Primedice.com | Since 2013 | Longest Running Crypto Casino | 113 BTC Jackpot!

[Brah]

While it is very nice that PD is paying back bets that were incorrect, my issue is this; if those bets were right and I had one, then I would not have gone on to make the next bet to double up and then lose. Altogether this is a mess. I believe I should be entitled to all my losses on PD2 since the game and my flow was fundamentally altered by PD's error. Does anyone agree on this?

Lol nope. 

[1715172460]

1715172460

[1715172460]

1715172460

[1715172460]

1715172460

[1715172460]

1715172460

[MICRO]

While it is very nice that PD is paying back bets that were incorrect, my issue is this; if those bets were right and I had one, then I would not have gone on to make the next bet to double up and then lose. Altogether this is a mess. I believe I should be entitled to all my losses on PD2 since the game and my flow was fundamentally altered by PD's error. Does anyone agree on this?

Ur game flow was fundamentally altered by 1.05% house edge instead of 1% ? U would bet differently if u known its 1.05% ?
Maybe, but its impossible to know/prove , and impossible to go back in time .

All it can be done is payout that bets that ware affected by that extra 0.05% that we didn't know of .

[grux]

Anybody, I don't want to mess around with the API and get my IP blocked.

Question about the api for primedice. This is listed on the top of https://primedice.com/api

"The primedice API provides low-level access to functions available on the website. Authentication is done by adding a paramter to the url. Here is an example of an authenticated URL query:
https://api.primedice.com/api/users/1?access_token=abc123

The access token can be found on login or register."

I can't find the access token on any page or am I missing it somewhere.

Looking to make a PHP curl script.

This token can be found by right clicking and inspecting element to open up the dev console, clicking on the resources tab, going to local storage on the list, and opening https://primedice.com. It is then the value next to the word token.

[xfactorx]

While it is very nice that PD is paying back bets that were incorrect, my issue is this; if those bets were right and I had one, then I would not have gone on to make the next bet to double up and then lose. Altogether this is a mess. I believe I should be entitled to all my losses on PD2 since the game and my flow was fundamentally altered by PD's error. Does anyone agree on this?

Ur game flow was fundamentally altered by 1.05% house edge instead of 1% ? U would bet differently if u known its 1.05% ?
Maybe, but its impossible to know/prove , and impossible to go back in time .

All it can be done is payout that bets that ware affected by that extra 0.05% that we didn't know of .

Um, yes Mirco that is exactly what I am saying. Does it not make sense or something? If I had not lost a .001 bet which was 45.5 then I would not have gone on to double my bet and lose an additional .002 -in other words if I had won the entire streak would have been different and may not have killed me

[xfactorx]

While it is very nice that PD is paying back bets that were incorrect, my issue is this; if those bets were right and I had one, then I would not have gone on to make the next bet to double up and then lose. Altogether this is a mess. I believe I should be entitled to all my losses on PD2 since the game and my flow was fundamentally altered by PD's error. Does anyone agree on this?

Lol nope. 

Interesting that a user who is always on PD like its going out of fashion and clearly loves to defend the site does not agree... You dont agree that someone who has been the victim of inconsistent and WRONG / FALSE rolls should be entitled to a claim? Ha! Anyway, you can have your opinion. Next opinion please.

[Brah]

While it is very nice that PD is paying back bets that were incorrect, my issue is this; if those bets were right and I had one, then I would not have gone on to make the next bet to double up and then lose. Altogether this is a mess. I believe I should be entitled to all my losses on PD2 since the game and my flow was fundamentally altered by PD's error. Does anyone agree on this?

Lol nope.  

Interesting that a user who is always on PD like its going out of fashion and clearly loves to defend the site does not agree... You dont agree that someone who has been the victim of inconsistent and WRONG / FALSE rolls should be entitled to a claim? Ha! Anyway, you can have your opinion. Next opinion please.

I just don't see how its fair to refund losses for this. So basically you only want people to agree with you otherwise you'll attack them? =3


EDIT: Maybe if the doubled rolls we're affects by it specifically by the roll number as well then yeah otherwise no. But I dont think thats the case. the rest we're fair rolls, you chose to double.

[galbros]

While it is very nice that PD is paying back bets that were incorrect, my issue is this; if those bets were right and I had one, then I would not have gone on to make the next bet to double up and then lose. Altogether this is a mess. I believe I should be entitled to all my losses on PD2 since the game and my flow was fundamentally altered by PD's error. Does anyone agree on this?

