Is Telegram the new measure of ICO success?

[leland orser]

Telegram is, indeed, a reference standard, but most of the time I only care about the discussion of the ICO project in the telegram, if more people talking about the ICO project, means that there are more potential participants, and not a robot.

[LillyBogan]

No,telegram campaign is only created because some of these ICO review websites requires these new ICOs to have more participants in the telegrams so they can list the ICO,it is measured by the participants in telegram so these new ICOs would be listed or featured in these ICO review sites if they have a lot of participants in their telegram bounty group.

[hastag_80]

Been seeing projects' Telegram groups blow up and I think that's an attribute of success. Personally, when I find a project, I do judge them by their social media presence. How active a telegram channel does say a lot with their demand.

With the rise of groups exceeding Telegram's 50k member cap...what do you guys think?

Article: https://news.bitcoin.com/telegram-followers-the-new-metric-for-cryptocurrency-success/

Actually in my opinion,telegram.is only helpul to determine of how many people who join in that ICO campaign and not the main measurement of its success,actually the big impact for me is the bounty campaign,social media, and those marketing strategy of the platform on how they introduce to the market,and how they convience all the  investor to joined there platform exchange and the help of all team in that campaign.

[Spoetnik]

No ICO coin has ever achieved any level of success.. ever ...period.

All you are talking about is how the premined / ICO coin prices go up on exchanges.

period.

[tigoes]

for me it's not measure of successful ICO, it's only measurement of how many hyip created around project

[tolkings]

for me it's not measure of successful ICO, it's only measurement of how many hyip created around project

For You there is no-for other Yes.

[Brunusmagnus]

The real asset when you are promoting an ICO is your credibility, so you try to gain trust with every means.
And as many people seem to believe that a big Telegram group is a sign of success, of course ICO manager try to build asap a big group.
This is understandable, but it seems to me so simple to fake it, that I don't see any reason to use the group dimension as the only measure of success.

[jimmywh]

I big Telegram group does not necessarily equal a solid project. However, what it does indicate is a lot of hype, and hype equals quick profit. I use Telegram to sort out which ICO's are quick flips, and which are long term HODL.

[paxmao]

Been seeing projects' Telegram groups blow up and I think that's an attribute of success. Personally, when I find a project, I do judge them by their social media presence. How active a telegram channel does say a lot with their demand.

With the rise of groups exceeding Telegram's 50k member cap...what do you guys think?

Article: https://news.bitcoin.com/telegram-followers-the-new-metric-for-cryptocurrency-success/

The problem is that once you use something to measure success it becomes and objective in itself and the ICO promoters start making airdrops and referrals, so you no longer know if it is real interest.

[MaiQwaN]

I do not know what is an important super idea has in itself Telegram ICO. They can collect a fantastically huge amount and have a large number of investors, but I still do not understand why they want to do this. What is the real purpose of this ICO?

[jorenpo]

Been seeing projects' Telegram groups blow up and I think that's an attribute of success. Personally, when I find a project, I do judge them by their social media presence. How active a telegram channel does say a lot with their demand.

With the rise of groups exceeding Telegram's 50k member cap...what do you guys think?

Article: https://news.bitcoin.com/telegram-followers-the-new-metric-for-cryptocurrency-success/

I don't think the telegram user is the reason of success ICO. most of them are bounty hunters though.
but it has an advantage, more user equals more advertising. more advertising of an ico is more likely to have a success.

[EricExxo]

Telegram or other messengers should be used mostly for the team to quickly answer questions and solve emerging issues. Lately we see a lot of users joining telegram groups to get free tokens. Real ICO investors read whitepaper and analyze the project potential.

[Orino Suimuri]

A big Telegram group COULD be a measure of success, but not the only one.
You know, it's very simple to make a group artificially big, just to show your muscle.
So, check also all the other aspect of an ICO, as the whitepaper, the staff, the project, and so on

[silent17]

Been seeing projects' Telegram groups blow up and I think that's an attribute of success. Personally, when I find a project, I do judge them by their social media presence. How active a telegram channel does say a lot with their demand.

With the rise of groups exceeding Telegram's 50k member cap...what do you guys think?

Article: https://news.bitcoin.com/telegram-followers-the-new-metric-for-cryptocurrency-success/

I really don't judge an ICO success when it comes to their telegram account because some of this ICO are just accumulating members or people because of their airdrops. That's why they have thousands of members. A successful ICO will be based on how they can handle their advertisement and how they can prove to people that they can really do their project. White Paper and roadmap is one of the best assets of an upcoming ICO for me.

[Cryptolupus]

Even if can't be the only parameter to evaluate an ICO, a big and active group on telegram is usually a good indicator of potential success.
Then, as already stated, it's better to verify all the other aspects.

[strateg_BY]

A good reponsive Telegram channel is always required to see if the project is active, having some potential or not.

[paradym3]

Been seeing projects' Telegram groups blow up and I think that's an attribute of success. Personally, when I find a project, I do judge them by their social media presence. How active a telegram channel does say a lot with their demand.

With the rise of groups exceeding Telegram's 50k member cap...what do you guys think?

Article: https://news.bitcoin.com/telegram-followers-the-new-metric-for-cryptocurrency-success/

There are a lot of Telegrams that have blown out of proportion and just seem to be a method of the creator/admins to advertise some fake coin alongside their bot which spams airdrops.

There's one i'm following currently that has 17k members that consists of no spam/bots; fortunately - take a look: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2937292

It's for a digital advertising project: Ternio

[roblccx]

Been seeing projects' Telegram groups blow up and I think that's an attribute of success. Personally, when I find a project, I do judge them by their social media presence. How active a telegram channel does say a lot with their demand.

With the rise of groups exceeding Telegram's 50k member cap...what do you guys think?

Article: https://news.bitcoin.com/telegram-followers-the-new-metric-for-cryptocurrency-success/

I'm part of a bunch of telegram alt coin and ico groups and tbh the set up seems messy and all over the place

I'd much prefer a more structured solution for two way communication between users, investors and the project's team

[Markyway88]

Though it is just a social media, telegram connected people all over the world. It helps for the investors and developers to communicate for the welfare of all. I also set telegram as a standard for a successful ICO because yhe more people joined the telegram, the more it will is popular.

[a2offrb]

Telegram is globally accepted in most countries in the world. So, Telegram made easy business linkages. As a result of this. It has now been perceived that majority ICO currently are now dependent of Telegram for initializing, projecting and adequately actualizing their success dream. Owing to this, Telegram had been a new measure of ICO success because of its immense contribution in the economy.