ang2
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 16
Merit: 0
|
|
September 24, 2018, 04:42:36 PM |
|
Hello, I have the following problem. I transferred 3300 bbp from one wallet to another but ./biblepay-cli getwalletinfo never shown my balance. It shows 80 bbp which was the balance before transfer. if you see here https://explorer.biblepay-central.org/address/B6qdMpj9CsCd9n4PXMmEZJS3DratUsS8pHyou can see the correct balance 3371.47375961 bbp. Any ideas? ./biblepay-cli getaddressesbyaccount "" shows this address (B6qdMpj9CsCd9n4PXMmEZJS3DratUsS8pH) between my addresses. Thanks
|
|
|
|
togoshigekata
|
|
September 24, 2018, 05:45:51 PM |
|
A billionaire could decide to drop a million dollars on buying BBP, and lets say he buys 300 masternodes and has ultimate control, the thing is, he is still bound by the free market, if this multi-millionaire upsets investors with his decisions and the BiblePay market goes down, his million dollars just lost value, the multi-millionaire is aligned by incentives/disincentives (money) to keep and grow the value of the project, now someone could come here to waste money to sabotage us but its going to be SUPER expensive to do so Understanding the BiblePay Masternode Governance and Budget System http://wiki.biblepay.org/UnderstandingGovernance"Masternode operators are not the only ones interested in the success of BiblePay, but they are the most stable ones because, unlike miners, they can’t reuse their asset for any other purpose or coin." "One advantage of this model is it can survive early adopters. If early masternode operators sell their coins, the new owner can set up a masternode and with it acquire the right to vote on the budgets and projects. This guarantees there is a working system of maintenance as people come and go, making the network capable of sustaining itself on its own without depending on specific actors." Id rather be led by people with money on the line, people who have a lot to lose and a lot to gain, good incentives and disincentives, then to be led by people who have little or no skin in the game and little incentives/disincentives
|
|
|
|
|
slovakia
|
|
September 24, 2018, 06:08:24 PM |
|
thanks for explorer,more ppl asked me about stake supply on CMC
togoshige CMC using for supply only 1 your explorer?
|
|
|
|
togoshigekata
|
|
September 24, 2018, 06:35:54 PM |
|
We were rejected again by Theymos, Head Bitcointalk Forum admin, for a banner ad spot. "Sorry, I'm still not convinced." https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5027613.msg46098258#msg46098258Investigation and Proof of BiblePay's Charity Donations: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5030640What more can we do? Other than recording myself calling Compassion, what else can I do? Do we need to hire a private investigator, an auditor? If we cant convince a smart guy like Theymos how can we convince others? Is something else going on here? Are we being discriminated against for being a religious coin? What else can we do?
|
|
|
|
macko20
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 89
Merit: 0
|
|
September 24, 2018, 06:37:28 PM |
|
"mint" who remembers mintpal. There, my 800dash went ... )
|
|
|
|
zthomasz
Member
Offline
Activity: 489
Merit: 12
|
|
September 24, 2018, 07:02:35 PM |
|
A billionaire could decide to drop a million dollars on buying BBP, and lets say he buys 300 masternodes and has ultimate control, the thing is, he is still bound by the free market, if this multi-millionaire upsets investors with his decisions and the BiblePay market goes down, his million dollars just lost value, the multi-millionaire is aligned by incentives/disincentives (money) to keep and grow the value of the project, now someone could come here to waste money to sabotage us but its going to be SUPER expensive to do so Understanding the BiblePay Masternode Governance and Budget System http://wiki.biblepay.org/UnderstandingGovernance"Masternode operators are not the only ones interested in the success of BiblePay, but they are the most stable ones because, unlike miners, they can’t reuse their asset for any other purpose or coin." "One advantage of this model is it can survive early adopters. If early masternode operators sell their coins, the new owner can set up a masternode and with it acquire the right to vote on the budgets and projects. This guarantees there is a working system of maintenance as people come and go, making the network capable of sustaining itself on its own without depending on specific actors." Id rather be led by people with money on the line, people who have a lot to lose and a lot to gain, good incentives and disincentives, then to be led by people who have little or no skin in the game and little incentives/disincentives Yes, skin in the game is good. Incentives are good. So is transparency. Securities regulators like the SEC and other government agencies will soon dramatically impact the crypto world, so we might as well be the first to implement best practices. Respectfully Togo, I don't agree that the whale-voting-rights issue will necessarily be solved by free-market forces. At current prices, any atheist bitcoin millionaire could likely make a profit and turn BBP into a joke by first becoming an MN whale, and then proposing/passing the launch of an online porn site where 10% of the profits from it are sent to help orphans. This would attract other investors who believe the idea is a valid money-maker from a free market perspective. So instead of losing money, the evil whale makes money off of the massive publicity generated by the shocking news of a Christian crypto-coin helping orphans by running a porn site. Imagine the amount of free PR. The whale doesn't have to worry about bad publicity personally as a result of his actions. He would be protected by the anonymity and lack of transparency that the current crypto environment gives him. In fact he could plant a few rumors suggesting that he wasn't involved at all, it was those hypocritical Christians doing what they always do. So instead of the investment being "expensive" for the evil whale, BBP becomes another lucrative income stream for him and his followers. There was a time when we were naive brothers, but now we have grown to accept the words of Christ ... "For the sons of this world are more shrewd in dealing with their own generation than the sons of light." "Look, I am sending you out like sheep among wolves. Therefore be as shrewd as snakes and as innocent as doves."