Sorry, no.  I agree it was a serious flaw though.  However, Stunna is being very open about trying to fix it.

I don't blame you for trying to reclaim all your losses but I don't think this angle has much merit. 

Good Luck.

[xfactorx]

While it is very nice that PD is paying back bets that were incorrect, my issue is this; if those bets were right and I had one, then I would not have gone on to make the next bet to double up and then lose. Altogether this is a mess. I believe I should be entitled to all my losses on PD2 since the game and my flow was fundamentally altered by PD's error. Does anyone agree on this?

Lol nope.  

Interesting that a user who is always on PD like its going out of fashion and clearly loves to defend the site does not agree... You dont agree that someone who has been the victim of inconsistent and WRONG / FALSE rolls should be entitled to a claim? Ha! Anyway, you can have your opinion. Next opinion please.

I just don't see how its fair to refund losses for this. So basically you only want people to agree with you otherwise you'll attack them? =3


EDIT: Maybe if the doubled rolls we're affects by it specifically by the roll number as well then yeah otherwise no. But I dont think thats the case. the rest we're fair rolls, you chose to double.

Well, don't mean to attack Brah, but I am talking about some real money here and I was under the impression this was a 'provably fair' site but now I am learning that I have lost certain rolls because of some 'flaw'. Jesus christ.. If I never happened to stumble on this page I would have never known.

Also, the doubled rolls were already affected because I would never had doubled if I never lost the bet. Perhaps I lost and doubled again 2/3 times and lost 1btc -does this sound fair to you? Why are you defending PD when it is clear the FUCKED UP mate -excuse the french but this is what it boils down to. When you want to claim to be the worlds best bitcoin gambling site then expect some flack from people who has gambled some hard money on the site to later find they have been duped.

[BBmmBB]

HITTING BACK TO BACK LOSS STREAKS 9+ REALLY MAKES ME THINK "FAIR" LMFAO  

50% CHANCE? ~ SUUUUURE

[nahtnam]

HITTING BACK TO BACK LOSS STREAKS 9+ REALLY MAKES ME THINK "FAIR" LMFAO  

50% CHANCE? ~ SUUUUURE

Its actually 49.5% chance.

Just sayin'.

[BBmmBB]

HITTING BACK TO BACK LOSS STREAKS 9+ REALLY MAKES ME THINK "FAIR" LMFAO  

50% CHANCE? ~ SUUUUURE

Its actually 49.5% chance.

Just sayin'.

you know what i'm saying ! lol ..back to back streaks of 9+ losses don't add up to "fair" anyway you slice it  buck-o! :\

[xfactorx]

HITTING BACK TO BACK LOSS STREAKS 9+ REALLY MAKES ME THINK "FAIR" LMFAO  

50% CHANCE? ~ SUUUUURE

Its actually 49.5% chance.

Just sayin'.

you know what i'm saying ! lol ..back to back streaks of 9+ losses don't add up to "fair" anyway you slice it  buck-o! :\

Cheer up, so far I have hit a 19 loss streak, a 20 loss streak and have just found out some of my rolls were supposed to wins but incorrectly went down as losses. Amazing this 'overlooked flaw' seemed to be in PD's favour... interesting that..

[Brah]

HITTING BACK TO BACK LOSS STREAKS 9+ REALLY MAKES ME THINK "FAIR" LMFAO  

50% CHANCE? ~ SUUUUURE

Its actually 49.5% chance.

Just sayin'.

you know what i'm saying ! lol ..back to back streaks of 9+ losses don't add up to "fair" anyway you slice it  buck-o! :\

Check out what "provably fair" is. Ive seen a 30 red streak. Its just luck. Its not literally 1/2 bets will win if you do 2x lmfao

HITTING BACK TO BACK LOSS STREAKS 9+ REALLY MAKES ME THINK "FAIR" LMFAO  

50% CHANCE? ~ SUUUUURE

Its actually 49.5% chance.

Just sayin'.

you know what i'm saying ! lol ..back to back streaks of 9+ losses don't add up to "fair" anyway you slice it  buck-o! :\

Cheer up, so far I have hit a 19 loss streak, a 20 loss streak and have just found out some of my rolls were supposed to wins but incorrectly went down as losses. Amazing this 'overlooked flaw' seemed to be in PD's favour... interesting that..

Well, if theres a database of the bets to prove which rolls would've been wins, I think a refund is somewhat fair for those losses. But if those bets you doubled on we're based of a losing starting bet then anh.

