KYC of bounty hunters

[Dcoollakky247]

I agree with some project that the headhunter presents his KYC form and the only way to receive our award, such as INS Ecosystem, I think because of any country's legislation the requirement is simply to seize a passport or a driver's license and provide some of your own information.

[1714652852]

1714652852

[1714652852]

1714652852

[1714652852]

1714652852

[1714652852]

1714652852

[1714652852]

1714652852

[basdjbzj8888]

It will be more fair if dev have told their bounty participants from the start, not when they have completed  their work. I believe 95% bounty participants will not give any of their ID only for claiming bounty.

[larks500]

It will be more fair if dev have told their bounty participants from the start, not when they have completed  their work. I believe 95% bounty participants will not give any of their ID only for claiming bounty.

In some cases Bounty manager could not know that KYC will required. In some cases ICO team is not familiar with regulation requirements enough. They can get advise about KYC at the end of ICO. Or regulation could be changed in the process of ICO.

[BeEvil]

I think the main reason of this innovation is because many bounty hunters create a lot of fake accounts and due to this they get more reward than they deserve, and the KYC process will simply stop these scam actions from the bounty of hunters. But I think that this process should be simplistic and managers must certainly warn about it at the beginning of the campaign.

[asjdhjnz86]

QIt's no problem signing a document. but I think the KYC process has two major problems. the first is that the security of KYC documents is very important and is there a guarantee of protection? the second problem is that they usually ask for KYC documents and they want KYC documents after the bounty is over.

[dolagani]

I don't have any problem with it personally, I think you will find that these restrictions are being passed down by regulatory authorities and not the companies themselves.

[francojon]

I firmly consider that Know Your Customer ain´t a suitable measure for the majority of the cryptos. They don´t bear the legal support of bonds and should not require of that approach.

[boranes]

Well am not too comfortable with giving out my ID to team I know not much about. Polymath did this, Shivom did it to me too.
I had to comply to avoid loosing out. I understand some are trying to fight multiple entries but I just hope they find another way
round this KYC.. It has to stop.

Of course you are not comfortable with sharing ID to team, only few bounty hunters are. But you shared your ID so it does mean that you are comfortable in giving out your ID.
I am not and I will never give my ID to anyone here, no matter how good project it might be.

[alttravel]

I do not consider it normal when they require confirmation of identity for participating in bounty crypto companies. For what purpose they collect information, I do not understand.

[xanto]

I think that most people have already got used to it, there's nothing to be done. We do not establish rules, we can simply accept them.

[nothingmiracle]

I think this is quite dangerous, the risk is the misuse of identity to do criminality because not 100% Altcoin here is verified, always pay attention by sending your ID documents to the ICOs!

[bootlace]

Bounty programs are asking bounty hunters to do KYC before they are paid for work done . What do you think of this development.

From one hand I can understand such request. The problem is that not all ICO are trustable and nobody knows how they can use our docs

[kuilopp]

I think that it is a really bad practice, giving an ID card to a company that you nearly know nothing of is too dangerous for me, they can sell your datas or even create a fake id, all that for you to gain a few bucks is totally not worth it. The worst situation is when a bounty only tell people at the end of the campaign that it is required to do a KYC to get your tokens...

[Krezi777]

What are bounty hunters. I still do not understand who these bounty hunters are. Maybe it's some kind people who want to help others.

[Spaffin]

I think this is quite dangerous, the risk is the misuse of identity to do criminality because not 100% Altcoin here is verified, always pay attention by sending your ID documents to the ICOs!

This is not only dangerous, but also illegal. The requirement of the ICO team to participate in the ICO signature campaign to pass the KYC test is illegal, as we are not investors and do not invest our funds in these projects. We do not need to be checked for the possibility of laundering us dirty money. Namely, this is the meaning of this test.

[rxkinglampung]

Bounty programs are asking bounty hunters to do KYC before they are paid for work done . What do you think of this development.

Not all bounty programs of the ICO project require participants to complete the KYC. That is the policy of each project.

So far I have never been objected to the policy. Though many people are concerned about the risk of our identity being scattered and our wallet address is known to be vulnerable to hacker attacks. I am sure and do not worry about it, the most important thing we have reviewed the project and have good prospects, not the SCAM project

[artisarr]

The problem is that bounty campaigns request the passage of KYC after all the bounty hunter work has been completed. In my opinion, this is not fair. I try to avoid the bounty campaign, which require the passage of KYC.

[dakiev]

the KYC program is actually good but I think it is less effective because to take care of it requires a passport and another while not everyone has it so it will feel very difficult if using that system

[valetrm]

I think people in the majority of their dramatize. It happens that even comes to such paranoid ideas as your passport will hire a car in Africa, they will break it, and then you will be caught by the interpol at the resort in Haiti.

[JGreg96]

Bounty programs are asking bounty hunters to do KYC before they are paid for work done . What do you think of this development.

this is one of the many regulations of the ico, in fact regulated ico (depending on the jurisdiction) has to do this to know the people which receive the first token.