KYC of bounty hunters

[malahivet930]

Yes.. I think it is good improvements.. It can stop cheater... And multiple accounts holders...
.

[1714641409]

1714641409

[1714641409]

1714641409

[1714641409]

1714641409

[1714641409]

1714641409

[annmhie0904]

KYC is okay for bounty hunters as soon as the KYC was said in the rules at the beginning of the campaigns.
So that the bounty hunters will be aware that there are KYC required to join or participate in the project.

[@prashant]

ya it is kinda irritating to ask kyc for bounty,for investment it is right to do kyc as it necessary if the investment fund is coming from legal source or not but for bounty as we are doing work for the payment it is not required.and giving away your information to various project and there is a good chance that you apply can be rejected then it is not secure to do that.

[tranquochung]

Dear everyone,
I think KYC is good for you, for me, for everyone. I know that maybe make you  a little trouble, but it's really more and more safe. It ensure that you are unique, only one. 

[Zelezinskyi]

KYC violates the anonymity that we sought. Why they should know who owns which account or not. The important thing is that the account corresponds to what needs to be done.

[Samum]

I do not see any difficulties. It somehow protects from multi-accounts. To a small extent, but still. Especially the process of passing does not cause complications. If you want money, confirm your reality with something.

[Television123]

Although I do not agree with KYC for bounty hunters I understand why they have to do so. They are hoping to deter some people from creating multiple accounts to register for the bounty which is good for the bounty program

[basesaw]

anonimity is one of the beautiful factor of cryptocurrency, we dont need to face the person you have to transact and leave your identity still private. But if the ICO company wants to know about their costumer I dont know what is their purpose for that. Also they require to have their passport details and I think it is not healthy for the investors to give such details.

[Theresaaa]

This is alerting me about KYC because they asking our own personal info its violates the anonymity we sought but we have our own decision if we are going to give such like personal info to participate in that ICO that providing KYC. Pls be aware for that, you have the one who's responsible for your own safety.

[jeraldskie11]

Even though i don't really agree on KYC but i know and understand that they'll do that because they want to know if the investor is real and trusted. We can't blame them because it is for the safety of their project and they don't want to have a problem for it. Some users not prefer for it especially the bounty hunters because you need to give your full identity but you need to think why they do that so you will understand them.

[arimamib]

there is a thing on my mind, first they want to know whether the campaign participants are human or just a multi-account. but the strange thing they give kyc bounty information when the campaign is over and waiting for this payment is very annoying. second may be the advantage for those who want to do kyc will get more stake because many people do not do kyc process because the information is informed before distribution, I'm sure members who do not fill KYC because they do not know the information or they are deliberately not fill the KYC because it is personal data

[stickkelsey]

I think this is completely unnecessary, if a bounty thread at first mention KYC information to be submitted, so I think I will not attend this bounty threads, if at the end of the ICO, so just for submission KYC information, then this is fraud and is very similar.

[denetci]

day by day it is going to be more and more difficult to take part in bounty campaigns but i think KYC process must be for a clear and good bounty campaing.
i am sick of multiple accounts.

[chejibadan]

The reward for bounty is very small for most of the low rank members. If you provide your own KYC in order to get even less than $10 in bounty, I don't think it is worth it.

[Disclaimert]

Bounty programs are asking bounty hunters to do KYC before they are paid for work done . What do you think of this development.

initially I think that this rule is quite heavy and does not make sense if the bounty hunter have to send KYC to get their tokens.
but over time I understand that this is done to prevent participants from using multiple accounts in the campaign

[Soccernet344]

I think I will agree on this because there are many fake accounts join the bounty campaign and that's not fair according to me. About privacy of documents that to risky for us but the ICO company that held the bounty they have rights to ask about KYC. i agree that ICO owner must state in the first place that the bounty hunter has to join KYC verification so the bounty hunter can choose to join the bounty campaign or not. Thanks

[Chikeokafor888]

Personally i felt kyc for bounty participant is not really necessary since they are not investor. Anyways that has now been the new rule of the day even airdrop participants are also mandated to do so before receiving anything from them

[@hosimanaka]

The reward for bounty is very small for most of the low rank members. If you provide your own KYC in order to get even less than $10 in bounty, I don't think it is worth it.

Every job has its benefits, if you KYC then the coin will probably be more potent and likely to be successful soon. I do not worry about it, it just takes a little bit of our time.

[trill312]

Bounty programs are asking bounty hunters to do KYC before they are paid for work done . What do you think of this development.

Why not? So it's the term of participation, if they pay you and ask for KYC after that will you send it?

[bitcoinking11]

I think the best way is not to participate in those bounties that require KYC (know your customer). These days, it is not safe to give personal details here and there.