tehconz
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 6
Merit: 0
|
|
January 02, 2014, 10:57:46 AM |
|
Perhaps swiftshoot just started driving his car 1/3rd less? Or his wife keeps filling the car up without telling him...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"You Asked For Change, We Gave You Coins" -- casascius
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
Catswold
|
|
January 02, 2014, 01:52:33 PM |
|
Gonna get me a Chevy Silverado 2500 Diesel. Gonna run it on Biodiesel. anyone wanting to help pay for it, send BTC to 1L52qx88JaFhmrRq9YjtLgGN774SPRXGkB
DO NOT Forget to add this on it... http://www.globalenergydevices.com/It will help you save more Fuel, Burn better and cleaner and gain some additional Horsepower. I am trying to get them to accept Bitcoins too. They have not accepted bitcoin yet... but if we got every HASHCOWer to email them asking if they accept Bitcoins, and they see a HUGE demand for their product from Bitcoin Community, I think they would start accepting it. This product actually works and damn well I must admit. I added it to my 2001 VW Diesel Jetta and increased my range from 600 miles/tank to 800 miles/tank. It is like getting Fuel for 1/3 cheaper (2.60/gallon with the HHO Generator vs 3.90/gallon without the HHO Generator) I am waiting for them to accept Bitcoin to buy it for my 2010 Hyundai Santa Fe to get better Gas Mileage Magic FOO-FOO dust for your automobile. Guaranteed to make you imagine your car is running better all the while doing absolutely nothing beneficial except enriching the scam artist who's marketing it. Total crap and anyone who buys this garbage deserves the screwing he'll get. People, learn a little science and quit believing in magic. Ok... If you think it does not work... keep believing it... I prefer to pay 1/3 less gas so I will keep using it. Oh wait, I forgot school is not important for the Government and some of you. Lets keep the kids dumb with iPods, iPhones and the Internet as the Holy WORD for all so that the value of us old folks will be significant for the future. I think you need to go back to school and learn some Chemistry... Oh... sorry Chemistry are for nerds and non-Internet folks. HAHAHAHAHA!!! Science, Chemistry, Mathematics, Physics--those I know--quite well, in fact . . . devices which magically alter the physical and chemical laws of the known universe . . . those, I don't know. What is quite clear is that you DON'T. It is also quite clear that either you are just one of those unfortunate gullible fools that comes along once and a while who so completely buys into a con-man's con that you actually shill for him, or you are a self-seeking liar who hopes to gain from deceiving others . . . either way, you're a loser. You can't beat the laws of thermodynamics. Simply cannot be done. Generation of hydrogen by electrolysis consumes more energy than it produces-PERIOD. I also know human nature and that no matter how much real world science I throw at you, you will not change in your belief in a magical system, so have fun in your delusion, the rest of us will remain here in "Real-ville" suffering through with our non-enhanced internal combustion engines and our poor--but real--mileage. Either way, this website is not intended for shilling products.
|
|
|
|
nlsupernova
Member
Offline
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
|
|
January 02, 2014, 02:22:17 PM |
|
[/quote]
You can't beat the laws of thermodynamics. Simply cannot be done. Generation of hydrogen by electrolysis consumes more energy than it produces-PERIOD!
[/quote]
A car makes more electricity then it needs. That is wasted energy. If you could recycle that surplus into fuel the argument that it would be ineficient loses its value. After all it would be free energy.. Or am i missing something.
Not to start a flame war or something, but just wondering if that would make a difference at all.
|
|
|
|
eric89
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 40
Merit: 0
|
|
January 02, 2014, 02:46:58 PM |
|
You can't beat the laws of thermodynamics. Simply cannot be done. Generation of hydrogen by electrolysis consumes more energy than it produces-PERIOD! A car makes more electricity then it needs. That is wasted energy. If you could recycle that surplus into fuel the argument that it would be ineficient loses its value. After all it would be free energy.. Or am i missing something. Not to start a flame war or something, but just wondering if that would make a difference at all. Any extra would be better off going straight back into the battery, you don't see electirc/hybrid cars using turning their energy generated from braking into hydrogen. I don't even know if a car produces waste electricity, if it does what does it do with the energy now? It can't just disappear. If there's anything I'd say it would be very negligible, the car scales up and down electricity generation according to demand just fine. Anyway, whatever his name is doesn't believe that crap, he wouldn't be trying to peddle it if he did and his number are clearly pulled out of his arse. Can we please just delete the spam. Jesus christ it's got nothing to do with this thread even, is spam fine and dandy. Don't quote it either. And the same with that other pool loser HANDY HINT. IF THERE IS EVER ELECTRISITY -> HYDROGEN IN A PRODUCT IT IS A SCAM The only use of hydrogen is as a gaseous battery. It is not a fuel.
|
|
|
|
skyhawk
Member
Offline
Activity: 83
Merit: 10
|
|
January 02, 2014, 02:49:43 PM |
|
A car makes more electricity then it needs. That is wasted energy. If you could recycle that surplus into fuel the argument that it would be ineficient loses its value. After all it would be free energy.. Or am i missing something.
