[PRE-ANN] Stone - DAG Data-Structured Private Cryptocurrency

[loremipsum]

I wasn't donating to this project, although I like the idea and the technical approach of Stone. I do not know if it is a scam or not but if it would be a scam the developer would have a lot of technical knowledge he is wasting. Then he should rather use it in a real good project instead of scamming people. This is why I am optimistic to this project.

Where did you see any technical knowledge? In fact, he avoided answering any technical questions.

[1714948911]

1714948911

[BitcoinArsenal]

I wasn't donating to this project, although I like the idea and the technical approach of Stone. I do not know if it is a scam or not but if it would be a scam the developer would have a lot of technical knowledge he is wasting. Then he should rather use it in a real good project instead of scamming people. This is why I am optimistic to this project.

Where did you see any technical knowledge? In fact, he avoided answering any technical questions.

I am not a techie. I read his post history concerning this thread and from my point of view he answered some technical question. Again I am not a tech guy but what he answered showed technical competence to me. Maybe I am wrong. Though, you are right he did not answer all the technical question clearly.

[dolores13]

I wasn't donating to this project, although I like the idea and the technical approach of Stone. I do not know if it is a scam or not but if it would be a scam the developer would have a lot of technical knowledge he is wasting. Then he should rather use it in a real good project instead of scamming people. This is why I am optimistic to this project.

Where did you see any technical knowledge? In fact, he avoided answering any technical questions.

I am not a techie. I read his post history concerning this thread and from my point of view he answered some technical question. Again I am not a tech guy but what he answered showed technical competence to me. Maybe I am wrong. Though, you are right he did not answer all the technical question clearly.

felixando censored tons of legit technical questions and that answers he probably copy past them from Wikipedia or from some websites related to crypto.

[StoneSoup]

I wasn't donating to this project, although I like the idea and the technical approach of Stone. I do not know if it is a scam or not but if it would be a scam the developer would have a lot of technical knowledge he is wasting. Then he should rather use it in a real good project instead of scamming people. This is why I am optimistic to this project.

Where did you see any technical knowledge? In fact, he avoided answering any technical questions.

I am not a techie. I read his post history concerning this thread and from my point of view he answered some technical question. Again I am not a tech guy but what he answered showed technical competence to me. Maybe I am wrong. Though, you are right he did not answer all the technical question clearly.

felixando censored tons of legit technical questions and that answers he probably copy past them from Wikipedia or from some websites related to crypto.

If you have actual evidence, then provide it. If not, you are just noise.

[dolores13]

I wasn't donating to this project, although I like the idea and the technical approach of Stone. I do not know if it is a scam or not but if it would be a scam the developer would have a lot of technical knowledge he is wasting. Then he should rather use it in a real good project instead of scamming people. This is why I am optimistic to this project.

Where did you see any technical knowledge? In fact, he avoided answering any technical questions.

I am not a techie. I read his post history concerning this thread and from my point of view he answered some technical question. Again I am not a tech guy but what he answered showed technical competence to me. Maybe I am wrong. Though, you are right he did not answer all the technical question clearly.

felixando censored tons of legit technical questions and that answers he probably copy past them from Wikipedia or from some websites related to crypto.

If you have actual evidence, then provide it. If not, you are just noise.

If you have actual evidence of existing Stone code , then provide it ,  If not, get lost from this thread.

[cryptopathshala]

I wasn't donating to this project, although I like the idea and the technical approach of Stone. I do not know if it is a scam or not but if it would be a scam the developer would have a lot of technical knowledge he is wasting. Then he should rather use it in a real good project instead of scamming people. This is why I am optimistic to this project.

Where did you see any technical knowledge? In fact, he avoided answering any technical questions.

I am not a techie. I read his post history concerning this thread and from my point of view he answered some technical question. Again I am not a tech guy but what he answered showed technical competence to me. Maybe I am wrong. Though, you are right he did not answer all the technical question clearly.

felixando censored tons of legit technical questions and that answers he probably copy past them from Wikipedia or from some websites related to crypto.

If you have actual evidence, then provide it. If not, you are just noise.

I clearly see split views and both are right at their place based on their crypto knowledge, so all i do is wait now to see how this project unfold and be ready to discuss who is right and who is wrong. Be careful.

[StoneSoup]

I wasn't donating to this project, although I like the idea and the technical approach of Stone. I do not know if it is a scam or not but if it would be a scam the developer would have a lot of technical knowledge he is wasting. Then he should rather use it in a real good project instead of scamming people. This is why I am optimistic to this project.

Where did you see any technical knowledge? In fact, he avoided answering any technical questions.

I am not a techie. I read his post history concerning this thread and from my point of view he answered some technical question. Again I am not a tech guy but what he answered showed technical competence to me. Maybe I am wrong. Though, you are right he did not answer all the technical question clearly.

felixando censored tons of legit technical questions and that answers he probably copy past them from Wikipedia or from some websites related to crypto.

