Primedice.com | Since 2013 | Longest Running Crypto Casino | 113 BTC Jackpot!

[Bit_Happy]

PD3 deposits are "broken" again,
...they were OK a few hours ago.

Let me test it . I just deposited.

FYI: I just edited my post, it went through... just not "instant" after 1 confirmation. 

[MICRO]

PD3 deposits are "broken" again,
...they were OK a few hours ago.

Let me test it . I just deposited.

FYI: I just edited my post, it went through... just not "instant" after 1 confirmation. 

Ah kk, didn't see that edit.

[waterpile]

The admin at 999dice.com gave me .07 for free because my withdraws got bugged on the site.   The only thing primedice admins have given  is agony from muting me for defending myself.  FUck all you primedice admins except maybe hui.  I think he is the only admin who didnt mute me and if you did fuck you too! hahaha!


I'm playing at 999dice.com from now on, peace you elitist fucks!

"Elitist" "NutHugger"
Man you're a real piece of work.

As you can see, he's full of himself and on a high horse. He never "defended" himself, just attacked me and accused PD of being a scam/rigged. He only went into chat to complain, flame, or boast about his "mathematical method" that cost him around .9 BTC in the start.

Don't pay attention to these types of kids newcomers. =3

Still glad you broke even.

He just keeps on trolling. Just ignore him.

I already did long time ago but i see his posts in quotes .

Btw , we are not Admins we are just mods.

So you admit you are worthless, yet you abuse the only power you have? Fucking sad.  Why do you even exist?

you sir, are trolling to the highest level you can, don't be a sad loser gambler

[rfisher1968]

Anybody, I don't want to mess around with the API and get my IP blocked.

Question about the api for primedice. This is listed on the top of https://primedice.com/api

"The primedice API provides low-level access to functions available on the website. Authentication is done by adding a paramter to the url. Here is an example of an authenticated URL query:
https://api.primedice.com/api/users/1?access_token=abc123

The access token can be found on login or register."

I can't find the access token on any page or am I missing it somewhere.

Looking to make a PHP curl script.

[xfactorx]

While it is very nice that PD is paying back bets that were incorrect, my issue is this; if those bets were right and I had one, then I would not have gone on to make the next bet to double up and then lose. Altogether this is a mess. I believe I should be entitled to all my losses on PD2 since the game and my flow was fundamentally altered by PD's error. Does anyone agree on this?

[Brah]

While it is very nice that PD is paying back bets that were incorrect, my issue is this; if those bets were right and I had one, then I would not have gone on to make the next bet to double up and then lose. Altogether this is a mess. I believe I should be entitled to all my losses on PD2 since the game and my flow was fundamentally altered by PD's error. Does anyone agree on this?

Lol nope. 

[MICRO]

While it is very nice that PD is paying back bets that were incorrect, my issue is this; if those bets were right and I had one, then I would not have gone on to make the next bet to double up and then lose. Altogether this is a mess. I believe I should be entitled to all my losses on PD2 since the game and my flow was fundamentally altered by PD's error. Does anyone agree on this?

Ur game flow was fundamentally altered by 1.05% house edge instead of 1% ? U would bet differently if u known its 1.05% ?
Maybe, but its impossible to know/prove , and impossible to go back in time .

All it can be done is payout that bets that ware affected by that extra 0.05% that we didn't know of .

[grux]

Anybody, I don't want to mess around with the API and get my IP blocked.

Question about the api for primedice. This is listed on the top of https://primedice.com/api

"The primedice API provides low-level access to functions available on the website. Authentication is done by adding a paramter to the url. Here is an example of an authenticated URL query:
https://api.primedice.com/api/users/1?access_token=abc123

The access token can be found on login or register."

I can't find the access token on any page or am I missing it somewhere.

Looking to make a PHP curl script.

This token can be found by right clicking and inspecting element to open up the dev console, clicking on the resources tab, going to local storage on the list, and opening https://primedice.com. It is then the value next to the word token.