Not to start a flame war or something, but just wondering if that would make a difference at all.
This really isn't the right place for this. Someone want to make a reddit post or something to continue this? Cars don't make more electricity than they need. They do make more _heat_ than they need. This is why cabin heating is free and you've got a big-ass radiator on the front. If the devices in the car are drawing 20 amps, the alternator is hard to turn, so the engine has to do work to turn it. If the devices are drawing 30 amps, the alternator is that much harder to turn, meaning the engine has to do that much more work to turn it. Engine work comes directly from fuel consumption. I do remember reading somewhere that one of these silly devices is actually real, I think it only worked for diesel, and it provided a very small boost in fuel economy by somehow causing the engine to combust the fuel more fully, emitting less unburnt fuel in the exhaust, thereby getting more "bang for the buck". But it was nowhere near a 33% fuel-mileage gain.
|
|
|
|
eric89
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 40
Merit: 0
|
|
January 02, 2014, 02:56:00 PM |
|
I do remember reading somewhere that one of these silly devices is actually real, I think it only worked for diesel, and it provided a very small boost in fuel economy by somehow causing the engine to combust the fuel more fully, emitting less unburnt fuel in the exhaust, thereby getting more "bang for the buck". But it was nowhere near a 33% fuel-mileage gain.
I highly highly doubt it. Maybe something really negligible such that the device would never pay itself off. If that were true the thing would be mass produced in all diesel trucks and whatever. It'd be standard. It's not like they're hard devices to design, or a new idea, and if it's not cost effective to produce shitloads it's not cost effective to produce hundreds (at a higher R&D and unit cost).
|
|
|
|
Catswold
|
|
January 02, 2014, 02:56:51 PM |
|
You can't beat the laws of thermodynamics. Simply cannot be done. Generation of hydrogen by electrolysis consumes more energy than it produces-PERIOD! [/quote] A car makes more electricity then it needs. That is wasted energy. If you could recycle that surplus into fuel the argument that it would be ineficient loses its value. After all it would be free energy.. Or am i missing something. Not to start a flame war or something, but just wondering if that would make a difference at all. [/quote]That's just the problem, nothing is 100% efficient. All systems lose energy through heat generation. IF you could recapture that energy, and IF you could get 100% efficiency from all components . . . then you would be at the break-even point--but you can't, so your aren't. Here is a simplified version of the three laws of thermodynamics: 1. You can't get something for nothing. 2. The best you can do is break even. 3. You can't break even. NOW! Let's get back to . . . When is HashCows going to be back up so I can see my account and all the fabulous riches I have accumulated so far?
|
|
|
|
captainbluff
|
|
January 02, 2014, 02:57:42 PM |
|
Let's stay on the topic, I know pool operators are working hard. Can we please get an update on when we can login again to view our stats?
Thanks
|
|
|
|
Catswold
|
|
January 02, 2014, 03:01:01 PM |
|
A car makes more electricity then it needs. That is wasted energy. If you could recycle that surplus into fuel the argument that it would be ineficient loses its value. After all it would be free energy.. Or am i missing something.
Not to start a flame war or something, but just wondering if that would make a difference at all.
I do remember reading somewhere that one of these silly devices is actually real, I think it only worked for diesel, and it provided a very small boost in fuel economy by somehow causing the engine to combust the fuel more fully, emitting less unburnt fuel in the exhaust, thereby getting more "bang for the buck". But it was nowhere near a 33% fuel-mileage gain. One British scientist did actually find a boost in mileage just as you described. Problem is, it wasn't a closed loop system. The hydrogen came from an external supply. The actual gain was around 6%--not insubstantial--but (and this is what all the looney-tunes advocates ignore) the hydrogen was not generated by hydrolysis, it came from a tank. Why is this important? . . . see again the laws of thermodynamics.
|
|
|
|
mdmedina07
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
|
|
January 02, 2014, 04:19:12 PM |
|
Any word on the site? I'd really like to add another worker soon In meantime that work is going towards middle.
