sMerit Post-Review

[bill gator]

I have a lot of sMerit points sitting around. I would be happy to contribute some to the posts in which you find worthy. Please PM me when required.

I should have been more clear. This is a message meant only for the OP. Please do not PM me begging for sMerit.

I'm sorry that offering your assistance has led to the spamming of links to your inbox as it has mine. Thanks for being there, you may be on-call very shortly as I am down to my final remnants of merit. I would apply to be a source, but I am honestly unsure how to go about it; I know theymos said submit 10-posts in the meta section, but that seems a little vague and I don't want to screw it up. Anyways, I appreciate it and I'll be in touch; will also make a list of "Need-to-Merit" threads in OP for when this happens.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2896975.0

I have given this post Merit, because obviously this idea is similar to mine and I believe that it is run in good faith. It seems like you have your intentions well aligned and the merit is going to the right places; that being said I didn't review the posts you've already reviewed, I'm just basing this off of the criteria in your OP (which  I did review). If I had more merit to spare, in order to keep your service running as well, I would spare more, but I am also down to my last 6 after meriting you.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2867333.msg29842862#msg29842862
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2707212.msg29558472#msg29558472

One of these posts is the 400th+ reply in a mega-thread, not something I'm particularly impressed about. Pretty generic, conversational response that wouldn't serve as extraordinarily helpful, informative, creative or doubtfully even read much, if at all (besides the one guy that already did merit you for it); I'd consider that merit a win and move on. The other is again, 400th+ reply in a mega-thread and I won't even explain the many other things that are wrong with the post. Mega-threads are not going to earn merit.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2222581.msg22586540#msg22586540
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2343388.msg23861449#msg23861449
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2310587.msg23441965#msg23441965
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2293140.msg23414341#msg23414341
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1899154.msg24239911#msg24239911

The post talking about ponzi-schemes is basically just repeating the same thing everyone else has already said fifty times prior to your post. One of these posts is in a language I cannot understand, which violates my Local-Rule and should disqualify the rest of these anyways. Another post was just asking for help doing some with a particular wallet program, that one has me confused why you would think it is meritable; could you please explain in PM or in your next submission? I am honestly very interested, because I'm confused. I don't normally merit anything to do with bounties, campaigns, airdrops or things of this nature so I won't be meriting the post where you mention the times airdrops normally take place. This may be helpful to a few, but allow them to merit you for this. The last post I can read in your submissions talks about working around social media rules in order to still force bounties, tweets, etc. onto a platform that clearly does not want you or this type of material and sees this as abusive. No way am I meriting a post that encourages breaking the rules of another site in order to exploit it for monetary gain.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2838688.0
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2879154.0
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2896110.0
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2866679.0

You created a mega-thread which is not fostering high-quality or meaningful conversation. I would highly suggest you lock this thread in order to do your part in not contributing towards the spam problem we see around here daily. In fact, all of these threads are basically just repeats of the same mega-threads we see time and time again... You are a very big part of the problem and will not be receiving merit from me. Stop creating these threads, please.

[1714764547]

1714764547

[1714764547]

1714764547

[1714764547]

1714764547

[1714764547]

1714764547

[Canis Majoris]

Hello! Please check this topic that I started:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2929187

[bill gator]

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2892670.msg29740853#msg29740853
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2825865.msg28958851#msg28958851

The one thread is basically just a justified "Up or Down?" Price speculation thread. I appreciate you trying to add some relevant recent news, but you fail it give context, explanation, clarification or any high-quality insights about what even would be affecting the price, causing this movement on a more fundamental level, etc. There is just a lot of missed opportunity for quality conversation. The other post is information that wasn't asked for, wasn't acknowledged and probably not necessary. I don't think you taught that user anything they didn't know, and they were already in a way different conversation at that point. It was borderline off-topic. No Merit here.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2915696.new#new

It might be worth meriting, but I honestly don't know enough about mining to even consider giving this kind of post merit. I appreciate the research and sharing your findings, but until I learn more about mining I will probably have to pass on things like this. I'm sure it'll help someone that will merit you for it though. I am in the process of learning more about mining, so hopefully in the near future I can have more of an input on this sort of thing.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2874264.msg29525885#msg29525885
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2864635.msg29607684#msg29607684
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2906373.msg29994793#msg29994793

I'll have to be consistent, so the post about mining I'll have to pass on for you as well. The post about asian countries accepting BTC kind of just reads like a rambling rant. I can't really take much information out of it, and it honestly looks like you were just trying to make the post longer (not saying you were). At any rate, it reads more like a conversation than something I would merit. The other post mostly just agrees with what has already been said, informs them of something they probably already know and isn't a solution to the problem they're discussing. I won't be giving merit for these.

