need 150k ETH like kyber for development their product. Just take a look at arbitrage crypto trader. Hard cap just 12k ETH. Nowadays its really small hardcap

[Blues017]

The funds will be divided into several stages of delivery to the project, it is a very good idea. Avoid many projects into enough money and the slow progress, on the other hand to help item company can make reasonable planning, rather than only for  money!

[nshrd]

Difference between big and small project is needed funds for developing. Small project no need 150k ETH like kyber for development their product. Just take a look at arbitrage crypto trader. Hard cap just 12k ETH. Nowadays its really small hardcap

but what's the difference, the platform will still work with both projects, small and big

[Besser99]

All types of measurement are interesting. But I meant projects where the number of participants is not great.

I still do not understand, it DES-project a universal platform that can be used for projects of all types, regardless of the number of participating.

What to do with the situation when the number of participants is small and the development team buys most of the tokens> 50.01% and using the majority votes in favor of themselves in the first stage of voting?

It's would be in conflict with our corporate values and harmed our reputation. So we are intersted in transparency.

[Zeppelins]

What to do with the situation when the number of participants is small and the development team buys most of the tokens> 50.01% and using the majority votes in favor of themselves in the first stage of voting?

It's would be in conflict with our corporate values and harmed our reputation. So we are intersted in transparency.

In this case, the voices of the developers will not be counted in voting?

I think that it does not make sense. The votes of investors and third parties will be taken into account.

[nshrd]

I came to the conclusion that this ANTI-SCAM-ICO platform will work mainly with large ICO projects.
For small projects, it will not be in demand

Do you think a commission from small projects will not cover the costs of studying it? I think that those who will be engaged in this on an ongoing basis will be able to do this sometimes even free of charge to maintain their professional status and skills.

Small projects will be able to engage novice experts or experts with a still low rating. They all will benefit from the projects.

hmm now i got it lol
first you work for a name, then the name works for you

[spawn4ever]

hmm now i got it lol
first you work for a name, then the name works for you

For sure. For example, if in some project Buterin as a advisor? Can this porject be a scam? I think not. But if in the tam no names than you cant trust him

[Zeppelins]

I think that it does not make sense. The votes of investors and third parties will be taken into account.

What if investors are anonymous? Require authorization?

Verification is most likely needed to invest in USD and other currencies. When you invest in crypto currency, confirmation is usually not necessary. But if the amount is large enough, then most likely there will be their own rules for confirming the identity.

[Zeppelins]

I think that it does not make sense. The votes of investors and third parties will be taken into account.

What if investors are anonymous? Require authorization?

Verification is most likely needed to invest in USD and other currencies. When you invest in crypto currency, confirmation is usually not necessary. But if the amount is large enough, then most likely there will be their own rules for confirming the identity.

As I understand from the WP investors will somehow be authorized. Otherwise, the whole logic of the decision-making process breaks down. It's unclear who is who. And who for whose interests votes.

In this case, all participants can track the transactions of each of them? I do not think that this will suit all investors, most of them will want to remain anonymous

[spawn4ever]

Life is a little more complicated than such straightforward conclusions. Buterin violated the principles that was proclaimed by himself , but in fact the project was a success. But we will not go to offtop.
We will hope that this project will also take its own niche.

For sure it will be, because nowadays too much ICO and some of them wanna take your money and escape