|
|
|
|
zthomasz
Member
Offline
Activity: 489
Merit: 12
|
|
September 24, 2018, 07:25:10 PM |
|
We were rejected again by Theymos, Head Bitcointalk Forum admin, for a banner ad spot. "Sorry, I'm still not convinced." https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5027613.msg46098258#msg46098258Investigation and Proof of BiblePay's Charity Donations: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5030640What more can we do? Other than recording myself calling Compassion, what else can I do? Do we need to hire a private investigator, an auditor? If we cant convince a smart guy like Theymos how can we convince others? Is something else going on here? Are we being discriminated against for being a religious coin? What else can we do? We can't convince someone who refuses to be convinced regardless of the facts. We don't really need a banner ad when there are so many other good alternatives. Once we've reached the objectives that Rob posted about today, we can probably get the interest of Trinity Broadcasting Network and/or the 700 Club. For now let's work on these objectives so the Christian TV networks will be more likely to cover us in a positive light.
|
|
|
|
togoshigekata
|
|
September 24, 2018, 07:30:15 PM Last edit: September 24, 2018, 09:08:35 PM by togoshigekata |
|
A billionaire could decide to drop a million dollars on buying BBP, and lets say he buys 300 masternodes and has ultimate control, the thing is, he is still bound by the free market, if this multi-millionaire upsets investors with his decisions and the BiblePay market goes down, his million dollars just lost value, the multi-millionaire is aligned by incentives/disincentives (money) to keep and grow the value of the project, now someone could come here to waste money to sabotage us but its going to be SUPER expensive to do so Understanding the BiblePay Masternode Governance and Budget System http://wiki.biblepay.org/UnderstandingGovernance"Masternode operators are not the only ones interested in the success of BiblePay, but they are the most stable ones because, unlike miners, they can’t reuse their asset for any other purpose or coin." "One advantage of this model is it can survive early adopters. If early masternode operators sell their coins, the new owner can set up a masternode and with it acquire the right to vote on the budgets and projects. This guarantees there is a working system of maintenance as people come and go, making the network capable of sustaining itself on its own without depending on specific actors." Id rather be led by people with money on the line, people who have a lot to lose and a lot to gain, good incentives and disincentives, then to be led by people who have little or no skin in the game and little incentives/disincentives Yes, skin in the game is good. Incentives are good. So is transparency. Securities regulators like the SEC and other government agencies will soon dramatically impact the crypto world, so we might as well be the first to implement best practices. Respectfully Togo, I don't agree that the whale-voting-rights issue will necessarily be solved by free-market forces. At current prices, any atheist bitcoin millionaire could likely make a profit and turn BBP into a joke by first becoming an MN whale, and then proposing/passing the launch of an online porn site where 10% of the profits from it are sent to help orphans. This would attract other investors who believe the idea is a valid money-maker from a free market perspective. So instead of losing money, the evil whale makes money off of the massive publicity generated by the shocking news of a Christian crypto-coin helping orphans by running a porn site. Imagine the amount of free PR. The whale doesn't have to worry about bad publicity personally as a result of his actions. He would be protected by the anonymity and lack of transparency that the current crypto environment gives him. In fact he could plant a few rumors suggesting that he wasn't involved at all, it was those hypocritical Christians doing what they always do. So instead of the investment being "expensive" for the evil whale, BBP becomes another lucrative income stream for him and his followers. There was a time when we were naive brothers, but now we have grown to accept the words of Christ ... "For the sons of this world are more shrewd in dealing with their own generation than the sons of light." "Look, I am sending you out like sheep among wolves. Therefore be as shrewd as snakes and as innocent as