If you have actual evidence, then provide it. If not, you are just noise.

If you have actual evidence of existing Stone code , then provide it ,  If not, get lost from this thread.

Oh grow up, I didn't make some stupid unsubstantiated claim - you did. As I said, you are just noise, noise should be moderated out of here so we can concentrate on the project.

[dolores13]

I wasn't donating to this project, although I like the idea and the technical approach of Stone. I do not know if it is a scam or not but if it would be a scam the developer would have a lot of technical knowledge he is wasting. Then he should rather use it in a real good project instead of scamming people. This is why I am optimistic to this project.

Where did you see any technical knowledge? In fact, he avoided answering any technical questions.

I am not a techie. I read his post history concerning this thread and from my point of view he answered some technical question. Again I am not a tech guy but what he answered showed technical competence to me. Maybe I am wrong. Though, you are right he did not answer all the technical question clearly.

felixando censored tons of legit technical questions and that answers he probably copy past them from Wikipedia or from some websites related to crypto.

If you have actual evidence, then provide it. If not, you are just noise.

If you have actual evidence of existing Stone code , then provide it ,  If not, get lost from this thread.

Oh grow up, I didn't make some stupid unsubstantiated claim - you did. As I said, you are just noise, noise should be moderated out of here so we can concentrate on the project.

LOL, ask felixando to share with some news about stone code so you can focus your attention on the project. BTW if you noticed he stopped censoring comments after he collected money from you.

[fonship]

Guys stop fighting, we old guns have seen many such things in crypto. Time will tell where it ends.
So wait and watch, as there is no point. If its a scam, no one can save anyone who wants to get scammed.
So lets see what happens next and enjoy the show :-)

[dolores13]

Guys stop fighting, we old guns have seen many such things in crypto. Time will tell where it ends.
So wait and watch, as there is no point. If its a scam, no one can save anyone who wants to get scammed.
So lets see what happens next and enjoy the show :-)

Agree , I will stop posting in this thread , we warned them from the very start but they didnt listen , still one option which is reporting felixando to the police if  he didnt delivered the product to donators.

[Elated]

Guys stop fighting, we old guns have seen many such things in crypto. Time will tell where it ends.
So wait and watch, as there is no point. If its a scam, no one can save anyone who wants to get scammed.
So lets see what happens next and enjoy the show :-)

+💯

[MrAhab]

I wasn't donating to this project, although I like the idea and the technical approach of Stone. I do not know if it is a scam or not but if it would be a scam the developer would have a lot of technical knowledge he is wasting. Then he should rather use it in a real good project instead of scamming people. This is why I am optimistic to this project.

Where did you see any technical knowledge? In fact, he avoided answering any technical questions.

I am not a techie. I read his post history concerning this thread and from my point of view he answered some technical question. Again I am not a tech guy but what he answered showed technical competence to me. Maybe I am wrong. Though, you are right he did not answer all the technical question clearly.

felixando censored tons of legit technical questions and that answers he probably copy past them from Wikipedia or from some websites related to crypto.

If you have actual evidence, then provide it. If not, you are just noise.

I found this...

One second...

https://imgur.com/a/UxUij

Here it is...

The code is the only thing that matters now....

[rapi]

When people will receive payment or reward, And whether pre ico is over?

[Yeuph]

When people will receive payment or reward, And whether pre ico is over?

Within the next 36 hours or so felixando is planning to begin distributing ERC-20 tokens.  The distribution will take place over 7 days.  So I guess currently about February 22nd would be like the last day that you should expect to get your ERC20 tokens.  Anything after that felixando got delayed somewhere.

Thats the current plan anyway.

[zaycc]

Felixando,

So that we can avoid some of the issues Nano has ran into I would like to suggest that a wallet be created for regular peer to peer users and a "exchange wallet" be created that creates a horizontal implementation of wallet addresses that are off the node and only send the raw blocks to node that are signed, so that we have no issues of orphaned blocks being resent (ie double tx node issues). Let's learn from raiblocks mess ups and build on that so ours does not suffer from the same pitfalls. If you would like me to go more in depth I will. Thanks!

There is nothing wrong with the RaiBlocks network / protocol. Bitgrail exchange got exploited because of poor coding.

Correct. But there's an issue specific to the raiblocks network / protocol that makes it difficult for exchanges to code proper wallets. My idea was suggesting that additional code piece be included in the "exchange wallet".

[StoneSoup]

And whether pre ico is over?

The donation period has ended. Tokens will be issued to those who donated. You may be able to buy tokens from some of the people who donated and received these tokens. If that is what you want to do, I suggest you make that clear here and maybe someone will contact you.

If anyone here no longer believes in this project and wants to get rid of their tokens, I am interested in acquiring some more for myself. PM me if you are interested in selling.