#1 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2722416.msg28043043#msg28043043
#2 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2836830.msg29199117#msg29199117
#3 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2915620.msg29996508#msg29996508
#4 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2081765.msg28676101#msg28676101
#5https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2796361.msg28673908#msg28673908
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1059082;sa=showPosts

You broke multiple rules and then just threw in a link to all your recent posts, presumably because you think they are all worth merit.I'm not going to fight through your formatting nonsense, and I won't be reading through your more recent posts. Feel free to not break the rules and resubmit.

[LogitechMouse]

Hello, I had posted here some links of my posts but got rejected. I will post some again and hoping to have some merits with my posts if they are deserving. Thanks

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2851181.msg30128619#msg30128619
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2810364.msg30107821#msg30107821
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2931409.msg30127831#msg30127831

[bill gator]

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1324174.msg28927958#msg28927958
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2164912.msg29305118#msg29305118
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2655156.msg28982809#msg28982809

You'd think that when you are submitting posts for my review on whether or not they will receive merit you might be interested in reading the past reviews/submissions and merits. It appears this is not a thought process almost anybody has though, because I am constantly getting these mega-thread submissions. One of your posts is the 6500th+ reply in a mega-thread and offers nothing unique. Another is the 900th reply of a mega-thread that also does not provide anything creative or interesting. The last post is also just a mega-thread reply.. My biggest suggestion, stop forcing yourself to post in these horrible meaningless threads. Go learn something and challenge yourself.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2893983.msg29755288#msg29755288
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2701941.msg29005090#msg29005090
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2774194.msg28809209#msg28809209
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2811940.msg28786702#msg28786702
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2756286.msg28738780#msg28738780

Your first submission is just asking people what they do for money management, that's not high-quality, insightful or helpful by any means. I would expect there might be a high-quality answer somewhere in the thread, but it did not happen in the submission. The ICO post didn't even answer the question directly, and the question was poorly formulated to begin with. You just say nothing and contribute nothing to the thread or discussion. Another post is just rattling off which shitcoins you think are good, yet fail to provide any explanation, criteria or anything that would make someone agree with you or open their eyes to new information. The post about South Korea is riddled with typos and again, it seems like you go very far out of your way to write a couple sentences without actually saying anything. None of these are going to get merit from me.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2842777.msg30080624#msg30080624

300th+ reply in mega-thread. This thread is not having a meaningful conversation and you did not present any new information. You will not be getting any merit from that post, is my assumption. Do not post in mega-threads, and do not post unless you have something to contribute.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2929187

I have given you Merit for this thread, because as always it is thought-provoking and it is genuinely a conversation that I would like to have. I have literally clicked "Watch" on almost every single one of your submissions so that I can follow the discussion and join in if I have time to do so.  I like the thought process and I like the implications of what you're suggesting is happening. If I do apply as a merit source, I will most likely use a handful of your posts as my submissions.

[erzascarlet_30]

Hello! Good day, hoping that you'll have some time to review my post and if you think that it deserves merit then yeah, thanks in advance with that! 

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2906237

[legendster]

Well, I've now run out of Merit points to give away.

@Bill. Feel free to review these posts and send some sMerit if you think they're worth it:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2948108
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=983661.msg30326887#msg30326887
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2864011.msg29684355#msg29684355
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2882232.msg29638024#msg29638024
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2876125.msg29552155#msg29552155

[avikz]

Thank you for your previous review. I request you to please review my below posts which I believe are worthy to get merit points,

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2946614.msg30264931#msg30264931
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2932584.msg30123858#msg30123858
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2920331.msg30048806#msg30048806
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2906868.msg29894238#msg29894238

Thanks in anticipation!

[mrelich]

Hi,
please have a look at this post, it's a list of best privacy coins I've created with a summary of features https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2869616.0
Best regards

[bill gator]

Sheesh this thread has been extra active lately, and I've been extra lazy. I promise, I will get to all of you, might lock the thread until I manage to make that happen.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2851181.msg30128619#msg30128619
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2810364.msg30107821#msg30107821
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2931409.msg30127831#msg30127831

The one post about leaving your work for Crypto was a decent read, but it is buried on page 8 or something like that and it doesn't necessarily add anything except an anecdote (which has been exhausted throughout the thread). In other words, it's more just a conversation. One of the posts is the 400th+ reply on a mega-thread so I didn't even bother to read it. The last one is not really worth a merit either; I don't know, maybe I am being conservative because I am running low, but it just seems like you mostly have conversations without adding very much (or anything).