doves." I cant tell if Im misreading or not, does the Athiest millionaire own the porn site? or will just pass a proposal to work on a porn site? If he owns the porn site, and its PR for the porn site, BiblePay investors would probably sell to get away from this guy, how much is the pornsite PR (additional porn revenue) worth in loss of BBP coins? He will have to sell his BBP coins at a loss becauses investors left Even If he does or doesnt own the porn site and its PR for BiblePay and the PR works, the value of BiblePay increases and we all sell at a profit and we can start a new cryptocurrency now with each of us having even more money Overall, for someone to gain enough masternodes to have ultimate power, they would make us all profit when they buy them up, whether his ultimate plan works or not we make profit along the way, I dont think he could slowly amass enough, he has to buy a lot, it would really change the market dynamic, giant buy pressure This is all quite interesting to think about haha
|
|
|
|
sunk818
|
|
September 24, 2018, 08:01:56 PM |
|
So lets talk about brainstorming how to pay Compassion slices of USD from BBP/BTC legally without tax risk for the volunteer. Unless Compassion.com accepts crypto on their web site after selecting children, I don't really see how you can scale sponsorship to a specific child. Perhaps just giving to a general fund is the best you can do. Some ideas: 1) Get listed on Cryptopia. BBP/BTC is an obvious pair, but also BBP/TrueUSD as well: https://www.cryptopia.co.nz/Exchange?market=TUSD_BTCSell BBP for TrueUSD, Send TrueUSD to Compassion exchange account. They may need to send to Coinbase or Bittrex to withdraw to USD. I would think you could see BBP & TrueUSD txid, although exchanges are tricky that way sometimes... Also, receive quarterly donation statement and receive end of year tax report for how much was donated. The figure hopefully matches up and they provide breakouts in some way so you can match up donations. The proposal would be for the BBP you sold to TrueUSD. If the sponsorship is $38, sell $39 just to cover all the tx fees? 2) Ask Compassion to build a page for Coinbase Merchant where they can accept crypto directly. They can accept BTC and cash out whenever they want to fiat. They are responsible for accounting funds received as USD. Again exchange txes are tricky, but I'd think you could see how much BTC donated. I don't know if Coinbase has exchange rate API, but you could probably figure out how much BBP is correct for the time the donation was made? 3) Get listed on Faast: https://www.faa.st/swap/2?from=BTC&to=TUSD - Swap from BBP to TrueUSD. Send TrueUSD to Bittrex, and Compassion can withdraw. Pipe Dream:* Bittrex has an auto-sell feature. Send BBP (or any other Crypto) to Compassion Bittrex account. Auto-sells altcoins to BTC. Sell BTC to USD and withdraw. * Atomic swap on BBP wallet to TrueUSD. Be able to track the transaction of BBP & TrueUSD. Post as a proposal for BBP sold. Transaction can be independently verified. * If you have non-profit foundation, you could withdraw crypto to checking account. Bill pay to Compassion or any other charity. Use a bank API to show all transactions. Bank Of America has a read-only option, so anyone can see checking account activity. AidCoin may be helpful with Bank API and transparency design. We don't really need a banner ad when there are so many other good alternatives. Advertising has its place and does provide reach where other efforts can not. Togo & I are working on some advertising schemes on other networks that will be very low cost. Still, I do see the value in appropriate marketing and public relations. Marketing & Public Relations continue to pay off indefinitely, while advertising has limited shelf life.
|
|
|
|
|
bible_pay (OP)
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 1176
Merit: 215
Jesus is the King of Kings and Lord of Lords
|
|
September 24, 2018, 09:08:45 PM |
|
Hey everyone! Please vote on the proposal and le me know what you think. https://forum.biblepay.org/index.php?And Rob, please don't take this personally, I think a spokesperson would be good for us. And I think you should take your Hate group, along with yourself to a new community. Since you apparently don't like BiblePay - and are not forgiving, and are accusing, it's not Christian behavior. I'll take care of being spokeperson for now. And we don't need a project management system with huge amounts of overhead - I'll take care of project management.
