[ANN] profit switching auto-exchanging pool - www.middlecoin.com

[zSprawl]

Aww small loss on unexchanged. I (like everyone) was hoping for a little better, but when the red line goes up less than the blue goes down, we didn't do as well. This is normal of course, and I'm not complaining, but I find it all intriguing.

[zSprawl]

See people all come good in the end, unexchanged nearly all gone.

If we were sitting on Doge none of you are going to complain after its 50% price increase in the last 24 hours.

I suspect you are correct. We were sitting on a ton of DOGE just hoping it would bounce back at least some... and it did.

[mikeybit]

Doge just had a huge spike and our unexchanged still took a haircut.  That's really interesting....

[falsealarm_bf]

Aww small loss on unexchanged. I (like everyone) was hoping for a little better, but when the red line goes up less than the blue goes down, we didn't do as well. This is normal of course, and I'm not complaining, but I find it all intriguing.

In my case it was roughly a loss of 50% as the unexchanged went from 0.17BTC to 0.05BTC while the exchanged went up by only about 0.06BTC. Disappointing conversion rate however still the eventual payment will be the highest in weeks.

[kangster_]

around 50 btc was just exchanged in an instant, yet the price also exploded. Is the middlepool owner colluding with someone and just hid the sell within the 60btc buy?

[Gaalahaad]

My 1.5 KH/s earns me about $20 a day here. The same power at LTC earns me $9. Seems legit to me.

Over the last 3 days I've got an average of ~0.0178 BTC per day. At today's rate that's ~$15/day, with 1.8Mh/s (about 1.3% rejects).
Would you mind sharing your address? I would like to see the difference in the patterns, if any?

[zSprawl]

My 1.5 KH/s earns me about $20 a day here. The same power at LTC earns me $9. Seems legit to me.

Over the last 3 days I've got an average of ~0.0178 BTC per day. At today's rate that's ~$15/day, with 1.8Mh/s (about 1.3% rejects).
Would you mind sharing your address? I would like to see the difference in the patterns, if any?

Sorry the latest graph is only the last few days, and I've been running with one computer broken, so my graph won't be useful.

[neofatalist]

around 50 btc was just exchanged in an instant, yet the price also exploded. Is the middlepool owner colluding with someone and just hid the sell within the 60btc buy?

Thats a possibility but without any evidence all you are contributing is FUD. Not exactly productive or constructive.

[neofatalist]

Doge just had a huge spike and our unexchanged still took a haircut.  That's really interesting....

H20, we would love a little bit more feedback if possible.

[noegzit]

Aww small loss on unexchanged. I (like everyone) was hoping for a little better, but when the red line goes up less than the blue goes down, we didn't do as well. This is normal of course, and I'm not complaining, but I find it all intriguing.

In my case it was roughly a loss of 50% as the unexchanged went from 0.17BTC to 0.05BTC while the exchanged went up by only about 0.06BTC. Disappointing conversion rate however still the eventual payment will be the highest in weeks.

no lost for me  when my  unexchanged dropped from 0.066 to 0.022 / I got a little more than 0.07 today - my second highest day in 2 weeks here.

My mean is 0.045/day with 4.4 MH/s  (with some maintenance on my rigs and connection issues I was probably, on average, more around 4 MH/s during these 2 weeks)
It's far better than what I earned mining litecoins only and much simpler than exchanging myself the coins mined on different pools.

Till the first day I'm happy to mine here.

[youngmathimus]

Us east server seems to be down.

[caution]

It's SO OBVIOUS that H2O just stole a bunch of coins, but his plan is to let unexchanged build up a couple days so then even after he steals coins, people still thank him for big pay day. Your pay day should be much larger today if he didn't steal.

 That way nobody complains and he gets to steal coins too

really???   Have you read the Hahcows thread?  I suppose they're scammers too with much lower payouts than middlecoin.  I think you should get on that and let the people in that thread know what's going on.

[youngmathimus]

And he would have got away with it too if it wasn't for that meddling tealover.

[Dawes]

Over the last 2 weeks, I averaged 5.28 mBTC/day with my modest 0.720 Mhash/s R9 280X setup. I restart CGMiner whenever rejected shares goes above 2%.

This comes out to 7.33 mBTC/day per Mhash/s. At current coinbase price of $864.86, I earned a total of $63.93 in two weeks.
This gives me $6.34 per Mhash per day. During these two weeks, USD/BTC ranged from $700 to $1000, while middlecoin grew from 7 GH/s to 13 GH/s. The rate of posting in this very thread saw a similar increase, as did the number of vocal dissidents.

If middlecoin earned 200,000 mBTC using 12,500 MH/s, today's pool payed 16 mBTC per Mhash/s, which puts me at about %50 below the pool average. The bottom line is, if you think you can earn more somewhere else, why are you posting here?

To everyone who asked for these numbers, all the data you need is available on middlecoin.com. Do the math  

I'm fine with H20 using my 3% to build more servers, trade on the exchanges, and resolve technical issues in a timely manner. It saves me the time and headaches of starting my own mining pool.

edit: useast.middlecoin.com started timing out for me, switching to the default pool seemed to fix it.

[neofatalist]

Over the last 2 weeks, I averaged 5.28 mBTC/day with my modest 0.720 Mhash/s R9 280X setup. I restart CGMiner whenever rejected shares goes above 2%.