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2934879.msg30157489#msg30157489

This would have gotten a merit if it attempted to explain anything. If you even tried to explain what the fake metamask looked like, or how to avoid it, how to remove it, or even linked to an official announcement from metamask it would've been more feasible to merit the post. I've already put more thought into your post than you have, so not worth a merit in my opinion.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2914594.msg29986138#msg29986138
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2916309.msg30006939#msg30006939
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2740808.msg28373227#msg28373227
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2896910.msg30232649#msg30232649
I am half way through reading the "Mastering Bitcoin" book. Is it enough to answer all the technical support questions or do I need to understand anything more than that book?

I've never heard of that book, so I'm in no position to talk about the content within it. Although, one book probably wouldn't suffice for a complete knowledge of Bitcoin. The post about ERC20 and ERC23 I cannot merit, because I'm simply uninformed in that area as well; plus, I don't feel like I stepped away from your post with a thorough understanding of the differences from a technical perspective. The post answering a question about SPV on ETH should probably be merited by the OP; they're a legendary, most likely have merit and asked a specific question. Although, again I don't normally merit this kind of Q & A.

The other guy got tagged by red trust from a DT member already, feel free to give them a negative reputation if you feel it is needed. I won't be giving a merit for your post pointing out their abuse, because this would set an unfortunate precedent, although I encourage you to continue doing this kind of work. It is very helpful.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2906237

I have given this post a Merit, because you've clearly put a lot of time, effort and thought into your post. It gives a lot of information, and even speaks about decentralized exchanges, which I did not even believe to be in existence. Very well done.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2898870.msg29812804#msg29812804
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2893595.msg29808897#msg29808897
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2892560.msg29742585#msg29742585
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2899337.msg29820199#msg29820199

You've already gotten 10 merit for the first submission, which seems like too much already when it appears that you've missed what they meant by "Bounty". I think they meant tracking someone down, not running a signature campaign. The other post just says "This site looks ugly, clear scam, join my telegram"; not that type of post I believe to be worth merit at this point. Another post talks about using obscure online classes to learn about Bitcoin, rather than just reading the Whitepaper, old e-mails or other simpler means of learning about how Bitcoin truly works. It seems unhelpful and misleading to me. The last just talks about not using Bitcoin for car purchases, without explaining why. No meritable posts here, in my opinion.

[Dread Pirate Roberts]

Hi bill please review my Thread and my post.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2969998.msg30513964#msg30513964
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2759202.msg29747981#msg29747981

[bill gator]

Going through some reviews now and will continue through tonight, probably 3-4 hours until finished. Post your submissions now and I'll go through all of them (even those posted after this) tonight.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2941926.msg30222456#msg30222456
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2834069.msg29059300#msg29059300

You didn't write the first one, you give credits to somebody else and then fail to link to the original article. Copy + Pasting someone's article does not deserve merit, especially when it isn't even bringing new information forward. The other is pointing people towards airdrops/bounties. I'm not giving you a merit for these.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2911911.msg29951954#msg29951954
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2892510.msg29738637#msg29738637
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2854962.msg29292859#msg29292859

These are all pretty much going to be denied for the same reason; I'm not going to set the precedent that if you basically just Copy + Paste the link to an article about Bitcoin then you receive a merit for it. The articles were interesting enough though, and I did enjoy reading them so thank you for that. If you were the article writer, I'd probably give you a merit.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2824944.msg29971714#msg29971714

I already gave you a merit for this thread Tubsie; so I'm going to have to decline. I realize it is another post, but it didn't need to be. Also, you formatted the link with tags in your submission, so you also broke a local-rule.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2873190.0
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2873063.msg29503403#msg29503403
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2825764.0

I've seen dozens of posts like the first submission, talking about what to do before investing in an ICO. I'm going to say, if you have a systematic approach to investing into something that is supposed to be revolutionary, then it's been over-saturated and is probably not operating as originally intended. Plus you already were given 10+ merit for this post. Another is to just identify which Alts to buy, which isn't particularly helpful to me, nor informative.

I am interested in the 01BTC journey, though, I haven't given you a merit at this point. I have watched the thread and I will be following along now and then. If you start hitting some serious mile-stones and sharing your story I will definitely be into that and might throw some merit for the unique situation/journey.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2946512.msg30273963#msg30273963
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2896910.msg30270940#msg30270940
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2824565.msg28934719#msg28934719

The first post is just your perspective/opinion on what normally occurs whenever change happens, nothing really unique or insightful being brought forward with this information. While you're right, it isn't something I'm interested in meriting at this point. The other post seems to be in the suspected merit abusers list, without adding to the list; this seems to just be a messy post in the thread that wasn't helpful or needed. The last was posting in a bounty/signature thread, nothing of use. Nothing meritable here.

