Is Telegram the new measure of ICO success?

[markgayamo]

I think telegram is also a good sign for an ICO success the more members are joining the more chances that thwre is more buyers or participants that are joining and believing in ICO. When telegram is use for supporting ICO this is sure not a scam Airdrop or ICO. People seek for good ICO platforms and community.

[GrayFullbuster]

Been seeing projects' Telegram groups blow up and I think that's an attribute of success. Personally, when I find a project, I do judge them by their social media presence. How active a telegram channel does say a lot with their demand.

With the rise of groups exceeding Telegram's 50k member cap...what do you guys think?

Article: https://news.bitcoin.com/telegram-followers-the-new-metric-for-cryptocurrency-success/

For me yes! Telegram is on of the marketing strategy of all ICO. If the telegram group of the project has many members, it means that their marketing strategy is good. The more investors, the more percent that you can earn profit by making investment.

[ifanxu]

social media does have a big impact on a project, just look at now a lot of airdrop using social media and most of all is telegram.

[MostafaGamal]

Telegram is a platform for communication between people, and it has become a news platform too. Telegram is easy to use so it has a large number of users, but I do not think it is the only measure of success or failure.

[ArabianStars]

Telegram is a platform for communication between people, and it has become a news platform too. Telegram is easy to use so it has a large number of users, but I do not think it is the only measure of success or failure.

Totally agree. Let us not discount the concept of ICO projects and roadmap that are needed to accomplish of which I believe is the true measure of success.
There are a lot of scams out there that have a garnered a mass of community support in telegram but are by no means end of the day the same scam as they were.

[mirawantirinjana]

although it can not be used as a benchmark for the success of an ICO but an ICO telegram group provides a transparent trust service for the sustainability of the ICO, a place to discuss and know the progress of the project

[Rida Zafar]

it might be possible .telegram is very easy way to connect with cryptocurrency users.

[jpoker272727]

yes, i think. why? because the members are the real person as another social media already full of "fake person", like twitter and instagram that the followers can be bought but telegram not. i think all of them in telegram are real person. 

[Xioma]

I don't think so, if anything some people hardly ever join the telegram chat. Whitepaper and other factors are definitely more important.

[tolkings]

And buy future token Gram (telegram) - https://antares.capital/en/referral/2f6171ac

[Megashaw]

Been seeing projects' Telegram groups blow up and I think that's an attribute of success. Personally, when I find a project, I do judge them by their social media presence. How active a telegram channel does say a lot with their demand.

With the rise of groups exceeding Telegram's 50k member cap...what do you guys think?


Article: https://news.bitcoin.com/telegram-followers-the-new-metric-for-cryptocurrency-success/

No , never you judge an ico success by this.  do you know some times more than half of this ico's telegram group members are bots made by the project to make them appear successful? if you don't know I just told so you knw

[oliviatwisp]

Yes, it looks like that.  I'm in the German project Vreo.io  https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2898738.msg29810876#msg29810876
and  I like that in the Telegram I can see all the information and the latest news about the project, I can observe the growth and development,
friendly team  will always answer any questions, they even have Bounty campaign in Telegram https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2898738.msg29810876#msg29810876. So, yes, Telegram show the level of the ICO

[SunJAB]

Yes, definitely 100%. If any ICO project we join in the Telegram community, everyone in it has no shared comment, questioned, then the community is deceptive. The ICO program has no potential. The lively Telegram community, investors ask many questions and admins respond quickly, these are good ICO projects.

[eolitic]

Been seeing projects' Telegram groups blow up and I think that's an attribute of success. Personally, when I find a project, I do judge them by their social media presence. How active a telegram channel does say a lot with their demand.

With the rise of groups exceeding Telegram's 50k member cap...what do you guys think?

Article: https://news.bitcoin.com/telegram-followers-the-new-metric-for-cryptocurrency-success/

of course, the number of followers in Telegram is not the only criteria to judge whether the project is serious and potential or not. we need more details, more datum.

[9jaflick]

I don't consider Telegram to be the new answer for the group move toward becoming in a large portion of cases trolls will show up, bedlam will begin and from that point is going to be a wreck. It's exceptionally basic to have strict principles on wire so along these lines you can have a decent and join group. I think this is a decide that the majority of the ICO's and undertakings ought to have it executed.

[strickland]

I don't consider Telegram to be the new answer for the group move toward becoming in a large portion of cases trolls will show up, bedlam will begin and from that point is going to be a wreck. It's exceptionally basic to have strict principles on wire so along these lines you can have a decent and join group. I think this is a decide that the majority of the ICO's and undertakings ought to have it executed.

Telegram is how most people talk to the developers of a coin in real time. There is not that many websites that could do that.

[BitSat]

telegram is never been measure for ICO success as its just a social media tool for better communication between them and some are doing just for more then as they need to do because right now its all about numbers and publicity so many companies opening too much about number of users but still its not good and solid measure for any ICO success

[Denigmatic]

This is a platform for social networks, if you run it on your phone, you can share your friends and other people, your opinion about crypto terminals and ICO.

[Lang09]

There is a big difference between a good project and a project that brings good profits. A large number of participants in groups tells me only about the popularity and possible manipulation of the developers. I'm not sure that such a project will bring me a profit.

[Elseye]

No, that's not true. Maybe for newbies it may be a good bait - to ensure that project is serious and so on...but the truth is that number means nothing, activity is the key.