icodestuff
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 44
Merit: 0
|
|
May 15, 2015, 12:56:04 AM Last edit: May 15, 2015, 01:19:07 AM by icodestuff |
|
It was a joke, a very good joke. I have never like pos coins. I do not want to leave my wallet open and unprotected for 3% to 6% per annum. Risk/reward is way out of line, for me.
Pos may become glc some day. But the best(most valuable) coins, remain to be pow if I am not mistaken....
Again I'll point out that your wallet is never unprotected with POS. You still have to input your passphrase when sending coins. You have the client running and connected to the network in order to generate new coins, thus making you a node and helping to secure the network; there's only a handful of GLC nodes active presently and this is not good. Also the most valuable coins are obviously POW as they are the longest running with associated infrastructure costs and actual use cases... but there's POS coins with million dollar market caps too. I'll reiterate some points from another of my posts on POS as well. The main issue people have with POS, especially 100% POS, is initial distribution being a key factor into who benefits. Globalcoin wouldn't be plagued by this as it's been distributed quite fairly through POW over the past two years. POS positives: 1. Helps to secure the network with lots of live nodes, in order to earn new coins through pos users must have their wallets running. 2. Allows people to obtain new coins without the need of expensive mining equipment or the technical knowledge. 3. As users are holding coins in their own wallets (for the sake of generating new coins) this decreases market saturation and dampens dumping fears. 4. Encourages a buyers mindset, the more coins you have the more coins you generate. 5. Reduces electricity usage that is often ridiculed as wastefulness, save the world greenpeace global warming and all that.
|
|
|
|
BitcoinNational
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1470
Merit: 1010
Join The Blockchain Revolution In Logistics
|
|
May 15, 2015, 01:08:50 AM |
|
It was a joke, a very good joke. I have never like pos coins. I do not want to leave my wallet open and unprotected for 3% to 6% per annum. Risk/reward is way out of line, for me.
Pos may become glc some day. But the best(most valuable) coins, remain to be pow if I am not mistaken....
Agree. POW has merit in the no need to stake, no need to unlock a wallet on an open machine. Global is in great position LONG term as in it can offer the comfort of POW without the high inflation for investors. And for users it is a great brand and fast coin. Even for day traders price peaks will still be reduced by miners rewards, this means just enough swing to keep short term traders interested in Global. Energy consumption point is moot if GLC goes MM. Then it is just piggy backing on Energy already being burned by LTCnet.
|
|
|
|
orco#2
|
|
May 15, 2015, 01:45:24 AM |
|
I like you people
|
|
|
|
muddafudda
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1008
Merit: 1022
|
|
May 15, 2015, 02:00:22 AM |
|
It's good to see productive chat.
|
|
|
|
icodestuff
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 44
Merit: 0
|
|
May 15, 2015, 02:10:05 AM Last edit: May 15, 2015, 03:16:18 AM by icodestuff |
|
Something needs to be done to secure the network, whether that be POS, AUXPOW or a hybrid system.
GLC has an extremely low network hashrate compared to the scrypt hashing power out there now. The threat of a 51% attack is very real. With daily trading volume often less than 1 BTC and very little buy support on exchanges I would say the only thing protecting GLC is that there's really no point in wasting time and money on such attacks.
If we introduce AUXPOW there's still somewhat of a hurdle and that's getting pools to include GLC. With POS security we'd only have to rely on GLC users having their wallets running to protect the network and with POS interest they have incentive to do so. There's also the hybrid POW+POS option, look at peercoin, diamond etc. In POW+POS case changing to an asic resistant algorithm like groestl may be a good idea?
|
|
|
|
BitcoinNational
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1470
Merit: 1010
Join The Blockchain Revolution In Logistics
|
|
May 15, 2015, 02:21:22 AM |
|
@icode I agree GLC needs to secure the network longterm. I can live with any of the 3 .. POS, AUXPOW or a hybrid system. But the assumption is that a solution is already in the works. And there is no need to worry about current hash power. GLC has excellent midfield hash scores among the Scrypt POW. Really are like 300 Scrypts running behind GLC in hash. When they start being picked off by 51% attacked then the alarm is sounded. AUXPOW is still my favorite. It takes GLC to the next level. Pool adoption is easy
|
|
|
|
muddafudda
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1008
Merit: 1022
|
|
May 15, 2015, 02:37:16 AM |
|
I am fairly confident to roll over to a POS coin, AUXPOW I haven't done before but looks not impossible to implement. At the moment the rewards for mining are just enough to keep us a little secure. 1 GHS can change that pretty quick though. As for an algo switch, it is only going to offer the same protection as the current POW unless its something like Scrypt Jane.