[derderder]

I wasn't donating to this project, although I like the idea and the technical approach of Stone. I do not know if it is a scam or not but if it would be a scam the developer would have a lot of technical knowledge he is wasting. Then he should rather use it in a real good project instead of scamming people. This is why I am optimistic to this project.

Where did you see any technical knowledge? In fact, he avoided answering any technical questions.

I am not a techie. I read his post history concerning this thread and from my point of view he answered some technical question. Again I am not a tech guy but what he answered showed technical competence to me. Maybe I am wrong. Though, you are right he did not answer all the technical question clearly.

felixando censored tons of legit technical questions and that answers he probably copy past them from Wikipedia or from some websites related to crypto.

If you have actual evidence, then provide it. If not, you are just noise.

Here ya go: https://streamable.com/crjw1

[Islapdonkey]

I wasn't donating to this project, although I like the idea and the technical approach of Stone. I do not know if it is a scam or not but if it would be a scam the developer would have a lot of technical knowledge he is wasting. Then he should rather use it in a real good project instead of scamming people. This is why I am optimistic to this project.

Where did you see any technical knowledge? In fact, he avoided answering any technical questions.

I am not a techie. I read his post history concerning this thread and from my point of view he answered some technical question. Again I am not a tech guy but what he answered showed technical competence to me. Maybe I am wrong. Though, you are right he did not answer all the technical question clearly.

felixando censored tons of legit technical questions and that answers he probably copy past them from Wikipedia or from some websites related to crypto.

If you have actual evidence, then provide it. If not, you are just noise.

Here ya go: https://streamable.com/crjw1

Well, Mr Stone he just gave you the proof. So... let see what Bs you will cough up to weasel out of it. By the way, everyone also seem to forgotten that this fool posted a link that he already applied to binance. I wonder how he pulled that one of with no fucking code. Feel bad for this newbies cos i see the same shit on BCC channel, ppl holding on dearly to a dream rather than accepting that they fucked up

[Yeuph]

I wasn't donating to this project, although I like the idea and the technical approach of Stone. I do not know if it is a scam or not but if it would be a scam the developer would have a lot of technical knowledge he is wasting. Then he should rather use it in a real good project instead of scamming people. This is why I am optimistic to this project.

Where did you see any technical knowledge? In fact, he avoided answering any technical questions.

I am not a techie. I read his post history concerning this thread and from my point of view he answered some technical question. Again I am not a tech guy but what he answered showed technical competence to me. Maybe I am wrong. Though, you are right he did not answer all the technical question clearly.

felixando censored tons of legit technical questions and that answers he probably copy past them from Wikipedia or from some websites related to crypto.

If you have actual evidence, then provide it. If not, you are just noise.

Here ya go: https://streamable.com/crjw1

Well, Mr Stone he just gave you the proof. So... let see what Bs you will cough up to weasel out of it. By the way, everyone also seem to forgotten that this fool posted a link that he already applied to binance. I wonder how he pulled that one of with no fucking code. Feel bad for this newbies cos i see the same shit on BCC channel, ppl holding on dearly to a dream rather than accepting that they fucked up

I'm not really sure why people are still coming here to attack the project.   Donations are closed - people that donated donated.  Basic logic shows you that since donations are closed and the dev is still around that the chance of it being a scam is several orders of magnitude less.  "Ohhh but he is trying to let you guys down slow."  lmao, what?

So look there is this thing called "Citing information".  When you "Cite Information" like felixando did you can use that information - even legally - within your own context - as he did.  People cite information all the fucking time; however when felixando cites information (intentionally showing us that it wasn't his writing or work) all of the sudden ***EEETS A SCAAAAAM***

Dude just let it go.  Let the ERC-20 tokens roll out and hope for the community's sake that you're wrong and you've been wrong.  Everyone here can make their own decisions on risks that they want to take.  Just let it go.  Let us take our risks.  I mean it would be one thing if there was actually *one* shred of evidence that this was a scam; however in the 2 months or so that people have been attacking this project the best evidence they could come up with is "I think this sounds vaguely similar to some other guy that once did some other thing - scam scam scam!" *yawn*  g'nite

[BKCCI]

References:
RaiBlocks Announcement: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1381323.0
RaiBlocks whitepaper: https://raiblocks.net/media/RaiBlocks_Whitepaper.pdf
zkSNARKs: https://blog.ethereum.org/2016/12/05/zksnarks-in-a-nutshell/
Bitcoin: https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf
DAG: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transitive_reduction

Page 1, first post. It is called referencing.

No matter what we are up to here, there is simply no need to discuss all the "what ifs". Just follow (or if you don't give a shit, simply don't) what's happening. If it's a scam we will find out, if it's not a scam we will find out too. Everybody had the same information base given by felixando, some decided to chip in, some decided not to. That's it.