This comes out to 7.33 mBTC/day per Mhash/s. At current coinbase price of $864.86, I earned a total of $63.93 in two weeks.
This gives me $6.34 per Mhash per day. During these two weeks, USD/BTC ranged from $700 to $1000, while middlecoin grew from 7 GH/s to 13 GH/s. The rate of posting in this very thread saw a similar increase, as did the number of vocal dissidents.

If middlecoin earned 200,000 mBTC using 12,500 MH/s, today's pool payed 16 mBTC per Mhash/s, which puts me at about %50 below the pool average. The bottom line is, if you think you can earn more somewhere else, why are you posting here?

To everyone who asked for these numbers, all the data you need is available on middlecoin.com. Do the math  

I'm fine with H20 using my 3% to build more servers, trade on the exchanges, and resolve technical issues in a timely manner. It saves me the time and headaches of starting my own mining pool.

edit: useast.middlecoin.com started timing out for me, switching to the default pool seemed to fix it.

What temp you running that thing? Been trying to tune my rigs (290x) and they run hot as hell so I tune them down to keep them at around 85C. You get more than I do per rig.

[Dawes]

What temp you running that thing? Been trying to tune my rigs (290x) and they run hot as hell so I tune them down to keep them at around 85C. You get more than I do per rig.

My MSI R9 280X stays at 82c at 40% fan speed. It's using a small engine overclock (1020/1500 -> 1040/1500), and is mounted in an ATX case with the side partially removed to improve airflow. Multiple cards in proximity would obviously result in higher temperatures.

This has been pointed out before, but middlecoin calculates moving average using your submitted shares. The US East server tends to reject fewer shares, resulting in my moving average showing up to 0.82 Mh/s when cgminer only reports 0.72.

[falsealarm_bf]

What temp you running that thing? Been trying to tune my rigs (290x) and they run hot as hell so I tune them down to keep them at around 85C. You get more than I do per rig.

My MSI R9 280X stays at 82c at 40% fan speed. It's using a small engine overclock (1020/1500 -> 1040/1500), and is mounted in an ATX case with the side partially removed to improve airflow. Multiple cards in proximity would obviously result in higher temperatures.

This has been pointed out before, but middlecoin calculates moving average using your submitted shares. The US East server tends to reject fewer shares, resulting in my moving average showing up to 0.82 Mh/s when cgminer only reports 0.72.

Not fair to compare 280Xs with 290Xs. Let alone the architecture difference, the cooling is significantly different between the two. We have a mix of 280X, 290s and 290Xs in our cluster and 280Xs no matter where you place them, in an open air case or a standard ATX, function significantly cooler with less power requirements and not so significantly less hashing power equaling greater efficiency.

[petabytecoin]

My 1.5 KH/s earns me about $20 a day here. The same power at LTC earns me $9. Seems legit to me.

Over the last 3 days I've got an average of ~0.0178 BTC per day. At today's rate that's ~$15/day, with 1.8Mh/s (about 1.3% rejects).
Would you mind sharing your address? I would like to see the difference in the patterns, if any?

Short periods of time, especially with lower hashpower, can be highly variable. I think most people are seeing more like 0.01 per day per Mhash. I know I am. For the last few days middlecoin has been ~5% better than mining litecoin for me, which is disappointing compared to how it used it was during the peak of the dogecoin craze.

[neofatalist]

What temp you running that thing? Been trying to tune my rigs (290x) and they run hot as hell so I tune them down to keep them at around 85C. You get more than I do per rig.

My MSI R9 280X stays at 82c at 40% fan speed. It's using a small engine overclock (1020/1500 -> 1040/1500), and is mounted in an ATX case with the side partially removed to improve airflow. Multiple cards in proximity would obviously result in higher temperatures.

This has been pointed out before, but middlecoin calculates moving average using your submitted shares. The US East server tends to reject fewer shares, resulting in my moving average showing up to 0.82 Mh/s when cgminer only reports 0.72.

Interesting, might have to revisit my air flow solutions and stop underclocking. My fan runs at 45%. My WU seems to be higher in USEAST, maybe because it has the best ping for me.

[neofatalist]

What temp you running that thing? Been trying to tune my rigs (290x) and they run hot as hell so I tune them down to keep them at around 85C. You get more than I do per rig.

My MSI R9 280X stays at 82c at 40% fan speed. It's using a small engine overclock (1020/1500 -> 1040/1500), and is mounted in an ATX case with the side partially removed to improve airflow. Multiple cards in proximity would obviously result in higher temperatures.

This has been pointed out before, but middlecoin calculates moving average using your submitted shares. The US East server tends to reject fewer shares, resulting in my moving average showing up to 0.82 Mh/s when cgminer only reports 0.72.

Not fair to compare 280Xs with 290Xs. Let alone the architecture difference, the cooling is significantly different between the two. We have a mix of 280X, 290s and 290Xs in our cluster and 280Xs no matter where you place them, in an open air case or a standard ATX, function significantly cooler with less power requirements and not so significantly less hashing power equaling greater efficiency.

Think you are missing a word or two there somewhere.  "We have a mix of 280X, 290s and 290Xs in our cluster and 280Xs no matter where you place them"

I have the reference design 290s, not sure if that makes any difference. Somewhat freaked out that reference designs only have 1 fan.