|
|
|
|
shveicar
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1414
Merit: 1013
DMD info: https://diamond-info.github.io/
|
|
May 15, 2015, 08:03:30 AM |
|
I am fairly confident to roll over to a POS coin, AUXPOW I haven't done before but looks not impossible to implement. At the moment the rewards for mining are just enough to keep us a little secure. 1 GHS can change that pretty quick though. As for an algo switch, it is only going to offer the same protection as the current POW unless its something like Scrypt Jane.
Ok, You can like it or hate POS, but the fact that this mechanism not only brings owner coins extra income, but also protects weak the network from a attack. Look at the power of the network GLC. Now she is very vulnerable. The arrival only one of a large miner with Asic miner device immediately cause the fork. How are you going to protect your network? each time will be releasing a new wallet?
|
|
|
|
muddafudda
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1008
Merit: 1022
|
|
May 15, 2015, 08:24:22 AM |
|
I am fairly confident to roll over to a POS coin, AUXPOW I haven't done before but looks not impossible to implement. At the moment the rewards for mining are just enough to keep us a little secure. 1 GHS can change that pretty quick though. As for an algo switch, it is only going to offer the same protection as the current POW unless its something like Scrypt Jane.
Ok, You can like it or hate POS, but the fact that this mechanism not only brings owner coins extra income, but also protects weak the network from a attack. Look at the power of the network GLC. Now she is very vulnerable. The arrival only one of a large miner with Asic miner device immediately cause the fork. How are you going to protect your network? each time will be releasing a new wallet? I have done a bit of work on POS. My suggestion would be POS, over an algo switch.
|
|
|
|
muddafudda
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1008
Merit: 1022
|
|
May 15, 2015, 08:25:59 AM |
|
I could roll GLC over to another maintain POS/Scrypt coin, which would be a quick and secure solution. I would love to hear other thoughts and possible reward structure.
|
|
|
|
shveicar
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1414
Merit: 1013
DMD info: https://diamond-info.github.io/
|
|
May 15, 2015, 08:47:10 AM |
|
I could roll GLC over to another maintain POS/Scrypt coin, which would be a quick and secure solution. I would love to hear other thoughts and possible reward structure.
I think that the basic regulations may be the: 1. The number of coins should remain unchanged (Total Coins: 70,000,000 ). 2. The best solution is to move to a different algorithm (possibly groestl or X11) 3. POS system should be 50% of the network capacity POW (This is a proven solution and it works best for the stability of networks) 4. Transaction speed can be divided into two parts between the POW and POS As regards remuneration POS in the time, it can diminish proportionally POW award. or even gradually shift towards the POS P.s But it is equally important to form a common team among the largest owners of GLC and people with skills of programming and web development
|
|
|
|
|
muddafudda
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1008
Merit: 1022
|
|
May 15, 2015, 01:49:08 PM |
|
Does anyone know who owns globalcoin.info?
|
|
|
|
orco#2
|
|
May 15, 2015, 02:24:38 PM |
|
Is me, I can cede control. You guys are better at this stuff than me. I also have facebook.com/globalcoin - twitter.com/globalcoin and reddit.com/u/MrGlobalcoin
There is also reddit.com/r/globalcoin which I do not control and is private. Not a huge deal.
|
|
|
|
CartmanSPC
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1270
Merit: 1000
|
|
May 15, 2015, 09:45:03 PM |
|
AUXPOW is still my favorite. It takes GLC to the next level. Pool adoption is easy Second I have also moved 7+Mh/s to GLC.
|
|
|
|
muddafudda
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1008
Merit: 1022
|
|
May 16, 2015, 02:38:34 PM |
|
AUXPOW is still my favorite. It takes GLC to the next level. Pool adoption is easy Second I have also moved 7+Mh/s to GLC. Yes getting a few orphans though still getting some payouts.
|
|
|
|
orco#2
|
|
May 16, 2015, 02:44:36 PM |
|
you guys want some glc, I will send some for supporting
|
|
|
|
muddafudda
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1008
Merit: 1022
|
|
May 16, 2015, 05:33:27 PM |
|
Is me, I can cede control. You guys are better at this stuff than me. I also have facebook.com/globalcoin - twitter.com/globalcoin and reddit.com/u/MrGlobalcoin
There is also reddit.com/r/globalcoin which I do not control and is private. Not a huge deal.