|
|
|
|
bible_pay (OP)
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 1176
Merit: 215
Jesus is the King of Kings and Lord of Lords
|
|
September 24, 2018, 09:22:14 PM |
|
Hey everyone! Please vote on the proposal and le me know what you think. https://forum.biblepay.org/index.php?And Rob, please don't take this personally, I think a spokesperson would be good for us. And I think you should take your Hate group, along with yourself to a new community. Since you apparently don't like BiblePay - and are not forgiving, and are accusing, it's not Christian behavior. I'll take care of being spokeperson for now. And we don't need a project management system with huge amounts of overhead - I'll take care of project management. Sure dictator, and I'm not saying it in a bad way, it's the truth. LOL, thanks, but you are, its not Christian behavior, trying to fracture the community and attack the lead dev. Brilliant t-mike. Just keep posting your hate in your hate group thread, please. I'm pretty democratic. Everyone knows the deleted messages were deleted because they are trash, and don't represent the community well. And I'm not here to be your personal programmer, sorry, I report to God.
|
|
|
|
bible_pay (OP)
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 1176
Merit: 215
Jesus is the King of Kings and Lord of Lords
|
|
September 24, 2018, 09:24:49 PM |
|
Hey everyone! Please vote on the proposal and le me know what you think. https://forum.biblepay.org/index.php?And Rob, please don't take this personally, I think a spokesperson would be good for us. And I think you should take your Hate group, along with yourself to a new community. Since you apparently don't like BiblePay - and are not forgiving, and are accusing, it's not Christian behavior. I'll take care of being spokeperson for now. And we don't need a project management system with huge amounts of overhead - I'll take care of project management. I wish you would reconsider the removal of the poll. There are many people who love this project, and would like it to succeed. Opinions do not always align, but an open discussion is healthy. Having governance allows for this sort of discussion, but does mean an individual might not have their ideas come to fruition. Removing the poll, removing the discussion is the antithesis of decentralization so please reconsider your actions. No, the poll was worded in a way that we needed Rob to be a programmer only - and an actual spokeperson to represent the community. Not that we needed Rob to be one spokeperson of the coin, and a PR spokeperson to represent the community for PR. So please go back to your hate group and post your opinion with T-Mike and the rest, or start a poll on a non-biblepay forum. I think that some people here are ashamed that I posted about JESUS! Maybe thats it. Well Im not ashamed of JESUS.
|
|
|
|
macko20
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 89
Merit: 0
|
|
September 24, 2018, 09:30:37 PM |
|
You have just been sent a personal message by Bitcoin Forum on Bitcoin Forum.
IMPORTANT: Remember, this is just a notification. Please do not reply to this email.
The message they sent you was:
A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by the starter of a self-moderated topic. There are no rules of self-moderation, so this deletion cannot be appealed. Do not continue posting in this topic if the topic-starter has requested that you leave.
You can create a new topic if you are unsatisfied with this one. If the topic-starter is scamming, post about it in Scam Accusations.
Quote Quote from: bible_pay on Today at 09:08:45 PM Quote from: tmike on Today at 07:56:17 PM
it`s not good!!
