Is Telegram the new measure of ICO success?

[suraniawan]

It may be said that way. Because the group a telegram of a project that is alive and active, usually indicates that the project is running and can be successful. While her telegram project quiet, never even update info, it could be the project that is a scam. So I agree that the telegram is one of the criteria in selecting a project.

[Ekosistim]

i think so too, maybe the number of community from telegram group was a trick for lure more investor and make their ico success.

[apur688]

I think it's a relative thing, meaning it all depends on why members of the Telegram group are so numerous. For example an ICO project within a month the number of members reaches 20k members. If all members are active members, that means they are all investors, they invest in the project, automatically so as not to miss further information, then it can be said that the project is very good. However, there are times when many members are due to certain programs, such as airdrop and bounty. Many people compete to join the program in order to get a free coin or token. And this can cause when the project goes into the market, the price will drop due to dump. Thus, the number of members of the Telegram group has no major effect on the quality of the ICO project.

[HERMESH KAUR]

Telegram is of a successful measure for crypto ecosystem. It is good way for communication and promotion for cryptocurrency.

[cryptocyprus]

I think that this absolutely does not play any role in the success of the project. But still, the more hype around the project, the better for the project itself.

[kendedes]

It is not the only one, but Telegram group of an ICO should be considered. This is the forum that we will know their community that concern with the ICO project. We can count from the amount of the telegram members in the group and how they interact and manage the community. From the telegram, we can see whether the group or the team is live or not. We can also watch the progress of the ICO project and the membership trustworthy.

[IwanGunawan]

if I think telegram can be used as a reference measure, because I think when many people are active in the telegram project, we can see a lot of interest in the project, as for other references you can see the progress in a project seen from the information that is always updated on twitter

[Bosmuda]

No telegram is not a measurement for an ICO success. Telegram only used for communication and the best thing to measure the ICO success is their soft cap.

[maianh09]

A few months ago we were able to identify the telegram as a measure of ICO success, but now the telegram subscriber service is making this measurement useless. Currently, I only care about Medium, and I think this will be a new measure.

[arthurgrand]

I think the telegram group is very important for community building, but many ICOs try to manipulate the numbers by offering somthing just for joining, so is not always reliable in analysing a project.

[morozo]

I think that this absolutely does not play any role in the success of the project. But still, the more hype around the project, the better for the project itself.

yes I agree with that. But the hype is more important for the ICO than anything, you can also see how active admins are before and after the ICO

[itsik78]

Yes, Telegram is a very convenient messenger, but the success of ICO does not depend on it.Don't forget Linkedin.Investors are mostly here.

[Tlongbottom]

Telegram size may be an indicator of a successful ICO, but it isn’t a definitive indicator. There are some telegram groups that have more than 10,000 members that have no chat going on outside of the mods. This usually happens because they run an airdrop that requires them to join and stay in the telegram to get their tokens. Artificially inflating telegram size can be an impressive thing for investors that may I’ve then confidence in the project.

More important than size is activity and number of active users. Again, this is just a piece of the puzzle that needs to go along with researching the project.

[cryptoburgerbash]

No because they are able to have airdrops or even buy bots to increase their number of followers. It is only one of the things you should look into. The token economics, the white paper, their concept and their team are far more important.

Although if they have less than 100 people in their group and their ICO is approaching, it's not a good sign as there isn't much hype.

[zhekad]

By telegram is still not clear. Yes, already there is a successful product mesenger, there is a good team that has an excellent reputation.
But there is a lot, but ... it's still unclear what they will do at all. Pavel Durov simply announced his plans and raised a large sum from closed investors. This can not be called ico.
Pay attention to EOS for the year of the conducted ico, the team collected 4.2 milliard $. Here is the indicator. But they already have a product.
Telegram is just a PR project.

[popotao92]

Before Telegram use to play a great influence in the success of some projects but not bots is talking over some of this channel and the numbers to me don't play the big role in investment decision for me again.

[letrana9162]

 Telegram made easy business linkages. As a result of this. It has now been perceived that majority ICO currently are now dependent of Telegram for initializing, projecting and adequately actualizing their success dream. Owing to this, Telegram had been a new measure of ICO success because of its immense contribution in the economy.

[pjusmfox]

I don't think so. There are many false accounts in the telegraph group, which may give a false impression to the new investors that the project is very hot. This is actually a misunderstanding.

[ToddDiaz]

No. A lot of the ICOs force people to enter into their telegram channels by making it mandatory before you can sign up for their signature campaigns, so mostly it is just a lot of people who are there just because they want to do bounties and not because they are interested in investing in it

[Bonheur]

With just one airdrop campain any ico can amess thousands of supporters.so it is not a measure about the icos success but it is a measure for exposure.at least that many people heard its name.