[Rabby637]

Hello sir can I get merit for Twitter free reaudit service?

I hope I will get merit from you.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2973352.new#new

Quote post
1. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2752209.msg29490416#msg29490416
2. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2752209.msg29714980#msg29714980

[bill gator]

I'm flying through these at this point.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2826755.msg29195921#msg29195921
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2858291.msg29399584#msg29399584
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2759202.msg29959658#msg29959658

I don't know enough about NEO, China or ETH to consider the first post; although it seems like some others have taken notice and given you merit, so that should suffice. Same goes for the second submission, and normally I wouldn't merit a post simply talking about their pick of coin, either. The final post is the 150th+ reply in a mega-thread asking if ETH is a scam. Beating a dead horse, not really bringing any new information to the conversation.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2929187.msg30286252#msg30286252
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2983956
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2983956.msg30679300#msg30679300
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2983956.msg30749508#msg30749508
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2983956.msg30754116#msg30754116
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2983956.msg30758266#msg30758266
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2983956.msg30817911#msg30817911

I normally have given you merit each time you submit, but this time I have to unfortunately make an example out of you. This way nobody will think I'm favoring you, because the local-rule is no more than 5-links per submission! Feel free to re-submit after you adjust.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2871735.msg29524807#msg29524807
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2855465.msg29355642#msg29355642
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2945961.msg30278034#msg30278034
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2809074.msg30211863#msg30211863
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2808281.msg29456560#msg29456560

"Write best post" in thread "How to get merit?"; this alone almost makes me not want to read through the rest of your submissions. Your English is very hard to understand, and your second submission is about social media bounties, which are really obnoxious and useless on multiple levels. Listing off BTC Debit card companies is also not worth merit in my estimation. If you were running a reputable BTC debit card service, then this might be meritable. Explaining what a spreadsheet is after a dozen people have already done the same thing in the thread is not worth a merit either. I should have taken my first instinct and stopped reading your submissions after the first one. You simply repeat the answers that others have given, but somehow provide less information than they did.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2949382.msg30304309#msg30304309
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2948565.msg30302837#msg30302837

The first submission is talking about receiving the biggest reward in bounties. This isn't helpful in my opinion, at least not in a way that would be meritable. The second goes with the rule I said earlier, about not meriting posts that are simply news articles re-posted; plus, you submitted twice before I got to you so you also broke a local-rule.

[Wolfman15]

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2946810.msg30266690#msg30266690
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2934879.msg30157489#msg30157489

[bill gator]

I've organized now so that it is easier when I decide I can go through all of these; I normally spend a lot of time doing each of you. Probably takes me 5-10 minutes per person on average.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2916021.msg30000734#msg30000734

This is in a language I do not understand; can not grant you merit.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2945458.msg30330426#msg30330426
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2932110.msg30330299#msg30330299
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2954668.msg30329814#msg30329814

One of your posts was just suggesting someone check out a particular bounty program; which is really lame if you think that deserves merit. The second submission is just generic trading tips that have been mentioned hundreds, if not thousands of times around here. None of these deserve merit.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2891680.msg29727954#msg29727954
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2770113.msg29460268#msg29460268
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2829299.msg29001108#msg29001108

Seems like you've already been drowned in merit for your first submission, plus I don't know too much about mining alt-coins. I've just begun mining alt-coins recently, but none of this information was particularly helpful to me if we're being honest. You've also received a good bit of merit for your second submission; one of my criteria is checking whether I believe the post to be under-merited. Your last submission is just asking for people to vote for some mobile app, so I won't be dishing out any merit to your posts here.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2895952.msg30345555#msg30345555
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1185580.msg30343869#msg30343869
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2851181.msg30212306#msg30212306

Your first submission was the 250th or so reply in a mega-thread, so I didn't even bother reading it and that was a discouraging start. Same thing goes for the second and third replies as well, both deep replies buried in a mega-thread that I didn't even bother to read; one of them was the 5000th+ reply.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2947670.msg30280501#msg30280501
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2928045.msg30065657#msg30065657

Your first submission is just describing how payment structures work for certain signature campaigns, which isn't the sort of thing I'm looking to merit. This information is provided by each individual campaign and doesn't need my merit. Same goes for your second submission; it is just explaining what an ICO is, rather incompletely, and has already received a chunk of merit.