|
|
|
|
zthomasz
Member
Offline
Activity: 489
Merit: 12
|
|
September 24, 2018, 09:47:46 PM |
|
A billionaire could decide to drop a million dollars on buying BBP, and lets say he buys 300 masternodes and has ultimate control, the thing is, he is still bound by the free market, if this multi-millionaire upsets investors with his decisions and the BiblePay market goes down, his million dollars just lost value, the multi-millionaire is aligned by incentives/disincentives (money) to keep and grow the value of the project, now someone could come here to waste money to sabotage us but its going to be SUPER expensive to do so Understanding the BiblePay Masternode Governance and Budget System http://wiki.biblepay.org/UnderstandingGovernance"Masternode operators are not the only ones interested in the success of BiblePay, but they are the most stable ones because, unlike miners, they can’t reuse their asset for any other purpose or coin." "One advantage of this model is it can survive early adopters. If early masternode operators sell their coins, the new owner can set up a masternode and with it acquire the right to vote on the budgets and projects. This guarantees there is a working system of maintenance as people come and go, making the network capable of sustaining itself on its own without depending on specific actors." Id rather be led by people with money on the line, people who have a lot to lose and a lot to gain, good incentives and disincentives, then to be led by people who have little or no skin in the game and little incentives/disincentives Yes, skin in the game is good. Incentives are good. So is transparency. Securities regulators like the SEC and other government agencies will soon dramatically impact the crypto world, so we might as well be the first to implement best practices. Respectfully Togo, I don't agree that the whale-voting-rights issue will necessarily be solved by free-market forces. At current prices, any atheist bitcoin millionaire could likely make a profit and turn BBP into a joke by first becoming an MN whale, and then proposing/passing the launch of an online porn site where 10% of the profits from it are sent to help orphans. This would attract other investors who believe the idea is a valid money-maker from a free market perspective. So instead of losing money, the evil whale makes money off of the massive publicity generated by the shocking news of a Christian crypto-coin helping orphans by running a porn site. Imagine the amount of free PR. The whale doesn't have to worry about bad publicity personally as a result of his actions. He would be protected by the anonymity and lack of transparency that the current crypto environment gives him. In fact he could plant a few rumors suggesting that he wasn't involved at all, it was those hypocritical Christians doing what they always do. So instead of the investment being "expensive" for the evil whale, BBP becomes another lucrative income stream for him and his followers. There was a time when we were naive brothers, but now we have grown to accept the words of Christ ... "For the sons of this world are more shrewd in dealing with their own generation than the sons of light." "Look, I am sending you out like sheep among wolves. Therefore be as shrewd as snakes and as innocent as doves." I cant tell if Im misreading or not, does the Athiest millionaire own the porn site? or will just pass a proposal to work on a porn site? If he owns the porn site, and its PR for the porn site, BiblePay investors would probably sell to get away from this guy, how much is the pornsite PR (additional porn revenue) worth in loss of BBP coins? He will have to sell his BBP coins at a loss becauses investors left If he doesnt own the porn site and its PR for BiblePay and the PR works, the value of BiblePay increases and we all sell at a profit and we can start a new cryptocurrency now with each of us having even more money This is all quite interesting to think about haha lol Togo, you're hilarious! Remember, this is hypothetical scenario. The point is that under the current MN system, an evil super whale could do whatever he wanted to do. That includes proposing/passing any deal he makes on the side regardless of who it's with, who owns it, etc. Of course I would suspect that many current BBP investors would consider selling to get away from this guy, which could temporarily lower the price depending on how quickly he spread the word about the "new" bbp. Maybe Theymos would sell him a banner to help with advertising. This is good versus evil. The dark novelty of the demented situation would appeal to anti-Christian interests the same way the satirical Jesus Coin does. The evil whale would only be in it for the short haul, so he pumps and dumps his way to financial gain. In this scenario he doesn't have to sell his coins, he chooses to sell them to the influx of anti-Christian buyers. Togo wrote: "If he doesnt own the porn site and its PR for BiblePay and the PR works, the value of BiblePay increases and we all sell at a profit and we can start a new cryptocurrency now with each of us having even more money"lol As Ben Franklin wrote, "An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure." None of this evil porn scenario will ever take place. Our community is under the guidance of the Lord, so we will unite in wisdom and implement reasonable mechanisms to prevent it.
|
|
|
|
zthomasz
Member
Offline
Activity: 489
Merit: 12
|
|
September 24, 2018, 10:48:21 PM |
|
If we don't figure out how to stop accusing and name-calling, God will humble us again, we'll have to repent again, ask for His forgiveness again, and then work thru the embarrassment again ... that's the way it goes.
All of you guys are smart and capable. You believe in Jesus or you wouldn't be here.
I suggest we slow it down a bit, pray for wisdom and show some humility.