Cool I think basic are needed before we go changing the client. If we dont have a basic solid base to grow from there is no point going further. First the site, I can bang one up and a forum. I also own globalco.in. So if I set up hosting for globalcoin.info can you change the DNS to the nameservers and ill put up a site and forum, do you want to handle the site and forum or do you want to just redirect globalcoin.info to globalco.in ? Either way lets set up home properly first.
|
|
|
|
orco#2
|
|
May 16, 2015, 05:41:50 PM |
|
It does not matter, i will do whatever you want really
|
|
|
|
muddafudda
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1008
Merit: 1022
|
|
May 16, 2015, 06:02:47 PM |
|
Gloablcoin has survived as a method of funds transfer where 25 banks have failed with over 5 billion in assets.
Bank City State Date Acquired by Assets($m)
1 First Community Bank of South Florida Fort Myers Florida August 2, 2013 C1 Bank 265.7 2 Bank of Wausau Wausau Wisconsin August 9, 2013 Nicolet National Bank 43.6 3 Community South Bank Parsons Tennessee August 23, 2013 CB&S Bank, Inc. 386.9 4 Sunrise Bank of Arizona Phoenix Arizona August 23, 2013 First Fidelity Bank, National Association 202.2 5 The Community's Bank Bridgeport Connecticut September 13, 2013 None (insured depositors paid directly) 26.3 6 First National Bank, also operating as The National Bank of El Paso Edinburg Texas September 13, 2013 PlainsCapital Bank 3,100 7 Bank of Jackson County Graceville Florida October 30, 2013 First Federal Bank of Florida 25.5 8 Texas Community Bank, National Association The Woodlands Texas December 13, 2013 Spirit of Texas Bank, SSB 180.1 9 Dupage National Bank West Chicago Illinois January 17, 2014 Republic Bank of Chicago 61.7 10 The Bank of Union El Reno Oklahoma January 24, 2014 BancFirst 331.40 11 Syringa Bank Boise Idaho January 31, 2014 Sunwest Bank 153.40 12 Vantage Point Bank Horsham Pennsylvania February 28, 2014 First Choice Bank 63.5 13 Millennium Bank, National Association Sterling Virginia February 28, 2014 WashingtonFirst Bank 130.3 14 Allendale County Bank Fairfax South Carolina April 25, 2014 Palmetto State Bank 54.5 15 AztecAmerica Bank En Español Berwyn Illinois May 16, 2014 Republic Bank of Chicago 66.3 16 Columbia Savings Bank Cincinnati Ohio May 23, 2014 United Fidelity Bank, fsb 36.5 17 Slavie Federal Savings Bank Bel Air Maryland May 30, 2014 Bay Bank, FSB 140.1 18 Valley Bank Moline Illinois June 20, 2014 Great Southern Bank 456.4 19 Valley Bank Fort Lauderdale Florida June 20, 2014 Landmark Bank, National Association 81.8 20 The Freedom State Bank Freedom Oklahoma June 27, 2014 Alva State Bank & Trust Company 22.8 21 Eastside Commercial Bank Conyers Georgia July 18, 2014 Community & Southern Bank 169.0 22 GreenChoice Bank, fsb Chicago Illinois July 25, 2014 Providence Bank, LLC 72.9 23 NBRS Financial Rising Sun Maryland October 17, 2014 Howard Bank 188.2 24 The National Republic Bank of Chicago Chicago Illinois October 24, 2014 State Bank of Texas 954.4 25 Frontier Bank, FSB D/B/A El Paseo Bank Palm Desert California November 7, 2014 Bank of Southern California, N.A. 86.4
|
|
|
|
|