|
|
|
|
skyhawk
Member
Offline
Activity: 83
Merit: 10
|
|
January 02, 2014, 05:30:39 PM |
|
Any word on the site? I'd really like to add another worker soon In meantime that work is going towards middle. I think you can connect multiple workers to a single logon - it's bad practice because it makes statistics worthless, but it does work. You could connect your new workers to an existing logon for now, and create logons for them once the site is back up.
|
|
|
|
tolguen
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 54
Merit: 0
|
|
January 02, 2014, 05:31:58 PM |
|
Hey guys, I read a lot of bad tongue stuff and am wondering whether this thread is still about the hashco.ws project? I ran into it, fell in love, and cannot sign up. Doeds anyone have information on the issue or is it me? Thank you
|
|
|
|
Sk1llS
Member
Offline
Activity: 87
Merit: 10
|
|
January 02, 2014, 05:38:58 PM |
|
Every Crypto site says Noirbits (NRB) is the most profitable at this moment...But Hashcows is mining WorldCoins? I would love to see the math / logic that decides what coin to mine....
|
|
|
|
coyote
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 58
Merit: 0
|
|
January 02, 2014, 05:42:10 PM |
|
Every Crypto site says Noirbits (NRB) is the most profitable at this moment...But Hashcows is mining WorldCoins? I would love to see the math / logic that decides what coin to mine....
I bet the admins at MiddleCoin & MultiPool would too. Lol
|
|
|
|
ppetrovic68
|
|
January 02, 2014, 05:52:03 PM |
|
Hey guys, I read a lot of bad tongue stuff and am wondering whether this thread is still about the hashco.ws project? I ran into it, fell in love, and cannot sign up. Doeds anyone have information on the issue or is it me? Thank you You can find out what's going on here: https://hashco.ws/update.php
|
|
|
|
massnerder
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 308
Merit: 250
No power in the 'verse can stop me.
|
|
January 02, 2014, 05:56:35 PM |
|
Every Crypto site says Noirbits (NRB) is the most profitable at this moment...But Hashcows is mining WorldCoins? I would love to see the math / logic that decides what coin to mine....
what is 'every' crypto site? on coinwars NRB isn't even close, and on cryptocoincharts it isn't even close. almost half as good as just mining LTC. What are you looking at? EDIT just checked, we are actually mining DGC which is currently #1 on coinwars.
|
|
|
|
Sk1llS
Member
Offline
Activity: 87
Merit: 10
|
|
January 02, 2014, 06:35:49 PM |
|
Every Crypto site says Noirbits (NRB) is the most profitable at this moment...But Hashcows is mining WorldCoins? I would love to see the math / logic that decides what coin to mine....
what is 'every' crypto site? on coinwars NRB isn't even close, and on cryptocoincharts it isn't even close. almost half as good as just mining LTC. What are you looking at? EDIT just checked, we are actually mining DGC which is currently #1 on coinwars. When I posted it was on top at both Coinwarz and Coinchoose. HC is now mining Anoncoin (ANC) with is ~18th on the list. Maybe they know something we dont?
|
|
|
|
induktor
|
|
January 02, 2014, 06:40:44 PM |
|
Even at the current "limited" state, hashcows rules, I leave here 20% of my miners, and I manually cash out every other day, and is still the most profitable from the other automatic exchange sites. (I also have workers there, in LTC and others, but will be all here once the site is full operational again). I always liked this site, and after seen how the admins responds to the 24th disaster, i like even more!. I am anxiously waiting for the new site
|
BTC addr: 1vTGnFgaM2WJjswwmbj6N2AQBWcHfimSc
|
|
|
Sk1llS
Member
Offline
Activity: 87
Merit: 10
|
|
January 02, 2014, 06:45:43 PM |
|
I always liked this site, and after seen how the admins responds to the 24th disaster, i like even more!. I am anxiously waiting for the new site The way they handled that issue is the reason I came back. I still have middlecoin as a back for when the HC pool goes down, but all in all still sticking with them, even if the manual payout is a mission
|
|
|
|
hardergamer
|
|
January 02, 2014, 06:46:36 PM |
|
Even at the current "limited" state, hashcows rules, I leave here 20% of my miners, and I manually cash out every other day, and is still the most profitable from the other automatic exchange sites. (I also have workers there, in LTC and others, but will be all here once the site is full operational again). I always liked this site, and after seen how the admins responds to the 24th disaster, i like even more!. I am anxiously waiting for the new site I could not agree with you more, i only have about about a 1/3 of my hash power on moo, but i will put it all on when the site is back up and running properly.
|
|
|
|
|