[xfactorx]

While it is very nice that PD is paying back bets that were incorrect, my issue is this; if those bets were right and I had one, then I would not have gone on to make the next bet to double up and then lose. Altogether this is a mess. I believe I should be entitled to all my losses on PD2 since the game and my flow was fundamentally altered by PD's error. Does anyone agree on this?

Ur game flow was fundamentally altered by 1.05% house edge instead of 1% ? U would bet differently if u known its 1.05% ?
Maybe, but its impossible to know/prove , and impossible to go back in time .

All it can be done is payout that bets that ware affected by that extra 0.05% that we didn't know of .

Um, yes Mirco that is exactly what I am saying. Does it not make sense or something? If I had not lost a .001 bet which was 45.5 then I would not have gone on to double my bet and lose an additional .002 -in other words if I had won the entire streak would have been different and may not have killed me

[xfactorx]

While it is very nice that PD is paying back bets that were incorrect, my issue is this; if those bets were right and I had one, then I would not have gone on to make the next bet to double up and then lose. Altogether this is a mess. I believe I should be entitled to all my losses on PD2 since the game and my flow was fundamentally altered by PD's error. Does anyone agree on this?

Lol nope. 

Interesting that a user who is always on PD like its going out of fashion and clearly loves to defend the site does not agree... You dont agree that someone who has been the victim of inconsistent and WRONG / FALSE rolls should be entitled to a claim? Ha! Anyway, you can have your opinion. Next opinion please.

[Brah]

While it is very nice that PD is paying back bets that were incorrect, my issue is this; if those bets were right and I had one, then I would not have gone on to make the next bet to double up and then lose. Altogether this is a mess. I believe I should be entitled to all my losses on PD2 since the game and my flow was fundamentally altered by PD's error. Does anyone agree on this?

Lol nope.  

Interesting that a user who is always on PD like its going out of fashion and clearly loves to defend the site does not agree... You dont agree that someone who has been the victim of inconsistent and WRONG / FALSE rolls should be entitled to a claim? Ha! Anyway, you can have your opinion. Next opinion please.

I just don't see how its fair to refund losses for this. So basically you only want people to agree with you otherwise you'll attack them? =3


EDIT: Maybe if the doubled rolls we're affects by it specifically by the roll number as well then yeah otherwise no. But I dont think thats the case. the rest we're fair rolls, you chose to double.

[galbros]

While it is very nice that PD is paying back bets that were incorrect, my issue is this; if those bets were right and I had one, then I would not have gone on to make the next bet to double up and then lose. Altogether this is a mess. I believe I should be entitled to all my losses on PD2 since the game and my flow was fundamentally altered by PD's error. Does anyone agree on this?

Sorry, no.  I agree it was a serious flaw though.  However, Stunna is being very open about trying to fix it.

I don't blame you for trying to reclaim all your losses but I don't think this angle has much merit. 

Good Luck.

[xfactorx]

While it is very nice that PD is paying back bets that were incorrect, my issue is this; if those bets were right and I had one, then I would not have gone on to make the next bet to double up and then lose. Altogether this is a mess. I believe I should be entitled to all my losses on PD2 since the game and my flow was fundamentally altered by PD's error. Does anyone agree on this?

Lol nope.  

Interesting that a user who is always on PD like its going out of fashion and clearly loves to defend the site does not agree... You dont agree that someone who has been the victim of inconsistent and WRONG / FALSE rolls should be entitled to a claim? Ha! Anyway, you can have your opinion. Next opinion please.

I just don't see how its fair to refund losses for this. So basically you only want people to agree with you otherwise you'll attack them? =3


EDIT: Maybe if the doubled rolls we're affects by it specifically by the roll number as well then yeah otherwise no. But I dont think thats the case. the rest we're fair rolls, you chose to double.

Well, don't mean to attack Brah, but I am talking about some real money here and I was under the impression this was a 'provably fair' site but now I am learning that I have lost certain rolls because of some 'flaw'. Jesus christ.. If I never happened to stumble on this page I would have never known.

Also, the doubled rolls were already affected because I would never had doubled if I never lost the bet. Perhaps I lost and doubled again 2/3 times and lost 1btc -does this sound fair to you? Why are you defending PD when it is clear the FUCKED UP mate -excuse the french but this is what it boils down to. When you want to claim to be the worlds best bitcoin gambling site then expect some flack from people who has gambled some hard money on the site to later find they have been duped.