[BBmmBB]

HITTING BACK TO BACK LOSS STREAKS 9+ REALLY MAKES ME THINK "FAIR" LMFAO  

50% CHANCE? ~ SUUUUURE

Its actually 49.5% chance.

Just sayin'.

you know what i'm saying ! lol ..back to back streaks of 9+ losses don't add up to "fair" anyway you slice it  buck-o! :\

Cheer up, so far I have hit a 19 loss streak, a 20 loss streak and have just found out some of my rolls were supposed to wins but incorrectly went down as losses. Amazing this 'overlooked flaw' seemed to be in PD's favour... interesting that..

how much did you lose to the bug? :\

[Minnlo]

HITTING BACK TO BACK LOSS STREAKS 9+ REALLY MAKES ME THINK "FAIR" LMFAO 

50% CHANCE? ~ SUUUUURE

Its actually 49.5% chance.

Just sayin'.

you know what i'm saying ! lol ..back to back streaks of 9+ losses don't add up to "fair" anyway you slice it  buck-o! :\

Try tossing your coin for 10 times to see if you will get 5 heads and 5 tails exactly.
Or try rolling an actual dice for 12 times to see if you will get each outcome exactly twice.

I mean, the losing streaks does not really prove the game is not fair.

[xfactorx]

HITTING BACK TO BACK LOSS STREAKS 9+ REALLY MAKES ME THINK "FAIR" LMFAO  

50% CHANCE? ~ SUUUUURE

Its actually 49.5% chance.

Just sayin'.

you know what i'm saying ! lol ..back to back streaks of 9+ losses don't add up to "fair" anyway you slice it  buck-o! :\

Check out what "provably fair" is. Ive seen a 30 red streak. Its just luck. Its not literally 1/2 bets will win if you do 2x lmfao


"Ive seen a 30 red streak. Its just luck. Its not literally 1/2 bets will win if you do 2x lmfao"

You've 'seen' a 30 red streak... not literally 1/2... this guy is on PD all the time and clearly a troll hired to run to their defense with these lame arguments.  If you had a 30 loss streak Brah and not suspicious at all and ooh it's just luck then you make me even more suspicious for spewing such garbage. A 30 loss streak is more than 1/billion so perhaps you should are a little naive my friend. If I had a 30 loss streak I would be dubious. Im sure most people would. But you seem happy to sit at home defending PD all day even though you had a 30 loss streak and in a rather negative balance. Just luck please come to these arguments with something more that rhetoric defense. We are men talking about money here brah, not some guy living at his moms house wagering faucet all day

HITTING BACK TO BACK LOSS STREAKS 9+ REALLY MAKES ME THINK "FAIR" LMFAO  

50% CHANCE? ~ SUUUUURE

Its actually 49.5% chance.

Just sayin'.

you know what i'm saying ! lol ..back to back streaks of 9+ losses don't add up to "fair" anyway you slice it  buck-o! :\

Cheer up, so far I have hit a 19 loss streak, a 20 loss streak and have just found out some of my rolls were supposed to wins but incorrectly went down as losses. Amazing this 'overlooked flaw' seemed to be in PD's favour... interesting that..

Well, if theres a database of the bets to prove which rolls would've been wins, I think a refund is somewhat fair for those losses. But if those bets you doubled on we're based of a losing starting bet then anh.

[BBmmBB]

Check out what "provably fair" is. Ive seen a 30 red streak. Its just luck. Its not literally 1/2 bets will win if you do 2x lmfao

well it's very deceptive to say 49% or whatever when the game is suppose to be completely random and uncalibrated at best..more likely purposefully rigged whereas the operator controls the outcome! :\

[BBmmBB]

HITTING BACK TO BACK LOSS STREAKS 9+ REALLY MAKES ME THINK "FAIR" LMFAO 

50% CHANCE? ~ SUUUUURE

Its actually 49.5% chance.

Just sayin'.

you know what i'm saying ! lol ..back to back streaks of 9+ losses don't add up to "fair" anyway you slice it  buck-o! :\

Try tossing your coin for 10 times to see if you will get 5 heads and 5 tails exactly.
Or try rolling an actual dice for 12 times to see if you will get each outcome exactly twice.

I mean, the losing streaks does not really prove the game is not fair.

fool ..when you start winning big and the game starts "streaking out" you can just tell there is something not right about that when you start seeing back to back 10+ streaks when you start betting up ...not to mention the glitches!!! 