If I can do it, I know you can.
|
|
|
|
bible_pay (OP)
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 1176
Merit: 215
Jesus is the King of Kings and Lord of Lords
|
|
September 25, 2018, 12:03:30 AM |
|
I'll enter a multiple choice proposal tomorrow morning with more detailed outcomes that might shine a little more light in a more accurate way than the previous poll.
|
|
|
|
bible_pay (OP)
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 1176
Merit: 215
Jesus is the King of Kings and Lord of Lords
|
|
September 25, 2018, 03:43:03 AM |
|
A billionaire could decide to drop a million dollars on buying BBP, and lets say he buys 300 masternodes and has ultimate control, the thing is, he is still bound by the free market, if this multi-millionaire upsets investors with his decisions and the BiblePay market goes down, his million dollars just lost value, the multi-millionaire is aligned by incentives/disincentives (money) to keep and grow the value of the project, now someone could come here to waste money to sabotage us but its going to be SUPER expensive to do so Understanding the BiblePay Masternode Governance and Budget System http://wiki.biblepay.org/UnderstandingGovernance"Masternode operators are not the only ones interested in the success of BiblePay, but they are the most stable ones because, unlike miners, they can’t reuse their asset for any other purpose or coin." "One advantage of this model is it can survive early adopters. If early masternode operators sell their coins, the new owner can set up a masternode and with it acquire the right to vote on the budgets and projects. This guarantees there is a working system of maintenance as people come and go, making the network capable of sustaining itself on its own without depending on specific actors." Id rather be led by people with money on the line, people who have a lot to lose and a lot to gain, good incentives and disincentives, then to be led by people who have little or no skin in the game and little incentives/disincentives Yes, skin in the game is good. Incentives are good. So is transparency. Securities regulators like the SEC and other government agencies will soon dramatically impact the crypto world, so we might as well be the first to implement best practices. Respectfully Togo, I don't agree that the whale-voting-rights issue will necessarily be solved by free-market forces. At current prices, any atheist bitcoin millionaire could likely make a profit and turn BBP into a joke by first becoming an MN whale, and then proposing/passing the launch of an online porn site where 10% of the profits from it are sent to help orphans. This would attract other investors who believe the idea is a valid money-maker from a free market perspective. So instead of losing money, the evil whale makes money off of the massive publicity generated by the shocking news of a Christian crypto-coin helping orphans by running a porn site. Imagine the amount of free PR. The whale doesn't have to worry about bad publicity personally as a result of his actions. He would be protected by the anonymity and lack of transparency that the current crypto environment gives him. In fact he could plant a few rumors suggesting that he wasn't involved at all, it was those hypocritical Christians doing what they always do. So instead of the investment being "expensive" for the evil whale, BBP becomes another lucrative income stream for him and his followers. There was a time when we were naive brothers, but now we have grown to accept the words of Christ ... "For the sons of this world are more shrewd in dealing with their own generation than the sons of light." "Look, I am sending you out like sheep among wolves. Therefore be as shrewd as snakes and as innocent as doves." I cant tell if Im misreading or not, does the Athiest millionaire own the porn site? or will just pass a proposal to work on a porn site? If he owns the porn site, and its PR for the porn site, BiblePay investors would probably sell to get away from this guy, how much is the pornsite PR (additional porn revenue) worth in loss of BBP coins? He will have to sell his BBP coins at a loss becauses investors left If he doesnt own the porn site and its PR for BiblePay and the PR works, the value of BiblePay increases and we all sell at a profit and we can start a new cryptocurrency now with each of us having even more money This is all quite interesting to think about haha lol Togo, you're hilarious! Remember, this is hypothetical scenario. The point is that under the current MN system, an evil super whale could do whatever he wanted to do. That includes proposing/passing any deal he makes on the side regardless of who it's with, who owns it, etc. Of course I would suspect that many current BBP investors would consider selling to get away from this guy, which could temporarily lower the price depending on how quickly he spread the word about the "new" bbp. Maybe Theymos would sell him a banner to help with advertising. This is good versus evil. The dark novelty of the demented situation would appeal to anti-Christian interests the same way the satirical Jesus Coin does. The evil whale would only be in it for the short haul, so he pumps and dumps his way to financial gain. In this scenario he doesn't have to sell his coins, he chooses to sell them to the influx of anti-Christian buyers. Togo wrote: "If he doesnt own the porn site and its PR for BiblePay and the PR works, the value of BiblePay increases and we all sell at a profit and we can start a new cryptocurrency now with each of us having even more money"lol As Ben Franklin wrote, "An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure." None of this evil porn scenario will ever take place. Our community is under the guidance of the Lord, so we will unite in wisdom and implement reasonable mechanisms to prevent it. A) The millionaire wouldn't be able to buy 51% of the masternodes on the open market, as the price would exponentially grow as they attempt to buy us out. B) I'm with Togo - the scenario doesn't make any sense. Maybe try to think of a better scenario.
|
|
|
|
|
|