[PsylockReborn]

Hello OP!

Please check this post if its worthy to receive a merit. Please try to check my others posts as well. Thanks alot!Have a great day ahead of you!

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2212075.msg30449415#msg30449415

[bill gator]

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2878321.msg30217106#msg30217106
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2889750.msg29766774#msg29766774
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2746879.msg29901675#msg29901675

Your first submission has already received merit, and it buried pretty deep in the thread. It reads pretty generic to me, and your second post doesn't read any more interesting, informative or anything like that. Your third submission is the worst offender, 300th+ post in a mega-thread and all of your posts follow a similar theme to this. They don't serve any significant purpose in the discussion, from what I can see.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1673843.msg29131934#msg29131934
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2833631.msg29068927#msg29068927
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2864674.msg29426112#msg29426112
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2860739.msg29357455#msg29357455
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2893191.msg29754286#msg29754286

The first post is already merited pretty well, and it's not something I understand well. Your second post was in response to a direct question and I normally expect OP to merit in these situations. Most of these are the same way, but I'll tell you this, I recently got into mining and I can see you answering one of my questions. If this becomes the case you can expect merit from me when you do. It's definitely helpful, just not the sort of thing I merit generally. The last submission I wanted to merit, but there's something about it that won't allow me to. It's a very interesting read, but I don't generally merit conversations of the manner. I'll be watching your posts and review in the future, because you are very helpful for sure and deserve merit even if it doesn't fit the scope of this thread or what I have going.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2946614.msg30264931#msg30264931
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2932584.msg30123858#msg30123858
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2920331.msg30048806#msg30048806
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2906868.msg29894238#msg29894238

I have given your first submission a Merit, because I was having similar thoughts about this. I was thinking that this is going to victimize a lot of people and open the doors for all kinds of identity theft. An open discussion surrounding this would be a good thing, helpful to a lot of people. The second and third submissions seem to be more like general financial/trading advice; they're more an economic conversation and I would expect the person you're speaking towards to be responsible for any merits there. The same goes for the final submission, but I honestly almost gave the final submission another merit, but it seems to be lacking in solutions or proposals on what should be done about the volatility or if this truly will continue to deter businesses from implementing Bitcoin. It was very enjoyable reading your posts though, and I'm going to continue to read your posts moving forward.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2828892.msg29286639#msg29286639
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2878787.msg29584497#msg29584497
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2870445.msg29699270#msg29699270
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2931409.msg30116866#msg30116866
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2833242.msg30253305#msg30253305

Broke local-rule, please no formatting the url tags, it makes it a headache to go through your posts. Feel free to re-submit, though.

[G00DFe77a]

Thank you for providing special recognition for the Jr Members and newbies that are trying to contribute and earn merit. Someone that is looking out for the little guys!

Here is my post for consideration. Thank you for your time.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2968018.msg30499033#msg30499033

[bill gator]

Hi sir won't it be easier if there would just be a google form and spreadsheet for submission of post link for revision? Just an idea though.

I appreciate the idea, but I don't think it would speed up things at all; my biggest problem is finding the 30-minutes per post to review everyone. Making a google spreadsheet to help organize it wouldn't make that any faster. I already have it pretty organized, just haven't found the time.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2802480.msg30433019#msg30433019
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2914559.msg30467801#msg30467801
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2966679.msg30764947#msg30764947

Your first submission is a very interesting read, so thank you for that; but it has already received some merit, and it mostly is just a conversation about something I don't know too much about. Either way, I don't believe it to be under-merited. The second submission seems to sit on the fence and agree without saying too terribly much. Again, mostly a conversation and something I don't understand terribly well. Your last post is mostly in the same category, but again they were all interesting reads so I encourage future submission for sure.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2036368.msg28918862#msg28918862
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2809886.msg28775474#msg28775474
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2953530.msg30318042#msg30318042

Broke a local-rule, using url tags makes it a headache to go through your posts; feel free to resubmit.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2869616.0

I have given this post a Merit; it is well structured, it is highly informative and I can see this helping out a lot of users. It taught me some things, and even though it already has been merited, I could definitely see it deserving of another.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2958771

Maybe I am naive, but this is something I expect people to already know when using the tags and embedding images. I will be considering this for future merit, depending upon whether or not I have to link somebody to it in the future. Very solid work, if it hadn't received any merit yet I would have given you one for sure. I'm also down to my last merit at this point, so I'm being very conservative about it. No hard feelings I hope.