[Brah]

HITTING BACK TO BACK LOSS STREAKS 9+ REALLY MAKES ME THINK "FAIR" LMFAO  

50% CHANCE? ~ SUUUUURE

Its actually 49.5% chance.

Just sayin'.

you know what i'm saying ! lol ..back to back streaks of 9+ losses don't add up to "fair" anyway you slice it  buck-o! :\

Check out what "provably fair" is. Ive seen a 30 red streak. Its just luck. Its not literally 1/2 bets will win if you do 2x lmfao


"Ive seen a 30 red streak. Its just luck. Its not literally 1/2 bets will win if you do 2x lmfao"

You've 'seen' a 30 red streak... not literally 1/2... this guy is on PD all the time and clearly a troll hired to run to their defense with these lame arguments.  If you had a 30 loss streak Brah and not suspicious at all and ooh it's just luck then you make me even more suspicious for spewing such garbage. A 30 loss streak is more than 1/billion so perhaps you should are a little naive my friend. If I had a 30 loss streak I would be dubious. Im sure most people would. But you seem happy to sit at home defending PD all day even though you had a 30 loss streak and in a rather negative balance. Just luck please come to these arguments with something more that rhetoric defense. We are men talking about money here brah, not some guy living at his moms house wagering faucet all day

HITTING BACK TO BACK LOSS STREAKS 9+ REALLY MAKES ME THINK "FAIR" LMFAO  

50% CHANCE? ~ SUUUUURE

Its actually 49.5% chance.

Just sayin'.

you know what i'm saying ! lol ..back to back streaks of 9+ losses don't add up to "fair" anyway you slice it  buck-o! :\

Cheer up, so far I have hit a 19 loss streak, a 20 loss streak and have just found out some of my rolls were supposed to wins but incorrectly went down as losses. Amazing this 'overlooked flaw' seemed to be in PD's favour... interesting that..

Well, if theres a database of the bets to prove which rolls would've been wins, I think a refund is somewhat fair for those losses. But if those bets you doubled on we're based of a losing starting bet then anh.

Check out what "provably fair" is. Ive seen a 30 red streak. Its just luck. Its not literally 1/2 bets will win if you do 2x lmfao

well it's very deceptive to say 49% or whatever when the game is suppose to be completely random and uncalibrated at best..more likely purposefully rigged whereas the operator controls the outcome! :\

Again please read provably fair. Also the coin toss comment


@xfactor lol Well you need to learn about probabilities and test out flipping a coin 10000.

The site is legit and I'm not here to defend PD blindly. It just idiots like you guys who know nothing and bitch about losing a few bets. I get you lost a lot with because you ended doubling but the only refunds that should be given are those in which the roll number got a loss when it was in fact a win, so unless it applies to your doubled bets I don't see you getting a full refund for gambling.

Get off your high horse buddy, men dont cry like you guys.

HITTING BACK TO BACK LOSS STREAKS 9+ REALLY MAKES ME THINK "FAIR" LMFAO 

50% CHANCE? ~ SUUUUURE

Its actually 49.5% chance.

Just sayin'.

you know what i'm saying ! lol ..back to back streaks of 9+ losses don't add up to "fair" anyway you slice it  buck-o! :\

Try tossing your coin for 10 times to see if you will get 5 heads and 5 tails exactly.
Or try rolling an actual dice for 12 times to see if you will get each outcome exactly twice.

I mean, the losing streaks does not really prove the game is not fair.

fool ..when you start winning big and the game starts "streaking out" you can just tell there is something not right about that when you start seeing back to back 10+ streaks when you start betting up ...not to mention the glitches!!! 

Lol at least read up on how gambling sites work. Rolls are predetermined. Too many kids keep coming onto gambling sites thinknig they'll win 2x bets 50%+ of the time when they barely started playing a few rolls. the statistic is not out of 2 rols, 10 rolls, etc It out of 1k or 10k I forget.

You also have to stay on one side (over or under) and 2x all the way otherwise its different % of winning =3

[snarlpill]

fool ..when you start winning big and the game starts "streaking out" you can just tell there is something not right about that when you start seeing back to back 10+ streaks when you start betting up ...not to mention the glitches!!! 

So you had been winning big? So you must have had some pretty good winning streaks then huh? Do you think winning all of those times in a row on win streaks should be checked out or is rigged? It is variance man. In long sessions of bets you will usually have good winning streaks, losing streaks, and everything in between. Sounds like you should have cashed out when you were up winning big...  And did you verify your bets? What did you see when you checked them? Let me know.