[BBmmBB]

HITTING BACK TO BACK LOSS STREAKS 9+ REALLY MAKES ME THINK "FAIR" LMFAO  

50% CHANCE? ~ SUUUUURE

[nahtnam]

HITTING BACK TO BACK LOSS STREAKS 9+ REALLY MAKES ME THINK "FAIR" LMFAO  

50% CHANCE? ~ SUUUUURE

Its actually 49.5% chance.

Just sayin'.

[BBmmBB]

HITTING BACK TO BACK LOSS STREAKS 9+ REALLY MAKES ME THINK "FAIR" LMFAO  

50% CHANCE? ~ SUUUUURE

Its actually 49.5% chance.

Just sayin'.

you know what i'm saying ! lol ..back to back streaks of 9+ losses don't add up to "fair" anyway you slice it  buck-o! :\

[xfactorx]

HITTING BACK TO BACK LOSS STREAKS 9+ REALLY MAKES ME THINK "FAIR" LMFAO  

50% CHANCE? ~ SUUUUURE

Its actually 49.5% chance.

Just sayin'.

you know what i'm saying ! lol ..back to back streaks of 9+ losses don't add up to "fair" anyway you slice it  buck-o! :\

Cheer up, so far I have hit a 19 loss streak, a 20 loss streak and have just found out some of my rolls were supposed to wins but incorrectly went down as losses. Amazing this 'overlooked flaw' seemed to be in PD's favour... interesting that..

[Brah]

HITTING BACK TO BACK LOSS STREAKS 9+ REALLY MAKES ME THINK "FAIR" LMFAO  

50% CHANCE? ~ SUUUUURE

Its actually 49.5% chance.

Just sayin'.

you know what i'm saying ! lol ..back to back streaks of 9+ losses don't add up to "fair" anyway you slice it  buck-o! :\

Check out what "provably fair" is. Ive seen a 30 red streak. Its just luck. Its not literally 1/2 bets will win if you do 2x lmfao

HITTING BACK TO BACK LOSS STREAKS 9+ REALLY MAKES ME THINK "FAIR" LMFAO  

50% CHANCE? ~ SUUUUURE

Its actually 49.5% chance.

Just sayin'.

you know what i'm saying ! lol ..back to back streaks of 9+ losses don't add up to "fair" anyway you slice it  buck-o! :\

Cheer up, so far I have hit a 19 loss streak, a 20 loss streak and have just found out some of my rolls were supposed to wins but incorrectly went down as losses. Amazing this 'overlooked flaw' seemed to be in PD's favour... interesting that..

Well, if theres a database of the bets to prove which rolls would've been wins, I think a refund is somewhat fair for those losses. But if those bets you doubled on we're based of a losing starting bet then anh.

[BBmmBB]

HITTING BACK TO BACK LOSS STREAKS 9+ REALLY MAKES ME THINK "FAIR" LMFAO  

50% CHANCE? ~ SUUUUURE

Its actually 49.5% chance.

Just sayin'.

you know what i'm saying ! lol ..back to back streaks of 9+ losses don't add up to "fair" anyway you slice it  buck-o! :\

Cheer up, so far I have hit a 19 loss streak, a 20 loss streak and have just found out some of my rolls were supposed to wins but incorrectly went down as losses. Amazing this 'overlooked flaw' seemed to be in PD's favour... interesting that..

how much did you lose to the bug? :\

[Minnlo]

HITTING BACK TO BACK LOSS STREAKS 9+ REALLY MAKES ME THINK "FAIR" LMFAO 

50% CHANCE? ~ SUUUUURE

Its actually 49.5% chance.

Just sayin'.

you know what i'm saying ! lol ..back to back streaks of 9+ losses don't add up to "fair" anyway you slice it  buck-o! :\

Try tossing your coin for 10 times to see if you will get 5 heads and 5 tails exactly.
Or try rolling an actual dice for 12 times to see if you will get each outcome exactly twice.

I mean, the losing streaks does not really prove the game is not fair.